Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. Uji Reabilitas
Pada tahap aplikasi uji instrument penelitian dilakukan melalui tahap-tahap sebagai
berikut:
1. Input Data dalam format SPSS (Nama file: modul 1-uji validitas-reabilitas-pratikum 1instrumen 2014).
di reliability analysis.
5.
Scale Variance
Corrected Item-
Cronbach's
Item Deleted
if Item Deleted
Total
Alpha if Item
Correlation
Deleted
p1
211,5385
377,936
-,113
,949
p2
211,3846
376,423
,000
,949
p3
211,5385
382,269
-,408
,950
p4
212,0769
369,244
,376
,948
p5
211,9231
364,410
,593
,947
p6
211,7692
368,359
,402
,948
p7
211,6154
376,923
-,041
,949
p8
211,8462
366,641
,479
,948
p9
212,0000
373,833
,119
,949
p10
211,6923
373,564
,142
,949
p11
212,0000
363,833
,638
,947
p12
212,0000
362,833
,531
,948
p13
212,2308
366,192
,370
,948
p14
212,0769
355,910
,846
,946
p15
212,0000
375,333
,042
,949
p16
211,8462
358,474
,517
,948
p17
212,5385
375,603
,024
,949
p18
211,8462
369,974
,310
,948
p19
211,7692
375,692
,024
,949
p20
212,1538
367,141
,389
,948
p21
212,0000
368,167
,260
,949
p22
212,5385
360,436
,505
,948
p23
211,8462
359,308
,561
,947
p24
212,1538
366,141
,352
,948
p25
212,1538
366,308
,296
,949
p26
212,3846
353,423
,727
,947
p27
211,7692
363,359
,663
,947
p28
211,8462
367,308
,445
,948
p29
211,7692
365,359
,558
,948
p30
211,7692
369,859
,324
,948
p31
211,6923
371,064
,277
,948
p32
211,7692
374,192
,101
,949
p33
211,8462
369,141
,352
,948
p34
211,6923
371,064
,277
,948
p35
211,6154
369,090
,424
,948
p36
211,5385
372,769
,242
,949
p37
211,4615
370,269
,569
,948
p38
211,4615
370,269
,569
,948
p39
211,7692
364,692
,593
,947
p40
211,9231
366,744
,474
,948
p41
211,8462
358,641
,694
,947
p42
211,6154
367,090
,544
,948
p43
211,8462
362,808
,524
,948
p44
212,5385
380,769
-,215
,950
p45
212,0769
354,744
,746
,946
p46
212,0769
367,244
,486
,948
p47
212,1538
371,474
,281
,948
p48
211,5385
366,603
,673
,947
p49
211,6923
364,397
,643
,947
p50
211,5385
372,603
,254
,948
p51
212,1538
367,308
,531
,948
p52
211,6154
365,756
,624
,947
p53
211,4615
370,269
,569
,948
p54
211,5385
366,936
,650
,948
p55
211,4615
375,269
,100
,949
p56
211,9231
366,244
,499
,948
p57
211,7692
367,692
,436
,948
p58
211,7692
363,359
,663
,947
p59
211,7692
367,692
,436
,948
p60
211,6923
365,564
,579
,948
p61
211,5385
366,936
,650
,948
p62
211,7692
367,192
,462
,948
p63
211,5385
366,936
,650
,948
p64
211,9231
370,244
,296
,948
p65
213,0000
376,000
,000
,950
p66
211,9231
366,410
,491
,948
p67
211,6923
363,231
,708
,947
p68
211,7692
363,692
,646
,947
p69
211,6923
363,231
,708
,947
p70
211,5385
372,769
,242
,949
p71
211,3846
376,423
,000
,949
p72
211,8462
379,641
-,142
,950
p73
211,6154
364,423
,705
,947
p74
211,6923
367,564
,468
,948
p75
211,6154
364,423
,705
,947
p76
212,0769
351,744
,856
,946
p77
212,4615
387,603
-,460
,952
p78
211,9231
363,744
,627
,947
p79
211,6154
363,256
,776
,947
p80
211,7692
359,526
,867
,947
p81
211,7692
360,026
,647
,947
p82
211,6154
363,256
,776
,947
p83
211,6923
360,731
,847
,947
p84
211,5385
369,269
,321
,948
Selanjutnya Reliabilitas instrument penelitian secara keseluruhan dapat dilihat pada nilai
Alpha pada tabel dibawah ini:
Reliability
[DataSet1] C:\Users\ASUS\Desktop\MODUL 1 -UJI VALIDITAS-RELIABILITAS
data Praktikum -1-Instrumen 2013.sav
Excluded
Total
a.
%
13
100,0
,0
13
100,0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
,949
84
3. Pada data view isikan variabel df dengan nilai 82. Lalu pilih Transform dan compute
variabel.
