Present: Shafiur Rahman and Saleem Akhtar !! M"#AMMA$ MA%&''R(((Petitioner )ersus *#"+AM M"R,A&A(((Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 720-L of 1992, decided on 22nd November, 1993. (n appeal from t!e "#d$ment of t!e La!ore %i$! Co#rt, &#ltan 'enc! dated (-3-1992 pa))ed in *+A No. 113 of 19,-.. +imitation A-t ./0 of 19182((( ----+. ----Con)tit#tion of Pa/i)tan (1973., Art. 1,-(3.---Condonation of dela0-- Petition 1a) barred b0 time---2ro#nd) for filin$ dela0ed petition 1ere t!e 1ron$ advice of co#n)el-..No )#pportin$ affidavit of co#n)el !ad been filed 1it!o#t 1!ic!, condonation of dela0 1a) not po))ible---%i$! Co#rt, even on merit) !ad $iven co$ent rea)on) for interferin$ 1it! findin$) of fact 1!ic! did not re3#ire interference b0 +#preme Co#rt---Leave to appeal 1a) ref#)ed in circ#m)tance). Pervai4 A/!tar, Advocate and +. 5na0at %#))ain, Advocate-on-*ecord for Petitioner. Nemo for *e)pondent. 6ate of !earin$7 22nd November, 1993. 'R$3R S#A4/"R RA#MA% !5(((8!e petitioner 1!o i) t!e plaintiff9preemptor, )ee/) leave to appeal a$ain)t t!e "#d$ment of t!e %i$! Co#rt dated (-3-1992 1!ereb0 t!e claim of t!e plaintiff 1a) di)mi))ed on $ro#nd) of 1aiver and e)toppel. 2. 8!e petition i) )!o1n to be barred b0 21 da0). 8!e e:planation $iven in t!e application for condonation of dela0 i) a) !ere#nder7----- ;8!at t!e petitioner in t!e compan0 of one %afi4 <avaid 53bal 1ent to contact a local la10er &r. &#!ammad *afi3 *i"1ana at &#ltan 1!o !a) )#fficient )tandin$ at t!e 'ar a) to t!e limitation for filin$ petition for leave to appeal 1!en t!e time of =0 da0) !a) not 0et e:pired. (c. 8!at !e 1a) told t!at t!e re3#i)ite time for filin$ t!e petition for leave to appeal i) 90 da0). (d. 8!at it 1a) m#c! before t!e e:pir0 of t!o)e 90 da0) t!at !e 1ent to t!e pre)ent co#n)el on 1,-7-1992 at &#ltan to en$a$e !im for filin$ t!e )ame. 5t t#rned o#t t!at t!e limitation 1a) =0 da0) for filin$ t!e petition for leave to appeal.; No )#pportin$ affidavit of t!e Advocate !a) been filed. >it!o#t it condonation i) not po))ible. 3. ?ven on merit), 1e find t!at t!e %i$! Co#rt !a) $iven co$ent rea)on) for interferin$ 1it! a findin$ of fact and t!at doe) not re3#ire o#r interference. (. 5n t!e circ#m)tance), leave to appeal i) ref#)ed. A.A.9&-1,7=9+ Leave ref#)ed.
1996 P L C CS 433 - Statutory Rules National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Services Rules Were First Promulgated in Year 1973 and Subsequently in Year 1980 Rules of 1980
2000 S C M R 1321 -Dismissal From Service---Regular Inquiry Not Held---Service Tribunal Had Rightly Concluded That Dismissal of Civil Servant From Service and Subsequent Reduction in Punishment Were Violative of Dictum
1998 P L C CS 221 - Constitutional Petition - Employee of Statutory Body - Termination of Service Without Show-Cause Notice and Without Affording Opportunity of Being Heard
1996 S C M R 1185 - Rule of Good Governance Demand That The Benefit of Such Judgment by Service Tribunal-Supreme Court Be Extended To Other Civil Servants Who May Not Be Parties To The Litigation
1996 S C M 8413 - IRREGULAR Appointment Service Tribunal Having Re Instated Civil Servant Could Not Be Deemed To Have Committed Any Illegality or Irregularity