I like your use of guiding text, however, your proofs must have more order and structure.

I like your use of guiding text for the structure, however, your proof should follow a more logic and intuitive order. Your proof is very clear and your guiding text is excellent. However, you sentences and ideas are still very choppy. Perhaps you can use a bit more connecting phrases? You should always highlight out what you want to prove separately as a !emma or a "laim. #lso, having a $fact$ statement is unnecessary. Instead you should %ust incorporate the fact directly in the proof. Your proof is very convoluted and dense since all the ideas are s&uee'ed into one paragraph. I recommend that you add in some guiding text and an outline of your proof so that the reader has sufficient time to digest all the ideas. Your proof is very clear, however, you should include guiding text so that the solution has more structure. (he reader could also then have a general idea on what is going on. )ice proof* +ake sure you read everything over again to get rid of some typographical errors* Please fix the indentation. #lso make sure you read everything over again to get rid of some typographical errors* Your proof is well written, but the complicated subscripts make the solution look very messy. "an you find a way to fix this , perhaps via a route that simplifies the unnecessary computations? You have too many claims* You need to instead weave the claims together to produce a coherent proof.