59 2 20096369

3004

*
Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, Vol. 59, No. 22008
, pp. 6369

Anisotropy of Lankford value and textures in the cold rolled 3004 aluminum alloy sheet
Shin TSUCHIDA*
Anisotropy of Lankford valuer valuewere measured and discussed in the relation with crystallographic textures and
ear behavior in the 3004 aluminum alloy sheet strain hardened by cold rolling of 86% total reduction after the hot rolling.
The rvalue is small in 0 direction from the rolling direction and maximum in near 90 direction as the tensile strength
shows the similar distribution. Typical and well developed rolling textures containing weak Cube, RD rotated cube and
Goss components are observed in the material. The distribution profile of r value near 30 to 90 direction is estimated to
depend on these texture components, however, the small r value in 0 direction is not consistent with the r value which is
calculated by Taylors model using the measured ODFs data. The actual small r value in 0 direction is considered to be
caused by not only the crystallographic textures but also the deformation by shear bands that are located parallel to the
transverse direction with an angle of 35 from the rolling plane. The characteristic ears in the drawn cup of this material
that are six ears at 45 and 0/180 position seem to correspond to the anisotropy of r value.
Received April 15, 2008 Accepted October 22, 2008

Keywords: Lankford value, texture, shear band, 0/180 ear, cold rolled 3004 aluminum alloy sheet

1
7r
8,9
10
14 ODF
15
22 r
23
26
27
31 32,33
r r

r 100111
r
r

DI
3004
r

r
34
DI

86%
3004
r

2
DI
3004
22 1900 mm
540C
500 mm 2.5 mm 300C

86% 0.34 mm
Table 1

1900 mm
C
E

* 4558670 3112R & D Center, Sumitomo Light Metal Ind., Ltd.

3112 Chitose, Minato-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 4558670
. E-mail: MAKOTO_TSUCHIDA@mail.sumitomo-lm.co.jp

64

5920092

Table 1 Chemical composition of the material

mass%
Si

Fe

Cu

Mn

Mg

Cr

Zn

Ti

Al

0. 26

0.39

0.20

1.02

1.04

0.02

0.08

0.03

Rem.

r 090
22.5 JIS13 B
1%
N
3
2 X
111200220 3
Schluz Los Alamos

popLA35

Standard ODF36 ODF

popLA
1

RDStandard ODF
ND
ODF r Taylor

r Standard ODF
r ODF
Taylor r 37
39

Fig. 1 Distributions of r value in the cold rolled 3004

aluminum alloy sheet. Mark C is obtained in the central
zone of width and mark E is obtained in the edge zone of
the 1900 mm wide strip.

JIS5
0 22.5
146 mm 87 mm
0.5 mm

350 ml
DI

3
r Fig. 1 r
90
ECr
45 90
Fig. 2 ODF
f 2
04565 3 C E
2
b -fiber
Cube 001
100 Cube

Fig. 2 Main sections of ODF results obtained in the central

zone Cand edge zone Eof the cold rolled 3004 aluminum alloy strip.

J. JILM

65

5920092

Fig. 3 Peak intensity of each component of the textures observed in the cold rolled 3004 aluminum alloy strip. The figures were read out from the ODF result data maps.

Fig. 4 Distributions of r value calculated from the results

of ODF analyses shown in Fig. 2. The calculated value deviates from the measured value especially in 0 direction in
the central zoneCor edge zoneE
.
RD rotated cube 031
100 Goss
011
100
EC
Fig. 3 E
Cube RD rotated cube
GossBrassSCopper

Fig. 2 ODF r
r Fig. 4
E 45 67.5
r C Fig. 3

CE90 22.5

Fig. 5

45 4
0 180 45 2
90
Fig. 6
EC 5 MPa
0
90

Fig. 5 Ear profiles at the top edge of drawn cup walls

made of the material Ccentral zoneand Eedge zone
.
The radial scale indicates the height from the zero level set
in the cup wall.

Fig. 6 Distributions of tensile strength UTSand yield

strengthYSin the material C and E.

4
r

4. 1 r
86%
3004
r
26,40 99.5%
b -fiber
r 45
45 29
3004
r 90
r

66

BrassS Copper
45 Cube
0 90 Goss
90 r 0 r
41RD rotated cube
Goss 90 0 r
r 90
Goss RD rotated cube
r

04590 r

0 r

Standard ODF r
Taylor Full ConstraintsFC

AlMg
Relaxed ConstraintsRC
42 24
RC Fig.
7 90 0
FC r
3004 Fig. 8
Fig. 3
r
0 r
0 r

Hughes Liu DDW

43
47Winther
48
50Hansen
40
42
51,52

DDW

53
58

59
61
35 62
66

67

Fig. 9 RD

5920092

Fig. 7 Distribution of r value calculated by the Relaxed

Constraints model. Miss match between the calculated
value and the measured value is not decreased in the lower
angle.

