positions, or does he or she argue for a particular position? Do you need to ANALYZE THE A!"#ENT? How persuasive do you find the arument? $hat reasons and e%idence does the author pro%ide in support of any position&s'? Are there citations or lin(s)and if so, are they credible? *s any e%idence presented +ithout citations? Do you find any of the author,s assumptions -uestionable? Ho+ thoroughly does he or she consider opposing arguments? What is the author!s STAN"E? Does the author stri%e for ob.ecti%ity, or does the language re%eal a particular bias? *s the author associated +ith a special interest that might signal a certain perspecti%e? Does he or she consider opposing %ie+s? Do the sources cited reflect multiple %ie+points, or only one? #oes the pu$%isher $rin a &ertain stan&e to the work? /oo( publishers, periodicals, or $eb sites that are clearly liberal or conser%ati%e or ad%ance a particular agenda +ill li(ely e0press %ie+s reflecting their 1TAN2E3 #o you re&oni'e ideas you!ve run a&ross in other sour&es? Does it lea%e out any information that other sources include? #oes this sour&e support or &ha%%ene your own position(or does it do $oth? Does it support your thesis? offer a different argument altogether? Does it represent a position you may need to A24N5$LED!E or E6"TE? Don7t re.ect a source that challenges your %ie+s8 your sources should reflect a %ariety of %ie+s on your topic, sho+ing that you7%e considered the sub.ect thoroughly3 What &an you te%% a$out the intended AU#)EN"E and *UR*+SE? Are you a member of the audience addressed)and if not, does that affect the +ay you interpret +hat you read? *s the main purpose to inform readers about a topic or to argue a certain point?