Four weeks ago today I wrote to you to inform you of the investigation into the "cash for questions" affair. I enclosed with my letter a dedicated copy of my book Trial by Conspiracy telling the story of our investigation. The purpose of my letter was to bring to your attention: a) our investigation; b) the importance of our investigation; and c) the merit of our investigation.
Four weeks ago today I wrote to you to inform you of the investigation into the "cash for questions" affair. I enclosed with my letter a dedicated copy of my book Trial by Conspiracy telling the story of our investigation. The purpose of my letter was to bring to your attention: a) our investigation; b) the importance of our investigation; and c) the merit of our investigation.
Four weeks ago today I wrote to you to inform you of the investigation into the "cash for questions" affair. I enclosed with my letter a dedicated copy of my book Trial by Conspiracy telling the story of our investigation. The purpose of my letter was to bring to your attention: a) our investigation; b) the importance of our investigation; and c) the merit of our investigation.
Director-General, BBC BBC Media Centre 201 Wood Lane London W12 7TQ 21 February 2006 “CASH FOR QUESTIONS”: THE UNREPORTED SIDE OF A MAJOR POLITICAL CONTROVERY Dear Mr. Thompson. Four weeks ago today I wrote to you to inform you of the investigation into the "cash for questions" affair conducted by my colleague Malcolm Keith-Hill and myself exposing how The Guardian perverted the course of the official parliamentary inquiry into the affair through the submission of forged documents and by lying in oral testimony and written statements. I enclosed with my letter a dedicated copy of my book Trial by Conspiracy telling the story of our investigation; plus a CD containing my letter of complaint of March 2004 to your predecessor Mark Byford together with the hyperlinked indexes and documents making up the bound appendices that supported it, namely: one containing written endorsements of our work by people of standing including BBC staff, plus two others containing documents outlining nine news events and over thirty press articles publicising our work over the last eight years. The purpose of my letter was to two-fold: firstly, to bring to your attention: a) our investigation; b) the importance of our investigation; c) the merit of our investigation; d) the controversy in the national press caused by our investigation; e) the many news events publicising our investigation; and f) the BBC's censorship to date of our investigation and the evidence we unearthed from its national news bulletins. Secondly, to request that you instigate an assessment of the merits of our research as a first step to the BBC broadcasting news about it commensurate with its status. However I have not yet received your response. Accordingly I enclose with this letter a replication of my first package, including a second dedicated copy of my book. I look forward to your reply.