( )

.






.


..


.

Abstract
Hisbah is one of the main islamic institutions.It is meant to
play an important role in the control and orientation of social

activities so as to lead to a gradual islamization of all aspects of

economic life. The ultimate goal is to discourage the informal growth
of corruptive mechanisms existing in most Islamic countries.
It has become necessary to institutionalize hisbah activities
and enlarge its scope to touch all aspects of social and economic life.
Hisbah should be regarded as one of the main institutions which
will have a vital role in preparing the Ummah to face the
challenges for the forthcoming events of the 21st century.

.
:


.

.

.

.
-1
" :
" ( )1
":



()2
" ...
":
()3



.

. "




()4
"

":
" 110
:

.72

-2 :






.
.




.

10

.






.
"

" .5


()6






. ..







.

11

.
:

-1 :




.


":

" ( )7

"( )8


"
" Demombynes " :

"( . )9 " :

- -

12

"(.)10

"

" ( )11 " :
"( )12 .

. "

"
()13

-2






"

()14
"

13

.



( 13)


.



.
:

( ... )...

14

.







.

( )


"

" ( )15



": "
( )16
" :


" (.)17

15

( )18


.








...
:

.40

.

16

.

:

.

.

.

.

17

.

.

-1

":




" (.)19

18

:
"


"
" " : " ( )20

":

()21
"






.


.




"

19

( )22

"




.




.
-2



.
-2-1

":



()23
" .

20

-2-2

.
-2-3

21

.









.
:

-1







.

22

.



.



:
"
:
- "

()24

:
"

23

()25
"
":


"
" :
()26
"
-2





.

24

-1

.







...

25

.




:
-

.
-


. . .


.


.
-2

26

.

.


...








. . .




.

27

:
-2-1




.





( .)27




(.)28
-2-2




.
-2-3

28

.
-2-4




.
-2-5





" : . . .

()29
" .
-3

-3-1

29

.








(.)30

30

.


...


.
-3-2

31

.



.




..

()31

32

.


" :

. . .

()32

" :

. . .

()33
". .

33

.
-1







.



.









.
-2

34

.



.







:
"
"
"

35

"

()34

.






.




.



.
:

36

-1




"
"( )35
.
-1-1





.



":


"
( )36

.

37

.







" :



"( )37
" : " (.)38

38

"
"

.
-2 -1






. . . .





:
"
()39
"

39

.
-2







.

":

...
()40
"

40

.



.
:

.




.
-1






.

41

" :


" ( )41






" :


" (.)42



.
-2

:
-1

42

...
-2

...
-


.
-





...
-







...
-27

43

...







.

:


:
-1

44

.
-2

.
-3







.
-4




.
-5



.
-6

45

.



.
-7



-8



.
:

46

.









.
-1

:
-1-1

47

.
-1-2



.

48

. :

: 1
.
: 2

:
.
: = + 1 + 2 3

<

= ( + 1 + 2 -) 3 <0

.
-2

49

.









.







.

:




:

50

-



.


.
-





.

:
-1



:
-1-1

51

.


.
-1-2






.
-1-3




.
-1-4




.
-2

52

:
-2-1





.



.



.
-2-2



.
-2-3
:

53

.
-2-4













.
-3
-3-1






.

54

-3-2


.
-3-3



.
-3-4


.












.

55

.



.

56

()1 1983 .284

2 1979 1 .398
3 .
1993 1= 120
4 .
1970=.73
5
. 1994 1
= . 72
6
= . 398
7
1983 .223
8
1986 48
9
.49
10 . 1962
. 31
11 . 51
12 1
. 12
13 14
14 . 399

.
15
2000 1 92
16 1997 .112
17
23
2/2000 .2
FRANCIS FUKUYAMA, La confiance et la puissance : Vertus sociales et prosprit 18
.conomique, plon, 1997




1999 .
19 .30
20 . = . 95
:

21
22

.
.303
9000
1999 .12

) ) THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION IOS

23

24
25
26
27
28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37
38
39
40
41

42

= .202



. .
.302
.302
.303
.
.
.2002 1

1404 1 . 81
: .
1980 1

:
. 1996

1996 . 45
:
1990 .57
:1997
1997 1 .114
1994
1994 . 13 12

1996 .400
. 289
. .93
. 34
1997 .41

1985 .82
= . 187