-

: - ,
. (1892-1967),
.
, .
: . , ,

, . , 15. 1892.
.
, . .
,
,
.1 ,
, -
,
.
,
, , ,
1911. .
1911. , .
, . ,
.
, ,

, . ,
, . , , 1983. . VII-XXXI;
. . , , , . , III
(-), , , 2007. . 653-656

 . : ,
, ?2 .
,
, ,
.
, : ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
,
.3
, , , ,
, , ,
1912. , , ,
, .
,
.4

, ,
, 1914.
, .5
- ,
27. 1918. . ,
:
, , ,
, ,
.6
2
3
4

, . , . VII
, , 10. 1967. . 12
, , II/1912, . 7 (18. I), . 2-4; ,
, II/1912, .12; , , 1914. , , , 1918; , , I/1919, .1, . 2-3;
, IV/1920, . 32-34;
: ( II 45),
I (1921), . 343-353; - ,
IV/1922, . VIII, . 3, . 161-169; ,
, , 1922
. , ,
. , , , . CDLVII, , . 59, ,
1972. . 21-24
, : , , II/1918, . 279 (23.II)

 , 1916.
, 1920.
.
, 1923.
. 7. 1928.
.
,
( 7),
.
, , , 8
, , .

,

.
:
, ; ,
; .9 .
, ,
, ,
.
.
( 10), , ,
( 11
12). ,
, , . .

10

11
12

, , ,
, , 1922.
, , , , VI/1924, . XVI, . 7, . 1624-1631
: ( II,
45), , . 1, . 7-8, 1921. . 347
, , , III/1921, . V, . 7, . 481-488; .
VI, .32, . 574-583
. , . , , IV/1960, . VII, . 6, . 503-517
. , . O. Spengler: Der Untergang des Abendlandes,
Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. , , 1927, . II,
. 5, . 355-363

 ,13
, 14
,
, a .
.

, , , ,
, , .
,
, ,
, 15
, .
.
,
,16 ,
,
, .
-
, -,
,
, , ,
.17
,
, 1922.
:
, ,
...
.18
13

14
15

16
17

18

. , : (. ),
, 1937.
. , , I/1928, , . 31-37
. , , , II/1927, .15, . 258-261; .
16, . 277-280; . 17, . 305-309
, , I/1919, . 19, . 2-3
, . ,
- 3, 1993. 15.12.1992. .
(1892-1967), . 27-41.
, , , 14. 1979. .


(1929),19 - ,
,
. ,20
.
, , .
, ,
:

...
:
; , ...
, ,
,
.21

( ),22
( ),23
( ).24
- ,
,
( ),25
. ,26
,
, .

19

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

11. 1929.
; ,
.
(1842-1910)
. , , , 1972. .1
, I/1923, . 2, . 33-37;
, II/1927, . II, . 6, . 393-400
, I/1928, , . 26-30
, IV/1934, . IV, . 7, . 607-617
, . XV ( 1935), . 7, . 688-702; . 8, . 797810; . 9, . 888-897; . 11, . 1033-1038

 , 27 ,
,28 ,
, ,
.
- ,
, .
, ,
.29 , :

. 30 ,
,
.31
, ,
,
, :
, ,
,
, , ,
- .32
, , ,

- ,
:
, , , ,
.33
(
, 1933.), .
27

28

29

30

31

32
33

. , ,

, . ( -
- ), , 1934.
, , , /1962, . 7-8, , .893903
. , , , ,
1967
. , ,
, . 138, 1962, 389, . 1, . 43-56
, . 85
. , , , 1960, . 67

 , ,
:
, . 34
, ,
6. 1938. ,
, (
(1930), (1933),
(1934), (1934),
(1934),
(1935), (1935),
(1935),
(1935), (1936)).
.
.

( ,35
36, 37),
, , :

...
.38
,39
: ,
,
. 40
34
35

36

37
38
39

40

. , , , 1933.
, VII/1932, .42, . 656-657; . 43, . 678; . 44, . 691-692; . 45, . 709710
, , 1933, . VIII, . 8, . 604-616; . I, . 1, .
23-29
, II/1933, . 1, . 1-6
, . 608
, , I/1919, . 1, . 2-3; - .
, , IV/1922, . VIII, . 3, . 161-169; VE INDIA,
( ), , 1929. . 3-7; -,
, , 1929, . VI, . 7, . 521-527;
, , IV/1929, . 34, . 568-569; . ,
, IV/1929, . 31, . 522-525; . 33, . 546-549;
, , VII/1957, . 1, . 45-65;
, , VIII/1957, . 33 (20. I), . 1 8
. , , , IV/1922, . IX, .5-6, . 977

 , ,
.
,
( 129),41
, , .
, , .
14. 1941. , .
.
, 17. 1941.

