SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO THE T.P.D. (21/02/13) Our justification, which should precede every amendment, would be: In order to better define, the scope, shape and full extent of the Proposed Directive. Further- more in accordance with the democratic principles of the European Union. To limit the power and authority of the un-elected Commission .To preserve the institutional balance between the Parliament and Council as legislators and Commission . Finally to ensure the preservation of the” Subsidiarity Check” We should propose the following amendments.:- AMENDMENT 4 (Article 3, paragraph2) Delete paragraph and insert (2) The Commission shall make proposals to adapt the maximum yields laid down in Paragraph 1, taking into account scientific development and internationally agreed standards. AMENDMENT 2 (Article3, paragraph 3) Delete paragraph and insert (3)Member States shall notify the Commission of the maximum yields that they set for other emissions of cigarettes and for the emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Taking into account internationally agreed standards, where available and based on scientific evidence and on the yields notified by member states. The Commission shall make proposals to adopt and adapt maximum yields for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes that increase in an appreciable manner the toxic or addictive effect of tobacco products beyond the threshold of toxicity and addictiveness stemming from the yields of tar nicotine and carbon monoxide fixed in paragraph 1. AMENDMENT 3 (Article 4, paragraph 3) Delete paragraph and insert. (3)The Commission shall make proposals to adapt the methods of measurement of the tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields taking into account scientific and technical developments and internationally agreed standards AMENDMENT 4 (Article 4, paragraph 4) Delete paragraph and insert. ‘Member States shall notify the Commission of the methods of measurement they use for other emissions of cigarettes and for the emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Based on these methods, and taking into account scientific and technical developments as well asinternationally agreed standards the Commission shall make proposals to adopt and adapt the methods of measurement. AMENDMENT 5 (Article 6, paragraph 3) Delete and insert (3)In case the experience gained in the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 shows that a certain additive or a combination thereof typically impart a characterising flavour when it exceeds a certain level of presence or concentration , The Commission shall make proposals to set maximum levels for those additives or combination of additives that cause the characterising flavour. AMENDMENT 6 (Article 6 , paragraph 10) Delete paragraph and insert, (10) Tobacco products other than cigarettes ,roll-your-own tobacco and smokeless tobacco products shall be exempted from the prohibition laid down in paragraphs 1 and 5 . AMENDMENT 7 (Article 8 paragraph 4) Delete paragraph and insert The Commission shall make proposals, (a)to adopt the wording of the health warnings laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 to scientific and market developments (b)to define the position, format, layout and design of the health warning s laid down in this Article , including their font type and background colour. AMENDMENT 8 (Article 8,paragraph 3) Delete and Insert. ‘The Commission shall make proposals to: (a)Adapt the text warning s listed in Annex 1 to this Directive taking in to account scientific and technical developments; (b)establish and adapt the picture library referred to in point (a)of paragraph 1 of this article taking into account scientific and market developments; (d) Define the position format , layout, design, rotation and proportions of the health warnings ; (a)By way of a derogation from Article 7(3), lay down the conditions under which health warnings may be broken during unit packet opening in a manner that ensures the graphical integrity and visibility of the text , photographs and cessation information,AMENDMENT 9 (Article 10,paragraph 5) Delete AMENDMENT 10, (ARTICLE 11,paragraph 3) Delete ‘AMENDMENT 11 (ARTICLE 13, paragraph 4) Delete AMENDMENT 12 (Article 14, paragraph 9) Delete and insert (9) The Commission will make proposals (a}to define the key elements (such as duration ,renewability expertise required ,confidentiality)of the contract referred to in paragraph 6 , including its regular monitoring and evaluation ; {b) to define the technical standards to ensure that the systems used for the unique identifiers and tthe related functions are fully compatible with each other across the Union and (c}to define the technical standards for the security feature and their possible rotation and to adapt them to scientific , market and technical development. AMENDMENT 13 (Article 14, paragraph 10,) Delete and insert (10) Tobacco products other than cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco shall be exempted from the application of paragraphs 1 to 8. AMENDMENT 14(Article18 paragraph 2) Delete and insert (2) The commission shall make proposals to update the nicotine quantities set out in paragraph 4,taking into account scientific developments and marketing authorisations granted to nicotine containing products pursuant to Directive 2001/83/EC. AMENDMENT 15 (Article 18 , paragraph 5) Delete. AMENDMENT 16(Article22 paragraph 2) Delete and insert (2)The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6(9) shall be conferred upon the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from (Office of publications will insert the date of entry into force of this directive)AMENDMENT 17((Article 22 paragraph 3) Delete and insert. ‘The delegation of powers referred to in in Article 6(9) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force, AMENDMENT18 (Article22 ,Paragraph 5) Delete and insert. ‘A delegated act pursuant to Article 6(9) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament or the Councilor if before the expiry of that period the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the CouncilEnvironment and Public Health Committee - ENV Green 48 Red 32 Yeliow 18 ‘© Full and Sub Members — data for 98 out of 137 MEPs © Data taken from the Market Dashboards nvironment and Public Health Committee — Full Members Green 23 Red 24 Yellow 2 ‘© Data taken from Market Dashboards 55 out of 69 known Environment and Public Health Committee — Sub Members Green 25 — Red 8 Yellow 5 ‘© Data taken from Market Dashboards 43 out of 69 known Committee Overall Green Red Yellow EP 24 5 2 S&D 5 3 9 ‘ALDE Z 5 z Green 0 6 0 ECR 6 1 3 GUE 1 2 4 FD 4 0 Full Members Green Red EPP 11 4 ‘S&D 2 Fy 9 ‘ALDE 3 4 L Green 0 a j ECR 3 0 z GUE oO 1 C EFD 3 0 D Sub Members Green Red EPP 13 1 S&D 3 2 ‘ALDE 4 1 1 Green oO 2 0 ECR 3 1 GUE 1 o i EFD 1 0 oAnalysis, ‘We would be in a close situation within the ENVI committee but the Rapporteur and Shadows have pointed towards a hostile amendment situation where deep political