ABB Group

August 14, 2014 | Slide 1

Thermowell Calculation Guide
In accordance with ASME PTC 19.3
TW-2010
Andrew Dunbabin March 2012

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 2
Introduction
ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010 was written to replace ASME PTC 19.3-1974 following
some catastrophic failures in non-steam service, these thermowells passed
the criteria laid out in 1974.

The 2010 standard includes significant advances in the knowledge of
thermowell behaviour. ASME PTC TW-2010 evaluates thermowell suitability
new and improved calculations including:
Various thermowell designs including stepped thermowells
Thermowell material properties
Detailed process information
Review of the acceptable limit for frequency ratio
Steady-state, dynamic and pressure stress
Failure of a thermowell

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 3
In 1995 a thermowell failed in the secondary coolant loop of
the Monju fast breeder reactor in Japan.
The failure closed the plant for 15 years
The thermowell was designed to ASME PTC 19.3 1974
The failure was found to be due to the drag resonance induced
on the thermowell by the liquid sodium coolant

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 4
Stresses on a Thermowell

Thermowells protect temperature sensors from direct contact with a
process fluid. But once inserted into the process, the thermowell can
obstruct flow around it, leading to a drop in pressure. This
phenomenon creates low pressure vortices downstream of the
thermowell.
These vortices occur at one side of the
thermowell and then the other, which is
known as alternating vortex shedding. This
effect can be seen in the example of a flag pole
rippling a flag in the wind

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 5
Frequency Ratio
Vortex shedding causes the
thermowell to vibrate.
If this vortex shedding rate (f
s
)
matches the natural frequency
(f
n
c
) of the thermowell, resonance
occurs, and dynamic bending
stress on the thermowell greatly
increases
The vortex shedding rate for the drag and lift must be calculated. The in-line frequency
(parallel to flow) is 2x the transverse frequency.

Forces created by the fluid in the Y plane (in-line with flow) are called drag and
forces created in the X plane (transverse to flow) are called lift
X
Y
Flow Direction
Induced Frequencies
Where the induced frequency meets the natural frequency of the thermowell the amplitude of
vibration increases rapidly
The drag frequency induced is twice that of the lift frequency induced.
As such it meets the natural frequency of the thermowell at half the fluid velocity of the lift
induced frequency
The drag forces are smaller than the lift forces and under certain special conditions may not
be significant.

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 6
Resonance lock in
Both lift and drag resonance tends to lock in on the
natural frequency
The low damping of thermowells exaggerates this effect


ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 7
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

F
n
Nominal lock-in
range
In line (drag) excitation
Transverse (lift)
Fluid velocity
Frequency Ratio Limit
The frequency ratio (f
s
/ f
n
c
) is the ratio between the vortex shedding rate and the
installed natural frequency. In the old standard, the frequency ratio limit was set
to 0.8. This was to avoid the critical resonance caused by the transverse (lift)
forces

The transverse
resonance band is
above the 0.8 limit
Following the inclusion of the in-
line (drag) forces, a second
resonance band may also need to
be avoided
Frequency Ratio Limit
The frequency limit ratio
is set at either 0.4 or 0.8.
The criteria for which
limit to use is defined in
ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010
and the theory is
simplified below. This is
the theory used in the
calculation and should
not be estimated
without carrying out the
full evaluation.

Thermowell stress location
The thermowell is an unsupported beam and as such the
stresses concentrate at the root of the stem

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 10
Thermowells; when to perform a calculation
A thermowell can be considered to
be at negligible risk if the following
criteria are met:
Process fluid velocity is less
than 0.64 m/s
Wall thickness is 9.55 mm or
more
Unsupported length is 610 mm
or less
Root and tip diameter are 12.7
mm or more
Maximum allowable stress is
69 Mpa or more
Fatigue endurance limit is 21
Mpa or more
For all other conditions it is advised
that a calculation is performed

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 11
Thermowells; Assumptions and limits
A number of assumptions are made in the
standard:
Surface finish of the thermowell will
be 32 Ra or better
The thermowell is solid drilled
There is no welding on the stem of
the thermowell (other than the
attachment to the flange)
That the flange rating and attachment
are in compliance with established
standards .
That the thermowell is within the
dimension limits given in the standard
(table 4-1-1 and 4-2-1)
That any corrosion or erosion is
allowed for


ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 12
Thermowell; the pass criteria
There are four criteria for a
thermowell to pass evaluation to
PTC 19.3 TW-2010
Frequency limit: the resonance
frequency of the thermowell shall
be sufficiently high so that
destructive oscillations are not
excited by the fluid flow
Dynamic stress limit: the
maximum primary dynamic stress
shall not exceed the allowable
fatigue stress limit
Static stress limit: the maximum
steady-state stress on the
thermowell shall not exceed the
allowable stress, determined by the
Von Mises criteria
Hydrostatic pressure limit: the
external pressure shall not exceed
the pressure ratings of the
thermowell tip, shank and flange
All four of the criteria need to be
evaluated and all four need to be
passed.

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 13

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 14
Introduction to ABBs Wake Frequency
Calculation

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 15
Thermowell Types
STR/THREAD
STR/SW STR/FLG STR/VAN STR/WELD
TAP/THREAD TAP/SW TAP/FLG TAP/VAN TAP/WELD
STEP/THREAD STEP/SW STEP/FLG STEP/VAN STEP/WELD
KEY: STR = STRAIGHT; TAP = TAPERED; STEP = STEPPED
THREAD = THREADED; SW = SOCKET WELD; FLG = FLANGED;
VAN = VAN STONE; WELD = WELD-IN

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 16
Dimension Details


Note:
L
s
and b
s
are only applicable for step-shank thermowells


ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 17
Calculation Report
Project and client details from the
Front Page are shown here
Input data from the Data Entry
sheet is pulled through here
including the thermowell type
and material details
The calculated results are shown
in either Metric or Imperial units
as selected on the Front Page
Thermowell Suitability is the key
information
The reason for suitability failure
can be found in the comments
section

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 18
When a Calculation Fails
If a thermowell fails the evaluation, the design can be changed in the
following ways:
Shorten the thermowell to reduce the unsupported length
Increase the thickness of the thermowell (A and B)
A velocity collar can be added to reduce the unsupported length although
this is not generally recommended. A velocity collar is used to provide a
rigid support to the thermowell and will work only if there is an
interference fit between the standoff wall and the collar.
Care must be taken to ensure the collar meets the standoff wall at
installation and is not affected by corrosion. If a velocity collar is the
only viable solution, it is the responsibility of the operator to ensure
there is an interference fit between the standoff wall and the velocity
collar.

ABB Group
August 14, 2014 | Slide 19