Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foundations of
Selection
❚ Standard pattern
❚ Skip some steps
❚ Inform applicants
❚ Get more information
❙ Background
❙ Motivation
❙ Abilities
❚ Multiple decision
makers
❚ Two parts
❙ Screening
applications
❙ Screening interview
❚ Result???
❙ Applicant pool
❚ HRM can describe
job
❚ Identify salary range
❚ Applicants
eliminated due to
❙ Inappropriate skills,
experience
❚ Red flags
❙ Gaps in employment
history
❙ Courses instead of
degrees
❙ Lots of brief jobs
❚ Signature on form
❙ Grounds for later
dismissal if falsified
❙ Permission to check
background and
work history
❙ Communicates
employment “at
will”
❚ Differentiate
between successful
and unsuccessful job
performers
❚ Weighted” more
heavily in hiring
decision
❚ Potential outcomes
❙ Performance
❙ Organization tenure
❚ Possible weighted
factors
❙ Education
❙ Prior work
experience
❙ Salary data
❙ Military experience
❚ Which ones to
use???
❚ Useful for a
number of jobs
❚ Good predictive
ability
❚ Legal
❚ Validated for each
job
❚ Historical uses -
intelligence,
aptitude, ability,
honesty, interest
❚ Legal issues caused
decrease in use- job
relatedness
❚ 60% of companies
use some form of
employment test
❚ Manager potential
❚ Group and
individual exercises
❚ Evaluated by
peers, supervisors,
psychologists
❚ Good indicators of
job performance
potential
DeCenzo and Robbins HRM 7th Edition 16
5: STEP 4 - JOB
INTERVIEWS
❚ Multiple people - HR
managers, supervisors,
colleagues
❚ Probe areas not
accessed by
application forms or
employment tests
❚ Questions must be job
related
❚ Types
❙ Individual
❙ Panel
❙ Technical
❙ Stress
❙ Situational
❚ Almost all jobs have
the 1on1 aspect in
selection
❚ HOWEVER….
❚ Take meaningful
notes
❚ Use structured
interviews
❙ Same questions
❙ Same order
❚ Are aware of their
bias
❚ Use multiple decision
factors
❚ Reduce voluntary
turnover
❚ Present favorable and
unfavorable job
features
❚ Part of interview
❚ Create work
expectations
❚ Best use with good
jobs
❚ Accuracy of
application form
❚ Contact former
employers
❚ Contact references
❚ Verify education
❚ Legal status to work
❚ Credit history
❚ Criminal records
❚ Performed by
❙ Internal - HR staff
(cheaper)
❙ External - Third
party investigators -
(more thorough)
❚ So far, so good
❚ Usually made by
HR
❚ Depending on
medical, drug, or
other remaining
tests
❚ Only used to
identify people
physically unable
to perform jobs
❚ ADA issues
❚ Baseline for health
insurance (after
employment)
❚ Drug testing
DeCenzo and Robbins HRM 7th Edition 28
7: STEP 8 - PERMANENT
JOB OFFER
❚ Decision made by
manager
❙ Best able to decide
❙ No one else to
blame
❚ Offer made by HR
for administrative
purposes
❙ EEO compliance
❚ Expensive
❙ Time
❙ Money
❙ People
❚ ANY TECHNIQUE
NEEDS TO STAND UP
TO ALLEGATIONS OF
DISCRIMINATORY
PRACTICE
❚ Match job to
personality
❚ Attractiveness of
company
❙ Meet goals
❙ Positive expectations
❚ Treat those you don’t
select well - image for
later years and friends
❚ STRENGTHS
❚ Workers
empowered to
select potential
coworkers
❚ Two (many) heads
are better than
one!
❚ AND….
DeCenzo and Robbins HRM 7th Edition 33
7: SELF-MANAGED TEAMS
SELECTION
❚ Commitment to
new worker
❚ Focus on
❙ Technical skills
❙ Personal traits
(reliability,
communication)
❚ WEAKNESSES
❚ Legal issues
❚ Interview
techniques
❚ Friction about
decision made
❚ Reliable - consistent
(A yard is a yard with
a yardstick)
❚ Valid - meaningful,
related to relevant
criteria
❙ (How about using eye
color to determine
course grades?)
❚ Content
❙ What is measured is
relevant
❙ Typing test
❘ Typing - good
❘ Spelling - maybe not
❚ Construct
❙ Complex, abstract
❙ SAT
❘ College success???
❚ Criterion-related
(relevance to doing A
Job)
❙ Predictive
❘ Test now for later
performance
❙ Concurrent
❘ Test current employees
employees
❚ PREDICTIVE IS BETTER
❚ Correlation
coefficient
❚ Validity coefficient
❚ Cut scores
❙ Raise - better quality
❙ Lower - more
applicants
❚ Meta analysis
❚ Useful for multiple
jobs
❚ Consistency
❚ Efficiency
❚ Broader issues
❙ Family
❙ Culture
❙ Personal (health)
❚ American
women…….