Fig. 8 Distribution of r value calculated by FC model for

the annealed 3004 aluminum alloy sheet. The calculated
value is similar in the profile to the measured value at
strain e
0.15.

Fig. 9 TEM structures of the cold rolled 3004 aluminum

alloy sheet. Lamellar high dense dislocation structure
deformation bandsis nearly rectangular to RD in the
observed RD-TD thin layer.

68 120C7 d
RD-ND Fig. 10

J. JILM

5920092

67

Fig. 12 Schematic illustration of shear bands configuration in the cold rolled 3004 aluminum alloy sheet.

Fig. 10 Shear bands observed in RD-ND section of the

cold rolled 3004 aluminum alloy sheet. sensitized by
120C, 7 d treatment

Fig. 11 Slip patterns in the sheet surface of cold rolled

3004 aluminum alloy given 2% tensile strain. Broken lines
indicate the parallel bands and horizontal grooves are the
marks of rolling.
30
35

2% Fig. 11

63

30 35 Fig. 12
0

r
90 r

r
90

4. 2

45
4
Brass 011
211 S
123
634 Copper 112
111 b -fiber

0 90 4
Cube 69
71
DI 3004
Fig. 5 45 4 0
180 0/180
1990

Goss
72
74 Cube RD 20
30
75,76
Goss RD rotated cube

45

45 0/180 Fig. 3

Whiteley10 Lilet
11 r
Wilson12 D r
r0r902r45
/2
0 90 4 45 4

r D r
0 45

r
90 r

r Whiteley

68

5920092

r 90
0/180 45
90 90 r

2
45 90 r

r r

5
86% 3004
r

1r
30
90
1900 mm

r 45 90

2ODF b -fiber
CubeGoss RD rotated cube
Cube RD rotated cube
Goss b -fiber
3ODF Taylor FC
r 30
90
0 r
0 r

TD 35

4D r
45 4 0/180 2
90 2
r

1 R. L. Whiteley: Blastfurnace and Steel Plant, 481960

, 1245.
2 R. L. Whiteley, D. E. Wise and D. J. Blickwede: Sheet Met. Ind., 38
1961
, 349353,358.
3 R. L. Whiteley and D. E. Wise: Flat Rolled Products III,1962
, 4763.
4 W. F. Hosford and W. A. Backofen: Fundamentals of deformation processing, Syracuse Univ. Press,1964
, 259, 284.
5 W. T. Lankford, S. C. Snyder and J. A. Bauscher: Trans. ASM, 42

1950
, 11971232.
6 331992782789
7 381997448453
8 R. S. Burns and R. H. Heyer: Sheet Met. Ind., 351958
, 261275.
9 81998540547
10 R. L. Whiteley: Trans. ASM, 521960
, 154169.
11 L. Lilet and M. Wybo: Sheet Met. Ind., 411964
, 783815.
12 D. V. Wilson: J. Inst. Metal, 941966
, 8493.
13 W. F. Hosford: Formability; Analysis, Modeling and Experimentation,
AIME,1978
, 7895.
14 D. Bauer and F. U. Leitloff: Metall, 431989
, 960963.
15 F. Barlat, S. Panchanadeeswaran and O. Richmond: Metall. Trans. A,
22A1991
, 15251534.
16 H. Inagaki: Z. Metallkde., 821991
, 361372.
17 C. S. Da Costa Viana and N. V. V. De Avila: Mater. Sci. Forum, 157162
1994
, 19611966.
18 A. P. Clarke, P. V. Houtte and S. Saimoto: Mater. Sci. Forum, 157162
1994
, 19531960.
19 P. Wagner and K. Lucke: Mater. Sci. Forum, 1571621994
, 2043
2048.
20 3 2 1 9 8 2
241246
21 24 1983
283289
22 D. W. Lin, D. Daniel and J. J. Jonas: Mater. Sci. Eng., A131 1991,
161170.
23 B. Ren, Z. Li and J. G. Morris: Scripta Metall. Mater., 31 1994,
387392.
24 H. Inoue and T. Takasugi: Materials Trans., 482007
, 20142022.
25 D. V. Wilson: Int. Materials Reviews, 351990
, 329338.
26 241983411418
27
C 501984716723
28
16197510571064
29
16197511171123
30
3 351969440458
31 6
1965557562
32 291965
10351040
33 301966
669673
34 592009
2429
35 J. S. Kallend, U. F. Kocks, A. D. Rollett and H. R. Wenk: Materials
Science and Engineering, A1131991
, 111.
36 402001589591.
37 44199497103
38 G. I. Taylor: J. Inst. Metals, 621938
, 307324.
39 H. J. Bunge: Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Butterworths,
London,1982
.
40 311981
307312
41 Y. S. Liu, S. B. Kang and H. S. Ko: Scripta Materialia, 37 1997,
411417.
42 H. Honneff and H. Mecking: Proc. of ICOTOM-5 vol. 1, Berlin,
1978
, 265275.
43 D. A. Hughes: Scripta Metall. Mater., 271992
, 969974.
44 Y. Liu, L. Delaey, E. Aernoudt and O. Arkens: Mater. Sci. Eng., 96
1987
, 125137.
45 Y. Liu, L. Delaey and J. P. Baekelandt: Aluminium Technology 86
Proc. Conf.
, London,1986
, 211215.
46 Y. Liu, L. Delaey, E. Aernoudt and O. Arkens: Mater. Sci. Eng., 96
1987
, 139146.
47 Y. Liu, L. Delaey and J. P. Baekelandt: Microstructure and Mechanical
Behaviour of Materials, Vol. 2Proc. Conf.
, China,1985
, 953960.