, ,
,
: ,
, .42 ,
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
, ,
9. 1943. .
1945. ,
, 1950. ,
(1953-1959). ,
, (26. 1962. ),
, ,
.

, 8. 1945.
.
,

, :
41
42

, VII/1961, . 4, . 7-10
, ,
, . IV; . . 1

 ,
. 43
,

,
,
. ,
, .


,44
, .

, ,
, .

.45
(1961).

, ,
. ,
,
.

43

, (1892-1967), , IV/1968, . 7, . 93
, , 1951.
45
. ,
. 20-24; , . 108-110; , . 181;
( . .), . 200;
, . 236-240; , . 285; ,
. 305; , . 327-329; , . 329-330;
, . 336-337;
,. 357-358; , . 369371; , . 371-373; ,
. 431-432; , . 451; , .
549-551; , . 581-583;
, . 583-585; , . 651-653;
, . 730-734;
, , CXXXI/1955, . 376, . 1-2, . 121-132;
, , I/1963, . 4-5, .14-17
44

 , ;
. :
, ,

. 46
, ,
, ,
,
.
,
, ,
, . .
, : .
.
,
,
, ,
.47
. 48
, ,
.49 ,
,

. ,
,
, , , ,
, , . 50 .
:

46

. , . , , , 1961. . 2
, . , , 9/1996,
. 244; . . 21.
48
. . ,
49
, : . 50-
, , 23. 1962, . 9
50
. , , , IV/1922, . IX, .5-6, . 977
47

10

 ,
, , , ,
, . , ,
, , .
, ,
.51
, ,
.

. ,
, 52.
,
, , , ,
, 53 .
, , ,
, , ,
, , , .54

, ,
,

.
, . .
,
.

.55
, , ,
51

, (1892-1967), , IV/1968, . 7, . 94
, ( -
, - ), , 1934.
53
, : . -
. , 1938. , CXIII/1939, . 351, . 2, . 158-159
54
, : . , ,
- 30.-31. 1993.
55
, : . ,
, 3. 1998. . 24
52

11

 , ,
, . 56
. (
1914. ; 1925.
; (1929-1930);
(1951

);

. ). . 1925.

. 57

(1930. V ; 1957.
; 1961.
; 1962.
; 1965.
; 1966.
, ).
,
. , ,
.58 ,

.

59

75

370 .60
. , Nulla dies sine linea,61
. ,
-,
. 1967. .
, 3, , ,

56

, (1892-1967), , IV/1968, . 7, . 94
, I-XIV. , , 1925;
, I- II,. , , 1925.
58
, , , 30-31.I 1993.
59
. ; .
, , . . 27
60
-, , , . 78-80, 1990, . 155-167
61
, Nulla dies sine linea, , IV/1964, . 171 (27. II), . 5
57

12

 ,
,62 .
Non obiit, abiit.

LEKSANDRA SMIRNOV-BRKI

LIFE AND WORK OF MILO N. URI

Summary
The paper presents biography of Milo N. uri (1892-1967), Serbian philosopher and
classicist, who made a significant contribution to the recognition of the ancient heritage in
Serbian and European culture, as well as the importance of classical studies and classical
education.
uris early works were mainly philosophical, dominated by a Romantic perspective
popular at the time of the struggle of the south Slavic peoples for their national states inside
the dying Turkish Empire. Furthermore, his humanistic ideals had lead him to an extensive
research in ancient Greek philosophy, religion and culture, as an instrument in his search of
universal moral values in the evolution of human thought.
In his mature writings, uri explores the eternal cultural achievements of the ancient
world, extolling reason and science, and expressing emancipation from his earlier
Romanticism. Nevertheless, uri widens the basis of his research, introducing elements of
eastern philosophies and religions (mainly India and China), thus building the foundations for
his theory of eternal ideas that can be found in all cultures, and which represent stimuli and
guidelines for the improvement of the human society.
In the last two decades of uris life, he was predominantly concentrated on comprising
his knowledge into great synthetic works. Furthermore, his work on the translation of specific
ancient authors intensifies, culminating in his original translation into Serbian of great
Homeric epic poems, The Iliad and The Odyssey.
Finally, we conclude that uris thoughts were focused on different segments of culture,
not only Hellenic, but also Serbian epic poetry and national legend, eastern philosophies and
religions, inspired by Bergson-like philosophy of life and ancient humanistic tradition.
62

, , , 7. 1967. . 9

13

Research in the ancient world was for uri merely a method for reaching the ancient
guidelines for a better society of the future. Nevertheless, his tireless and selfless work as a
professor at the University of Belgrade, and a member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences
and Arts, became a moral example for the future generations. uris legacy to Serbian
classical studies is that he introduced a wider, interdisciplinary approach in classical studies
and produced numerous studies on the ancient culture. He is still one of the best Serbian
translators.

14