Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ira Varianta 2010 2011
Ira Varianta 2010 2011
Criteriile RIFLE
Conceptual model for integration of AKI, CKD, and AKD. Overlapping ovals show the relationships among AKI, AKD, and CKD. AKI is a subset of AKD. Both AKI and AKD without AKI can be superimposed upon CKD. Individuals without AKI, AKD, or CKD have no known kidney disease (NKD).
AKI
Normal Increased risk Damage GFR Kidney failure Death
Staging of AKI
Stage 1 SCr >1.5-1.9 times baseline OR 0.3 mg/dl increase >2.0-2.9 times baseline >3.0 times baseline OR increase in SCr to >4.0 mg/dl OR RRT Urine output <0.5 ml/kg/h for 612 hours <0.5 ml/kg/h for >12 hours <0.3 ml/kg/h for 24 hours OR Anuria for >12 hours
2 3
Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney)
29 269 critically ill patients. 5.7% (5.5 - 6.0%) had ARF. 72% were treated with RRT.
ETIOLOGIE
pre-renala renala post-renala
Cauze pre-renale
Cauze renale
Cauze Post-renale
Necroza tubulara
Postrenala Necroza tubulara acuta Obstructia sistemului colector sau a cailor urinare extrarenale
Strictura vezicala
GN
acute
GN postinfectioase, Sdr Goodpasture
Ischemica
Nefrotoxica
Exogena
Nefrotoxine : 1. Antibiotice (gentamicina) 2. substante de contrast iodate 3. Cisplatina
Endogena
1. Depunerea de pigmenti intratubular (hemoglobinuria, mioglobinuria) 2. depunere de proteine intratubular (mielom) 3. depunere de cristale intratubular (acid uric, oxalat)
Incidenta Cauza
Supravietuire
Post-surgical
Hypovolaemia Nephrotoxins and drug induced Hepato-renal syndrome Myocardial infarction Rhabdomyolysis Urinary obstruction Glomerulonephritis
21.5
22.6 12.5 7.5 6.3 5.6 5.2 3.0
24.2
23.5 11.8 9.3 5.8 7.2 5.0 2.3
13.9
20.1 14.4 2.4 7.7 1.0 5.7 4.8
Pancreatitis
Myeloma
2.8
1.2
3.7
1.5
0.5
0.5
Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney)
Most common factor - septic shock 47.5% (45 - 49%). 30% of patients had pre-admission renal dysfunction. Dialysis dependent survivors: 14% (11- 16%).
BEST Kidney
Independent risk factors for mortality:
use of vasopressors (OR, 1.95; (1.50-2.55) P<0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.11; (1.58-2.82) P<0.001), septic shock (OR, 1.36; (1.03-1.79) P = .03),
60
Mortalitate (%)
Mortalitatea la pacientii dializati pt IRA
40
20
Mortalitatea in primul an la pacientii cu BRC terminala raportata de ERA EDTA
1980
1990
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
1978 1978 1980 1980 1982 1982 1984 19841986 19861988 19881990 19901992 19921994 1994 1996 1996
Ani
Effect of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on outcome in critically ill patients Metnitz PG et al. Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):2051-8.
ARF associated with four-fold increased mortality Controlled for underlying disease severity using case controls Mortality significantly higher in ARF patients (62.8 vs. 38.5%)
Patofiziologia IRA
Patofiziologia IRA
Teoria hemodinamica
Vascoconstrictia I/R Obstructie tubulara Retrodifuziune
IRA functionala
Deshidratare + Vasoconstrictie renala si scaderea coeficientului de ultrafiltrare Insuficienta cardiaca Sepsis
Angiotensina II
Feedback tubuloglomerular
Scaderea RFG
Fluxul plasmatic la nivelul nefronului se ajusteaza prin alterarea rezistentei arteriolei aferente
Modificarile sunt dependente de SRAA, adenozina, prostaglandine
Ischemia
100
Normal
50
0 0 50 100 150
95% CI
Presiunea intratubulara
flux tubular
GFR
Oligurie
PO2, ~ 50 mm Hg
Outer medulla
Inner medulla
ischemia/reperfusion
ISCHEMIE
Depletie ATP
REPERFUZIE
Acumulare de hipoxantine Xantine Generare de superoxid
SOD
Peroxid hidrogen
Fe3+
Radical hidroxyl
1) Stresul oxidativ
2) Inflammatory response
3) Rolul calciului
in leziunile de ischemie-reperfuzie renale.
