Suggestion for Evaluation of Projects (For Internal & External Examiners) In order to justify the attempts of the B.E.

Semester 8th students for their first ever attempt to implement IDP at GTU, external examiners are requested to refer following suggestions for evaluation of Project II. Students are to be evaluated for their innovative ideas, however small, it can be and not for size of the project. A semi finished project done properly may fetch more score than fully finished ordinary project works. Basic understanding of the student for the Project and related methodologies for its implementations need to be analyzed, using your expertises. In case of students, who have fully implemented their project in B.E. they are to be encouraged. Also discuss future scope of update/ modifications to current project, which can be taken up in the coming academic year by upcoming batch of students. If project is not fully implemented, you are requested to provide inputs for their future implementations and availability of various sources to help them. If students have not reached to significant level in project then please analyze the causes for the same and report to university in feedback form for the Project II, with your comments. Students are required to show case a proto type/proof of concept of their efforts in contextual branches in possible cases depending upon the feasibility and cost. Both External and Internal examiners are required to evaluate students for final year project examination with equal weightage Industry mentor from particular project or mentors from industries related to the area of the project may be invited for final project examination nominated by council of deans. Examiner is required to note specific innovative projects during Examination and mention in feedback from which are useful to MSMEs, Particular User or society in large. University will recognise such innovations and appreciate the teams to encourage them and the coming generations. If the team has taken projects from any user like industries, expert faculties or similar sources verify the joint efforts of the students and see whether the students have interacted with them and documented the works properly throughout the year.