Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tax
Tax
GENERAL PRINCIPLES 1
INCOME TAXATION 26
............................................................................................................................. Annexes to Income Tax 99
TRANSFER TAXES 116
........................................................................................................................................... Estate Taxes 116
......................................................................................................................................... Donors Taxes 129
VALUE-ADDED TAX 133
........................................................................................... Amendments to Value-Added Tax (Annex) 144
TARIFF AND CUSTOMS CODE 147
.............................................................................................................. Annexes to Tariff and Customs 159
TAX REMEDIES UNDER THE NIRC 164
...................................................................................................... Related Revenue Regulations (Annex) 195
LOCAL TAXATION 205
......... Specific Provisions on The Taxing and Other Revenue-Raising Powers of Local Government Units 223
COURT OF TAX APPEALS 226
............................................................................................................ Taxpayer Bill of Rights (Annex) 234
This is the Intellectual Property
of the San Beda College of Law 2008 Centralized Bar Operations.
Unauthorized use and reproduction of this material is not allowed.
TAXATION LAW
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Power of Taxation
TAXATION. defined. power by which the
sovereign through its law-making body raises
revenue to defray the necessary expenses of the
government. It is a way of apportioning the costs
of the government among those who in some
measure are privileged to enjoy its benefits and
must bear its burdens.
Nature of the Taxing Power (ILL)
1. It is an inherent attribute of sovereignty
t he power of t axat i on i s i nherent i n
sovereignty as an incident or attribute thereof,
being essential to the existence of every
government. It exi sts apart from the
constitution and without being expressly
conferred by the people.
BASIS OF TAXATION (Lifeblood Theory)
The power of taxation is essential because
the government can neither exist nor endure
without taxation. Taxes are the lifeblood of the
government and their prompt and certain
availability is an imperious need (Bull vs. United
States G.R. No.5270, Jan.15, 1910). The collection
of taxes must be made without hindrance if
the state is to maintain its orderly existence.
The governments ability to serve and protect
the people depends largely upon taxes. Taxes
are what we pay for a civilized society (CIR vs.
Algue, G.R.No 28896 Feb. 17, 1988).
POWER OF TAXATION EXERCISED
The power of taxation is sometimes called the
power to destroy. Therefore it should be
exercised with caution to minimize injury to
the propriety rights of a taxpayer. It must be
exercised fairly, equally, and uniformly, lest
the tax collector kill the hen that lays the
golden egg. And in order to maintain the
general publics trust and confidence in the
Government this power must be used justly
and not treacherously. It does not conform to
the sense of justice for the Government to
persuade the taxpayer to lend it a helping
hand and later on to penalize him for duly
answering the urgent call.
THEORIES ON TAXATION
Necessity Theory
Taxes proceed upon the theory that the
existence of the government is a necessity;
that it cannot continue without the means to
pay its expenses; and that for those means, it
San Beda College of Law 1
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
VISMARCK UY over-all chair, APRIL CABEZA chair academics operations, ALDEAN LIM chair hotel operations,
AYN SARSABA vice chair for operations, ANTHONY PURGANAN vice chair for academics,
RONALD JOHN DECANO vice chair for secretariat, KARLA FUNTILA vice chair for finance,
JEFFREY GALLARDO vice chair for edp, ULYSSES GONZALES vice chair for logistics
TAXATION LAW
IRIS VICTORIA MERIN subject chair
MARK JULIUS ESTUR assistant chair
DICT V. UNTAYAO edp
MARIEL MAILOM general principles, MAUREEN ROSE OBON income taxation, MARK JULIUS ESTUR estate
taxation, MINERVA JIMENEZ donors tax and court of tax appeals, MARK ANTHONY DIZON, value added tax,
ARLENE ALDAY and NELSON SALVA JR. tax remedies, MAUREEN SEYMOUR JAVIER local taxation and real
property taxation, JULIUS BABALCON tariff and customs code, ROWENA MUTIA tables and annexes
MEMBERS: Maria Evitha Abante, Aldren Abrigo, Herbert Abugan, Julian Adarlo, James Agustin, Karren Amparo,
Mary Joy Aquino, Aileen Artificio, Ray John Bangi, Jennifer Bautista, Vincent Cablao, Raul Canon, Jay Martin Celzo, John
Ray Concepcion, Maureen De Castro, Ramon Alfredo Dela Cruz, Karla Funtila, Kathryn Joy Hautea, Irene May Junio,
Erwin Legaspi, Precious Angela Lledo, Micael Ortiz Luis, Katherine Jane Manarang, Masha Mariano, Leonardo Mendoza
II, Joanne Mosquera, Sol Pejo, Ryan Pingol, Donelle Jay Quilates, Diana Rabanal, Mariflor Reyes, Deepee Salazar, Ralph
Jerome Salvador, John Zernan Sambahon, Lauren Rose Tanyag, Maria Joy Toledo, Jan Reiner Uy, Jennylyn Valencia,
Cristiellane Valerio and Sherwin P. Pascua
has a right to compel all citizens and property
within its limits to contribute.
Taxation is a power emanating from necessity.
It is a necessary burden to preserve the
State's sovereignty and a means to give the
citizenry an army to resist an aggression, a
navy to defend its shores from invasion, a
corps of civil servants to serve, public
improvements designed for the enjoyment of
the citizenry and those which come within the
State's territory, and facilities and protection
which a government is supposed to provide.
(Phil. Guaranty Co., Inc. vs. CIR G.R. No.22074, Apr.
30, 1965)
Benefits-Protection/Reciprocity Theory
The power of the State to demand and
receive taxes is based on the reciprocal
duties of support and protection. The citizen
supports the State by paying the portion from
his property that is demanded in order that he
may, by means thereof, be secured in the
enjoyment of the benefits of an organized
society.
Thi s theory spawned the Doctri ne of
Symbiotic Relationship (CIR vs. Algue, G.R. No.
28896 Feb. 17, 1988) Every person who is able
must contribute his share in the burden of
running the government. The government for
its part is expected to respond in the form of
tangible and intangible benefits intended to
improve the lives of the people and enhance
their material and moral values.
2. It is legislative in character such power is
exclusively vested in the legislature except
when the Constitution provides otherwise.
This is based upon the principle that taxes
are a grant of the people who are taxed, and
the grant must be made by the immediate
representatives of the people. And where the
people have laid the power, there it must be
exercised. (Cooley)
SCOPE OF LEGISLATIVE TAXING POWER
(PAPKASM)
1. Person, property, occupation, excises or
privileges to be taxed provided they are
within the taxing jurisdiction. The taxing
authority can select the subjects of
taxation.
2. Amount or rate of tax
3. Purposes for which taxes shall be levied
provided they are for public purposes
4. Kind of tax to be collected
5. Apportionment of the tax (whether the tax
shall be general or limited to a particular
locality or partly general and partly local)
6. Situs of taxation
7. Method of collection
IS THE POWER TO TAX THE POWER TO
DESTROY?
Marshall laid down the rule that the Power to
tax is the power to destroy. According to
Cooley, this is because such power includes
the power to regulate even to the extent of
prohibition or destruction. Cooley also
emphasized that this should be used to
describe not the purposes for which the taxing
power may be utilized but the degree of vigor
with which the taxing power may be employed
in order to raise revenue.
According to Justice Cruz, the power to tax
includes the power to destroy if it is used
validly as an implement of the police power in
di scouragi ng and i n effect, ul ti matel y
prohibiting certain things or enterprises
inimical to the public welfare. But where the
power to tax is used solely for the purpose of
raising revenues, the modern view is that it
cannot be allowed to confiscate or destroy.
According to Holmes, the Power to tax is not
the power to destroy while the Supreme Court
sits because of the constitutional restraints
placed on a taxing power that violate
fundamental rights. Although the power to tax
is almost unlimited, it must not be exercised in
an arbitrary manner. If the abuse is so great
so as to destroy the natural and fundamental
rights of the people, it is the duty of the
judiciary to hold such an act unconstitutional.
POWER OF JUDI CI AL REVI EW I N
TAXATION
As long as the legislature, in imposing a tax,
does not violate applicable constitutional
limitations or restrictions, it is not within the
province of the courts to inquire into the
wisdom or policy of the exaction, the motives
behind it, the amount to be raised or the
persons, property or other privileges to be
taxed.
The courts power in taxation is limited only to
the application and interpretation of the law.
3. I t i s subj ect to consti tuti onal and
inherent limitations.
2 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
Purposes and Objectives of Taxation
1. Revenue to raise funds or property to
enable the State to promote the general
welfare and protection of its citizens.
2. Non-Revenue (PR2EP)
a. Promotion of general welfare
b. Regulation
c. Reduction of social inequality possible
through progressive system of taxation
where the object is to prevent the undue
concentration of wealth in the hands of a
few individuals.
d. Encourage economi c growth by
granting incentives or exemptions in order
to encourage investments
e. Protectionism taxes sometimes provide
prot ect i on t o l ocal i ndust ri es l i ke
protective tariffs and custom duties
Taxation distinguished from Police Power
and Eminent Domain
TAXATION
POLICE
POWER
EMINENT
DOMAIN
Purpose
To raise
revenue
To promote
public welfare
through
regulations
To facilitate
the taking of
private
property for
public use
Amount of Exaction
No limit Limited to the
cost of
regulation,
issuance of
the license or
surveillance
No exaction
but private
property is
taken by the
State for
public purpose
Benefits received
No special or
direct benefit
is received by
the taxpayer
merely
general
benefit of
protection
No direct
benefit is
received; a
healthy
economic
standard of
society is
attained
A direct benefit
results in the
form of just
compensation
to the property
owner
Non-impairment of Contracts
Contracts
may not be
impaired
Contracts
may be
impaired
Contracts may
be impaired
Transfer of Property Rights
Taxes paid
become part
of public
funds
No transfer
but only
restraint in its
exercise
Transfer is
effected in
favor of the
State
Scope
All persons,
property and
excises
All persons,
property,
rights and
privileges
Only upon a
particular
property
Aspects of Taxation
1. Levy or imposition of the tax (tax legislation)
enactment of tax laws or statutes; includes
the determination of the persons, property or
excises to be taxed, the sum or sums to be
raised, the due date thereof and the time and
manner of levying and collecting taxes.
2. Enforcement or tax administration (tax
administration) collection of taxes already
levied. Collection (including assessment)
consists of the manner of enforcement of the
obligation on the part of those who are taxed.
Basic Principles of A Sound Tax System
/Canons of Taxation (FAT)
1. Fiscal Adequacy sources of government
r evenue must be suf f i ci ent t o meet
government expenditures and other public
needs.
2. Administrative Feasibility tax laws must
be capable of being effectively enforced.