4) Role of NO
A
Pathways of oxygen-derived reactive species
NO NO
Integrins
Lumen
Cytoskeletal Targets of NO
Basolateral Membrane
Patofiziologia IRA
Teoria hemodinamica
Vascoconstrictia I/R Obstructie tubulara Retrodifuziune
Afectarea subletala a cel. tubulare renale determina exfolierea cel. epiteliale viabile si adeziune intercelulara aberanta mediata de 1-integrina ( Noiri et al. Kidney Int 46:1050, 1994)
Normal renal epithelium
Sublethal injury
Patofiziologia NTA
Teoria celulara
Pierderea polaritatii celulare Necroza vs apoptoza Recuperare prin factori de crestere ca IGF-1, HGF, EGF
CMJ hipoxie
Leziune microvasculara Obstructie Inflamatie Coagulare
Intretinere
nediferentiere Migrare Proliferare
Rediferentiere Repolarizare
Determinarea bazala a ureei si creatininei plasmatice pentru toate internarile in urgenta si TESTAREA REGULATA IN TIMPUL SPITALIZARII cuantificarea corecta intrari / iesiri, greutatea zilnica, TA in clino- si ortostatism Detectare/ recunoastere precoce si tratament prompt sau transfer cu toate documentele si investigatiile imagistice
Examen clinic
Anemia Modificari radiologice osoase Dimensiunile renale Consecintele prezentei HTA de lunga durata
D/ Proba terapeutica
IRA prerenala
< 20 40-60 (>20)
IRA parenchimatoasa > 40 <20 Hipostenurie < 350 < 1.1 <3 < 20 >1
GENERAL MANAGEMENT
(fortarea) diurezei
Limitata de functia renala si volumul urinar Impune un volum urinar de > 1000 mls / 24 h Excretia urunara de K+ redusa de medicamente (IECA, amiloride, spironolactona)
WET-DRY
-IC cu deshirdratare prin tratatament diuretic si hipoperfuzie renala -IC cu hipoperfuzie renala in ciuda hiperhidratarii generale
DRY-WET
Spatiul trei: hiperhidratare, darlichidul nu e in circulatie
PA Catheter
Oesophageal doppler
K 10
5 30-60 5
H 90
HCO3
Cl 100-140
40-65
135-155 25-50 30-50
70-90 30-45
Solutii terapeutice pt I
1. Restrictie sodata 2. Diuretic de ansa in doza conventionala (furosemid 40 mg iv, bumetanide 2 mg iv) 3. Diuretic de ansa in doze mari SI repetate (furosemid 200 mg la 6 ore) 4. Diuretic tiazidic urmat la 30 min de diuretic de ansa in doza mare 5. Diuretic de ansa in infuzie continua (furosemid 10-40 mg/hr) 6. Diuretic de ansa in doze mari diluat in albumina desodata perfuzat in 30 minute la fiecare 6 ore. 7. Ultrafiltrare
Diureticele de ansa
Ratiuni teoretice pentru utilizarea diureticelor de ansa: inhiba pompa Na/K/Cl din lumenul ramurii groase ascendente a ansei Henle, diminind astfel semnificativ activitatea metabolica la acest nivel si deci necesarul de oxigen; cresc fluxul de urina intratubular, prevenind / reducind obstructia tubulara; inhiba procesul de feedback tubuloglomerular; reduc rezistenta la nivelul vasculaturii renale si cresc astfel, fluxul sanguin renal (mecanism mediat prin prostaglandine).
Percent
Curba de supravietuire Kaplan-Meier la pacientii critici tratati fie cu albumina sau ser fiziologic.
albumin
Vasopresoare
Norepinephrine
Other vasopressors
Hospitalisation days
: DA1 receptor effect renal blood flow : receptor effect cardiac index and heart rate : receptor effect systemic vascular resistance index and arterial pressure
Meta-analiza: dopamina in doze mici creste fluxul urinar dar nu previne disfunctia renala sau decesul
FRIEDRICH et al. Ann Intern Med 142:510-24, 2005
'Low-dose' dopamine worsens renal perfusion in patients with acute renal failure
A Lauschke et al
CCM 2006;34:589-597
Absenta raspunsului Infuzie furosemid 2-4 mig/min dopamina 1-3 ug/kgc/min 4 ore
Raspuns
STOP furosemid Diureza se reduce Se reia furosemidul
Absenta raspunsului
Dializa
CCB
Limiteaza fluxul intracelular de Ca++ Multe date pe animale, efect maxim daca se administreaza anterior agresiunii
Influenta ACC asupra functiei renale dupa expunere la substante de contrast iodate
Tepel et al. NEJM 343,2000
Factori de crestere - IGF I Factor natriuretic atrial - ANF Antagonistii receptorilor endotelinei tiroxina PGE1
but given what we know of pathophysiology, what might help in some cases (if we knew which to go for)?