posturing will occur. We are very heavily reliant on the EPP but with a breakdown looking only at Full members would be in a losing situation due to the alliance of the left of the House which combined to outweigh the EPP dominance. Following the appointment of Florenz (EPP,DE) we will need to, on an issue specific basis, identity key MEPs to break the silo he will create against us with the other Groups. It may be necessary to use an opinion giving to tackle such an issue with a proper amendment strategy which is to be discussed.Industry, Research and Energy- ITRE Green 21 Red 9 Yellow 7 © Fulland Sub Members ~ data for 55 out of 122 MEPs ‘© Data taken from the Market Dashboards Industry, Research and Energy — Full Members Green 24 Red 9 Yelow 7 © Data taken from Market Dashboards 55 out of 69 known Industry, Research and Energy — Sub Members Green 2B Red Ey Committee Overall Green Red Yellow EPP, 20 0 5&D 6 5 ALDE 3 0 i Green O 3 1 ECR 2 1 a GUE 1 2 y EFD 2 iz NI a 0 9 Full Members Green Red Yellow EPP 22 0 2 ‘S&D 4 4 3 ‘ALDE 2 0 H Green 0 3 i ECR. a 0 0 GUE 1 1 7 EFD a 1 7 Sub Members Green Red Yellow EPP 8 0 S&D 2 1 ALDE 1 0 7 Green 0 0 o ECR 1 1 7 GUE oO 1 EFD 1 0 > NI 1 oOLegal Affairs Committee - JURI Green 20 Red 1 ‘© Fulland Sub Members ~ data for 24 out o ‘© Data taken from the Market Dashboards F 49 MEPs (50?) JURI Committee — Full Members Green 2 Red: 0 yesow 2 ‘© Data taken from Market Dashboards XX out of known XX JURI Committee = Sub Members Green 8 Red 1 i Committee Overall Green Red EPP S&D ALOE Green ECR GUE EFD NA slolelelolelalo Full Members Green Red) EPP ‘S80 ALDE, Green ECR GUE EFD Nu Bfoleelalelula efelelelelelele Sub Members Green Red EPP, S&D ‘ALDE o Green ECR slelelol= olelelale!‘GUE lo EFDPltical Groves ENVI Committee IMCO Committee ears ew Posbe aus “> a “pb @ susatute P em oso snus 8 3 “8 a .& - | aa SURMIARY sum for ss an acon se — la ir og sae arr rte 20 bape concen eat feat 9B | reese ful meters so enters ottes — FERE fae Grows fa fanaa SUMMARY sem —— et aa ‘ary oor engagement So ra cen -Senevvay oman issuesENVI Committee: Coverage thus ENVI Full ENVI Substitutes ENVI Committee: Possible vote as Position: Full Members o mW 8B PosoB Nop NUS Pome 1 8 ‘® € 5 Nese 0 6 " & ” . 2B 2 a 2 a 5 Position: Sub Members aw OB POSDB Nop sNus 2 ¢ 2 aIMCO Committee: Coverage thus IMCo Full IMCO Sub IMCO Committee: Possible vote as Position: Full Members, PP EH Ingredients POSDB Nop swus Position: Sub Members Pe BNW —ngresents = POSDB Nop hus BBY | rosrromsisecws,IMCO Committee: Analysis 44 full members. + 38 substitute members + 48.78% of Full members met (20) + 32.4396 of Substitute members met (12) + Good Access to EPP, ECR and ALDE + Limited access to left leaning members and majority of substitute members + Results of public consultation should be repeated + Third parties must be activated to fill in gaps + Priority to be given to heads of delegations, co-ordinators, heavy weights + Focus on MEP's not yet met is paramount Create coalitions between MEP's and Councl alippatignallings nmin IMCO Committee Enhanced co-operation: more than one principal committee + Desired outcome is to have co-committee(s) + Depends on proposal wording Political acceptance of delay in process. Strategy IMCO: Secure key MEPs request for enhanced co-operation + OTHER COMMITTEES: Secure as many chairs as possible ask for enhanced co-operation + Conference of Committee Chair: secure President endorses IMICO requestCommittee Level ee eSegyge Parliamentary Full Pariament weargenes o Eat Leadership wo tas Boas a ABE | mse som raxsions,TPD Core Team meeting Brussels, 14 September 2011 TPD plan - current focus + tntotigence gathering Pras tinine + Engagements =" EU Coniston impact sessanant ssa goin erent D8 ~ Potea oupe Pestenlrup poston + Platforms Ene aaton nih MEPs EU Conmiason Cat + Market coordination ~ Restonace bung wih kay ese = Nesonalpiatomssowpe a 19-Sep-13TPD Review? 3+ primarily Brussels Office + ensure this is backed up at politcal level: personal commitment from Commissioners against excessive proposals - Markets & Brussels, Action plan: a 8-weeks-plan developed by markets and Brussels office Sensitivity check of DG’s « General Secretariat Lack of legal basis Lack of evidence J back of logic Lack of acknowledgement of Public Consultation * Legal Services * DG Internal Market + DG Enterprise Lack of legal basis Lack of evidence ee ade Lack of logic = DG AGRI Lack of market analysis of IA (e.g. tobacco oc Coup ‘growing, ilct trade problem) = DG JUSTICE Requirement: “AVIS NEGATIF” 19/09/201319/09/2013 Tools & tactics (examples) ajo jo}oho fo cree ee 39}9 phop hope “political backing”KPIs for the 8-week plan: one target — several avenues ‘Trigger “negative opinions” Y Commissioner and Cabinet: briefed directly or indirectly ¥ Country position (or “anti-extreme-TPD-sentiment') expressed / translated in Brussels and carried by as many as possible MEPs Y Coalition members: active towards EU Commission ¥ High level infuencers: directly engaging with EU Commissioners Inter-service consultation — stakeholders mobilization wo Beuc Political level 19/09/2013 10Increasing campaign visibility OBJECT sTEGY: + Symbolic high level campaign action with media impact towards political targets + Create ripple effect markets => Brussels ATION: + Symbolic protest closing of tobacconists, + *Plain-Shop-Day" + Accompany event with social media & print media ("5° campaign led by third parties Bere Inter-service consultation - media strategy 19/09/2013 119/09/2013 Outlook Strategy for Co-Decision Procedure Council of Member States - Strategy 12A European Parliament - Strategy Co-Decision — Role of National Parliaments + Treaty of Lisbon gives Member States’ Parliaments prior scrutiny on legislative proposals before the Council and the Parliament can take a position: + 8 weeks to study legislative proposal made by Commission + National Parliaments can: 19/09/2013 Qualitative Quantitative Procedural Paiitical be kin, ALDE, ECR, ‘Greons) National ategations of “xt countries send Reasoned Opinion in case of incompatibility with subsidiarity principle Enter political dialogue (non-binding pinion” views) 13BACK UP SLIDES Overall Strategic Objective + Re-discuss “Push” or "Delay" ? = Proposal is unbalanced = Fighting individual elements of this proposal leaves always another flank wide open, in other words: we cannot change all the provisions = Need to prioritize 19/09/2013 1419/09/2013 European Parliament - Fractions’ “Heavy Weights” OIernan KH. Lenne (OE) Hi Reul (OE) European Parliament - Strategy ENVI Committee eee Gen Gi sxenry O_o Qi reine 0808) 1519/09/2013 European Parliament - Strategy IMCO Committee commerceagermany Balancing Mate Efciency wb 16HOR | PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL, EU Tobacco Products Directive Review 117 August 2012 Timeline: retro-planning + 27 Aug 2012 Begin of Inter-Service Consultation + 14 Sept 2012 End of Inter Service Consultation + 2910-2.11 “Special Ghefs' meeting (w. Heath Advisors) + 5Nov2012 Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet (Hobdo") + Nov 2012 College of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publication 19-Sep-1327 Aug 2012 Begin of Inter-Service Consultation = 14 Sept. 2012 End of inter-Service Consultation | Undefined period for negotiations lead by DG Sanco | | with diferent Des Possible intervention by Barroso's circle ‘Technical love Sectetarat General Poltcaltevel Chief of Cabinet » 2e40-2.11 “Special Chefs’ meeting (w. Health Advisors) * SNov 2012 ‘Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet (Hebdo’) Nov 2012 College of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publication Scope 2. Ingredients & Emissions 3, Labelling & Packaging 4, Traceability 5. Smokeless Tobacco 6. Presentation & Sale of tobacco products 7. Non-Tobaceo Products General provisions 19-Sep-13Overall Strategic Objective * Re-discuss "Push’ or “Delay”? * Proposal is unbalanced Fighting individual elements of this proposal leaves always another flank wide open, in other words: we cannot change all the provisions, © Need to prioritize Strategy for the Inter-Service Consultation Objective: block DG SANCO's extreme policy options in the proposal Strategy: twofold + ensure as many as possible “avis negatif/ negative opinions" from various DGs. Technical level > primarily Brussels Office + ensure this is backed up at politcal level: personal commitment from ‘Commissioners against excessive proposals - Markets & Brussels ‘Action plan: a 8-weeks-plan developed by markets and Brussels office 19-Sep-13Sensitivity check of DG's * General Secretariat * Legal Services Lack of logic: Lack of legal basis Lack of evidence Lack of acknowledgement of Public Consultation DG Internal Market * DG Enterprise Lack of legal basis Lack of evidence gue) Lack of logic = DGAGRI Lack of market analysis of IA (e.g. tobacco » DG COMP ‘growing, ilct trade problem) + DG JUSTICE Requirement: “AVIS NEGATIF” 1 io Bboy: bole fF if (i = 2 .o = A> 2 =-2L5 42 = 2=- 6 = §S- 2= =e @= 9= “political backing” rn A Phe hop joe { t 19-Sep-13KPIs for the 8-week plan: one target — several avenues ‘Trigger “negative opinions’ ¥ Commissioner and Cabinet: briefed directly or indirectly ¥ Country position (or “anti-extreme-TPD-sentiment’) expressed / translated in Brussels and carried by as many as possible MEPs ¥ Coalition members: active towards EU Commission ¥ High level influencers: directly engaging with EU Commissionners Inter-service consultation — stakeholders mobilization Political level 19-Sep-13Increasing campaign visibility (OBJECTIVE / STRATEGY: + Symbolic high level campaign action with media Impact towards political targets + Greate ripple effect markets => Brussels + *Plsin-Shop-Day’ + Accompany event with social media & print media ‘campaign led by third parties BACK UP SLIDES 19-Sep-1319-Sep-13 European Parliament - Fractions’ “Heavy Weights” European Parliament - Strategy ENVI Committee Estrela (S&D, PT) @ Ayuso (EPP, ES) Qualitative19-Sep-13 European Parliament - Strategy a IMCO Committee Qualitative ‘Vergnaud (S&D, FR) European Parliament - Strategy a, Qualitative Quantitative Procedural Focus on ENVI, Tico ctoes National selegaions of ‘Ku ountiesImpact Assessment Board Steering Group - Comments semen) Timeline = 27 Aug 2012 Begin of Inter-Service Consultation "14 Sopt. 2012 End of Inter-Service Consultation Undefined period for negotiations lead by DG Sanco wih different DGs Possible intervention: Commission President Barroso's Office ‘Technical Level Political Level ~Socrotary General~ ~Chief of Cabi = 2940-211 "Special Chefs" meeting (w. Health Advisors) = SNov 2012 Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet (‘Hebdo") + 7Nov2012 College of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publication 19-Sep-1319-Sep-13 European Parliament - Fractions’ “Heavy Weights” E85 oy EPP -271 We are also building coalitions with heavy weights in the smaller groups Commission Tactics to break 3" Party Coalition 1019-Sep-13 | PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL EU Tobacco Products Directive Review 17 August 2012 Timeline: retro-planning + 27 Aug 2012 Begin of nter-Service Consultation = 44 Sept. 2012 End of inter-Service Consultation + 2910-211 ‘Special Chefs" meeting (w. Health Advisors) = 6 Nov 2012 ‘Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet (Hebdo") = TNov 2012 College of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publication19-Sep-13 27 Aug 2012 Begin of Inter-Service Consultation 14 Sept. 2012 End of Inter-Service Consultation Undefined pei fr negotiations lead by DG Sanco pees senses ” "Technical lovel Secretariat General Polticaltevel Chef of Cabinet | Posie iteertin by Bares’ cle | i + 2940-2411 "Special Chefs" meeting (w. Health Advisors) + 8Nov2012 Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet Hebd") + 7Nov2012 Cologe of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publication Content 4. Scope 2, Ingredients & Emissions 3. Labelling & Packaging 4, Traceabilty 5, Smokeless Tobacco 6. Presentation & Sale of tobacco products 7. Non-Tobacco Products 8. General provisions.Overall Strategic Objective * Re-discuss “Push or ‘Delay’ ? * Proposal is unbalanced * Fighting individual elemens ofthis proposal leaves always anothor flank wie open in her words! we cannat change al th prowsions * Need to prioritize Strategy for the Inter-Service Consultation Objective: block DG SANCO's extreme policy options in the proposal Strategy: twofold + ensure as many as possible “avis negatif/ negative opinions" from various DGs. Technical level > primarily Brussels Office + ensure this is backed up at political level: personal commitment from Commissioners against excessive proposals ~ Markets & Brussels Action plan: a 8-weeks-plan developed by markets and Brussels office 19-Sep-13Sensitivity check of DG's Lack of evidence Lack of logic: Lack of acknowledgement of Public Consultation = General Secretariat Lack of legal basis = Legal Services = DG Internal Market + DG ENED Lack of legal basis, Lack of evidence poeiacd Lack of logic = DGAGRI Lack of market analysis of IA (e.9. tobacco Peaeane growing, ilict rade problem) * DG JUSTICE Requirement: “AVIS NEGATIF” “Breaking the Silo” -- Reaching out to EU Commission = = 4% = ge P= 84 s=- fe e¢@= 2= 2 a 9S @ = a= 2 2 ¢s g= i= B = @= o= i= e “political backing” 19-Sep-13KPIs for the 8-week plan: one target — several avenues Trigger “negative opinions” ¥ Commissioner and Cabinet: briefed directly or indirectly ¥ Country position (or “anti-extreme-TPD-sentiment’) expressed / translated in Brussels and carried by as many as possible MEPs ¥ Coalition members: active towards EU Commission ¥ High level influencers: directly engaging with EU Commissionners Inter-service consultation — stakeholders mobilization Political level 19-Sep-13Increasing campaign visibility ‘OBJECTIVE / STRATEGY: + Symbolic high level campaign action with media impact towards politcal targets + Create ripple effect markets => Brussels ACTION: + Symbole protest closing of tobacconists + *Prain-Shop-Day" Accompany event with social media & print media ‘campaign led by BACK UP