3. Theoretical Justice a sound tax system
must be based on the taxpayers ability to pay
(Ability to Pay Theory). Our laws mandate
that taxes must be reasonable, fair, just, and
conscionable. The Constitution provides that
taxation must be uniform and equitable and
that the State must evolve a progressive
system of taxation.
San Beda College of Law 3
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Taxes
DEFINITION: enforced proportional contributions
from the persons and property levied by the law-
making body of the State by virtue of its
sovereignty for the support of government and for
public needs.
E S S E N T I A L C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S
(ATTRIBUTES) OF A TAX (SLEP4)
1. It is levied by the state which has jurisdiction
over the person or property
2. It is levied by the law making (legislative)
body of the state
3. It is an enforced contribution not dependent
on the will of the person taxed, not a contract
but a positive act of the government
4. It is generally payable in money
5. It is proportionate in character taxes must
be based on ability to pay in accordance with
the constitutional mandate to Congress to
evolve a progressive system of taxation
6. It is levied on persons and property
7. It is levied for public purpose/s
REQUISITES OF A VALID TAX (JAPUL)
1. That either the person or property taxed be
within the jurisdiction of the taxing authority
2. That the assessment and collection of certain
kinds of taxes guarantee against injustice to
individuals, especially by providing notice and
opportunity for hearing
3. Should be for a public purpose
4. The rule of taxation shall be uniform
5. The tax must not impinge on the inherent and
Constitutional limitations on the power of
taxation
CLASSIFICATION OF TAXES
1. As to subject matter or object:
a. Personal, poll or capitation tax of a
fixed amount imposed upon persons
residing within a specified territory,
whether citizens or not, without regard to
their property, occupation or business in
whi ch they may be engaged (ex.
Community tax).
b. Property tax imposed on property,
whether real or personal, in proportion
ei ther to i ts val ue or some other
reasonable rule of apportionment (ex.
Real estate tax).
c. Excise or Privilege charge imposed
upon the performance of an act, the
enjoyment of a privilege or engaging in an
occupation, profession or business (ex.
Donors tax).
2. As to who bears the burden:
a. Direct tax which is demanded from the
person who also shoulders the burden of
the tax; the taxpayer is directly or
primarily liable which he cannot shift to
another. Both the incidence (liability) for
the payment of the tax as well as the
impact (burden) of the tax falls on the
same person. (i.e. Income tax).
b. Indirect tax wherein the incidence or
liability for the payment falls on one
person but the burden can be shifted or
passed on to another (ex. VAT).
3. As to purpose:
a. General, fiscal or revenue tax
imposed for the general or ordinary
purposes of the Government, to raise
revenue for governmental needs (ex.
income tax)
b. Special or regulatory tax imposed for
a special purpose, to achieve some social
or economic ends irrespective of whether
revenue is actually raised or not (ex.
customs duties)
4. As to determination of amount:
a. Specific tax of a fixed amount imposed
by the head or number or by some
standard of weight or measurement; it
requires no valuation other than a listing
or classification of the objects to be taxed.
b. Ad Valorem (Value) tax of a fixed
portion of the value of the property with
respect to which the tax is assessed; it
requires the intervention of assessors or
appraisers to estimate the value of such
property before the amount due from
each taxpayer can be determined.
5. As to taxing authority:
a. National levied by the National
Government
b. Local levied by the local government
6. As to rate:
a. Progressive or graduated taxes
whereby the tax rate increases as the tax
base or bracket increases.
b. Regressive taxes whereby the tax rate
decreases as the tax base increases.
4 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
c. Proportionate based on a fixed
percentage of the amount of the property,
receipts or other basis to be taxed.
TAXES DISTINGUISHED FROM OTHER
IMPOSITIONS
Tax and Special Assessment
Imposed on persons,
property and excises
Levied only on land
Personal liability
attaches on the
person assessed in
case of non-payment
Cannot be made a personal
liability of the person
assessed
Not based on any
special or direct
benefit
Based wholly on benefit
Levied and paid
annually
Exceptional both as to time
and locality
Exemption granted by
Art. VI, Sec 28 (3) of
the 1987 Constitution
is applicable
Exemption does not apply.
N.B. If property is exempt
from Real Property Tax, it is
also exempt from Special
Assessment.
Tax and License Fee
Based on the power
of taxation
Emanates from police power
The purpose is to
generate revenue
The purpose is regulatory
Amount is unlimited Amount is limited to the cost
of (1) issuing the license,
and (2) inspection and
surveillance
Normally paid after
the start of a business
Normally paid before
commencement of business
Taxes, being the
lifeblood of the State,
cannot be
surrendered except
for lawful
consideration
License fee may be with or
without consideration
Non-payment does
not make the
business illegal but
may be a ground for
criminal prosecution
Non-payment makes the
business illegal
Tax and Debt
An obligation imposed
by law
Created by contract
Due to the
government in its
sovereign capacity
May be due to the
government but in its
corporate capacity
Payable in money Payable in money, property
or services
Does not draw
interest except in
case of delinquency
Draws interest if stipulated
or delayed
Not assignable Assignable
Not subject to
compensation or set-
off
Subject to compensation or
set-off
TAXES DISTINGUISHED FROM OTHER
IMPOSITIONS
Non-payment is
punished by
imprisonment except
in poll tax
No imprisonment in case of
non-payment (Art. III, Sec.
20 1987 Constitution)
Imposed only by
public authority
Can be imposed by private
individual
Tax and Toll
Enforced proportional
contributions from
persons and property
A sum of money for the use
of something, a
consideration which is paid
for the use of a property
which is of a public nature;
e.g. road, bridge
A demand of
sovereignty
A demand of proprietorship
No limit as to the
amount of tax
Amount of toll depends upon
the cost of construction or
maintenance of the public
improvement used
Imposed only by the
State
May be imposed by:
1. Government
2. Private individuals or
entities
Tax and Penalty
Enforced proportional
contributions from
persons and property
Sanction imposed as a
punishment for violation of a
law or acts deemed
injurious; violation of tax
laws may give rise to
imposition of penalty
Intended to raise
revenue
Designed to regulate
conduct
May be imposed only
by the government
May be imposed by:
(1) Government
(2) Private individuals or
entities
Tax and Tariff
All embracing term to
include various kinds
of enforced
contributions upon
persons for the
attainment of public
purposes
A kind of tax imposed on
articles which are traded
internationally
Tax and Compromise Penalty
Basic imposition on
persons, property and
excises
Collected as a compromise
in cases involving violations
of the Tax Code, rules or
regulations.
Tax and Subsidy
Levied by the law-
making body of the
State for the support
of the government
and for public needs.
A legislative grant of money
in aid of a private enterprise
deemed to promote the
public welfare.
Tax and Revenue
A source of revenue
of the government.
A broad term that includes
not only taxes but income
from other sources as well.
San Beda College of Law 5
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
COMPENSATION OR SETOFF OF TAXES
General Rule: Taxes cannot be the subject of
compensation or set-off because the government
and the taxpayer are not creditors and debtors of
each other. Obligations in the nature of debts are
due to the government in its corporate capacity
while taxes are due to the government in its
sovereign capacity. (Philex Mining vs. CIR CTA Case
No.5200 Aug.21, 1998)
Exceptions:
1. Solutio Indebiti Compensation takes place
by operation of law, where the government
and the taxpayer are in their own right
reciprocally debtors and creditors of each
other, and that the debts are both due and
demandable. This is in consequence of
Articles 1278 and 1279 of the Civil Code.
(Domingo vs. Garlitos G.R. No. 18994, June 29, 1963)
2. If the case involves local government
taxes.
Doctrine of Equitable Recoupment where the
refund of a tax illegally or erroneously collected or
overpaid by a taxpayer is barred by prescription, a
tax presently being assessed against a taxpayer
may be recouped or setoff against the tax whose
refund is now barred by prescription. (UST vs.
Collector G.R. No. 570 June 23, 1953)
The doctrine is NOT followed in the Philippines
because of the lifeblood theory.
TAXPAYERS SUIT
A case where the act complained of directly
involves the illegal disbursement of public funds
derived from taxation. (Justice Melo, dissenting in
Kilosbayan, Inc vs. Guingona, Jr. G.R.No. 113375, May 5,
1994)
Taxpayers have locus standi for they are parties in
interest to be prejudiced or benefited by the avails
of the suit but not if executive acts do not involve
the use of public funds. (Gonzales vs. Marcos G.R. No.
21897 Oct. 22, 1963)
The plaintiff in a taxpayers suit is in a different
category from the plaintiff in a citizens suit. In the
former, the plaintiff is affected by the expenditure
of public funds, while in the latter, plaintiff is but
the mere instrument of the public concern. (David
vs. Macapagal-Arroyo 489 SCRA 160)
REQUISITES FOR TAXPAYERS SUIT
1. The tax money is being extracted and spent in
violation of specific Constitutional protections
against abuses of legislative power;
2. That public money is being deflected to any
improper purpose (Pascual vs. Secretary of Public
Works G.R.No.10405 Dec. 29, 1960); and
3. That the peti ti oner seeks to restrai n
respondents from wasting public funds
through the enforcement of an invalid or
unconstitutional law.
Inherent Limitations
These proceed from the very nature of the taxing
power itself. These are: (SPINE)
1. territoriality or situs of taxation
2. public purpose
3. international comity
4. non-delegability of the taxing power and
5. tax exemptions of the government.
1. TERRITORIALITY OR SITUS OF TAXATION
Situs of taxation is the place or authority
that has the right to impose and collect taxes
(CIR vs. Marubeni Corp. G.R. No. 137377 Dec. 18,
2001). The state where the subject to be taxed
has a situs may rightfully levy and collect the
tax. The situs is necessarily in the state
which has jurisdiction or which exercises
dominion over the subject in question.
General Rule: A state may not tax
property lying outside its borders or lay an
excise or privilege tax upon the exercise or
enjoyment of a right or privilege derived from
the laws of another state and therein
exercised or enjoyed (51 Am. Jur. 87-88). Tax
laws do not operate beyond the jurisdictional
limits of a country.
Reasons:
a. Taxation is an act of sovereignty which
could only be exercised within a countrys
territorial limits.
b. This is the result of the concept that taxes
are paid for the protection and services
provided by the taxing authority which
could not be provided outside the
territorial boundaries of the taxing state.
Factors that determine the situs
a. Kind or classification of the tax being
levied
b. Situs of the thing or property taxed
c. Citizenship of the taxpayer
d. Residence of the taxpayer
e. Source of the income taxed
f. Situs of the excise, privilege, business or
occupation being taxed
Situs of the Subject of Tax
6 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
a. Persons poll, capitation or community
taxes are based upon the residence of
the taxpayer, regardless of the source of
income or location of the property of the
taxpayer.
b. Property
1) Real property Real estate is
subject to taxation only in the state
where it is located whether the owner
is a resident or non-resident (51 Am.