Prevention of renal vasoconstriction Growth factors Stem cells
Placebo Fenoldopam
days
Prevention of vasoconstriction
Fenoldopam dopamine A-1 receptor agonist
Systematic review of RCTs in ICU or major surgery 16 studies, 1290 patients Reduced risk of acute kidney injury OR 0.43 (0.32-0.59) Reduced need for RRT OR 0.54 (0.34-0.84) Reduced in hospital death OR 0.64 (0.45-0.91)
Stimulation of regeneration epo in patients with ATN receiving renal replacement therapy
Retrospective cohort study (not RCT) on ICUs of Washington University hospital Epo (71 patients); no epo (116 patients) No effect on requirement for blood transfusion when adjusted for baseline haemoglobin No effect on renal recovery OR 0.63 (0.30-1.3)
Stimulation of regeneration HUVEC infusion immediately after ischaemic renal injury (animal)
Stimulation of regeneration infusion of cells that do and do not express eNOS immediately after ischaemic renal injury (animal)
HEK = Human Embryonic Kidney WT = wild type G2A = transfected with deficient eNOS eNOS = transfected with active eNOS
60
%
40
20
Oliguric (n=121)
Non-oliguric (n=376)
Coagulation
Anticoagulant
TM - thrombin
PC APC + PS
Degrades Va, VIIIa
Procoagulant
COAGULATION
Thrombin
(-) (-)
Xa X
VIIa
ATIII TFPI
T-ATIII complexes
TF
IXa IX
Prothrombin
24.7% 30.8%
French multi-centre PRCT (n=299) - just completed Low dose hydrocortisone (50 qds) + fludrocortisone in early septic shock (within 6 hours)
significant reduction in relative mortality!!
ALL PATIENTS
0.2
0.0
p=0.01
0 7 14 21 28
days
Methylene blue
* 50% respond
Vasopressin
Acts on V1 and V2 receptors
V2 receptors collecting tubules - water resorbtion V1 receptors vascular smooth muscle - vasoconstriction
Anti-diuretic action/regulation of plasma osmolarity (5-10 pg/ml) Levels are dramatically increased (often >100 pg/ml) early in stress
Vasopressin
VP levels very low later in septic shock 3 vs. 22 pg/ml in cardiogenic shock
(Landry et al, Circulation 1997)
BP restored by small bolus doses of VP or low dose infusion (0.01-0.04 U/min) infusions up to 0.26 U/min had no pressor effect in normal humans
Activated Protein-c Yes (cost!!!) Steroids Probably Methylene blue ? rescue Vasopressin.maybe
1548 admissions to 1 surgical ICU (Belgium) in 1 yr Randomised to receive insulin to keep blood sugar at:
80-110 mg/dl [4-6 mmol/l] or standard Rx of 180-200 mg/dl [9-11 mmol/l])
Mortality reduced from 8 to 4.6% (p<0.05) MOF with proven septic focus: 33 vs. 8 deaths MOF w/o detectable septic focus: 18 vs 14 deaths Dialysis/CVVHF: 64 (8.2) vs 37 (4.8)
Cell Injury
Cell repair
IGF-1
Concluzii
Cercetarea elaborata si intensiva in NTA a dus la o
intelegere mai buna a proceselor implicate
Necesarul de calorii creste si mai mult daca pacientul este septic Mortalitatea este direct proportionala cu balanta azotului Nu sunt date controlate care sa sustina efectul benefic al suportului nutritional asupra supravietuirii.
De preferat calea enterala daca intestinul este functional 35 Kcal, 1g proteine, 0.16g N / kg corp
Eficienta
Controlul volumului, fara limitarea alimentarii Corectia acidozei
Cellulose-acetate
Cuprophane
Odds ratio
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.5
CRRT IHD PD
Dezavantaje
Probleme abord vascular Risc crescut de sangerare Imobilizare prelungita Frecvent, ruperea capilarelor filtrului Cost ridicat Acidoza lactica la utilizarea de solutii lactat
Clearanceul de uree necesar in CCRT pt atingerea controlului corespunzator al azotemiei la pacientii cu IRA.
2000
5
4
1000
3
2 50 60 70 80 90 100
Weight (Kg)
100 mg/dL 80 mg/dL 60 mg/dL
Weight (Kg)
60 mg/dL 80 mg/dL 100 mg/dL
25
CCF score outcome
0 0 2 4
low Kt/Vurea
16
18
20
Stabilitatea hemodinamica
110
p=NS
80 Mean Map Maxi fall Map 20
50
100
50
* p<0.05
0 6 12 18 24
Time (hours)
De Vriese & Lameire, J Am Soc Nephrol 1999
P=0.02
N= 166
N=979
Survived Died
CRRT: dezavantaje
sangerare Cost Inconvenienta Greseli in aprecierea balantei hidrice Tulburari electrolitice Hipotermia
hemodiafiltrare lenta
(adaptabila si zilnica)
CRRT clasic
preMAP
midMAP
endMAP
Kumar et al, AJKD, 36, 294-300, 2000
SLEDD: anticoagulare
No heparin: 31.9% in SLEDD vs 2.7% in CCVH (p<0,05)
Heparin need in units/day
35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Lowest dose Median dose Highest dose SLEDD CVVH
CRRT
Preferata in instabilitatea cardiocirculatorie, hiperhidratare, edem cerebral
Concluzii
Pacientii cu IRA necomplicata au prognosy=tic bun cu HD conventionala Desi initiatorii CRRT raporteaza avantajeale tratamentului, nu a putut fi demonstrat un beneficiu major asupra supravietuirii la acesti pacienti Individualizarea prescriptiei de dializa alaturi de experienta fiecarui centru in parte determina cele mai bune solutii pt fiecare centru de dializa in parte
A. Jrres 09-2005
A. Jrres 09-2005