Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lupus 2014 Gonzalez Suarez
Lupus 2014 Gonzalez Suarez
com/
Lupus
http://lup.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/01/22/0961203313520340
The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/0961203313520340
published online 22 January 2014 Lupus
Maria L Gonzalez-Suarez, Ahmed A Waheed, David M Andrews, Dana P Ascherman, Xu Zeng and Ali Nayer
Lupus vasculopathy: Diagnostic, pathogenetic and therapeutic considerations
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at: Lupus Additional services and information for
http://lup.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Reprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Permissions:
What is This?
n
i
n
e
(
m
g
/
d
l
)
Hospi t al day
Methyl-
prednisolone
pulse
Plasma
exchange
CYP
Mycophenolate mofel
Glucocorcoids
47
Renal
biopsy
Figure 3 Renal function and therapeutic interventions during hospitalization. Serum creatinine concentration during hospital-
ization is demonstrated. Gray boxes represent the type and duration of treatments. See text for details. CYP: cyclophosphamide.
Lupus vasculopathy
L Gonzalez-Suarez et al.
4
Lupus
at HINARI on January 24, 2014 lup.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2014) [21.1.201411:26am] [17]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/LUPJ/Vol00000/140001/APPFile/SG-LUPJ140001.3d (LUP) [PREPRINTER stage]
renal biopsies from SLE patients, lupus vasculopa-
thy is characterized by accumulation of IGs and
complements in the wall of arterioles and small
arteries resulting in luminal narrowing.
17
Adjacent endothelial cells and medial myocytes fre-
quently demonstrate degenerative features or
necrosis. Lupus vasculopathy is distinguished
from vasculitis by the lack of inammatory cells
in the vessel wall. Although documented predom-
inantly in the kidney, lupus vasculopathy can
involve the heart, joints, spleen, skin, retina and
lungs.
5,8,9
The pathogenesis of lupus vasculopathy is
largely unknown. Accumulation of IGs and com-
plements in the vascular wall suggests immune-
mediated vascular injury.
13
Complements are
activated through the classical, lectin or alternative
pathways.
10
The classical pathway is strongly acti-
vated by immune complexes, which are recognized
by the versatile pattern recognition molecule C1q.
Following target recognition, C1q-associated pro-
tease C1s is activated and cleaves C4 and C2,
thereby resulting in generation of the classical path-
way C3 convertase (C4b2b). C3 cleavage into ana-
phylatoxins C3a and C5a by the C3 convertases
and subsequent C5 cleavage by the C5 convertases
results in the formation of C5a and C5b. The latter
participates in the assembly of the membrane
attack complex (MAC, C5b-9, terminal comple-
ment complex). In the context of complement acti-
vation, C3a and C5a trigger proinammatory
signaling, C3b facilitates phagocytosis and MAC
mediates target cell activation, injury or lysis in a
dose-dependent manner. Of note, C3a and C5a are
potent chemotactic factors for neutrophils, mono-
cytes and macrophages.
10
Therefore, the lack of
inammatory cell inltration into the vessel wall
in lupus vasculopathy remains an enigma. In add-
ition, vascular antigen(s) that provoke a humoral
immune response in lupus vasculopathy are not
characterized.
The development of lupus vasculopathy in our
patient coincided with the appearance of antipho-
spholipid antibodies. Similarly, antibodies to b
2
-
glycoprotein I were detected in the patient with
lupus vasculopathy reported by Wu and col-
leagues.
11
Therefore, it is tempting to speculate
that antiphospholipid antibodies are involved in
the pathogenesis of lupus vasculopathy. However,
antiphospholipid antibodies are highly prevalent in
SLE patients.
12
Therefore, it remains to be seen
whether there is indeed a causal relationship
between antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus
vasculopathy.
Lupus vasculopathy is usually associated with
severe forms of glomerulonephritis and portends a
poor prognosis.
57,9,13
Limited available evidence
supports an aggressive approach in the treatment
of lupus vasculopathy. Sung et al. diagnosed a
16-year-old boy with renal failure and dilated car-
diomyopathy.
9
Renal biopsy demonstrated lupus
vasculopathy. While high-dose glucocorticoids
and plasma infusion improved cardiac function,
renal function deteriorated necessitating renal
replacement therapy. Ma et al. showed that a cyclo-
phosphamide-based regimen consisting of high-
dose glucocorticoids, rituximab, plasma exchange
and intravenous cyclophosphamide led to improve-
ment of renal function in a 16-year-old girl with
lupus vasculopathy.