4. Isikan pada kolom target variabel t_0.05 pada level signifikan 95%. Kemudian pada kotak
Numeric Expression, ketik rumus IDF.T (0,95,df)
Hasil Output:
COMPUTE t_0.05=IDF.T(0.95,df).
EXECUTE.
5. Luaran nilai t dengan nilai df=82, maka di dapat nilai t=1,66, dapat dilihat pada tabel di
bawah ini:
6. Langkah selanjutnya mencari nilai r, ulangi kembali dengan transform dan compute
variabel. Selanjutnya pada kotak Target Variabel
ketik r_0.05 sedangkan pada kotak
Numeric Expression ketik rumus t_0.05/SQRT(df+t_0.05**2).
7. Luaran nilai r=0.18, yang dipergunakan sebagai cut of point uji validitas item kuisioner.
No.
Instrumen
Corrected
r table/hit.
Kesimpulan
Item-Total
Spss
Validitas
Rekomendasi
Correlation
p1
-,113
0,18
TIDAK VALID
p2
,000
TV
p3
-,408
TV
p4
,376
VALID
p5
,593
p6
,402
p7
-,041
TV
p8
,479
p9
,119
TV
p10
,142
TV
p11
,638
p12
,531
p13
,370
p14
,846
p15
,042
TV
p16
,517
p17
,024
TV
p18
,310
p19
,024
TV
p20
,389
p21
,260
p22
,505
p23
,561
p24
,352
p25
,296
p26
,727
p27
,663
p28
,445
p29
,558
p30
,324
p31
,277
p32
,101
TV
p33
,352
p34
,277
p35
,424
p36
,242
p37
,569
DELETE
p38
,569
p39
,593
p40
,474
p41
,694
p42
,544
p43
,524
p44
-,215
TV
p45
,746
p46
,486
p47
,281
p48
,673
p49
,643
p50
,254
p51
,531
p52
,624
p53
,569
p54
,650
p55
,100
TV
p56
,499
p57
,436
p58
,663
p59
,436
p60
,579
p61
,650
p62
,462
p63
,650
p64
,296
p65
,000
TV
p66
,491
p67
,708
p68
,646
p69
,708
p70
,242
p71
,000
TV
p72
-,142
TV
p73
,705
p74
,468
p75
,705
p76
,856
p77
-,460
TV
p78
,627
p79
,776
p80
,867
p81
,647
p82
,776
p83
,847
p84
,321
Kesimpulan uji validitas dan reabilitas dengan metode one shoot adalah sebagai berikut:
a. Jumlah item instrument riset yang valid (V) adalah sejumlah 68 item.
b. Jumlah item instrument riset yang tidak valid (TV) sejumlah 16 item, tidak digunakan
dalam penelitian.
c. Sehingga jumlah item pernyataan yang digunakan dalam instrument penelitian
berjumlah 68 item pernyataan instrument penelitian.
D. Edit Data
Data yang tidak valid, di delete. Dan dilakukan ulang uji validitas dan reliabilitas sampai
semua data pernyataan hasilnya valid.
BAB II
UJI CHI SQUARE
1. Input data hasil observasi instrument penelitian di lapangan dalam format SPSS. (file:
Modul 2-data Pratikum-2-LBP-Chi-Square-2013)
3. Uji Chi-Square, masukan variabel kategorikal pada kotak row (untuk variabel X) dan
kolom (untuk variabel Y).
4. Pilih Statistics,dan klik di kotak chi-square dan contingency coefisien lalu continue.
5. Pilih Cells dan muncul kotak crosstabs, cells display, klik di precentages, row,
column, total. Kemudian klik continue.
6. Jika ingin menampilkan bar charts. Klik Display clustered bar charts pada kotak
crosstabs.