J. JILM

5920092

48 G. Winther: Scandinavian J. Metall., 251996

, 265272.
49 G. Winther, D. J. Jensen and N. Hansen: Acta Mater., 45 1997,
24552465.
50 G. Winther, D. J. Jensen and N. Hansen: Acta Mater., 45 1997,
50595068.
51 N. Hansen and D. J. Jensen: Acta Metall. Mater., 401992
, 32653275.
52 D. J. Jensen and N. Hansen: Acta Metall. Mater., 381990
, 13691380.
53 B. Bay and N. Hansen: Strength of Metals and Alloys Proc. of
ICSMA-8

, 1989
, 193198.
54 B. Bay, N. Hansen and D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf: Mater. Sci. Eng., A113
1989
, 385397.
55 B. Bay, N. Hansen, D. A. Hughes and D. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf: Acta
Metall., 401992
, 205219.
56 D. A. Hughes: Microstructural and Crystallographic Aspects of
Recrystallization, Riso National Lab.,1995
, 6385.
57 R. D. Doherty, D. A. Hughes, F. J. Humphreys, J. J. Jonas, D. J. Jensen,
M. E. Kassner, W. E. King, T. R. McNelly, H. J. McQueen and A. D.
Rollett: Mater. Sci. Eng., A2381997
, 219274.
58 C. S. Lee and B. J. Duggan: Acta Metall. Mater., 411993
, 26912699.
59 J. Hirsch and K. Lucke: Acta Metall., 361988
, 28632882.
60 J. Hirsch and K. Lucke: Acta Metall., 361988
, 28832904.

69
61 J. Hirsch, K. Lucke and M. Hatherly: Acta Metall., 361988
, 2905
2927.
62 K. Brown: J. Inst. Metals, 1001972
, 341345.
63 R. J. Asaro: Acta Metall., 271979
, 445453.
64 W. B. Lee and K. C. Chan: Acta Metall. Mater., 391991
, 411417.
65 Y. Shen: Scripta Metall. Mater., 291993
, 16651666.
66 W. B. Lee: Scripta Metall. Mater., 291993
, 16671668.
67 2 5 1 9 8 6
404410
68 3 0 1 9 8 0
713719
69 F. H. Wilson and R. M. Brick: Trans. AIME, 1611945
, 173202.
70 G. E. G. Tucker: Acta Matall., 91961
, 275286.
71 A. W. Bowen: Mater. Sci. Technol., 61990
, 10581071.
72 H. J. Bunge: Z. Metallkde., 761985
, 457470.
73 S. E. Naess: Z. Metallkde., 821991
, 259264.
74 A. S. Malin and B. K. Chen: Aluminum Alloys for Packaging, TMS,
1993
, 251260.
75 J. Hirsch, P. Wagner and H. Schmiedel: Mater. Sci. Forum, 217222
1996
, 641646.
76 B. Ren: Aluminum Alloys for Packaging III, TMS,1998
, 4958.