Jur. 458). This is the principle of lex rei
sitei.
Reasons:
a) The taxing authority has control
because of the stationary and
fixed character of the property.
b) The pl ace wher e t he r eal
pr oper t y i s si t uat ed gi ves
protection to the real property,
hence the property or its owner
should support the government
of that place.
2) Tangible personal property the
modern rule is that it is taxable in the
state where it has actual situs; where
it is physically located although the
owner resides in another jurisdiction
(51 Am. Jur. 467).
Reason: The pl ace where the
tangible personal property is found
gives it protection.
3) Intangible Personal Property
General Rule: The situs is at the
domicile of the owner. This is in
accordance with the principle of
mobilia sequuntur personam or
movables follow the person.
Exceptions:
a) When the property has acquired
a business situs in another
jurisdiction; or
b) When the law provides for the
situs of the subject of tax;
Example: For purposes of estate
and donors taxes, the following
intangible properties are deemed
to have a situs in the Philippines:
(a) Franchise which must be
exercised in the Philippines;
(b) Shares, obligations or bonds
issued by any corporation
organized or constituted in
t h e P h i l i p p i n e s i n
accordance with its laws;
(c) Shares, obligations or bonds
by any foreign corporation
eighty-five percent (85%) of
the business of which is
located in the Philippines;
(d) Shares, obligations or bonds
i ssued by any f or ei gn
corporation if such shares,
obligations or bonds have
acquired a business situs in
the Philippines; and
(e) Shares or rights in any
partnership, business or
industry established in the
Philippines (Sec. 104, NIRC)
4) Income Factors that determine the
situs of income tax:
a. Nationality or citizenship of the
taxpayer;
b. Residence or domicile of the
taxpayer; and
c. Source of the income
General Principles of Income
Taxation in the Philippines
Except when otherwise provided in
this Code:
a. A citizen of the Philippines
residing therein is taxable on all
income derived from sources
w i t h i n a n d w i t h o u t t h e
Philippines;
b. A nonresident citizen is taxable
only on income derived from
sources within the Philippines;
c. An individual citizen of the
Philippines who is working and
deriving income from abroad as
an overseas contract worker is
taxable only on income derived
f r o m s o u r c e s wi t h i n t h e
Philippines: Provided, That a
seaman who is a citizen of the
Philippines and who receives
compensat i on f or ser vi ces
rendered abroad as a member of
the complement of a vessel
e n g a g e d e x c l u s i v e l y i n
i nternati onal trade shal l be
treated as an overseas contract
worker;
d. An alien individual, whether a
resident or not of the Philippines,
is taxable only on income derived
f r o m s o u r c e s wi t h i n t h e
Philippines;
e. A domestic corporation is taxable
on all income derived from
sources within and without the
Philippines; and
f. A foreign corporation, whether
engaged or not in trade or
San Beda College of Law 7
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
business in the Philippines, is
taxable only on income derived
f r o m s o u r c e s wi t h i n t h e
Philippines. (Sec. 23 NIRC)
5) Excise or Privilege the power to
levy an excise upon the performance
of an act or the engaging in an
occupation does not depend upon the
domicile of the person subject to the
excise nor upon the physical location
of the property and in connection with
the act or occupation taxed, but
depends upon the place wherein the
act is performed or occupation
engaged in (Allied Thread vs. City Mayor of
Manila G.R. No.40296 Nov. 21, 1984)
6) Gr a t ui t ous Tr a ns f e r t h e
transmission of property from a donor
to a donee or from a decedent to his
heirs may be subject to taxation in
the state where the transferor is
(was) a citizen or resident, or where
the property is located.
2. PUBLIC OR GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSE -
purpose affecting the inhabitants of the state
or taxing district as a community and not
merely as individuals and is designed to
support the services of government for some
of the recognized objects of the country.
Tests in Determining Public Purpose
a. Duty Test whether the thing to be
furthered by the appropriation of public
revenue is something which is the duty of
the State as a government to provide.
b. Promotion of General Welfare Test
whether the proceeds of the tax will
directly promote the welfare of the
community in equal measure.
3. INTERNATIONAL COMITY
The property or income of a foreign state or
government may not be the subject of
taxation by another.
Reasons:
a. In par parem non habet imperium. As
between equals there is no sovereign.
(Doctrine of Sovereign Equality)
b. The rule of international law that a foreign
government may not be sued without its
consent so that it is useless to impose a
tax which could not be collected.
c. The concept that when a forei gn
sovereign enters the territorial jurisdiction
of another, it does not subject itself to the
jurisdiction of the other.
4. NON-DELEGABILITY OF THE TAXING
POWER
General Rule: The power of taxation being
purely legislative, Congress cannot delegate
the power to others. This limitation arises from
the doctrine of separation of powers among
the three branches of government.
Exceptions:
a. Delegation to the President The
Constitution expressly allows Congress to
authorize the President to fix within
specified limits and subject to such
limitations and restrictions as it may
impose, tariff rates, import or export
quotas, tonnage and wharfage dues and
other duties or imposts. (Sec. 28 [2] Art. VI)
b. Delegation to local governments
Each local government unit shall have the
power to create its own sources of
revenues and to levy taxes, fees and
charges subject to such guidelines and
limitations as the Congress may provide,
consistent with the basic policy of local
autonomy. Such taxes, fees and charges
shall accrue exclusively to the local
government (Sec. 5 Art. X, 1987 Constitution)
c. Delegation to administrative agencies
also known as the power of subordinate
legislation. The delegation must comply
with the completeness test and the
existence of sufficiently determinate
standards test (Pelaez vs. Auditor General G.R.
No. 23825 Dec. 24, 1965.) It should only be
f o r t a x a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o r
implementation.
Non-delegable legislative powers
(cannot be delegated to administrative
agencies):
1. Selection of the property to be taxed
2. Determination of the purposes for
which taxes shall be levied
3. Fixing of the rate of taxation
4. Rules of taxation in general (1 Cooley
196)
IS THE POWER GRANTED TO THE
PRESIDENT TO INCREASE THE VAT RATE TO
12% under RA 9337, AN UNDUE DELEGATION
OF POWER?
NO. It is not a delegation of legislative power. It is
simply a delegation of ascertainment of facts upon
which enforcement and administration of the
increase rate under the law is contingent. No
discretion will be exercised by the president. Thus,
it is a ministerial duty of the President to
immediately impose the 12% rate upon the
existence of any of the conditions specified by the
8 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
Congress. The 12% VAT rate was made effective
by Congress on February 1, 2006.
5. EXEMPTION OF THE GOVERNMENT
Properties of the national government as well
as those of the local government units are not
subject to tax, otherwise it will result in the
absurd situation of the government taking
money from one pocket and putting it in
another (Cooley as cited in Board of Assessment Appeals
of Laguna vs. CTA).
Other Reasons:
a. To levy a tax upon public property would
render necessary new taxes on other
public property for the payment of the tax
so laid and thus, the government would
be taxing itself to raise money to pay over
to itself.
b. So that the functions of the government
shall not be unduly impeded (51 Am. Jur.
550-51)
c. To reduce the amount of money that has
to be handled by the government in the
course of its operations (Maceda vs. Macaraig
G.R. No. 88291 June 8, 1993)
However, the Constitution is silent on
whether Congress is prohibited from taxing
the properties of the agencies of the
government. Therefore, nothing can prevent
Congr ess f r om decr eei ng t hat even
i nst r ument al i t i es or agenci es of t he
government perf ormi ng government al
functions may be subject to tax. (MCIAA vs.
Marcos G.R. No. 120082 Sep. 11, 1996)
Unless otherwise provided by law, the
exemption applies only to government entities
through which the government immediately
and directly exercises its government powers.
(Infantry Post Exchange vs. Posadas G.R. No. 33403 Sept.
4, 1930)
Rules:
a. Administrative Agencies performing:
1) Governmental functions tax exempt
unless the law expressly provides
otherwise [Sec. 32(B)(7)]
2) Proprietary functions taxable unless
exempted by law [Sec. 27(C)]
b. Government-owned and -controlled
corporations
General Rule: Since they are performing
proprietary functions, they are subject to
taxation. Their income is taxable at the
rate imposed upon corporations or
associations engaged in similar business,
industry, or activity.
Except: GSIS, SSS, PHIC and PCSO
[Sec. 27(C), NIRC as amended by RA 9337]
NOTE: PAGCOR used to be exempt but
effective July 1, 2005, RA 9337 removed
the exemption.
c. Government Educational Institutions
1) Propert y act ual l y, di rect l y and
exclusively used for educational
purposes exempt from property or
real estate tax but i ncome of
whatever kind and character from any
of their properties, real or personal,
regardless of the disposition, is
taxable (Sec. 30, last par., NIRC)
2) Income received by them as such is
exempt from taxes. However, their
income from any of their activities
conducted for profit regardless of the
disposition is taxable (Sec. 30, last par.,
NIRC)
Constitutional Limitations
Note: Constitutional grant is not necessary in the
exercise of the power of taxation. It is an inherent
power of the Sate. Constitutional provisions are
mere limitations of the power.
1. DUE PROCESS OF LAW (Art. III, Sec. 1, 1987
Constitution)
Any deprivation is with due process if it is
done:
a. Under the authority of a law that is valid
or of the Constitution itself, the tax statute
is within the Constitutional authority of
Congress to pass, and that it must be
reasonabl e, fai r and j ust. Thi s i s
Substantive Due Process which limits
the governments law and rule making
powers.
b. After compliance with fair and reasonable
methods of procedure prescribed by law,
with notice or hearing or at least an
opportuni ty to be heard whenever
necessary. This is Procedural Due
Process which limits the actions of
judicial and quasi-judicial bodies.
In addition as held in Pepsi Cola vs. Mun.
of Tanauan G.R. No.31156 Feb. 27, 1976:
Due process in taxation requires:
1) Tax must be for public purpose
2) Imposed within territorial jurisdiction
San Beda College of Law 9
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
3) No arbitrariness or oppression in
a) assessment
b) collection
Due process in taxation does NOT require:
1) Determination through judicial inquiry of
a) Property subject to tax
b) Amount of tax to be imposed
2) Notice and hearing as to
a) Amount of tax
b) Manner of apportionment
2. EQUAL PROTECTION (Art. III, Sec.1, 1987
Constitution)
Equal protection neither requires equal rates
of taxation on different classes of property, nor
prohibits unequal taxation so long as the
inequality is not based upon arbitrary
classification. It merely requires that all
persons subjected to such legislation shall be
treated alike, under like circumstances and
conditions, both in the privileges conferred
and in the liabilities imposed (Cooley as cited in
Sison, Jr. vs. Ancheta G.R. No. 59431 July 25, 1984)
The power to select subjects of taxation and
apportion the public burden among them
includes the power to make classifications.