7. Klik OK
8. Luaran Chi-Square
Crosstabs
[DataSet1] C:\Users\ASUS\Desktop\JUMAT-SABTU-S1-CRLS-2014-03-MARETCAROLUS-S1-jadwal -DIKTAT-SILABUS-kuliah-2014\MODUL 2-data Praktikum2-LBP- Chi-Square-2013.sav
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
JK * katLBP
52
100,0%
0,0%
52
100,0%
BB * katLBP
52
100,0%
0,0%
52
100,0%
TB * katLBP
52
100,0%
0,0%
52
100,0%
IMT * katLBP
52
100,0%
0,0%
52
100,0%
UMUR * katLBP
52
100,0%
0,0%
52
100,0%
PDK * katLBP
52
100,0%
0,0%
52
100,0%
JK * katLBP
Crosstab
katLBP
beresiko LBP(0-8)
Total
tidak beresiko
LBP(9-17)
JK
LAKI-LAKI
Count
14
Expected Count
9,2
4,8
14,0
% within JK
57,1%
42,9%
100,0%
% within katLBP
23,5%
33,3%
26,9%
% of Total
15,4%
11,5%
26,9%
26
12
38
24,8
13,2
38,0
% within JK
68,4%
31,6%
100,0%
% within katLBP
76,5%
66,7%
73,1%
% of Total
50,0%
23,1%
73,1%
34
18
52
34,0
18,0
52,0
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
Count
Expected Count
PEREMPUAN
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within JK
% within katLBP
% of Total
Crosstab
katLBP
beresiko LBP(0-8)
Total
tidak beresiko
LBP(9-17)
Count
16
20
Expected Count
13,1
6,9
20,0
% within UMUR
80,0%
20,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
47,1%
22,2%
38,5%
% of Total
30,8%
7,7%
38,5%
18
14
32
Expected Count
20,9
11,1
32,0
% within UMUR
56,3%
43,8%
100,0%
% within katLBP
52,9%
77,8%
61,5%
% of Total
34,6%
26,9%
61,5%
34
18
52
Expected Count
34,0
18,0
52,0
% within UMUR
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
% within katLBP
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
UMUR
Count
KURANG DARI 35
Count
Total
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
,575
df
Exact Sig.
sided)
sided)
(1-sided)
,448
Continuity Correction
Likelihood Ratio
,185
,667
,564
,453
,519
,564
N of Valid Cases
,453
52
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,85.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
Approx. Sig.
,105
N of Valid Cases
,448
52
Risk Estimate
Value
Upper
,615
,175
2,170
,835
,505
1,380
,329
1,357
N of Valid Cases
,632
2,916
52
BB * katLBP
Crosstab
katLBP
beresiko LBP(0-8)
Total
tidak beresiko
LBP(9-17)
39
40
42
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
2,0
1,0
3,0
66,7%
33,3%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
5,6%
5,8%
% of Total
3,8%
1,9%
5,8%
2,0
1,0
3,0
66,7%
33,3%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
5,6%
5,8%
% of Total
3,8%
1,9%
5,8%
% within BB
BB
45
Count
Expected Count
47
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
48
% within BB
49
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
2,0
1,0
3,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
8,8%
0,0%
5,8%
% of Total
5,8%
0,0%
5,8%
2,6
1,4
4,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
11,1%
7,7%
% of Total
3,8%
3,8%
7,7%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
2,6
1,4
4,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
11,1%
7,7%
% of Total
3,8%
3,8%
7,7%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
Count
Expected Count
50
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
52
53
56
57
% within BB
% within BB
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
58
59
% within BB
% within BB
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
2,0
1,0
3,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
16,7%
5,8%
% of Total
0,0%
5,8%
5,8%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
2,6
1,4
4,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
11,8%
0,0%
7,7%
7,7%
0,0%
7,7%
1,3
,7
2,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
5,6%
3,8%
% of Total
1,9%
1,9%
3,8%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
1,3
,7
2,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
0,0%
3,8%
% of Total
3,8%
0,0%
3,8%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
60
61
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
62
% within BB
% within katLBP
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
64
65
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
67
68
70
% within BB
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
2,6
1,4
4,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
11,8%
0,0%
7,7%
7,7%
0,0%
7,7%
2,6
1,4
4,0
75,0%
25,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
8,8%
5,6%
7,7%
% of Total
5,8%
1,9%
7,7%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within BB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
34
18
52
34,0
18,0
52,0
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
% within BB
% within katLBP
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
75
76
79
80
90
% within BB
% within BB
% within BB
% within BB
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within BB
% within katLBP
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
31,749
df
a
,202
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
41,084
26
,030
3,013
,083
N of Valid Cases
52
a. 54 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
,35.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
,616
N of Valid Cases
52
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for BB (39 / 40)
Approx. Sig.