SLIDES 19-Sep-13Qualitative European Parliament - Strategy European Parliament — Fractions’ “Heavy Weights” ENVI Committee & Estela ($80, PT) ge Sonik EPP, PL) Weissgerber EPP, BE) & Berato (EPP, IT @ ‘Ayuso (EPP, ES) @ Krahmer (ALDE, DE) 19-Sep-13European Parliament - Strategy —_— IMCO Committee | ive | QL__vewres 620. Fm European Parliament - Strategy Qualitative Quantitative Procedural Plt! Focus on ENV, ee groups a gre, S40, ALbe, EcR, Heads of nations! ‘elegations Select apd target aries" heavy welahis 19-Sep-1319-Sep-13 Impact Assessment Board Steering Group - Comments aa Timeline = 27 Aug 2012 Begin of Inter-Service Consultation = 14 Sept. 2012 End of inter-Service Consultation Undefined period for negotiations lead by DG Sanco with cifferent DGS Possible intervention: Commission President Barroso's Office ‘Technical Levat Political Level ~Secretary Genera “Chie of Cabinet = 29.10-2.11 “Special Chefs" meeting (w. Health Advisors) * 6 Nov 2012 ‘Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet (‘Hebdo") "7 Nov2012 College of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publicationInter-service consultation — stakeholders mobilization Political level European Parliament — Fractions’ “Heavy Weights” pos EPP - 271 S&D- 188 * We are also building coalitions with heavy weights in the smaller groups. 19-Sep-13 10Strategy: European Parliament Objective: Break ENVis full control on the dossier Have interest from as many other Committee as possible Strategy: twofold + Enact a co committee status with the Internal Market Committee (IMco) + Have all non legislative opinions from other interested committee show strong opposition to extreme measures Action plan: Directly meet with 3 main committee chairs (IMCO, JURI, ENVI) Continue all direct and indirect engagement with MEPS, Strategy: Council Strategy Objective: Create blocking minority to any extreme measures Strategy: twofold + Utilise domestic concerns with Minister and Parliaments in the Capital of the Member States + Perm Reps in Brussels voicing concems within technical working groups Action plan: 19-Sep-13 "1Strategy: Possible Commission Reverse Tactics Objective: Achieve extreme measure by stealth Alleviate all 3" party concem during co-decision process Strategy: Give short term exemptions to any quantitive stakeholders Action plan: Secure EP support prior to college adoption Liaise with TCA and employment bodies to explain short term rationale of proposal. Commission Tactics to break 3“ Party Coali Full Plain Packet 75% 75% GHW Full POSDB. 1 SKU per brand display Fullingredientban Menthol ban Full PSDB: 10 year exemption to small shops 19-Sep-13 IPR Associations Retailers Growers Unions and Retailers 12ISC Retailer Mobilization - 6 September Role of National Parliament in European Process National parliaments peed tepation pseu mmoataspenora| [ rnemoancsor [>A “ee 19-Sep-13Role of National Parliament in European Process + Following the Lisbon Treaty now a formal part of the process + National Parliaments can only raise concer on basis of subsidiary principle + Silence is interpreted as complience 19-Sep-13 14ee | PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL EU Tobacco Products Directive Review 17 August 2012 Impact Assessment Board Steering Group - Comments 19/09/2013Timeline + 27 Aug 2012 Bagin of Inter-Service Consultation "14 Sept. 2012 End of Inter-Service Consultation Undefined peried for negotiations lead by DG Sanco wih diferent DGs Possible intervention: Commission President Barroso's Office Technical Level Political Level ~Secretary General Chief of Cabinet = 20.10-2.411 “Special Chefs" meeting (w. Health Advisors) + 5 Nov.2012 Weekly Meeting of Chiefs of Cabinet (*Hebdo") = TNov 2012 College of Commissioners adoption of Proposal & publication Inter-service consultation - stakeholders mobilization Political level 19/09/201319/09/2013 European Parliament — Fractions’ target “Heavy ALDE- 85 fe ‘S8D- 188 GUE. 34 NI-30 * We are also building coalitions with heavy weights in the smaller groups Es European Parliament Vice Presidents ‘New President — Martin Schulz (S&D - DE) Replaces = Joray Buzek (EPP -PL) ‘ice President Ranking in rrTELLa(g80. 7 s19ves tmousangs Manne? HARTINEZ (600, £9) Soe ‘en POOHATA 82D £0). Bree ‘Np ubaL auroras (2, es) pend new. Ganrgin PAPASTANNOS [EPPEL) Be wots tera ANGELL (ET) 2a ve se -Oitra KORAS (EPPA dievowe EovardMeaMLLANSCOTTALDE, UK) 20\eaes’ Insbele DURANT (roe BU) Zev sew: Alencar AN (ADE, 38 vet aor WicLaNa (cP De) Bovase “se -Ofch VEASAY (ER, C2) Zivot “She. ooo PROTASIEMNCE (EPP, PL) overs 22324 “Sores ‘throes Role of Vice Presents ‘ee Presidents sre Members of the European Parlament Bureau. The Bureau ete boy that av ‘dos for Parlamant. erawe op Parlement primar aan oudge anc cecdee acme, at ‘nd eganisatonal matesENVI Bureau — Equivalent of Board of Directors Coordinators Ghair & Vice Chairs ies 222 ges 2 —, 3 a EPP Group Bureau Equivalent of Board of Directors 19/09/2013Strategy: European Parliament Objective: Break ENVIs full control on the dossier Have interest from as many other Committee as possible Strategy: twofold + Enact a co committee status with the Internal Market Committee (ico) + Have all non legislative opinions from other interested committee show strong opposition to extreme measures Action plan: Directly meet with 3 main committee chairs (IMCO, JURI, ENV!) Continue all direct and indirect engagement with MEPs Strategy: Council Strategy Objective: Create blocking minority to any extreme measures Strategy: twofold + Utilise domestic concems with Ministers and Parliaments in the Capital of the Member States + Perm Reps in Brussels voicing concerns within technical working groups Action plan: + Third party mobilisation based on employment and ‘SME agenda 19/09/2013Strategy: Possible Commission Reverse Tactics ‘Objective: Achieve extreme measure by stealth Alleviate all 3° party concern before/during co-decision process Strategy: Give short term exemptions to any quantative stakeholders ‘Action plan: Secure EP support prior to college adoption Liaise with TCA and employment bodies to explain short term rationale of proposal. Commission Tactics to break 3 Party Coalition Full Plain Packet 75% 75% GHW IPR Associations Full POSDB 1 SKU per brand Retailers display Fullingredientban Menthol ban. Growers Full POSDB. 