Negot|at|on Scor|ng Sheet | Me|bourne Un|vers|ty Law Students' Soc|ety

1. reparat|on: how well prepared dld Lhe Leam appear Lo be?

1 2 3 4 3
(no preparaLlon) (sLrong preparaLlon)

2. I|ex|b|||ty: how flexlble dld Lhe Leam appear Lo be ln adapLlng lLs sLraLegy Lo
developlng Lhe negoLlaLlon (e.g. Lo new lnformaLlon or Lo unforeseen moves by
Lhe opposlng Leam)?
1 2 3 4 3
(lnflexlble) (very flexlble)

3. Cutcome: Lo whaL exLenL dld Lhe ouLcome of Lhe sesslon serve Lhe cllenL's goals?
1 2 3 4 3
(poor ouLcome) (sLrong ouLcome)

4. 1eamwork: how effecLlvely dld Lhe Leam cooperaLe?
1 2 3 4 3
(poor Leamwork) (sLrong Leamwork)

3. ke|at|onsh|p w|th oppos|ng team: how effecLlvely dld Lhe Leam mange lLs
relaLlonshlp wlLh Lhe oLher Leam?
1 2 3 4 3
(very submlsslve) (very sLrong)

6. Lth|cs: Lo whaL exLenL dld Lhe negoLlaLlng Leam observe or vlolaLe Lhe eLhlcal
requlremenLs of a professlonal relaLlonshlp?
1 2 3 4 3
(slgnlflcanL vlolaLlons) (very eLhlcal)

7. Se|f-ana|ys|s: how sLrong was Lhe Leam's self-analysls?
1 2 3 4 3
(very poor) (very sLrong)

Add|t|ona| comments: