SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.339510521
R Square 0.115267394
Adjusted R Square 0.0876195
Standard Error 53.28730714
Observations 34
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 11838.37155 11838.37155 4.169120221 0.04948248
Residual 32 90865.18727 2839.537102
Total 33 102703.5588
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 432.1471599 142.0061064 3.043158994 0.004651244 142.8901868 721.404133 142.8901868 721.404133
X(pH of well water) -37.76584813 18.49596662 -2.04184236 0.04948248 -75.44089926 -0.090796997 -75.44089926 -0.090796997

GROUND WATER SURVEY DATA:
The data is by water well from a random sample of wells in Northwest Texas.
Reference: Union Carbide Technical Report K/UR-1
Sample Data(10 ows):
X(pH of well water) Y(Bicarbonate (parts per million) of well water)
7.6 157
7.1 174
8.2 175
7.5 188
7.4 171
7.8 143
7.3 217
8 190
7.1 142
7.5 190




R squared value being 0.115267394 indicates that 11.5% of the variation in PH
value is explained by this model. Significance F value being 0.04948248 indicate
that PH value is 95% significant in explaining the bicarbonate of well water. P-
Value being same as signicant F, explains that PH is statistically significant to
Bicarbonate of Well water.
Assuming a linear relationship (since significance F value and the P-Value are the
same),
From the output we see that b0 = 432.15, and b1 = -37.766.
Interpreting the meaning of the slope b1 in this problem.
As the pH of well water increases by 1, bicarbonate decreases by 37.766.
Prediction equation is Bicarbonate of well water = 432.15(intercept)-37.76*pH