10 year exemption to Unions and Retailers small shops 19/09/2013ISC Retailer Mobilization — 6** September ae RE Role of National Parliament in European Process Following the Lisbon Treaty now a formal part of the process + National Parliaments can only raise concern on basis of subsidiarity principle + Silence is interpreted as compliance + Untested system only been used once since being established (collective redress) Commission still hold right to reject objections from National Parliaments 19/09/2013Strategy: Role of National Parliaments Objective: Have a yellow card system applied to draft Strategy: + Liaise with National Parliament to highlight where Internal Market principles are not substantiated + Secure objection from Chairs of National scrutiny committee Action plan: Direct and indirect liaison in National Parliament based on subsidiarity Role of National Parliament in European Process National parliaments ihe formation enforcing sory ‘propor elation atonal parinwent snes. | Coeggen ] = yscsouetse Conminion view | [ Commissonreviw on ‘rvouies propor | | no mosiestion 19/09/2013CA Tools and Tactics + Full EP and EU Council vote calculator has been developed. EP has been tested in real scenarios on two occasions (NCD real time and Budget -post vote) + Engagement calculator produced shows where, given the system of politcal ‘groups in the EP, opportunities can be identified CA Tools and Tactics Engagement Tracker + Shows lack of access to Socialists and Greens + Calculator works on full Parliament and also key committee and produces weekly statistics + Can be broken down per each individual Member State 19/09/201319/09/2013 CA Tools and Tactics + Reallfe example of vote from EP Budget on Agriculture subsidies to tobacco growers, + Can be broken down into votes from individual Member States delegations within groups. + System can be adapted to specific articles and paragraphs once documents released. 10=) ey | PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL TPD Workshop Lausanne 18 September 2012 Agenda 1. Stage I- Status update 19/09/2013Overall Timeline Proposal EU COMMISSION EU PARLIAMENT COUNCIL ng Stage | Stage I “shaping” of policy options, > Commission proposal ar2010 voting’ of legislation > new TPO 04.2012 (014/15) Contents "7S% HW combined tox & picture both des | “iar of promotional elements Pack requirement (se, shape and construction) Requirement for cigarette appearances ‘Optional pain packaging in Member States Packaging & Labeling ‘Mandatory reporting format ~ Fee to manufacturers penton an chartering favors [US approach including menthol Prohibit prometion at Pos Display face per Brand ‘optional POSDS in Member States Vending Machine age verification ‘Access to tobacco products ‘Allow marketing of NOP which have Been authored under nop. ‘modicnal products legislation {an af snus mlntained and extended to ater smokeless products “ertual health warning covering 30-35% of two largest surface areas of packaging. Member States can ask or a TEN year derogation for traditionally used products ‘smokeless [Tracking and tracing “Tracking and tracing with security feature (eg. hologram) Defintions “Aracivanest af 0 new concept for justieation of measures. “General use of implementing powers and delegated acts, Implementation ptanalty to Member tats to go beyond the 1 measure 19/09/2013Contents — latest update 75% HWL combined text & peture both sides | tan oF promotional elements Packaging & Labelling Pack requirement (see, shape and construction) ARequiement for clgarette appearances Optional plan packagingin Mornber States ‘Mandatory reporting format —Fee to manufacturers Ban characteriving favors (US approach) intuding mental Ingredients Prohibit promation at Pos Diplay+ace per Brand -+optional-POSDB in Member states ending Machine ogewerifetion ‘Allow marketing of NCP which have been authored under NP ‘medicinal products legislation ‘Accesso tobacco products Ban of snus maintained and extended to other smokeless product ae ‘Textual health warning covering 30-35% of two largest surface areas oe of pactaging. Membor States can ack fr TEN year derogation for Lradiionaly used products Tracking and wacing “Tracking and tracing with security feature (eg hologram) Definitions ‘Atraciveness asa new concept for justification of measures. ‘Genera use of implementing powers and delegated acts. ESE Optionaliy to Member states to go beyond the TPO measure Stage I: ISC Strategy & Objectives Brussels and Internationa stakeholders Target European Commissioner 19/09/201319/09/2013 4. Slage | - Status update 2. Stage Il - Co-Decision FromCo-Decision Procedure from the Commission Perspective The Commission wants a success. Alot of preparation, risk analysis, balancing of interests, etc. goes into the first draft through formal and informal consultation of all interested parties, Detailed Timeline 19/09/2013“EN + ICO ullsub ENVI + 1MCO Ful ‘The European Parliament appar 3 Shadou Rapponiale — C= Rap + Shadow Rap Serie“ The Council o Working partie: \ “attaché evel 19/09/201319/09/2013 Executive Elections within the EU 2011 - 2014 Stage Il: Milestones 2013 ‘Announcement n Plenary ‘Appaintment of Rapporteur ‘working Doaument| Presentation of Report ‘Amendments ae i, Discussion of Amendments Vote19/09/2013 Glossary on key players (Alastair will take from EU 1g booklet) European Parliament European Counc SERGE it ee eeu me ened ‘Eiwnatne furans tava Comes nce ed + cee arnt a SSRs es lo oe Stage Il: Co-decision Strategy & Objectives Loca stakeholders ana Weta trom ‘Local constituency stakeholders ‘regions! consttvencios 2 Lea & Brussels ‘of target poicans ‘partes ‘stories generated by relevant ‘stakeholdersod | PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL TPD Workshop Lausanne 1a September 2012 Agenda 1. Stage |~Status update 19/09/2013Overall Timeline Proposal EU PARLIAMENT COUNCIL EU COMMISSION Se ae Stage! Stage Il shaping’ of policy options “voting” of legislation > Commission proposal > new TPO ar2010 24-2012 (014/15) Detailed Timeline 19/09/2013Contents Packaging & Labeling 753 WL combined text pcture bath sides Ban af promotional elements Pack requirement (se, shape and construction) Requirement for cigarette appearances Optional plain packagingin Member States ‘Mandatory reporting format —Feo to manufacturers Epos Ban characteriing flavors (US approzch including menthol Prohibit promotion at Po sas | Play 1 face per Brand ‘Accesstotobacco products | prignal POSDB in Member States Lenling Machine age version ‘allow marketing of NCP which have been athoried under NP ‘medicinal products legislation {an of snus malntained and extended to other smokeless products, Textual heath warning covering 30-35% of two largest surface areas Sain of packaging, Member States canal for 3 TEN year derogation for teaitionaly used products ‘Tracking and wacing “Taking and tracing with seca feature [eg hologram) Definitions ‘itractiveness asa new concept for Jstfiation of measures cere: “General use of implementing powers and delegated act tionality to Member States to go boyend the TPO measure Contents — latest update Packaging & Labeling 75% HW combined ten & pete both sides ‘Ban of promotional elements Pack requirement (si, shape and construction) Requirement for cigarette appearances Optional plain packaging in Member States Ingredients "Mandatory reporting format ~Fee to manufactures Ban charatering flavors (US approach Including menthol Accesso tobacco products Prohibit promation at Pas Display face per Brand ‘+optional-POSOBIn MemberStates: Vending Machine ope verifistion ‘Allow marketing of NCP which have been authorized under ‘medicinal products leglsiaton Smokeless {an of snus maintained and extended to other smokeless products, “Textual health warning covering 30-35% of two largest surface areas of packaging, Member States