,202
TB * katLBP
Crosstab
katLBP
beresiko LBP(0-8)
Total
tidak beresiko
LBP(9-17)
145
148
149
TB
150
151
152
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within TB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
Count
10
13
Expected Count
8,5
4,5
13,0
% within TB
76,9%
23,1%
100,0%
% within katLBP
29,4%
16,7%
25,0%
% of Total
19,2%
5,8%
25,0%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within TB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
1,3
,7
2,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within TB
% within TB
% within TB
Count
153
Expected Count
% within TB
% within katLBP
5,9%
0,0%
3,8%
% of Total
3,8%
0,0%
3,8%
1,3
,7
2,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
5,6%
3,8%
% of Total
1,9%
1,9%
3,8%
2,0
1,0
3,0
33,3%
66,7%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
11,1%
5,8%
% of Total
1,9%
3,8%
5,8%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
2,6
1,4
4,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
11,8%
0,0%
7,7%
7,7%
0,0%
7,7%
2,0
1,0
3,0
66,7%
33,3%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
5,6%
5,8%
% of Total
3,8%
1,9%
5,8%
2,0
1,0
3,0
33,3%
66,7%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
11,1%
5,8%
% of Total
1,9%
3,8%
5,8%
2,0
1,0
3,0
66,7%
33,3%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
5,6%
5,8%
% of Total
3,8%
1,9%
5,8%
Count
Expected Count
154
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
155
156
% within TB
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
157
% within TB
% within katLBP
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
158
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
160
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
162
164
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
1,3
,7
2,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
5,6%
3,8%
% of Total
1,9%
1,9%
3,8%
1,3
,7
2,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
5,6%
3,8%
% of Total
1,9%
1,9%
3,8%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
% within TB
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
0,0%
5,6%
1,9%
% of Total
0,0%
1,9%
1,9%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
2,6
1,4
4,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
5,9%
11,1%
7,7%
% of Total
3,8%
3,8%
7,7%
1,3
,7
2,0
50,0%
50,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
5,6%
3,8%
% of Total
1,9%
1,9%
3,8%
Count
Expected Count
,7
,3
1,0
100,0%
0,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
2,9%
0,0%
1,9%
% of Total
1,9%
0,0%
1,9%
34
18
52
34,0
18,0
52,0
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
165
167
169
% within TB
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
170
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
173
175
% within TB
% within TB
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within TB
% within katLBP
% of Total
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
9.
10.
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
20
,668
21,126
20
,390
1,086
,297
16,767
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
52
a. 41 cells (97,6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
,35.
11.
12.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
14.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for TB (145 / 148)
15.
,494
52
13.
empty cells.
Approx. Sig.
,668
16.
17.
18.
19.
20. IMT * katLBP
21.
22.
Crosstab
katLBP
beresiko LBP(0-8)
Total
tidak beresiko
LBP(9-17)
IMT
Count
14
15
Expected Count
9,8
5,2
15,0
% within IMT
93,3%
6,7%
100,0%
% within katLBP
41,2%
5,6%
28,8%
% of Total
26,9%
1,9%
28,8%
20
17
37
24,2
12,8
37,0
% within IMT
54,1%
45,9%
100,0%
% within katLBP
58,8%
94,4%
71,2%
Count
Expected Count
KURANG DARI 30
% of Total
38,5%
32,7%
71,2%
34
18
52
34,0
18,0
52,0
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within IMT
% within katLBP
% of Total
23.
24.
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
df
Likelihood Ratio
sided)
sided)
sided)
,007
5,644
,018
8,686
,003
7,276
b
,009
Linear-by-Linear Association
7,136
N of Valid Cases
,008
52
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,19.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
25.
26.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Approx. Sig.
,350
,007
52
27.
28.
Risk Estimate
Value
Upper
11,900
1,415
100,066
1,727
1,246
2,393
,145
,021
,995
29.
52
,006
30.
31.
32.
33.
34. UMUR * katLBP
35.
36.
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction
df
Likelihood Ratio
sided)
sided)
sided)
,080
2,108
,147
3,207
,073
3,067
b
,133
3,008
,083
52
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,92.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
37.
38.
,072
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
Approx. Sig.
,236
,080
52
39.
40.
Risk Estimate
Value
Upper
3,111
,848
11,408
1,422
,976
2,071
,457
,175
1,195
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46. PDK * katLBP
52
47.
48.
Crosstab
katLBP
beresiko LBP(0-8)
Total
tidak beresiko
LBP(9-17)
Count
14
23
15,0
8,0
23,0
% within PDK
60,9%
39,1%
100,0%
% within katLBP
41,2%
50,0%
44,2%
% of Total
26,9%
17,3%
44,2%
17
24
15,7
8,3
24,0
% within PDK
70,8%
29,2%
100,0%
% within katLBP
50,0%
38,9%
46,2%
% of Total
32,7%
13,5%
46,2%
3,3
1,7
5,0
60,0%
40,0%
100,0%
% within katLBP
8,8%
11,1%
9,6%
% of Total
5,8%
3,8%
9,6%
34
18
52
34,0
18,0
52,0
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
65,4%
34,6%
100,0%
Expected Count
SPK
Count
Expected Count
PDK
D3
Count
Expected Count
S1
% within PDK
Count
Expected Count
Total
% within PDK
% within katLBP
% of Total
49.
50.
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
,746
Likelihood Ratio
,590
,745
Linear-by-Linear Association
,118
,731
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
,586
52
a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1,73.
51.
52.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
Contingency Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
54.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for PDK (SPK / D3)
55.
56.
57.
58.
,106
52
53.
cells.
Approx. Sig.
,746