5- High quality KUDOS!

Seed Idea and connection to philosophy The idea exemplifies sustainable and charitable actions well and is very realistic for the students to achieve.

4- Very Good CONGRATS! The idea supports sustainable and charitable actions and is realistic for the students to achieve with minor adjustments.

3-Satisfactory A GOOD EFFORT! The idea may have weaknesses in its intention of sustainable and/or charitable actions and needs modification to be realistic for the students to achieve. Media is used somewhat effectively to record the experience but the design or production distracts from content/intent.

2-1-0 Needs Improvement MISSED OPPORTUNITIES! o o o The idea itself is weak. The fulfillment of the idea is weak. The lesson is not suited to this purpose.

SCORE

Kelly

Peers

Group/self o o Media is not always used effectively Media does not show care in editing/producing for the stated purpose. Finished media is not high enough quality to market. Kelly

Quality of media

High quality of the finished product shows diligence in recording, editing and sharing. Audio/video is creative, unique and celebrates the experience of the lesson well.

Competent quality of the finished product shows strong effort at recording, editing and sharing. Audio/video conveys the idea of the lesson well.

Peers

Group/self Generally well organized, prepared with mostly appropriate materials and sufficient instructions. Cohesive lesson and demonstration suited to the audience. Lacks strong organization. Lesson included questionable materials and mostly sufficient instructions. Audience/students may have appeared unsure of task. o Not well organized. Questionable or inappropriate materials Lacked clear and sufficient instructions. Audience/students were unsure of task. Not suitable for sharing with the community at this point. Kelly

Preparation and undertaking of project

Clearly well organized, prepared with appropriate materials and clear instructions. High level of instruction and a demonstration well received by the students.

o o o

Peers

Group/self Total score by Kelly Total score by peer review Total score of team evaluation /15 /15 /15