Output: Case 1: m_g=0, v_g =1 sigma_t2 = .5000 sigma_f2 = .5050 c=.2525 Case2: m_g=2,v_g=1 sigma_t2 = .5000 sigma_f2 = .5050 c=.2525 Case 3: m_g=0, v_g =2 sigma_t2 = 2.0000 sigma_f2 = .1263 c=.2525 Case 4: m_g=2, v_g =2 sigma_t2 = 2.0000 sigma_f2 = .1263 c=.2525 Conclusion: 1) Principle is verified, i.e. Sigma_t^2*sigma_f^2 =1/4 for Gaussian 2) From above four cases it can be seen that variance in time domain and frequency domain remains .5000 and .505 respectively, when mean =0 and changed to 2 3) However by changing variance, values of variance in time domain and frequency domain changes. 4) Principle is independent of mean and variance
Task 2: a) Verify principle for laplacian b) variance in time domain and frequency domain independent of mean %Verify Uncertainity principle for Laplacian
clc; clear all;
fs=10; t=-10:1/fs:10; lambda = 2;
l = (lambda/2).*exp(-lambda.*abs(t)); % Lambda /2 is normalizing factor
Output: Case 1: lambda=2 sigma_t2 = .1233 sigma_f2 = 4.4055 c= .5434 Case2: lambda = .5 sigma_t2 = 1.9931 sigma_f2 = .2595 c=.5173 Case 3: lambda = 100 sigma_t2 = 4.1223e-11 sigma_f2 = 332.2400 c=1.3696e-08 Conclusion: 1) Principle is verified, i.e. Sigma_t^2*sigma_f^2 >1/4 for Gaussian 2) From above four cases it can be seen that variance in time domain and frequency domain changes with change of lambda 3) Principle is independent if value of lambda is small At lambda=100 Principle violates as product is less than .25