LING 610 Outside Reading Presentation Rubric Presenter: _______Robin__________

V
i
s
u
a
l

a
i
d
s
/
H
a
n
d
o
u
t
Were te !o"er!oint !resentation and andout !ro#essional loo$ing and use#ul% &id te' contain su##icient in#or(ation and/or data #or te
audience to #ollo" te (ain !oints%
Emerging Developing Exemplary Points
- Visual aids were not always clear/easy to
read (3)
- Visual aids contained some relevant
information (3)
- Visual aids were relatively easy to read and
understand (4)
- Visual aids contained mostly relevant
information gave t!e audience some
guidance to follow t!e main points (4)
- Visual aids appeared clear and professional were
easy to read and understand )*+
- Visual aids contained relevant information !elped
t!e audience to understand and follow t!e main
points )*+
10
"omments#
Very good visual aids $ nice incorporation of p!otos and t!e video (%itc!ell&s artwor' was (eautiful))
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
e
c

a
n
i
c
s
&id te Presenter s!ea$ loudl' and clearl' enoug to be eard b' te entire audience% Was te !resentation balanced and "ell ti(ed )i-e-.
su##icient ti(e gi/en to central issues/data. intro and conclusion $e!t sort and direct. $e!t to te ti(e li(it+%
Emerging Developing Exemplary Points
- Presenter was often difficult to !ear
(mum(led) (3)
- Presentation was not well timed (eit!er
too long or too s!ort) and/or t!e presenter
made poor use of time (3)
- Presenter was mostly clear (ut occasionally
difficult to !ear (4)
- Presentation was well timed (stuc' to time
limit) )0+
- Presenter was consistently clear and easy to
!ear )*+
- Presentation was well timed (stuc' to time limit)
t!e presenter used time wisely/efficiently and
covered relevant material well (*)
1
"omments#
+verall good mec!anics, (ut t!ere were some lengt!y moments (you went a little over a time $ some elements could !ave (een cut s!orter)-
O
r
g
a
n
i
2
a
t
i
o
n
/
3
l
a
r
i
t
'
Was te !resentation organi2ed in a "a' tat "as eas' to #ollo"/understand%
Emerging Developing Exemplary Points
- .!e presentation was sometimes difficult
to follow (3)
- /nformation was presented in a c!oppy
and unclear manner (3)
- .!e presentation was generally easy to
follow (4)
- /nformation was presented in a mostly
logical se0uence occasional c!oppiness (4)
- .!e presentation was clear and easy to follow )*+
- /nformation followed a logical se0uence )*+
10
"omments#
1ell-organi2ed presentation was overall clear and easy to follow
3
o
n
t
e
n
t
&id te Presenter dis!la' ade4uate $no"ledge o# te to!ic% )&id s/e a!!ear to $no" "at s/e "as tal$ing about%+ &uring te discussion. did te
Presenter ade4uatel' and res!ect#ull' engage audience 4uestions/co((ents%
Emerging Developing Exemplary Points
- Presenter sometimes appeared uncertain
a(out t!e su(3ect matter (4)
- Presenter was a(le to address some
0uestions and did not lin' t!e outside
reading to re0uired readings (4)
-Presenter appeared generally 'nowledgea(le
a(out t!e su(3ect matter )5+
- Presenter was a(le to address most
0uestions, and made only one or two
connections (etween t!e outside and re0uired
readings (5)
- Presenter demonstrated extensive 'nowledge of
t!e su(3ect matter )10+
- Presenter was a(le to address all 0uestions and
made several connections (etween t!e outside and
re0uired readings )10+
11
"omments#
6ood explanation of 7eading/1riting 1or's!op, (ut / was unclear on a few details (suc! as !ow t!e partners!ip was set up during t!e writing wor's!op)- 8ou did
a very good 3o( drawing connections wit! our previous readings (e-g-, %oll et al- and +xford)
6otal Points: _05_/*0