14
Similarly, Seshan reported
that intravenous glucocorticoids and cyclophos-
phamide improved renal function and reduced pro-
teinuria in a 36-year-old woman with lupus
vasculopathy.
2
Wu et al. reported a 12-year-old
girl who developed acute renal failure and severe
hypertension secondary to lupus vasculopathy and
nephritis.
11
Although high-dose glucocorticoids
and intravenous cyclophosphamide failed to
induce remission, addition of daily plasma
exchange resulted in renal recovery.
Wang et al. compared the ecacy and safety of
intravenous cyclophosphamide to MMF for lupus
vasculopathy and nephritis in a prospective, rando-
mized, open-label clinical trial.
15
All patients
received high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone
followed by prednisone taper. Complete remission
was observed in 44% and 0% of patients treated
with MMF and cyclophosphamide, respectively.
Partial remission occurred in 22% and 27% of
patients treated with MMF and cyclophosphamide,
respectively. Adverse eects were more common in
patients treated with cyclophosphamide. The
authors concluded that MMF was more eective
than intravenous cyclophosphamide in inducing
complete remission and had a more favorable side
eect prole. In contrast, our patient developed
lupus vasculopathy while taking MMF, prednisone
and hydroxychloroquine. Moreover, administra-
tion of high-dose intravenous glucocorticoids
failed to demonstrate a tangible response.
However, intravenous cyclophosphamide in con-
junction with plasma exchange therapy induced
clinical and serological remission.
Plasma exchange represents an adjuvant thera-
peutic strategy for antibody-mediated autoimmune
diseases by removing pathogenic autoantibodies
and circulating immune complexes.
16
In addition,
plasma exchange therapy exerts immunomodula-
tory eects by altering T-cell functions (favoring
Lupus vasculopathy
L Gonzalez-Suarez et al.
5
Lupus
at HINARI on January 24, 2014 lup.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2014) [21.1.201411:26am] [17]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/LUPJ/Vol00000/140001/APPFile/SG-LUPJ140001.3d (LUP) [PREPRINTER stage]
type 2 helper T cell dierentiation) and suppressing
interleukin 2 and interferon gamma production.
16
Although a randomized clinical trial of plasma-
pheresis in lupus nephritis showed no additional
benet beyond standard therapy, plasma exchange
could serve as an adjunct treatment in patients with
severe lupus nephritis who do not respond to the
conventional therapy or those who demonstrate a
rapidly progressive decline in renal function.
1720
Our patient suered from severe hypertension
necessitating hospitalization on several occasions.
Severe recalcitrant hypertension is a common mani-
festation of lupus vasculopathy.
1,2,9,11,13
The patho-
genesis of hypertension in this setting appears to be
a consequence of vascular disease. Sung et al.
hypothesized that lupus vasculopathy leads to a
decline in glomerular perfusion pressure, thereby
stimulating renin secretion and activation of angio-
tensin-aldosterone system.
9
Therefore, judicious
use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
and angiotensin receptor blockers may prove eect-
ive in controlling blood pressure in this setting.
Our patient developed pericarditis, mitral valve
regurgitation and cardiomyopathy. Approximately
one-half of patients with SLE develop clinical or
subclinical cardiac disease.
21,22
The pericardium,
myocardium, conduction system, endocardium
including heart valves and coronary arteries can
be aected. Pericarditis is a common cardiac mani-
festation of SLE.
21,22
Echocardiography revealed
thickening of pericardium, pericardial eusion or
both in 1154% of patients with SLE. In autopsy
studies, the prevalence of pericarditis in SLE aver-
aged 56%. Gross examination of the pericardium
revealed brinous or brous thickening with focal
or diuse adhesions between the visceral and par-
ietal layers. Histologically, pericardial disease is
characterized by chronic inammatory changes
and deposition of IGs and complements in the
wall of pericardial blood vessels.
22
Based on the
description in the above-mentioned studies, the his-
topathologic features of the blood vessels in lupus
pericarditis closely mimic those of lupus vasculopa-
thy. Therefore, it is conceivable that lupus vasculo-
pathy is the underlying vascular disease in a subset
of patients with lupus pericarditis. This preliminary
conclusion, however, needs to be further examined.
Valvular heart disease is frequently diagnosed
in patients with SLE.
21,22
Echocardiography
reveals valvular thickening, stenosis, regurgitation
or sterile vegetations (Libman-Sacks endocarditis)
in approximately 60% of SLE patients. Mitral
and aortic valves are more frequently involved
than their counterparts in the right heart.