For the classification to be valid, the following
requisites must concur:
a. I t must be based on subst ant i al
distinctions;
b. It must apply both to present and future
conditions;
c. It must be germane to the purposes of the
law; and
d. It must apply equally to all members of
the same class. (Ormoc Sugar Company vs.
Treasurer of Ormoc G.R. No. 23794 Feb.17, 1968)
3. UNIFORMITY AND EQUITABILITY (Art. VI,
Sec. 28 [1], 1987 Constitution)
Uniformity all taxable articles or properties
of the same class shall be taxed at the same
rate. (City of Baguio vs. De Leon G.R.No. 24756 Oct.
31, 1968)
Different articles or other subjects may be
taxed at different rates provided that the rate
is uniform on the same class everywhere. (De
Villata vs. Standley G.R. No. 8154 December 20, 1915)
Equity requires that such apportionment be
more or less just in the light of the taxpayers
ability to shoulder the tax burden, usually
measured in terms of wealth, and, if
warranted, on the basis of the benefits he
receive from the government. Taxation may
be uniform but inequitable where the amount
is excessive or unreasonable.
4. PROGRESSIVE SYSTEM OF TAXATION
(Art. VI, Sec. 28 [1], 1987 Constitution)
Progressive System of Taxation means that
as the resources of the taxpayer become
higher, his tax rate likewise increases. This is
exemplified by the income tax rate which
i ncreases as the net taxabl e i ncome
increases.
It is based on the ability to pay and in
implementation of the social justice principle
that the more affluent should contribute more
for the communitys benefit.
The Constitution does not really prohibit
regressive taxes. What it simply provides is
that Congress shall evolve a progressive
system of taxation. This is a mere directive
upon Congress, not a justiciable right. (Tolentino
vs. Secretary of Finance, G.R. No. 115455, August 25,
1994)
In case of VAT, it is an antithesis of
progressive taxation. By its very nature, it is
regressive. The principle of progressive
taxation has no relation with the VAT System
inasmuch as the VAT paid by the consumer or
business for every goods bought or services
enjoyed is the same regardless of income.
Nevertheless, the Constitution does not
prohibit the imposition of indirect taxes like the
VAT. The Constitutional provision has been
interpreted to mean simply that direct taxes
are to be preferred and as much as possible,
indirect taxes should be minimized.
5. NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE (Art. III, Sec. 10,
1987 Constitution)
The obligation of a contract is impaired when
its terms or conditions are changed by law or
by a party without the consent of the other,
thereby weakening the position or rights of the
latter. (Edwards vs. Kearney, 96 US 607)
Examples:
a. When a tax exemption based on a
contract is revoked by a later taxing
statute (Cassanova vs. Hord GR No. 3473 March
22, 1907);
b. A taxpayer enters into a compromise with
the BIR; this cannot be impaired without
violating the Constitution.
Rationale:
When the State grants an exemption on the
basis of a contract, consideration is presumed
to be paid to the State, and the public is
supposed to receive the whole equivalent
therefrom.
Rules:
a. When the exemption is bilaterally agreed
upon between the government and the
taxpayer it cannot be withdrawn without
violating the non-impairment clause.
10 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
b. When it is unilaterally granted by law
and the same is withdrawn by virtue of
another law no violation.
c. When the exemption is granted under a
franchise may be revoked because
under the Constitution, a franchise is
subject to amendment, alteration, or
repeal by Congress when the common
good so requires. (Art. XII, Sec. 11, 1987
Constitution)
6. NONI MPRI SONMENT FOR NON
PAYMENT OF POLL TAX (Art. III, Sec. 20, 1987
Constitution)
A poll tax is imposed on persons without any
qualification. An example is the community tax
under Sec. 162 of the LGC which provides
that a person or corporation which does not
own any real property, does not receive any
income, or even a minor may be permitted to
pay basic community tax and be issued a
community tax certificate.
One cannot be imprisoned for non-payment of
poll tax because payment thereof is not
mandatory. Payment is merely permissive; it
cannot be imposed compulsorily upon
taxpayers.
While a person may not be imprisoned for
non-payment of pol l tax, he may be
imprisoned for non-payment of other kinds
of taxes where the law so expressly so
provides.
7. BILLS TO ORIGINATE FROM THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES (Art. VI, Sec. 24, 1987
Constitution)
It is not the law but the revenue bill which is
required by the Constitution to originate
exclusively in the House of Representatives.
A bill originating in the House may undergo
such extensive changes in the Senate that the
result may be a rewriting of the whole.
The Constitution simply means that the
initiative for filing the bills must come from the
House, on the theory that, elected as they are
from the districts, the members of the House
can be expected to be more sensitive to the
local needs and problems. (Tolentino vs. Secretary
of Finance G.R. No. 115455, August 25, 1994)
8. VETO POWER OF THE PRESIDENT (Art. VI,
Sec. 27 [2], 1987 Constitution)
9. PRESIDENTS POWER TO TAX (Art. VI, Sec.
28 [2], 1987 Constitution)
The president may increase tariff rates as
authorized by law even for revenue purposes
only. (Garcia vs. Executive Secretary GR No. 101273
July 3, 1992)
10. TAXATION AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
(Art. III, Sec. 4, 1987 Constitution)
There is curtailment of press freedom and
freedom of thought and expression if a tax is
levied in order to suppress this basic right and
impose a prior restraint. (Tolentino vs. Secretary of
Finance, supra)
However, if the fee imposed is not for the
exercise of a privilege but only for the purpose
of defraying part of the cost of registration, the
Constitution is not violated.
11. TAXATION AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION
(Art. III, Sec. 5, 1987 Constitution)
A Municipal license tax on the sale of bibles
and religious articles by a non-stock, non-
profit missionary organization at minimal profit
constitutes curtailment of religious freedom
and worship which is guaranteed by the
Constitution. (American Bible Society vs. City of Manila
G.R. No. L-9637 April 30, 1957)
Income of such organizations from any
activity conducted for profit or from any of
their property, real or personal, regardless of
the disposition made of such income, is
taxable.
12. TAX EXEMPTI ON OF PROPERTI ES
ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY AND EXCLUSIVELY
USED FOR RELIGIOUS, CHARITABLE AND
EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES (Art. VI, Sec. 28
[3], 1987 Constitution)
The foregoing provision exempts religious and
educational institutions from real estate tax.
Test of Exemption: It is the use of the
property and not ownership.
Nature of Use: The properties must be
actually, directly and exclusively used for
the purposes mentioned.
Exclusive is defined as possessed and
enjoyed to the exclusion of others; debarred
f rom part i ci pat i on or enj oyment ; and
exclusively is defined, in a manner to
exclude; as enjoying a privilege exclusively.
If real property is used for one or more
commercial purposes, it is not exclusively
used for the exempted purposes but is subject
to taxation. The words dominant use or
principal use cannot be substituted for the
words used exclusively without doing
violence to the Constitutions and the law.
Solely is synonymous with exclusively.
(Lung Center of the Philippines vs. Quezon City, G.R. No.
144104, June 29, 2004)
Scope of Exemption: The exemption is not
limited to property actually indispensable for
religious, charitable or educational purpose. It
extends to facilities which are incidental to or
reasonably necessary for the accomplishment
of said purposes. (Abra Valley College vs. Aquino
G.R. No. L-39086 June 15, 1988.)
San Beda College of Law 11
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
13. TAX EXEMPTION GRANTED TO NON-
STOCK NON-PROFI T EDUCATI ONAL
INSTITUTIONS (Art. XIV, Sec. 4 [3], [4], 1987
Constitution)
NOTE: Congress is authorized to grant similar
exempti ons to propri etary educati onal
institutions subject to limitations provided by
law.
The exemption covers income, property, and
donors taxes and custom duties.
Exemption also covers interest income of
Non-stock Non-profit Educational Institution
from bank deposits, deposit substitutes,
treasury bills and other government bonds
and foreign currency deposits. These are
exempted from the 20% final withholding tax
without need of certificate of tax exemption
provided that the interest income is used
act ual l y, di rect l y and excl usi vel y f or
educational purposes. (San Beda Law Journal,
March 2007, St. Marys College of Quezon City, June 17,
2005).
General Rule: To be exempt, the revenue
and assets must be used actually, directly
and exclusively for educational purposes.
However, as to income derived from activities
conducted by them for profit, there are
different views:
a. According to the majority view, the
Constitution has not made any distinction
with respect to the source of the
revenues; it merely distinguished with
respect to the utilization. Thus, even if the
income does not proceed from any school
related activity it may be subject to
exemption so long as it is actually, directly
and exclusively used for educational
purposes. And as the Constitution is the
basic and paramount law to which all
laws must conform, the NIRC provision
(last par., Sec. 30) must yield to the former.
b. According to the minority view, the
exemption does not extend to income
derived by these educational institutions
from thei r property or acti vi ti es
conducted by them for profit regardless of
the disposition made of such income
because of the provision in the NIRC
holding such income taxable (Last par., Sec.
30). But where the transaction is an isolated one, the
exemption still applies. (Manila Polo Club vs. CTA
G.R. No. L-10854 January 27, 1960)
Note: Section 30 of the NIRC speaks of
the source of income while the 1987
Constitution refers to the use of the
income.
14. APPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC MONEY (Art.
VI, Sec. 29[2], 1987 Constitution)
Reasons:
a. Requirement that taxes can only be
levied for a public purpose.
b. In consonance with the inviolable
principle of separation of the Church and
State.
What the Constitution prohibits is the use of
public money or property for the benefit of any
priest, etc. as such. When so employed in the
armed forces, any penal institution, or
government orphanage or leprosarium, they
ma y r e c e i v e t h e i r c o r r e s p o n d i n g
compensations for services rendered in their
non-religious capacity without violating the
Constitutional prohibition.
15. VOTING REQUIREMENT ON GRANT OF
TAX EXEMPTIONS (Art. VI, Sec. 28[4], 1987
Constitution)
Reason: The requirement is obviously
intended to prevent indiscriminate grant of tax
exemptions.
The phrase a majority of all the members of
the Congress means at least ! plus 1 of all
the members voting separately.
In granting tax exemptions, an absolute
majority of the members of Congress is
required, while in cases of withdrawal of such
tax exemption, a relative majority is sufficient.