can askfor.3 TEN year derogation for ‘radkionaly used products Tracking and acing “racking and tracing with ser feature (eg. hologram) Definitions ‘Aitractiveness as anew concept for justification of measures. Implementation “General use of mmplernenting powers and delegated vets. Optionalty to Member States to go beyond the TPD measure 19/09/2013Stage I: ISC Strategy & Objectives [Brussels and Internationa stakeholders estan roel trgt fri rans 7 eonmattes ae Target European) Eira” \ Commissioner —_/ aco! mete Sonera NG ey serrated by — stakeholders Agenda 1, Stage | — Status update 2. Stage Il - Co-Decision 19/09/201319/09/2013 Co-Decision Procedure from the Commission Perspective The European Parliament as ALwers a xo aL te exweico FULL 46 orArHMNSHADOWS COMMITTEE. Timing DRarTANADOWS Mp al By EW} eave ween zo puenany19/09/2013 The Council Working parties: attaché level Executive Elections within the EU 2011 - 2014Stage Il: training booklet) Glossary on key players (Alastair will take from EU Milestones 2013 ‘Announcement in Plenary ‘Appointment of Rapporteur Exchange of views -ENVI Possible Hearing Werking Document Presentation of Report ‘Amendments Discussion of Amendments European Parliament eeot termes cos eng he European Couneit, SS et ET ea ES 19/09/2013Stage Il: Co-decision Strategy & Objectives ‘Loca stakoholders and Ms rom + Local consivency stakeholders ‘regions constituencies 2 Local € Brussels ‘of target pallielans / partes ‘tories generated by relevant ‘Stakeholders 19/09/201319/09/2013 London 28th November 2012 (ABE | emursemsesi The Institutional Framework EU Commission Council EU Parliament National influence National influence Government driven Various sources {BP murmermensOnce the proposal is issued: Outline of the Decision Making Procedure Co-Decision Procedure from the Commission Perspective ‘The Commission wants a success Alot of preparation, risk analysis, balancing of interests, etc. goes into the first draft through formal and informal consultation ofall interested parties. 19/09/2013European Parliament 2012 -2014 EPP -271 The European Parliament enema a. jeivco FULL Tim PLENARY MB | crnescrecsese 19/09/201319/09/2013 The Council Working parties: attaché level The Council of Ministers - Coordinating informal discussions in view of formulating a position ECOSOC and REGIO Opinions 'DG SANCO Officials review inital Proposal with Legal Service and SG according to EP amendments Wiking Party s ing Paty on Counel Secretariat PublcHeatn and | Council Secretariat receives =|" conEPER receives Commission discuss Proposal Commission Proposal ‘and prepare postion reviewed ProposalThe Council of Ministers - Finalising a position Health Gounal adopts position ath Council votes by OM t J Council does not eas pe Sa eel Camsta Pete asamended by eP ” 3common psi modified Proposal. = Act adopted AB | uronsonamnoss Record-breaking Public Consultation on TPD Q4-2010 os 85,000 + responses “Talal number of Subrisions Wee! Contig 8 | rx rerascaan 9S | 19/09/2013Contents — latest update 759 HV combined txt & pete both sides ‘an af promotional cements Packaging & Labeling Packrequrement (sie, shape and construction) Requirement for cigarette appearances Optional plan packagingin Member States ‘Mandatory reporting format ~Fee to manufactures pees Ban characteraing Maver (US approach) incuding menthol Prohibit promation at Pos Deplay-2 face per Brand ‘Aceans to tobacco Predvets | opxiqnal-POSDB in Member States Vending Machine age erfiation ‘allow marketing of NCP which have Been authorized under Nor medicinal products legsation ‘an of sus maintained and extended to athe smakaloss products fe ‘Tental health warning covering 30-35% of two largost surface areas of packaging, Member States can ask fr TEN year derogation for Lraditonaly used products “Tracking and tring Tracking and wacing with security feature fg hologram) Definitions _raciveness as anew concept fr jstifiation of measures. ‘General se of implementing Seleepedianseanami. Geese Cptionality to Member states to go beyend the TPD measure Stage Il: Milestones 2013 ‘Announcement in Plenary (Feb 2013) Possibie Hearing (Feb 25/26) ‘Appointment of Rapporteur (March) Exchange of views - ENVI (end Mach) Presentation of Report (Mayilune 2013) “Amendments (June/July 2013) Discussion of Amendments (July/Sept) Voto September October) 19/09/2013Tier 1 MEPs Name sss “te European Parliament County Group ong w MEP + atember Seal [ Gra = Gnthes meinnre United Kingdom] ECR BEHWORTH, Richerd James 'BRADSOURN, Philip a “CASHMAN, Micheet aD. GIRLING. Jolie. EGR, TERBOUR, Msicoin EGR. KAMAL Syed ECR TIRKHOFE, Timothy Een MCLAREN, Emma Unites Kingetom| ECR NEWTON OUNN, B17 Unites Kingsiom| ALDE, HICHOLSON, James. ‘United Kingsom| ECR ‘YARNAKOUDANS, Marine United Kingstom| ECR PRY | row eessn0e00 19/09/2013OENVI Group Coordinators A \. fa] 6, ay g 2 d a ux bea e FL “ ° Dk Conference of Committee Chairman 19-Sep-13European Parliament: ENVI Committee Total ees FutmenbersSubtmtes TPD Hearing + Scheduled for 25 oF 26 February, 2013 in Brussels + ahours; open to the public (observers only] + BSpeakers + 5Speakers invited so far Ms Florence Bertelet Kemp—Smokeee Partnership = MeDavid Hammond Waterloo Unversity Professor of Public Health and Tobacco Control =-MsJean King~ WHO award wlner of Pioneer of tobacco conto; Plan Packet expert at Cancer Research UK = MrSrendan Nelson ~ Australian Ambassador tothe EU ~ Ms Martina PBtschke-Langer~ German Cancer Research Soclety + Co-ordinators to take final decision on 3 remaining speakers upon proposals ‘from political groups 19-Sep-13Tin The European Parliament 19-Sep-13Stage II Engagement milestones Stage II will cover at least one year and we have split it in the following waves, based on a single reading adoption: Wave 1: Opinion of national Parliament Wave 2: Council -EPSCO Announcement Wave 3: EP - Adoption of procedure and Announcement in Plenary ‘Wave 4: Non-binding Opinions of ECOSOC and Committee of the Region ‘Wave 5: EP — Leading Committees (ENVI AND IMCO): ‘Appointment of Leading Rapporteur/s and Shadow rapporteurs, Exchange of view (preliminary debate) Hearing/s Debates Working document/s Presentation of draft report/s Amendment/s to draft report/s Consideration of amendments to draft report/s Vote rrommpnp> Wave 6: EP — Opinion Committees (ITRE, AGRI, JURI, INTA) A. Appointment of Opinion/s writer Shadow writer/s, B. Exchange of view (preliminary debate) C. Debates D. Presentation of draft opinion/s E. Amendment/s to draft opinion/s F. Consideration of amendments to draft opinion/s: G Vote Wave 7: £P ~Plenary: A. Debate in Political Groups B. Debate and Amendments in Plenary c. Vote Wave 8: Council ‘A. Initial debate in Public Health Working Group B. Debates in Public Health Working Group C._Amendments in Public Health Working Group D. COREPER: debate/s and vote E. EPSCO Decision Wave 9: COM+EP+Councll - Informal negotiations Wave 10: Council and EP adoption of the common positionStage Il: Milestones 2013 Ciminelen Plenary Announcement + Procedure Leading Committee discussion jon Debate in poltical