Valvular heart disease is more common in SLE
patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.
23
Echocardiography disclosed mitral regurgitation
in 38% of SLE patients with antiphospholipid anti-
bodies and in 12% of those without. Similarly,
mitral valve vegetation was diagnosed in 16% of
SLE patients with antiphospholipid antibodies
and in only 1.2% of those without. Our patient
developed moderate to severe mitral valve regurgi-
tation and was found to have lupus anticoagulant.
Transesophageal echocardiography did not show
vegetations. While afterload reduction therapy
was continued, she was referred to cardiac surgery
for potential surgical treatment.
Although early diagnosis and improved manage-
ment of SLE has reduced the incidence of clinically
relevant myocardial disease, it remains a serious
manifestation.
21,22
Myocardial disease is mainly
secondary to myocarditis and atherosclerotic cor-
onary artery disease. Lupus myocarditis is charac-
terized by perivascular and interstitial mononuclear
inammatory cell inltration, cardiac myocyte
injury and myocardial brosis. Myocardial disease
in SLE can also be secondary to small-vessel dis-
ease characterized by vascular thrombosis, regen-
erative/degenerative features of endothelial cells
and perivascular inammation. Jain et al. reported
a 24-year-old White woman with concurrent SLE
and antiphospholipid syndrome who had small-
vessel disease on endomyocardial biopsy.
22
In the
case reported by Sung et al., myocardial disease
occurred in conjunction with lupus vasculopathy
in the kidney.
9
High-dose glucocorticoids and
plasma infusion led to improved myocardial con-
tractility. Our patient developed reduced ejection
fraction along with elevated cardiac enzymes (six-
and three-fold increase in troponin I and creatine
kinase MB, respectively) indicating myocardial
injury. Although endomyocardial biopsy was not
performed, myocardial disease occurred in conjunc-
tion with lupus vasculopathy in the kidney and de
novo lupus anticoagulant.
Cerebrovascular disease and seizure disorder are
two of the 19 neuropsychiatric manifestations of
SLE.
24
In a study by Sanna et al. involving 323
SLE patients, the overall prevalence of neuro-
psychiatric manifestations was 57%.
12
Cerebrovascular disease and seizure disorder were
diagnosed in 14.5% and 8.3% of patients, respect-
ively. The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibo-
dies in this cohort was 39.3%. While
anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant
were detected in 27.5% and 11.8% of patients,
respectively, approximately 10% of patients had
both anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anti-
coagulant.
12
Cerebrovascular disease and seizure
Lupus vasculopathy
L Gonzalez-Suarez et al.
6
Lupus
at HINARI on January 24, 2014 lup.sagepub.com Downloaded from
XML Template (2014) [21.1.201411:26am] [17]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/LUPJ/Vol00000/140001/APPFile/SG-LUPJ140001.3d (LUP) [PREPRINTER stage]
disorder were independently and signicantly asso-
ciated with antiphospholipid antibodies. Therefore,
long-term anticoagulation has been recommended
for SLE patients with severe focal lesions of the
CNS such as vascular thrombosis associated with
antiphospholipid antibodies.
25
In a retrospective
observational study involving 26 patients with
neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE, plasma-
pheresis either alone or in conjunction with cyclo-
phosphamide led to improvement (74%) or
stabilization (13%) of the clinical status.
26
The
American Society for Apheresis has recommended
plasmapheresis in the treatment of severe SLE
involving the CNS as second-line therapy, either
as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with
other treatment modalities.
27
Our patient developed
a generalized tonic-clonic seizure as a result of acute
focal cerebral hemorrhage probably secondary to
cerebrovascular disease. She received plasma
exchange therapy as part of the therapeutic regimen
for her aggressive systemic disease. Considering the
hemorrhagic nature of the CNS lesion in our
patient, anticoagulation was delayed until four
weeks after presentation. No side eects related to
anticoagulation were noted.
Final diagnosis: lupus vasculopathy, lupus neph-
ritis, cardiomyopathy and acute focal cerebral hem-
orrhage in conjunction with lupus anticoagulant.
Funding
This research received no specic grant from any
funding agency in the public, commercial or not-
for-prot sectors.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References
1 Appel GB, Pirani CL, DAgati V. Renal vascular complications of
systemic lupus erythematosus. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 4:
14991515.
2 Seshan S. Lupus vasculopathy and vasculitis - what is the difference
and when do they occur? Pathology Case Reviews 2007; 12: 214221.