Tax amnesties, condonations and refunds are
in the nature of tax exemptions, such being
the case, a law granting them requires the
vote of an absolute majority.
A constitutional grant of exemption may be
selfexecuting or may require an act of
Congress for i ts operati on. Where a
Const i t ut i onal pr ovi si on gr ant i ng an
exemption is self-executing, the legislature
can neither add nor detract from it. It may,
however, prescribe a procedure to determine
whether a cl ai mant i s enti tl ed to the
Constitutional exemption.
16. MUNICIPAL TAXATION (Art. X, Sec. 5, 1987
Constitution)
Delegation of legislative taxing power to local
governments is justified by the necessary
implication that the power to create political
corporations for purposes of local self-
government carries with it the power to confer
on such local government agencies the
authority to tax. (Pepsi Cola vs. Municipality of
Tanauan G.R. No. L-31156 Feb.27, 1976)
Despite the grant of taxing power, judicial
admonition is given to the effect that the tax
so levied must be for a public purpose,
uniform, and must not transgress any
constitutional provision or be repugnant to a
12 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
controlling statute. (Villanueva vs. City of Iloilo G.R.
No. L-26521 Dec. 28, 1968)
17. NONIMPAIRMENT OF THE SUPREME
COURTS JURISDICTION OVER TAX
CASES (Art. VIII, Sec. 2 and 5, 1987 Constitution)
18. SPECIAL FUND (Art. VI, Sec. 29 [3], 1987
Constitution)
19. NECESSITY OF AN APPROPRIATION
BEFORE MONEY MAY BE PAID OUT OF
THE PUBLIC TREASURY (Art. VI, Sec. 29 [1],
1987 Constitution)
20. CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT ON
THE SUBJECT AND TITLE OF BILLS (Art.
VI, Sec. 26 [1], 1987 Constitution)
21. PROVISIONS REGARDING ALLOTMENTS
TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS (Art. X, Sec. 6,
1987 Constitution)
Double Taxation
DOUBLE TAXATION (DUPLICATE TAXATION)
means taxing the same property twice when it
should be taxed only once (CIR vs. Solid Bank Corp.
G.R. No 148191 Nov. 25, 2003) It has also been
defined as taxing the same person twice by the
same jurisdiction over the same thing (Victoria
Milling vs. Mun. of Victoria, Negros Occidental G.R. No.
L-21183 Sept. 27, 1968).
NO PROHI BI TI ON AGAI NST DOUBLE
TAXATION.
According to the Supreme Court (Villanueva vs. City of
Iloilo, G.R. No. L-26521 December 28, 1968) there is no
constitutional prohibition against double taxation in
the Philippines. It is something not favored, but is
nevertheless permissible.
KINDS OF DOUBLE TAXATION
1. Direct Duplicate Taxation / Obnoxious
double taxation in the objectionable or
prohibited sense. This violates the equal
protection clause of the Constitution, hence
prohibited.
Elements:
a. The same property or subject matter is
taxed twice when it should be taxed only
once
b. Both taxes are levied for the same
purpose
c. Imposed by the same taxing authority
d. Within the same jurisdiction
e. During the same taxing period
f. Covering the same kind or character of
tax (Villanueva vs. City of Iloilo, supra)
2. Indirect Duplicate Taxation is permissible
double taxation. This is allowed if the taxes
are of different nature or character imposed
by different taxing authorities. Generally, it
extends to all cases in which there is burden
of two or more pecuniary impositions. The
absence of one or more of the above-
mentioned elements makes the double
taxation indirect.
Example: A Filipino citizen who received
dividend income from the United States. The
dividend being remitted to him is taxed in the
United States and at the same time taxed in
the Philippines. There is double taxation but it
is not prohibited because the taxes are
imposed by different taxing authorities.
INTERNATIONAL JURIDICAL DOUBLE
TAXATION
Thi s i s defi ned as the i mposi ti on of
comparable taxes in two or more states on
the same taxpayer in respect of the same
subject matter and for identical periods.
The rationale for doing away with double
taxation is to encourage the free flow of goods
and services and the movement of capital,
technology and persons between countries,
conditions deemed vital in creating robust and
dynamic economies. Foreign investments will
only thrive in a fairly predictable and
reasonable international investment climate
and the protection against double taxation is
crucial in creating such a climate. (Commissioner
of Internal Revenue vs. S.C. Johnson and Son, Inc. G.R.
No.127105, June 25, 1999)
METHODS OF REDUCING THE RIGORS OF
DOUBLE TAXATION (CD RET)
1. Tax credits There is no exact legal
definition of tax credits however it can be
defined by its ordinary usage based on
existing laws to wit:
a. Tax credit is an alternative remedy to a
refund of overpaid taxes which may be
applied to offset tax liabilities.
b. Tax credits shall mean credits against
taxes and/or duties equal to those
actually paid on raw materials used in
manufacturing the export products.
c. A reward or incentive granted to certain
t axpayer s f or sat i sf yi ng cer t ai n
requirements prescribed by an incentive
law.
San Beda College of Law 13
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
In Blacks Legal Dictionary, Tax Credit is
defined as an amount subtracted from an
individuals or entitys tax liability to arrive at
the total tax liability.
Tax Credits are granted in lieu of the inability
of the government to give cash refund to its
taxpayers. Tax Credit Certificates are given in
lieu of cash which in turn can be used by the
holder thereof to settle his or her obligation
with the government.
Example: In income taxation, foreign taxes
imposed and paid on income earned by a
resident citizen or domestic corporation from
sources within a foreign country may, under
certain limitations, be claimed as tax credit
against the Philippine tax on the same
income. (Sec. 34 [C] [4] [a] and [b], NIRC)
2. Tax deductions tax write-off or reduction in
the gross amount on which a tax is calculated
Example: Our estate tax law provides for the
so-called vanishing deduction (Sec. 86 [A]
[2], NIRC). This involves property previously
taxed upon transfer from a prior decedent,
and the recipient (present decedent), dies
within 5 years, who then transfers the same
property to another. Deduction is therefore
allowed on the subsequent transfer.
3. Reduction of the Philippine income tax
rate
Example: Tax Sparing Rule the dividend
earned by a NRFC within the Phil. is reduced
by imposing a lower rate of 15% (in lieu of the
35%), on the condition that the country to
which the NRFC is domiciled shall allow a
credit against the tax due from the NRFC,
which taxes are deemed to have been paid in
the Phil. (Sec.28 [B] [5] b) (CIR vs. Procter & Gamble
G.R. No 66838 December 2, 1991)
4. Tax Exemptions a grant of immunity to
particular persons or corporations from the
obligation to pay taxes.
Example: Exempt transfers under estate and
donors taxation:
a. If the decedent at the time of his death or
the donor at the time of the donation was
a citizen and resident of a foreign country
which at the time of his death or donation
did not impose a transfer tax of any
character, i n respect of i ntangi bl e
personal property of citizens of the
Philippines not residing in that foreign
country, or
b. If the laws of the foreign country of which
the decedent or donor was a citizen and
resident at the time of his death or
donation allows a similar exemption from
transfer or death taxes of every character
or description in respect of intangible
personal property owned by citizens of
the Philippines not residing in that foreign
country. (Sec 104 NIRC)
5. Tax treaties Agreement between two
countries specifying what items of income will
be taxed by the authorities of the country
where the income is earned.
Methods resorted to by a tax treaty in order to
eliminate double taxation:
a. The tax treaty sets out the respective rights to
tax by the state of source or situs and by the
state of residence with regard to certain
classes of income or capital. In some cases,
an exclusive right to tax is conferred in one of
the contracting states; however, for other
items of income or capital, both states are
given the right to tax although the amount of
tax that may be imposed by the state of
source is limited.
b. The state of source is given a full or limited
right to tax together with the state of
residence. In this case, the treaty makes it
incumbent upon the state of residence to
allow relief in order to avoid double taxation.
There are 2 ways under the 2
nd
method:
1) The exemption method the income or
capital which is taxable in the state of
source or situs is exempted in the state of
residence, although in some instances it
may be taken into account in determining
the rate of tax applicable to the taxpayers
remaining income or capital. (This may be
done using the tax deduction method
which allows foreign income taxes to be
deducted from gross income, in effect
exempting the payment from being further
taxed.) The focus here is on the income
or capital itself.
2) The credit method although the
income or capital which is taxed in the
state of source is still taxable in the state
of residence, the tax paid in the former is
credited against the tax levied in the
latter. (CIR v. S.C Johnson and Son G.R. No.
127105, June 25,1999) The focus is on the
tax.
MOST FAVORED NATION CLAUSE IN TAX
TREATIES
The purpose of the most favored nation clause is
to grant to the contracting party treatment not less
favorable than that which has been or may be
granted to the MOST FAVORED among other
countries. The most favored nation clause is
intended to establish the principle of equality of
international treatment by providing that the
citizens or subjects of the contracting nations may
enjoy the privileges accorded by either party to
those of the most favored nation.
14 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
Forms of Escape From Taxation
There are 6 basic forms of escape: (SE2CAT)
1. SHIFTING
The transfer of the burden of tax by the
original payer or the one on whom the tax was
assessed (i mpact of taxati on/statutory
taxpayer) or imposed to another or someone
else (incidence of taxation).
Direct tax cannot be shifted a tax cannot
be shifted when it is purely personal or when
it has no relation to any business dealings of
the taxpayer. (Schultz and Harris, American Public
Finance)
Impact of Taxation point on which tax is
originally imposed or the one on whom the tax
is formally assessed.
Incidence of Taxation point on which the
tax burden finally rests or settles down.
Illustration: Value added tax. The seller is
required by law to pay tax, but the burden
is actually shifted or passed on to the
buyer.
Kinds of shifting
a. Forward shifting when the burden of
tax is transferred from a factor of
product i on t hrough t he f act ors of
distribution until it finally settles on the
ultimate purchaser or consumer
b. Backward shifting when the burden is
transferred from the consumer through
the factors of distribution to the factors of
production
c. Onward shifting when the tax is
shifted 2 or more times either forward or
backward
2. TAX EVASION A term that connotes fraud
through the use of pretenses and forbidden
devices to lessen or defeat taxes. (Yutivo Sons
Hardware vs. CTA GRN L-13203 January 28, 1961)
A scheme used outside of those lawful means
and when availed of, it usually subjects the
taxpayer to further or additional civil or
criminal liabilities. (CIR vs. Estate of Benigno Toda Jr.
GR No. 78583 March 26, 1990.)
Factors of Tax Evasion:
a. The end to be achieved, i.e. payment of
less than that known by the taxpayer to
be legally due, or paying no tax when it is
shown that the tax is due.
b. An accompanying state of mind which is
described as being evil, in bad faith,
willful, or deliberate and not coincidental.
c. A course of action which is unlawful.
