AIMINESTY
INTERNATIONAL
REPORT
1986
This report covers the period
January to December 1985
Italy
‘Amnesty International's principal
voncerns were the excessive length
of preventive detention and judicial
procedures in political cases. The
organization expressed concern
about a case of alleged torture re-
sulting in death and about cases of
reported medical neglect of prison-
on prosecutions of ufficers accused
vf illtreating prisoners trom previous years. Amnesty International
continued to work for the release of imprisoned conscientious
objectors to military service,
Law 398. promulgated in July 1984, reduced the length ofAIMINESTY
INTERNATIONAL
REPORT
1986
This report covers the period
January to December 1985
290 Amnesty international Report 1986
preventive detention — defined as the period between arrest and the
passing of a definitive verdict by the highest court — from 10 years
tight months to six years. n November 1985 this law resulted in the
release of about 160 prisoners charged with serious crimes, because
the permitted limit had been reached. The released prisoners, who
‘included defendants in political cases, were subject to police
supervision after release,
In the Rome section of the “7 April" trial (see Amnesty
international Report 1980 to 1985), The Motivation for Judgment and
Sentence was published in May. Amnesty International was concerned
that some of the principal defendants had been kept in preventive
detention for over five years and that special legislation was applied
retroactively to extend the permitted limits of preventive detention
‘see Amnesty International Report 1980), There was also a delay of 15
‘months without any judicial justification between the committal for
trial order and the first trial hearing. In addition, Amnesty
International was concerned that there was no opportunity for the
ourt to examine Carlo Fioroni, the main source of information for
the charges against the defendants, He had lett the country by the
time he was called for examination at the hearing. His testimony,
which had been taken in secret during the investigation phase, was
nevertheless admitted by the court
(On 3 December 1984 the Paduan section of the “7 April” trial
pened after several postponements and aiter a change of President
ind jury at the prosecution’s request. It continued throughout 1985,
The 143 defendants in the Paduan trial included six whose cases were
under investigation by Amnesty International (see Ammesty Interna:
tional Report 1980 to 1985). Four of these lett the country after being
«equitted by the investigating judge. They were nonetheless included
‘a the list of defendants after the prosecution had appealed
successfully against the investigating judge's decision, The prosecu-
‘ion also appealed successfully against the acquittal by the investigat-
ing judge in Padua of Professors Luciano Ferrari-Bravo and Emilio
Vesce, who had carlier been convicted of formation of an armed
and in the Rome trial. They were defendants in the Padua trial as
well because they had heen charged separately by the Paduan
prosecuting magistrates with possession of arms. Amnesty Interna
‘ional’s grounds for concern in the Padua trial were similar to those in
‘he Rome trial, in particular the excessive length of pretrial detention,
und the inability of the court to examine Carlo Fioroni, Amnesty
International was also concerned that the sirms charges against
9 and Vese appeared to be based
cay lormed the basis of their conviction in
the Rone trialAWVINESTY
INTERNATIONAL
REPORT
1986
This report covers the period
January to December 1985
Amnesty Intemational Report 1986 291
Om 29 August Amnesty Internatiénal asked the Minister of Justice
bout an inquiry into the death in police custody of Salvatore Marino
J Palermo, He was young tisherman who had gone voluntarily to
the police station to answer questions about the murder on 29 July of
« police officer. Amnesty International received reports that he had.
been beaten and forced to swallow large quantities of salt water
‘hrough a plastic tube. The post-mortem stated that he had died from
respiratory constriction which had led to heart arrest” and referred
'o “injuries to the trachea”. Fleven officers of the Flying Squad were
wrested after his death and charged with “unintentional homicid
\ further seven were arrested later. Subsequently [4 of the 18 were
granted provisional liberty or put under house arrest
‘On 10 July Amnesty International asked the Minister of Justice for
information on the progress of judicial inquiries which had been
sstablished in 1982 in Rome, Verona and Viterbo into allegations of
‘orture and ill-treatment of political detainees between their arrest
und transfer to prison, ‘The incidents were reported to have taken
place in police stations, barracks and other places (see Amnesty
International Report 1983). Amnesty International had received no
reply to previous inquiries about these cases nor did any arrive by the
ind ot 1985,
The judicial inquiry into violence against prisoners in San Vittore
prison in Milan in September 1981 ended in November 1985,
Amnesty International had written to the Minister of Justice in
December 1981 (see Amnesty International Report 1982) after
receiving allegations of ill-treatment of prisoners. The inquiry found
that during a prison transfer serious offences had been committed
azainst 133 prisoners, most of whom had been charged. with
politically motivated crimes. It recommended that the former prison
zovernor, two doctors and 19 officials be committed for thal on
‘charges ineluding premeditated infliction of injury, use of inappropri-
te weapons, failure to administer aid and failure to report the
incidents
On 28 November Amnesty International wrote to the Minister of
Justice about the health of Professor Paolo Signorelli, who had been
held for tive years in preventive detention at the prison of Regina
Coeli in Rome and was alleged to belong to the Nuclei Armati
Rivoluzionari (NAR), the Armed Revolutionary Nuclei. He was
reported to be sutfering trom cardiac and circulatory problems as well
1s a serious arthritic condition and to have fallen into a coma lasting
4% hours following a collapse. Amnesty International had received
reports that Protessor Signorelli had been denied necessary medi
reatment and might therefore suffer an irreversible decline in health,
No reply had been received by the end of 1985,
Amnesty international worked for the release of seven conscien-
ous vdjectors 0 military service, They included objectors who hd
snsuocesstully applied 10 do alternative civilian service ot who had
rotused alternative serviee in protest at its prmitive length. tn Italy
ternative civilian seevice is 20 months, compared tI months’
olitary service.