3 Descombes E, Droz D, Drouet L, et al. Renal vascular lesions in
lupus nephritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1997; 76: 355368.
4 Mubarak M, Nasri H. What nephrolopathologists need to know
about antiphospholipid syndrome-associated nephropathy: Is it
time for formulating a classification for renal morphologic lesions?
J Nephropathology 2014; 3: 48.
5 Grishman E, Venkataseshan VS. Vascular lesions in lupus neph-
ritis. Mod Pathol 1988; 1: 235241.
6 Wu LH, Yu F, Tan Y, et al. Inclusion of renal vascular lesions in
the 2003 ISN/RPS system for classifying lupus nephritis improves
renal outcome predictions. Kidney Int 2013; 83: 715723.
7 Banfi G, Bertani T, Boeri V, et al. Renal vascular lesions as a
marker of poor prognosis in patients with lupus nephritis.
Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Nefrite Lupica (GISNEL).
Am J Kidney Dis 1991; 18: 240248.
8 Klemperer P, Pollack A, Baehr G. Pathology of disseminated lupus
erythematosus. Arch Pathol 1941; 32: 569631.
9 Sung JM, Hsu SC, Chen FF, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus
presented as non-inflammatory necrotizing vasculopathy-induced
ischemic glomerulopathy and small vessels-related ischemic cardio-
myopathy. Lupus 2002; 11: 458462.
10 Ricklin D, Hajishengallis G, Yang K, et al. Complement: A key
system for immune surveillance and homeostasis. Nat Immunol
2010; 11: 785797.
11 Wu CT, Fu LS, Wen MC, et al. Lupus vasculopathy combined
with acute renal failure in lupus nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 2003;
18: 13041307.
12 Sanna G, Bertolaccini ML, Cuadrado MJ, et al. Neuropsychiatric
manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence and
association with antiphospholipid antibodies. J Rheumatol 2003;
30: 985992.
13 Baldwin DS, Gluck MC, Lowenstein J, et al. Lupus nephritis.
Clinical course as related to morphologic forms and their transi-
tions. Am J Med 1977; 62: 1230.
14 Ma AL, Lai WM, Chiu MC, et al. A girl with difficult lupus neph-
ritis: Lupus vasculopathy. Clin Exp Nephrol 2012; 16: 968972.
15 Wang J, Hu W, Xie H, et al. Induction therapies for class IV lupus
nephritis with non-inflammatory necrotizing vasculopathy:
Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide. Lupus
2007; 16: 707712.
16 Winters JL. Plasma exchange: Concepts, mechanisms, and an over-
view of the American Society for Apheresis guidelines. Hematology
Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012; 2012: 712.
17 Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Lan SP, et al. A controlled trial of
plasmapheresis therapy in severe lupus nephritis. The Lupus
Nephritis Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:
13731379.
18 Mistry-Burchardi N, Scho nermarck U, Samtleben W. Apheresis in
lupus nephritis. Ther Apher 2001; 5: 161170.
19 OCallaghan CA. Renal manifestations of systemic autoimmune
disease: Diagnosis and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
2004; 18: 411427.
20 Wakai S. [The criteria for indication of plasma exchange on lupus
nephritis]. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi 1990; 32: 703713.
21 Doria A, Iaccarino L, Sarzi-Puttini P, et al. Cardiac involvement in
systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2005; 14: 683686.
22 Jain D, Halushka MK. Cardiac pathology of systemic lupus ery-
thematosus. J Clin Pathol 2009; 62: 584592.
23 Khamashta MA, Cervera R, Asherson RA, et al. Association of
antibodies against phospholipids with heart valve disease in sys-
temic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 1990; 335: 15411544.
24 [No authors listed]. The American College of Rheumatology
nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syn-
dromes. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 599608.
25 Sanna G, Bertolaccini ML, Mathieu A. Central nervous system
lupus: A clinical approach to therapy. Lupus 2003; 12: 935942.
26 Neuwelt CM. The role of plasmapheresis in the treatment of severe
central nervous system neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythema-
tosus. Ther Apher Dial 2003; 7: 173182.
27 Szczepiorkowski ZM, Winters JL, Bandarenko N, et al.
Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice-
evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications
Committee of the American Society for Apheresis. J Clin Apher
2010; 25: 83177.
Lupus vasculopathy
L Gonzalez-Suarez et al.
7
Lupus
at HINARI on January 24, 2014 lup.sagepub.com Downloaded from