Proof of tax evasion:
a. Failure to declare for taxation purposes
true and actual income derived from
business for 2 consecutive years. (Republic
vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. L-17962)
b. Substantial under-declaration of income
in the tax returns of the taxpayer for 4
consecut i ve year s coupl ed wi t h
intentional overstatement of deductions.
(CIR vs. Reyes, 104 PHIL 1061)
TAX
AVOIDANCE
TAX EVASION
Validity Legal and not
subject to
criminal penalty
Illegal and subject
to criminal penalty
Effect Minimization of
taxes
Almost always
results in absence
of tax payments
3. TAX EXEMPTION is the grant of immunity
to particular persons or corporations or to
persons or corporations of a particular class
from a tax which persons or corporations
generally within the same state or taxing
district are obliged to pay. (51 Am. Jur. 503)
Kinds of Tax Exemption
a. As to manner of creation:
1) Express or affirmative exemption
expressly granted by organic or
statute law
2) Implied or exemption by omission
when particular persons, property or
excises are deemed exempt as they
fall outside the scope of the taxing
provision itself
b. As to extent:
1) Total absolute immunity
2) Partial one where a collection of a
part of the tax is dispensed with
c. As to object:
1) Personal granted directly in favor of
certain persons
2) Impersonal granted directly in favor
of a certain class of property
d. As to source:
1) Constitutional immunities from
taxation that originate from the
Constitution
2) Statutory those which emanate from
legislation
San Beda College of Law 15
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
3) Contractual agreed to by the taxing
authority in contracts lawfully entered
into by them under enabling laws
4) Treaty
5) Licensing Ordinance
EFFECTS/ BENEFITS OF TAX EXEMPTIONS:
a. Deduction for income tax purposes
b. Claims for refund
c. Tax amnesty
d. Condonation of unpaid tax liabilities
NATURE OF THE POWER TO GRANT TAX
EXEMPTION
Like the inherent power to tax, the power to
exempt is an attribute of sovereignty for the
power to prescribe who or what property shall
be taxed implies the power to prescribe who
or what property shall not be taxed.
Municipal corporations have no inherent
power to tax. But the moment the power to
impose tax is granted, they also have the
power to grant exemption unless forbidden by
the Constitution or law.
NATURE OF TAX EXEMPTION
a. An exemption from taxation is a mere
personal privilege of the grantee.
b. I t i s gener al l y r evocabl e by t he
government unless the exemption is
founded on a contract which is protected
from impairment.
c. It implies a waiver on the part of the
Government of its right to collect what
otherwise would be due to it and
prejudicial thereto. (Commissioner vs. Bothelo
Shipping G.R. No.216330, June 29, 1967)
N.B. Tax Exempt persons are still required to
keep books of accounts for examination for
purposes of ascertaining compliance with the
conditions under which they have been
granted tax exemptions or tax incentives
(Sec. 235 NIRC, last par.)
CONSTRUCTION OF TAX EXEMPTIONS
General Rule: Exemptions are not favored
and are construed strictissimi juris (by the
most strict right or law) against the taxpayer.
(Comm. of Customs vs. Phil. Acetylene G.R. No. L-22443
May 29, 1971)
Exemptions are highly disfavored in law and
he who claims tax exemption must be able to
justify his claim or fight (Afisco Insurance Corporation
vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 112675, Jan. 25, 1999)
PRINCIPLE OF STRICTISSIMI JURIS
Laws gr ant i ng t ax exempt i on ar e
construed in strictissimi juris against the
taxpayer and liberally in favor of the taxing
power. Taxation is the rule and exemption
is the exception. The law does not look with
favor on tax exemptions and that he who
would seek to be thus privileged must justify it
by words too plain to be mistaken and too
categorical to be misinterpreted. (SeaLand Service
vs. CA G.R. No. 57828 June 14, 1993)
REASONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF STRICTISSIMI
JURIS
a. Lifeblood theory
b. To minimize differential treatment and
foster impartiality, fairness and equality of
treatment among taxpayers (Maceda vs.
Macaraig)
c. Taxati on i s a hi gh prerogati ve of
sovereignty whose relinquishment is
never presumed (Luzon Stevedoring vs. CA
G.R. No 58897 Dec. 3, 1987)
EXCEPTIONS TO STRICTISSIMI JURIS
a. When the statute granting exemption
provides for liberal construction thereof
b. In case of special taxes relating to special
cases and affecting only special classes
of persons
c. If exemptions refer to the public property
d. In cases of exemptions granted to
religious, charitable and educational
institutions or their property
e. In cases of exemptions in favor of the
government, its political subdivisions or
instrumentalities
REVOCATION OF TAX EXEMPTIONS
Since taxation is the rule and exemption is the
exception, the exemption may thus be
withdrawn at the pleasure of the taxing
authority. (Mactan Cebu Intl Airport Authority vs.
Marcos, supra)
RESTRICTIONS ON REVOCATION
a. Nonimpairment clause Where the
exemption was granted to private parties
based on material consideration of a
mut ual nat ur e, i t t hen becomes
contractual and is covered by the non-
impairment clause of the Constitution.
b. Adherence to form I f t he t ax
exemption is granted by the Constitution,
its revocation may be effected through
constitutional amendment only.
c. Where the tax exemption grant is in the
form of a special law and not by a general
law even if the terms of the general act
are broad enough to include the codes in
the general law unless there is manifest
intent to repeal or alter the special law.
(Province of Misamis Oriental vs. Cagayan Electric
Power and Light Co. Inc GRN No. 45355 Jan. 12,
1990)
16 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
NATURE OF TAX REFUNDS
Tax refunds are in the nature of tax
exemptions. They are regarded as in
derogation of sovereign authority and to be
construed strictissimi juris against the person
or entity claiming the exemption. The burden
of proof is upon him who claims the
exemption in his favor and he must be able to
justify his claim by the clearest grant of
organic or statute law (Commissioner of Internal
Revenue vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 104151 March
10, 1995)
NATURE OF TAX AMNESTY
1. General or intentional overlooking by the
State of its authority to impose penalties
on persons otherwise guilty of evasion or
violation of a revenue or tax law.
2. Partakes of an absolute forgiveness or
waiver of the government of its right to
collect.
3. To give tax evaders, who wish to relent
and are willing to reform a chance to do
so.
RULES ON TAX AMNESTY
1. Tax amnesty
a. like tax exemption, it is never favored
nor presumed
b. const r ued st r i ct l y agai nst t he
taxpayer (must show compl ete
compliance with the law)
2. Gover nment not est opped f r om
questioning the tax liability even if
amnesty tax payments were already
received.
Reason: Erroneous application and
enforcement of the law by public officers
do not bl ock subsequent cor r ect
appl i cat i on of t he st at ut e. The
government i s never estopped by
mistakes or errors of its agents.
Basis: Lifeblood Theory
3. Defense of tax amnesty, like insanity, is a
personal defense.
Reason: Relates to the circumstances of
a parti cul ar accused and not the
character of the acts charged in the
information.
Tax amnesty
Tax
exemption
Immunity from all criminal, civil
and administrative liabilities
arising from non payment of
taxes
Immunity
from civil
liability only
Applies only to past tax periods,
hence retroactive application
Prospective
application
Rule III Section 6.4 of Department Order
No. 29-07 provides for the filing of the tax
amnesty return together with the SALN
(statement of assets, liabilities and networth)
and the payment of the tax amnesty within
six (6) months from the effectivity of said
order. The said order became effective last
September 6, 2007. Thus, qualified taxpayers
have until March 6, 2008 to avail of the said
tax amnesty program.
Note: Under RMC 29-2008 and Department
Order No. 11-08, it is clarified that the last day
of availing benefits under RA 9480, otherwise
known as Tax Amnesty Act of 2007, shall be 6
months from November 7, 2007 or on May 5,
2008. Effectivity of DOF Department Order
29-07 commenced on November 7, 2007.
DOCTRINE OF IMPRESCRIPTIBLY
As a rule, taxes are imprescriptible as they
are the lifeblood of the government. However,
tax statutes may provide for statute of
limitations.
The rules that have been adopted are as
follows:
a) National Internal Revenue Code
ASSESSMENT
If a Tax return is
filed on or before
the due date
Within three (3) yrs
from due date
If a Tax return is
filed after due
date
Within three (3) yrs
from date of actual
filing
No return is filed
or the return filed
is false or
fraudulent
Within ten (10) yrs
from discovery of the
failure to file the return
or the filing of false or
fraudulent return.
COLLECTION
If a Tax
return is
filed
Within three (5) yrs from
receipt of notice of
assessment.
No return is
filed or the
return filed
is false or
fraudulent
Within ten (10) yrs from
discovery of the failure to
file the return or the filing of
false or fraudulent return
without need of an
assessment.
b) Tariff and Customs Code
It does not express any general statute of
limitation. It provides, however, that
when articles have entered and passed
free of duty or final adjustment of duties
made, with subsequent delivery, such
entry and passage free of duty or
settlement of duties will, after the
expiration of one (1) year, from the date
of the final payment of duties, in the
San Beda College of Law 17
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
absence of fraud or protest, be final and
conclusive upon all parties, unless the
liquidation of import entry was merely
tentative. (Sec 1603, TCC)
c) Local Government Code
Local taxes, fees, or charges shall be
assessed within five (5) years from the
date they become due.
In case of fraud or intent to evade the
payment of taxes, fees or charges the
same may be assessed within ten (10)
years from discovery of the fraud or
intent to evade payment.
They shall also be collected either by
administrative or judicial action within five
(5) years from date of assessment (Sec.
194, LGC)
4. CAPITALIZATION The reduction in the price
of the taxed object equal to the capitalized
value of future taxes which the purchaser
expects to be called upon to pay.
5. TAX AVOIDANCE The exploitation by the
taxpayer of legally permissible alternative tax
rates or methods of assessing taxable
property or income, in order to avoid or
reduce tax liability.
Tax avoidance is the tax saving device within
the means sanctioned by law. This method
should be used by the taxpayer in good faith
and at arms length. (CIR vs. Estate of Benigno Toda
Jr. G.R. No. 30554 Feb.28.1983.)
A taxpayer has legal right to decrease the
amount of what would otherwise be his taxes
or altogether avoid them by means which the
law permits. (Delpher Trades vs. IAC G.R. No. 69259
Jan. 26, 1988)
Example: Availing of all deductions allowed
by law or refraining from engaging in activities
subject to tax.
6. TRANSFORMATION The manufacturer or
producer upon whom the tax has been
imposed, fearing the loss of his market if he
should add the tax to the price, pays the tax
and endeavors to recoup himself by improving
his process of production, thereby producing
his units at a lower cost.
