You are on page 1of 22
a 09 CV ORG g Rev 2008 iJLC CAST BIW cover steer FARTS SEPERATE ‘SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. ‘SPONGETECH, INC. EES Ee TERRE TEER ATOMS OM ——OCE-92 2oee peerage £00 exNGTON AVENUE EW von NeW YORK 1022 2 752-0700 ‘GAUSE OF ACTION (ire THE US ivi STATUTE UNDER WRIOH YOU ARE FING ANO WRTEA BREF STATEWENT OF GAUSE) {20 NOT CITE JUROICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS OWERSITY) 15 UCS 1114 (1) Trademark infingement, 1125 (a) and (c) Unfaie Competition and False Description, Has this ora similar case boon previously fed in SONY at any ime? No?(Z] Yes? [1] Judge Previously Assaned, ‘tyes, was this case VoiL] invot [) pismiseed. Nol Yes C_ it yes, give date & PLCs one xO NATURE OF SUIT ve sere mene resiamy rowan ——soermenrt sue onan a USE ener OE CRRUR HNS SRE, USER ower 1 i oe OM RE em 8 osu iow Kisesros personas!” ie pe ae se? aaa wise Hit Bee terres HBS 1182 BEES ona 2 tia Bieter 185 RRR US (Bee: |e RS ine Seite. | Sees (ie REELS oy Be a REE an im tim ‘ine SB emma HEE som omn yng BERBER ow asus ramre 00 See quent rmomatermoe 1S Sea ey ce Se ie Be tim ee {18S Sine" Een Reber, "RUE ar semana (18 ae Bee Ue eee fis eee” IE ery | meme tw es, ne geaes OF Bian (8 Beem pees Ee i om Bee vay Sess time SEER B86 BRPREOUET caw Qrvene moms pals i= 2 Check if demanded in complsint: TI GHECKIFTHBIGACLASS ACTON _—_—OYOUCLAM THE CAREIS RELATED To ACL CASE Nb PENONGING.ONY? Sse Ss Ravan DEMAND & omer woe _ pocxet wuneer (Check YES only if dpmanded in complaint JURY DEMAND: BYES ENO NOTE: Please submit atthe time of fling an explanatich of why cases are deemed rated. % ‘ORIGIN Di2a. removes tom C13 nemencestom C) 4 rei D5 trates tom C18 warsnnir — 27 appeato ome She Cou Aspalnie tour Reopanes (pect One) ton 2b -Remores tem 1 OF JURISDICTION IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE FEDERAL QUESTION [4 DIVERSITY CITIZENSHIP BELOW. (UB. NOT APARTY) (28 USC 1322, 1441) Grizenanlhge ppnas panTigs FOR ONERBTTY ENGES OND) re es emuENortwesvare —(] T1t etteaw on suaiser ona FITTS eompogareo warmmcinriace {15 11 CEN OF ANOTHER STATE. (12 INCORPORATED arPRINGIPAL PLACE + |]4 FOREIGN NATION ues PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc, 43 West 33rd STreet, Suite 600, New York, NY 10001 DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COLNTY(IES) ‘Spongetech, Inc., 5302 West 83rd Street, Los Angeles, CA 90045 DEFENDANTS) ADDRESS UNKNOWN [REPRESENTATION iS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, | HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: a) Checkone: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: ] WHITE pans! © MANEYTTAN one eat ne etfs PaSOREA FE TRON) one te Tre "a Tis DaTGT Z F188, care sowing a NOW, 1972 certs L \iotey Se Cnet Pad” #29357 Maweso-age (be daslonated bye Clark of ne Cour eye Magia sce _ i Designates 4. Monae MoManon, Cah of Coun by Deputy Crk DATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (NEW YORK SOUTHERN) James D. Fornari, Esq. (JF3433) 0 9 Pong? 3 9 8 GERSTEN SAVAGE LLP 600 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 752-9700 (212) 980-5192 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC., Plait Versus COMPLAINT CIVIL ACTION NO SPONGETECH, INC., JURY TRIAL, DEMANDED Defendant. Plaintiff, SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC. (“SPONGETECH” or the “COMPANY”, by its attorneys, Gersten Savage LLP, for its Complaint against the Defendant, SPONGETECH, INC. (“STI”) hereby alleges and states as follows: STATEMENT OF THE CASE

You might also like