Groups 19-Sep-1320% | PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL TPD Stage Il Master Plan Lausanne, 11 January 2013 Table of Contents + PMI Objective + Timing & Calendar + Procedure + TPD Content & Objectives + Strategy + Action Plan + Tracking ProgressBackground (Commission proposals are hardly changed in EP and Council + Political environment drastically changed after Dali scandal, making engagement challenging (FCTC 5.3) + Overall perception: balanced proposal, industry have won + Pushing Irish Presidency and 2014 EP elections make fast adoption likely 2 | revo cena PMI ObjectivesObjectives Deletion of certain delegated acts and optionality clauses Workable text on NGPs Markets specific derogation of ban on menthol and slims + HWLs to be placed on bottom of pack + Counter exireme amendments (PP, POSDB, full IB, etc.) Bi | mee ener Timing & CalendarOverall Timing EU COMMISSION “drafting” proposal “voting” of legislation EU PARLIAMENT EU COUNCIL ([Boos-20%2 yea22012 2013 Milestones 2013 Informal negotiations EP Opinion ctees report “Amenements opinion ABE | reuw xomesimaascsMilestones 2013 (detailed) Procedure reShift of Focus STAGE1 = => 27 Commissioners 3 insttutions play an equally Important role CONSILIUM, TS4MEP's <==] STAGE2 C= 27 Member States 2, | mmr soa ers Ordinary Legislative Procedure European Parliament Ministers | eisNational Parliaments 18 (= rceeceen Opinion by national parliaments + Deadline: 8 working weeks (end February tbc) + Deliverables: + National pariaments to issue an opinion + Parliamentary discussion (market specific) BP, | muraEuropean Parliament European Parliament by Political Group eee eeeGlossary + Jan-Feb and March June objectives and strategy $B | rersmwsormess EP 1: Announcement of Proposal + 14 January, 2013 + President acknowledges TPD proposal in plenary session + Merely formal announcement, no debate possible + Serves as starting date of EP procedure $B | marronEP 2: Conference of Committee Chairman 15 January, 2013 + All 20 chairmen of standing committees + Decision on lead, potential associate, opinion giving committee(s) + Deliverables + Tier 1 fully briefed. + ENVI assigned lead committee + IMCO assigned associate committee (Rule 50") + AGRI, ITRE, INTA, EMPL, JURI assigned opinion giving committee $B | rarer ENVI Committee 10ENVI Group Coordinators BS mak a2 ABE | rmsrsomsonaeice, Conference of Committee Chairman $B | rere miceEuropean Parliament: ENVI ToalMEPS ——Fullmembers Substutes 2 TPD Hearing ‘Scheduled for 26 or 26 February, 2013 in Brussels 3 hours; open tothe public (observers only) 8 Speakers 5 Speakers invited so far Ms Florence Bertolet Kemp - Smoketee Partnership ‘Mr David Hammond — Waterloo University Professor of Public Health and Tobacco Control Ms Jean King — WHO award winner of Pioneer of tobacco control Plas Packet expert at Cancer Research UK [Mr Brendan Nelson ~ Australian Ambassador tothe EU Ms Martina Potschke-Langer ~ German Cancer Research Society Co-ordinators to take final decision on 3 remaining speakers upon proposals from political groups 12$B wesc The European Parliament RAF THAN SHADOWS DR ArTUAN a h eS aeENVI Committee “pp -D 3s Pitas [EP Setm Loss than haf ertscted Groups [351 Jasna ae sot8 Minor Groups neglected -GP bigger concern ENVI Key MEP’s Positions 9B | neoroessteesu 14IMCO Key MEPs Positions IMCO CommitteeIMCO Committee “SUMMARY ‘ery poor engagement -Sensiviy to main issues Opinion Giving Committees BB | wren ones 16Opinion Giving Committees QB | com enor Opinion Giving Committees 17EP 3: Co-ordinators Meeting 15 January, 2013 + Co-ordinators are appointed by political groups for each committee. The coordinators play an important role in preparing the group position as well as the group voting orientation in both committee and plenary + Co-ordinators decide on rapporteur and shadows + Deliverable: + Moderate EPP rapporteur Plame Rapporteur Hostile rapporteur Non Hostile rapporteur ss + Access Acces + Intetigence Inteligence Soe + Credbie = Wile attacked by other groups + Willbe attacked by other groups ~ Pressure from TCAs $B | rorcroormne 18Rapporteurs & Shadows - Deliverables Couenen an Bonin ENVI (Shadow) Rapporteurs 1920Rapporteur & Shadow Rapporteurs Short List EN ico Key Roles in Committees eet dled See cae Tae, [eats at [Seetra ime [ae rarest | Vv Vv Vv Vv ‘appereurs [NO Vv Vv Vv Vv cose |e v v Vv v Faimenbers NO 7 NO TY T Sueaeige ond, (NO Vv NO v NO, unless fe ar xoaa OR BIARIOD colleagues: 21Key Roles in Plenary Gay [stad | me aie anne [ra [oe Farrane |ncrenon [score fern? |e Roe | Bhs ey Tar EGE Siler Sai — [RO Teper Tem [Fer] ona se ma os Se Fabeip [RO [cones] Tem [7a |v Ce wher oa os Sa a a 7 mo vas eas Teta [RO [soso [roar Te) eae Ss. [ae | Beret |Srien one, aoe [ho fro FG eee ties es ae] Deliverables + As many members as possible vocally supporting our positions + Split S&D Group away from extreme views + Build alliance between EPP and ECR Groups SRD | reverence + 23-24 January, 2013 : 18t Exchange of Views Rapporteur sets priorities & calendar Commission & Council present views 22EP 5: ENVI Hearing + 25 February, 2013 + MEP's question 8 experts (1 being CECCM) + Sets tone for further discussion in EP + Deliverables: + Key MEPs fully briefed + Extreme views countered by MEPs $5 | memes List of Speakers at Hearing + [other slide to be inserted] 23EP 6: Draft Report Presentation in ENVI 20,21 or 26 March, 2013, Rapporteur explains line of thinking and amendments to text Setting of deadline for amendments (normally 2 weeks, maximum 3) (ther ENVI members may table amendments + Deliverables: Balanced drat report Good debate that isnot hijacked by extreme views Heads of Delegations t influence ENVI members o be vocal + MEPs supportive of Pal positions Fovoursble amendments EP 7: Discussion of Amendments 24-25 Apri, 2013 + ENVI Committee discusses amendments + Rapporteur gives his view on other members’ amendments + Deliverables Resch a balanced compromise poston on amendments Favourable poston on supportive amencments $B | errs 24EP 8: Vote in Lead Committee 6,7,29 oF 30 May, 2013 ‘Adoption of amendments from lead and opinion giving comrnittees in ENVI committee (not on amendments of associate committee, if any) + Deliverables: Exteme amendments ejected + Some oppesion expressed in vole + Atleast 7 votes against report (needed to secure debate In Pena) | murs cre EP 9: Discussions in Groups 46 oF 25-26 June, 2013 (ifno trilogue) + [dates] + Groups position themselves on amendments + Deliverables: + Agreed amendments Trilogue: (Alastair) EB) | mursomsimncnss, 25EP 10: Plenary Amendments Deaaline: [dates] if no trilogue) + Deadline: [date] (if trlogue) ‘Amendments can be tabled by a political group or 40 MEP's (or in case of tilogue agreement by lead committee submitting final agreement in cone single amendment); they can be tabled until midnight the day before the vote + Deliverables: Groups toate plenty amendments (depending on theta rape) | reunronasirixsnss EP 11: Debate in Plenary + [dates] (f no trilogue) + [dates} (iftrilogue) + Deliverables: Main political Groups defending amendments BE, | re vorsitencness. 