Tax Laws
NATURE OF TAX LAWS
1. Not political in character
2. Civil in nature, not subject to ex post facto law
prohibitions
3. Not penal in character
CONSTRUCTION OF TAX LAWS
1. Legislative intention must be considered
Tax statutes are to receive a reasonable
construction with a view to carrying out their
purpose and intent (51 Am. Jur. 361).
2. Where there is doubt In every case of
doubt, in tax statutes imposing payment of
tax, laws are construed strictly against the
government and liberally in favor of the
taxpayer (Manila. Railroad vs. Collector of Customs
G.R. No. 10214 Nov.4, 1915). Taxes, being
burdens, are not to be presumed beyond what
the statute expressly and clearly declares.
3. Where language is plain Rule of strict
construction against the government does not
apply where the language of the tax law is
plain and there is no doubt as to the
legislative intent (51 Am. Jur. 368). The words
employed are to be given their ordinary
meaning.
4. Where taxpayer claims exemption
Exemptions are construed strictly against the
one who asserts the claim of exemption.
Public purpose is always presumed.
5. Provisions of the taxing act are not to be
extended by implication.
6. Tax laws are special laws and prevail over
general laws.
APPLICATION OF TAX LAWS
General Rule: Tax laws are prospective in
operation.
Exception: While it is not favored, a statute may
nevertheless operate retroactively provided it is
expressly declared or is clearly the legislative
intent (Cebu Portland Cement vs. Coll. G.R. No. 18649, Feb.
27, 1965).
KINDS OF PROVISIONS OF TAX LAWS
1. Mandatory those provisions intended for
the security of the citizens or which are
designed to insure equality of taxation or
certainty as to the nature and amount of each
persons tax.
2. Directory those provisions designed merely
for the information or direction of officers or to
secure methodical and systematic modes of
proceedings.
Importance of Distinction
The omission to follow mandatory provisions
renders invalid the act or proceeding to which it
18 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
relates while the omission to follow directory
provisions does not involve such consequence.
SOURCES OF TAX LAWS
1. Constitution
2. Legi sl at i on or st at ut es, i ncl udi ng
presidential decrees and executive orders on
taxation and tax ordinances, tax treaties and
conventions with foreign countries
3. Administrative rules and regulations,
rulings and opinions of tax officials
particularly the CIR, including opinions of the
Secretary of Justice
Authority of the Secretary of Finance to
promulgate rules and regulations
T h e Se c r e t a r y o f F i n a n c e , u p o n
recommendation of the Commissioner, shall
promulgate all needful rules and regulations
for the effective enforcement of the provisions
of the NIRC (Sec. 244, NIRC).
The statute that is being administered may
not be altered or added to by the exercise of a
power to make regulations thereunder.
Requisites for validity and effectivity of
regulation
a. They must not be contrary to law and the
Constitution (Art. 7, Civil Code).
b. They must be published in the official
Gazette (Lim vs. Central Bank, Sec. 79-B and 551
Rev. Adm. Code).
Force and Effect of Regulations
Such regulations once established and found
to be in consonance with the general
purposes and objects of the law have the
force and effect of law and so they must be
applied and enforced (De Guzman vs. Lontok G.R.
No. 45958 July 22, 1939).
Administrative Rulings and Opinions
Rulings are less general interpretations of
tax laws at the administrative level which are
issued by tax officials in the performance of
their assessment functions. They are usually
rendered by the CIR on request of taxpayers
to clarify certain provisions of a tax law. These
rulings may be revoked by the Secretary of
Finance if the latter finds them not in
accordance with law.
The Secretary of Finance has the power to
revoke, repeal or abrogate the acts of his
predecessors in office. The construction of the
statute by those administering it is not binding
on their successors if thereafter the latter
becomes satisfied that a different construction
should be given.
NonRetroactivity of Repeal
Any revocation, modification or reversal of
any of the rules and regulations or any of the
rulings or circulars promulgated by the CIR
cannot be given retroactive effect when such
will be prejudicial to the taxpayer but it shall
be retroactive in the following cases:
a. Wher e t he t axpayer del i ber at el y
misstates or omits material facts from his
return or in any document required of him
by the BIR;
b. Where the facts subsequently gathered
by the BIR are materially different from
the facts on which the ruling is based; or
c. Where the taxpayer acted in bad faith
(Sec. 246, NIRC).
Opinions they have the character of
substantive rules and are generally binding
and effective if not otherwise contrary to law
and the Constitution. These are also given by
the Secretary of Justice.
4. Judicial Decisions decisions of the
Supreme Court applying or interpreting
exi st i ng t ax l aws are bi ndi ng on al l
subordinate courts and have the force and
effect of law. They form part of the legal
system of the Philippines (Art. 8 Civil Code).
They constitute evidence of what the law
means (People vs. Licera G.R. No. L-39990 July 22,
1975).
Not all sources of tax laws require publication
in the Official Gazette. The following require
publication as a condition for their effectivity:
statues, including those of local application
and private laws, presidential decrees and
executive orders and administrative rules and
regulations if their purpose is to enforce or
implement existing law, pursuant to a valid
delegation (Taada vs. Tuvera GR. No. L-63915,
April 24, 1985).
Interpretative regulations and those which are
merely internal in nature need not be
published.
Consequently, in the BIR, the following do not
require publication for purposes of effectivity:
1. Revenue Memorandum Orders
2. Revenue Memorandum Circulars
3. Revenue Administrative Orders
4. BIR rulings
5. Tax Treatises and conventions with foreign
countries tax treatises comprehend two
objectives: (a) to avoid double taxation in
cases where the income is taxed twice and
(b) to eliminate or minimize tax evasion
through the adopti on of exchange of
information scheme whereby the signatory
countries undertake to furnish each other, on
a mutual basis, information on the taxable
income and/or activities of any of their
nationals or residents.
San Beda College of Law 19
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
PRINCIPLE OF LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL OF AN
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION THROUGH
REENACTMENT
Where a statute is susceptible of the meaning
placed upon it by a ruling of the government
agency charged with its enforcement and the
legislature thereafter reenacts the provision
without substantial change, such action is to some
extent confirmatory that the ruling carries out the
legislative purpose.
RULE OF NO ESTOPPEL AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
General Rule: The Government is not estopped
by the mistakes or errors of its agents; erroneous
application and enforcement of law by public
officers do not bar the subsequent correct
application of statutes (E. Rodriguez, Inc. vs. Collector,
G.R. No. L-23041, July 31, 1969).
Exception: In the interest of justice and fair play,
as where injustice will result to the taxpayer (See
CIR vs. CA, G.R. No. 117982, Feb. 6, 1997; CIR vs. CA,
G.R. No. 107135, Feb. 3, 1999).
Agencies Involved in Tax Administration and
Enforcement
Tax administration refers to the manner and
procedure of assessing and collecting or enforcing
tax liabilities.
BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE It is
t he admi ni st r at i ve agency of t he
government charged with the primary
function of administration of the national
internal revenue laws and regulations. For
administrative purposes, the BIR is under
the executive supervision and control of the
Department of Finance which oversees the
administration of national taxes in the
Philippines. (Sec. 2, NIRC)
CONCEPT OF BUREAU OF INTERNAL
REVENUE ISSUANCES
Revenue Regulations (RRs) are issuances
signed by the Secretary of Finance, upon
recommendation of the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, that specify, prescribe or define rules
and regulations for the effective enforcement of
the provisions of the National Internal Revenue
Code (NIRC) and related statutes
Revenue Memorandum Orders (RMOs) are
issuances that provide directives or instructions;
prescribe guidelines; and outline processes,
operations, activities, workflows, methods and
procedures necessary in the implementation of
stated policies, goals, objectives, plans and
programs of the Bureau in all areas of operations,
except auditing.
Revenue Memorandum Rulings (RMRs) are
rulings, opinions and interpretations of the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue with respect to
the provisions of the Tax Code and other tax laws,
as applied to a specific set of facts, with or without
est abl i shed pr ecedent s, and whi ch t he
Commissioner may issue from time to time for the
purpose of providing taxpayers guidance on the
tax consequences in specific situations. BIR
Rulings, therefore, cannot contravene duly issued
RMRs; otherwise, the Rulings are null and void ab
initio
Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMCs) are
issuances that publish pertinent and applicable
portions, as well as amplifications, of laws, rules,
regulations and precedents issued by the BIR and
other agencies/offices.
Revenue Bulletins (RB) refer to periodic
issuances, notices and official announcements of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that
consolidate the Bureau of Internal Revenue's
position on certain specific issues of law or
administration in relation to the provisions of the
Tax Code, relevant tax laws and other issuances
for the guidance of the public.
BIR Rulings are official positions of the Bureau to
quer i es r ai sed by t axpayer s and ot her
stakehol ders rel ati ve to cl ari fi cati on and
interpretation of tax laws
Powers and Duties of the BIR
a. Assessment and collection of all national
internal revenue taxes, fees, and charges.
b. Enforcement of all forfeitures, penalties, and
fines connected therewith.
c. Execution of judgments in all cases decided in
its favor by the Court of Tax Appeals and the
ordinary courts.
d. Giving effect to and administering the
supervisory and police powers conferred to it
by this Code or other laws. (Sec. 2, NIRC)
e. Recommend to the Secretary of Finance all
needful rules and regulations for the effective
enforcement of the provisions of the NIRC.
(Sec. 245, NIRC)
Organization of the BIR
The BIR is under one (1) chief known as the
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and
20 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
four (4) assistant chiefs known respectively as the
Deputy Commissioners.
The Bureau consists of National Office and Field
Service.
a. National Office- its function is confined to
general direction, guidance and control of the
entire operations of internal revenue service,
national policy formulation and program
pl anni ng f or ef f i ci ent and ef f ect i ve
implementation of internal revenue law and
regulations. It consists of the Commissioner
and four (4) Deputy Commissioners.
b. Field Service- the BIR operates under a
decentralized system through which is
primarily charged with the operational activities
of the Bureau.
(1) Regional offices (RO) - for effective
administration and control, the Philippines
has been divided into Regional offices
which directly execute and implement the
national policies and programs prescribed
by the National Office for the enforcement
of internal revenue laws. Each office is
headed by a Regional Director.
Powers and duties of Regional Director
a. i mpl ement l aws, pol i ci es, pl ans,
programs, rules and regulations of the
department or agencies in the regional
area
b. administer and enforce internal revenue
laws, rules and regulations, including
the assessment and collection of all
internal revenue taxes, charges and
fees
c. i ssue l etters of authori ty for the
examination of taxpayers within the
region
d. provi de economi cal , effi ci ent and
effective service to the people in the
area
e. coordinate with regional offices or the
departments, bureaus and agencies in
the area
f. coordinate with local government units
in the area
g. exercise control and supervision over
the officers and employees within the
region
h. perform such other functions as may be
provided by law and may be delegated
by the Commissioner.
