PUP v.

CA
404 SCRA 683
Facts: The petitioner bought a propert! "hich has a #easee therein! "ho has the right to $irst
re$usa# un%er the #ease agree&ent.
'ence this petition (here the petitioner conten%s that the transaction %i% not constitute a sa#e!
)ut &ere# a trans$er o$ properties bet(een govern&ent agencies. An% that the private
respon%ent (as not entit#e% to the right o$ $irst re$usa#.
*ssue: "hether or not there (as a sa#e at the present case.

'e#%: +es! Contrar to the contention o$ the petitioner the t(o parties possesses a separate an%
%istinct persona#it! A#so a## o$ the essentia# re,uisite $or a va#i% sa#e (as present! -a&e#
Consent! .b/ect an% Consi%eration.
An% the contention o$ the petitioner that the private respon%ent (as not entit#e% to the right o$
$irst re$usa# (as (ithout &erit.
)eing an integra# an% in%ivisib#e part o$ the contract o$ #ease an% is inseparab#e $ro& the (ho#e
contract. The consi%eration $or the right is bui#t into the reciproca# ob#igations o$ the parties.