26EP 12: Deadline for Votes [dates] (ifno titogue) [dates] (i trlogue) Deliverables: to be inserted) : Vote in Plenary [dates] (if no trilogue) [dates] (f no trilogue) End of frst reading or end of legislative procedure Deliverables + Adoption of balanced report + Amendment on NP adopted + Amendment on KWLs postion adopted stl 273B | rr ws asco Council — Strategic Issues + Presidency + Te tna 2015), LT (second nat 2013) + TPD possi adectes ding ich Presidency + Break the health silo + Gatintigercetatse potcal pressure from the miisties + Blocking minory (91 out of 255 vos) + Tracking and Trseng to be deat wih by ether Working Groups + Elections in MS [to be updated] fy | mnarrowssiscesscnns 28Council negotiating bodies * Rotating Presidency + TPD Regulatory Committee (ikely to play minor role, ifany) + Nations! exerts / Techn level + Public Health Working Group + Heath atachée / Technica eve + CoRePer! “+ Deputy Permanent Reeresenatves/ Diplomatic avel + EPSCO Councils + Ministers Pottes ove CMI hono wee ee C 1: Public Health Working Group + T January, 2013 + Debate among health attaches 9BB | erenesocnsne 29C 1: Public Health Working Group 7,46 and 21 January, 6,14, and 18 February, + Debate among health attachés + Deliverables: Folly briefed MoH, Corepar, Heath atachés + Inolve Govenment (PM and ther Minis) 27 MS vocal against atleast 7 blockers + Market focus: + oP: FR, DE, PO, ND, SK, GZ, EF, GR, GY, SW, OK. LT, Ir HW: FR PO, BG & FR. IT, ES, PO, GR, PT, OK, SW, CZ, DE ‘snus ‘SW, SK, CZ, GR, CY, NGP UK, DE. PO, LU BBB | mmm omices C 2: COREPER! + Idate] + Deputy Permanent Representatives discuss text + Deliverables: $B | meremrcimnns 30C3: EPSCO + [date] + Ministers of Health Council + Deliverables: BBE | rors, TPD Content & Objectives 31Contents rere Sinchencurcey au saponin ert nor ice en sets Tera ti rg sing DSS font een pe aaa dew Toekngsd cig wth oer eee orem <= Genel ofimptnee gowen ad ad es Onna > $9 |e nsec Strategy 32Strategic Principles + Indirect engagement over direct engagement + National level is key + Defending TPD content Focus on NGP & delegated acts in Parliament + Focus on delegated acts in Council Key Member States 33Action Plan £8, | mar omwrenos Executive summary Ensure opposition to excessive measures through top level engagement + Ensure coal mass against extreme measures + Ensure postion of key politcal groups + Industry dialogue + Timing - decisive facoro reach compromise within 2014Tracking Progress BBY | eursoms imams, Vote Tracker on Critical Issues 35Glossary Ewepean Pariament Ewopean Gounct + rai ae werent ores ym two | | eect" es he a | Secs rh ct iy Se as Denerpestntngem ct pamdnninecceeree eee = ‘Saetapetier ou emai ar ways Greer jon 36UN Non-Communicable Disease Resolution Seierusse 14, Emphasis the and fos a iment 1 Fieemtseite cy ggg efetie tevioa ofthe Tobrco Predict Eectieeacseacnas Diective making ino account the ernest European Union's commitment to the Remcegeeme Framoverk Convention on Tobacco NEP Moon by UK Sciaist, certain adi tibet sn Amendment on extreme policies rejected by large majority of the EP Plenary on 14 Sept. "11 MEP'’s Against Plain Packaging ‘Matthias Groote Amendment ‘WEP Giooa 0 Chara ET ‘Sona ‘Strats patkage ret gorge ‘hee poo + ep nets reon oder tas one (berg wuld enenrags ee aay 37EPP Congress Resolution on IPR (Dec Reinforcing the Single Market - Guarantor for Jobs and Growth ‘The EPP recognises the need for adequate protection of intellectual property rights and supports the creation of a unitary patent protection as an affordable, secure and efficient patent eystem which would give incentives for investment and research efforts The EPP considers that the increasing brand infringements over the internet require an action to strengthen the confidence of the consumers and the ‘companies which operate on line. The EPP welcomes proposals helping to fight against counterfeiting and suppor the foreseen review of the current regulatory framework for the trademark protection. Willoffer arguments to EPP Members and EPP Governments, Council + Strategy + Tocreate a coaton wih FR, PL IT 2nd DE, tying to move ES and neutralize UK Ut 38Stage Il - Commission- Strategic Points + Commission defends the proposal and want success + Incase of apostve" ropes ensure an active defence fit by DG SANCO + Incase ofa negative” proposal, be ready to compromise Commission rns the show + Koop cose contact andthe intvenent of ferent Gs + Maiiain te potica foawsressure + Closed door exercise + Inetigencegatherag + Situation analysis + Smal counties EU presidencies + Thalogue SP [eres Wrap up — Focus 2013 + National Parliaments + subsiclaitychectplial logue + Council + Anatona poston needed + must be transposed to Brussels + Group of blockers + European Parliament + MEPS in key commiiees (ENVIEMCO*ITRE, AGRI, JURD + National Delegation Leader & heavy weighs Plan .. for the un-expected 39Council Informal Consultation — deliverable (ongoing) + Objective: + Qualitative sttements of concemsonpositon to + Plan Packaging + Excessive haath waminge + Sales arangements + grins tan + Support te NGP and Srus + Caveat: The consultation is informal, but we need tangibles + Deliverables: = Gabne's'Senices and Legal Sewioes expressing concersleppzsion Commissioner EP Polical Grours exprestng concemetpposton EP Head of National Delegation expressing concems!Oppostion Key ENVIMEPs expressing ConcemsiOpposion atonal cminievation axesting cocernslopesiton (Le Perm Rep, Mnisrss) 40TPD Regulatory Cttee/EPSCO Deli NCD Follow Up: Shared Accountability Health Warnings: Counties veal against HW 75% 27 Countries vocal avocatng HW satus quo Perception of cee minoy block aginst HW 75% Plain Packaging 27 Counties vocal against PP/etandaeszed pack Perception ofa cea minority block against PP Sales arrangements + Perception cfacear minoly back agate ale arrangements Ingredients Ban Perception of clear minoty bork agains intents ban NGP and Snus Perception a csar nee to maintsin the door open for NGP a open to srs Inteligence Constant Revie Curent one new + Deep anaiyes ofthe Comission werk programme + Annual wal of key infemationa events + Map key cppanents and supporters + Senstza stakeholders a provide timely and proacve infomation Engagement ‘Advance engagement wth heed of natonl delegtonheavy wets ‘Scenghien presence In Sresboug Standard “emergency process" wih clear sczountbily checkist £8 orem aConsensus Scouting Miscellaneous 9B | aeons DG SANEOTTEAS PACK reduce pack traciveness and propose standard pact (PP) PACK: inrease HVS to 80-00-100% INGREDIENTS: reduce atractveress by Banning several ingredints SALES: ban of vending, dislay NUS: ban al smokeless ‘Senay PP presents many legal, IPR. business ‘and potion suns 550% ana pletoris proposed by Stakeholsere lots that Ws are tantarnout to PP ‘en of candy favoured pracucts, charsclotang Favours gang ‘momenton Ris or ment esue on competence Restrcfon in ordr to maintain ‘ommunioaton adit purchases 'SNUS ban should be marae PBB | moun rousemsras, 42European Parliament by Nationality & Groups 43