Tanner Tilby

Period 3

Probability Distribution Law of Large Numbers

number probability
1
0.35
2
0.25
3
0.15
4
0.1
5
0.05
6
0.1

0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2

Series1

0.15
0.1
0.05

0
1

Mean= 2.55

Standard Deviation= 2.64

Part II

2
2
1
2
1
6
2
4
3
1
5
4
2
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
1
5
1
3
2.375
1.46888
Bin
Frequency
1
8
2
8
3
3
4
2
5
2
More
1

Part III
60

2.576592
1.642939
0.305533
0.214462

1
2
1
2
1
3
5
1
1
2
2
4
1
3
1
2
5
1
3
4
4
1
3
1
4

Bin

Frequency
1.6
0
1.8
0
2
6
2.2
18
2.4
40
2.6
52
2.8
47
3
20
3.2
15
3.4
2
3.6
1
More
0

2
3
2
6
4
6
2
3
6
3
1
3
2
3
1
1
4
3
3
1
4
1
1
4
1

2
1
2
2
1
5
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
5
2
6
1
2
2
5
1
6
5
1
6

1
6
1
3
4
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
1
6
5
1
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
2
1

2
5
3
1
1
2
6
6
3
6
1
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
2
4
1

50
40
30

Series1

20
10
0

1
1
6
1
5
3
1
1
2
6
1
1
2
2
6
1
3
4
1
1
2
3
2
3
2

6
4
3
6
4
2
2
3
4
1
2
1
3
2
1
2
5
2
1
1
5
3
4
1
1

2
2
6
1
1
4
1
1
1
2
5
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
1
4
1
3
4
2

4
1
2
6
1
1
2
5
3
2
6
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
1
3
4
1
2
2
2

3
4
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
4
3
2
2
2
2
1
6
6
2
6
4
4
1
1
1

2.32
2.8
2.6
2.12
2.6
2.44
2.76
2.36
2.44
1.375984 1.607275 1.892969 1.641138 1.707825 1.709776 1.614517 1.380821 1.529706

2.56
1.68523

1
3
2
1
2
5
6
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
6
1
5
1
4

5
5
2
4
4
3
1
2
2
6
2
6
3
3
2
6
2
4
2
1
1
6
3
2
2

4
6
2
2
3
1
6
2
5
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
6
1
3
4
5
1
1
6

2.32
3.16
2.76
1.6 1.675311 1.920937

10

2
6
3
4
1
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
6
1
3
1
5
1
4

11

12

2
2
1
1
2
2
4
3
2
1
1
6
1
2
4
6
6
4
1
1
2
2
1
3
2

1
3
3
2
2
1
3
2
2
5
3
6
1
2
1
1
6
1
2
4
1
1
2
6
2

1
3
6
2
1
2
4
1
3
6
3
3
4
1
1
3
1
3
6
2
4
1
6
1
2

3
2
5
3
1
3
2
2
6
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
6
1
4
2
1
1
6
4
4

2
2
6
1
6
3
5
2
2
4
5
4
1
1
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
1

2
2
2
2
2
2
5
3
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
5
2
2
4
6
6

2.52
2.48
2.52
2.8
2.72
2.52
2.48
1.71075 1.636052 1.661325 1.755942 1.720465 1.686219 1.584298

E-1. The means in Parts 1 and 2 were very similar to the sample means of part 3. The means in Parts 1
and 2 were 2.55 for part 1, and 2.375 for part 2. Similarly, part three had a combined mean of all 200
spins at 2.576592.
E-2. The standard deviations in parts 1 and 2 are not relatively close together. Part 1 had a standard
deviation of 2.64, and part 2 had a standard deviation of 1.46888. Part two was more similar to part
three which had an average standard deviation of 1.642939.
E-3. The standard deviation of the sample means in part 3 was 0.305533, and the theoretical standard
deviation of the sample means was 0.214462.
E-4. The histograms in parts 1 and 2 were very similar in the way that they were both skewed to the left.
They were very different from the normal bell-shaped curve. The histogram in part three is less like
parts one and two, but more like the bell and has a very normal distribution containing a rise and fall.