2.

76 Sulfur %
1,342 MM/Btu
261,035 lb/hr fuel flow
225.14 lb-mole/hr Sulfur in fuel
14,409 lb/hr SO2 inlet to boiler
1,441 lb/hr SO2 inlet to polishing FGD calculated
1439 lb/hr SO2 inlet to polishing FGD from M10
1.07 lb/Mbtu SO2 inlet to polishing FGD from M10
90.01 % removal across CFB Boiler
607 lb/hr SO2 inlet to stack from M10-Station Point 18 page 5 of 9
1350.89992 lb/hr SO2 removed across polishing SDA
832 lb/hr SO2 removed across polishing SDA
57.82 % removal across polishing ESP
0.45 lb/Mbtu
68,591 lb/hr
685.91 lb-mole/hr
27,436 lb/hr
1,715 lb-mole/hr
Calcium to Sulfur Mole Ratio from
CaCO3 7.61639216
100
lb-mole/hr Sulfur in fuel
lb/hr SO2 inlet to boiler
lb/hr SO2 inlet to polishing FGD calculated
lb/hr SO2 inlet to polishing FGD from M10
lb/Mbtu SO2 inlet to polishing FGD from M10
% removal across CFB Boiler
lb/hr SO2 inlet to stack from M10-Station Point 18 page 5 of 9
lb/hr SO2 removed across polishing SDA
lb/hr SO2 removed across polishing SDA
% removal across polishing ESP
CaCO3
CaCO3
portion of Ca
Ca
Ca
Calcium to Sulfur Mole Ratio from
100
100
+ CO3 = CaCO3
lb-moles Ca 40 lb Ca = 4,000 lb Ca = 0.40
lb- moles Ca
lb-moles CO3 60 lb CO3 = 6,000 lb CO3 = 0.60
1 lb- moles CO3
10,000 lb/hr total
JEA (Jacksonville Energy
Authority) has constructed 2 x
265-MW(net) (2 x 298-
MW(gross))
CFB
Illinois #6 Coal =
(3.2 S%)
Pittsburgh
#8 Coal
(4.8S%)
with a 50 (6.7 S%):(4.8
S%)50 Blend of
Petroleum Coke and
Pittsburgh #8 Coal=
(5.8S%)
NOX, (1) 0.086 0.074 0.07
CO, (1) 0.02 0.026 0.015
PM10, (1) 0.0019 0.004 0.0041
Opacity, percent 1.5 1.1 1
Sulfur capture data
SO2 leaving boiler (1) 0.276 0.237 0.202
SO2 leaving SDA (1) 0.107 0.102 0.093
In-bed capture, % 94.9 96.8 97.5
SDA capture, % 61 56.9 54
Combined capture, % 98 98.6 98.8
In-bed Ca/S ratio 2.68 1.77 1.7
Limestone/coal ratio, - 0.27 0.28 0.34
Hg leaving boiler
Table 2-2 Environmental Performance of JEA CFB Fired
with a 80 (4.8 S%): 20
(4.8 S%) Blend of
Petroleum Coke and
Pittsburgh #8 Coal =
(6.37%)
EKPCs E. A. Gilbert Unit 3
EKPC (East Kentucky Power
Cooperative) has constructed a
268-MW(net) (295-MW(gross))
ALSTOM Power CFB unit at its
Spurlock site.
Design
Fuel
Kentu
cky
Pittsbu
rgh #8
0.013 NOX, (1)
0.0127 CO, (1)
0.0024 PM10, (1)
0.7 Opacity, percent
Sulfur capture data
0.115 SO2 leaving boiler (1) 4.5 1.5 4
0.058 SO2 leaving SDA (1)
97.8 In-bed capture, %
49.5 SDA capture, %
98.9 Combined capture, %
2.29 In-bed Ca/S ratio 1.9
0.27 Limestone/coal ratio, -
<0.0738 Hg leaving boiler
Table 2-2 Environmental Performance of JEA CFB Fired Table 2-2 Environmental Performance of JEA CFB Fired
Reliant Energy Seward Unit 1 and
2, 2 x 260 MW net., (2 x 292-
MW(gross))
Design
Fuel
Kentucky
Pittsburgh
#8
NOX, (1)
CO, (1)
PM10, (1)
Opacity, percent
Sulfur capture data
SO2 leaving boiler (1) 4.5 1.5
SO2 leaving SDA (1)
In-bed capture, %
SDA capture, %
Combined capture, %
In-bed Ca/S ratio 1.9
Limestone/coal ratio, -
Hg leaving boiler
Table 2-2 Environmental Performance of JEA CFB Fired
ALSTOM report that at full load the unit has achieved 98 percent SO2