(2) Revenue District Offices (RDO) - under
the ROs and headed by revenue district
officers who are under the direct control
and supervision of the Regional Director.
These offi ces i mpl ement programs,
methods and procedures necessary for
effi ci ent, effecti ve, and economi cal ,
assessment and collection of internal
revenue taxes in the revenue district.
Composition of RDOs
a. Field men and examiners performing
assessment work
b. Collection agents and clerks performing
collection work
Duties of Revenue District Officers and
other Internal Revenue Officers
a. ensure t hat al l l aws, rul es and
regulations affecting national internal
revenue are faithfully executed and
complied with, and to aid in the
prevention, detection and punishment of
frauds or delinquencies in connection
therewith
b. Examine the efficiency of all officers and
empl oyees of the BIR under hi s
supervision, and to report in writing to
the Commissioner through the Regional
Di r ect or, any negl ect of dut y,
i ncompet ency, del i nquency, or
malfeasance in office of any internal
revenue officer of which he may obtain
knowledge with a statement of all the
facts and any evidence sustaining each
case.
Authority of Revenue District Officers
(RDO)
a. examine taxpayers within the jurisdiction
of the district in order to collect the
correct amount of tax
b. recommend the assessment of any
deficiency tax due in the same manner
that the said acts could have been
performed by the Revenue Regional
Director himself (Section 13 NIRC)
POWERS OF THE COMMISSIONER:
1. Exclusive and original jurisdiction to interpret
the provisions of the NIRC and other tax laws
subject to review by the Secretary of Finance
(Sec. 4, NIRC)
2. Decide disputed assessments, refunds of
internal revenue taxes, fees or other charges,
penalties imposed in relation thereto, or other
matters arising under this Code or other laws
or portions thereof administered by the
Bureau of Internal Revenue subject to
exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the CTA (Sec.
4, NIRC)
3. Obtain information, and to summon, examine,
and take testimony of persons in ascertaining
the correctness of any return, or in making a
return when none has been made, or in
determining the liability of any person for any
internal revenue tax, or in collecting any such
San Beda College of Law 21
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
liability, or in evaluating tax compliance (Sec. 5,
NIRC)
4. Make assessments and prescribe additional
requirements for tax administration and
enforcement (Sec. 6, NIRC)
I. Power to interpret the provisions of the
NIRC and other tax laws
This power shall be the exclusive and original
jurisdiction of the Commissioner, subject to
review by the Secretary of Finance. (Sec. 4,
NIRC)
II. Power to decide tax cases
The Commissioner shall decide disputed
assessments, refunds of internal revenue
taxes, fees or other charges, penalties
imposed in relation thereto, or other matters
arising under this Code or other laws or
portions thereof administered by the Bureau of
Internal Revenue subject to exclusive
appellate jurisdiction of the Court Tax
Appeals (Sec. 4, NIRC)
Disputed Assessment refers to a tax
assessment that is administratively protested
within 30 days from the date the taxpayer
received the assessment. It includes protested
assessments wherein the administrative
protest is denied in whole or in part, or is not
acted upon by the BIR within 180 days from
the submission of all the required documentary
evidence, and the taxpayer adversely affected
by the decision or inaction appealed the same
to the CTA within 30 days from receipt of the
decision, or from the lapse of the 180-day
period. Pending appeal, such assessments
shall continue to be considered as a disputed
assessment.
The opinion or ruling of the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, the agency tasked with the
enforcement of tax laws, is accorded much
weight and even finality where there is no
showing that it is patently wrong, particularly in
a case where the findings and conclusions of
the internal revenue commissioner were
subsequent l y aff i rmed by t he CTA, a
specialized body created for the exclusive
purpose of reviewing tax cases, and the Court
of Appeals (Afisco Insurance Corp., et al v. CA, G.R.
No. 112675, Jan. 25, 1999)
Rulings which merely embody administrative
opinions on queries submitted do not have the
force and effect of laws (Alexander Howden and Co.,
Ltd. V. Collector of Internal Rev., G.R. No. L-19392,
April 14, 1965)
III.Power to obtain information, and to
summon, examine, and take testimony of
persons
In ascertaining the correctness of any return,
or in making a return when none has been
made, or in determining the liability of any
person for any internal revenue tax, or in
collecting any such liability, or in evaluating tax
compliance, he is authorized to:
1. Examine any book, paper, record or other
data which may be relevant or material to
such inquiry.
2. Obtain on a regular basis information from
any person other than the person whose
internal revenue tax liability is subject to
audit or investigation, or from any office or
officer of the government, its agencies and
instrumentalities including BSP and
GOCCs any information such as but not
l i mi t ed t o, cost s and vol umes of
production, receipts or sales and gross
income of taxpayers, names, addresses
and financial statements of corporations.
3. Summon the person liable for tax or
required to file a return, or any officer or
employee of such person, or any person
having possession, custody, or care of the
books of accounts to appear before the
Commissioner and to produce such books
and to give testimony.
4. Take testimony of the person concerned,
under oath.
5. Cause revenue officers and employees to
make a canvass from time to time of any
revenue district or region. (Sec. 5, NIRC)
IV. Power to make assessments and prescribe
a d d i t i o n a l r e q u i r e me n t s f o r t a x
administration and enforcement (Sec. 6,
NIRC).
The Commissioner shall have:
1. Authority to examine returns and
determine tax due.
However, any ret urn, st at ement or
declaration filed in any office authorized to
receive the same shall not be withdrawn
but the same may be modified, changed or
amended within three 3 years from the date
of such filing PROVIDED that no notice for
audi t of such ret urn, st at ement or
declaration has in the meantime been
actually served upon the taxpayer. (Section
6(A) NIRC)
2. Authority to make assessment based on
the Best Evidence Obtainable in the
following cases:
a. if a person fails to file a return or other
document at the time prescribed by law;
or
b. he willfully or otherwise files a false or
fraudulent return or other document.
By t he us e of t hi s met hod, t he
Commissioner makes or amends the
return from his own knowledge and from
such information as he can obtain
22 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
t hrough t est i mony or ot herwi se.
Assessments made as such are deemed
prima facie correct and sufficient for all
legal purposes. (Section 6(B) NIRC)
3. Authority to conduct inventory-taking,
surveillance and prescribe presumptive
gross sales and receipts
INVENTORY TAKING may be made at
any time during the taxable year as a basis
for assessment.
SURVEILLANCE conducted if there is
reason to believe that a person is not
declaring his correct income, sales or
receipts for internal revenue tax purposes.
The findings may be used as a basis for
assessing the taxes for other months or
quarters of the same or different taxable
years. Such assessment shall be deemed
prima facie correct.
PRESUMPTIVE GROSS SALES AND
RECEIPTS if it is found that a person has
failed to issue receipts and invoices or
when there is reason to believe that the
books of accounts do not correctly reflect
the declarations made or to be made in the
return, the Commissioner, after taking into
account the sales, receipts, income or other
taxable base of other persons engaged in
similar business under similar situations or
after considering other relevant information,
may prescribe a minimum amount of such
gross receipts, sales and taxable base, and
such amount so prescribed shall be prima
facie correct for purposes of determining
the internal revenue tax liabilities of such
person. (Sec 6(C) NIRC)
4. Authority to terminate taxable period
Commissioner has the authority to
terminate the period in the any of the
following cases:
a. retiring from business subject to tax
b. intending to leave the Philippines
c. intending to remove his property
therefrom
d. intending to hide or conceal his property
e. performing any act tending to obstruct
the proceedings for the collection of tax
for the past or current quarter or year
f. Performing any act tending to render the
same totally or partly ineffective unless
s u c h p r o c e e d i n g s a r e b e g u n
immediately. (Sec 6(D) NIRC)
5. Authority to prescribe Real property
Values
Commissioner is authorized to divide the
Philippines into different zones or areas
and shall upon consultation with competent
appraisers, determine the fair market value
(FMV) of real properties located in each
zone or area.
For purposes of computing any internal
revenue tax, the value of the property shall
be whichever is higher of: (1) the FMV as
determined by the Commissioner OR (2)
the FMV as shown in the schedule of
values of the Provincial and City Assessors.
(Sec 6(E) NIRC)
6. Authority to inquire into bank deposits
As a rule, Commissioner is not allowed.
except:
a. determining the gross estate of a
decedent
b. in case of taxpayer who has filed an
application for compromise of his tax
liability by reason of financial incapacity.
(Sec 6(F) NIRC)
7. Authority to accredit and register tax
agents
Commissioner shall accredit and register
based on their professional competence,
integrity and moral fitness, individuals and
general professional partnerships and their
representatives who prepare and file tax
returns, reports and other papers with, or
who appear before the BIR for taxpayers.
(Sec 6(G) NIRC)
8. Authori ty to prescri be addi ti onal
p r o c e d u r e o r d o c u m e n t a r y
requirements. (Sec 6(H) NIRC)
Authority of the Commissioner to Delegate
Power
Commissioner may delegate powers vested in him
to any or such subordinate officials with the rank
equivalent to a division chief or higher, subject to
such limitations and restrictions as may be
imposed under rules and regulations to be
promulgated by the Secretary of Finance, upon
recommendation of the Commissioner.
Except with the following powers:
a. power to recommend the promulgation of
rules and regulations
b. power to issue rulings of first impression or to
reverse, revoke, or modify any existing ruling
of the Bureau
c. power to compromise or abate any tax liability
d. power to assign or reassign internal revenue
officers to establishments where articles
subject to excise tax are produced or kept. (Sec
7 NIRC)
Provided that an internal revenue officer:
Assigned to any establishment where articles
subject to excise tax are produced or kept,
San Beda College of Law 23
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
shall in no case stay in his assignment for
more than 2 years.
Assigned to perform assessment or collection
functions shall not remain in the same
assignment for more than 3 years.
Agents and Deputies for Collection of National
Internal Revenue Taxes
a. the Commissioner of Customs and his
subordinates with respect to the collection of
national internal revenue taxes on imported
goods
b. the head of the appropriate government office
and his subordinates with respect to the
collection of energy tax
c. Banks duly accredited by the Commissioner
with respect to the receipt of payments of
internal revenue taxes authorized to be made
through banks. (Section 12 NIRC)
BUREAU OF CUSTOMS It is the
administrative agency of the government
charged with the administration of the tariff
and customs laws and regulations. For the
collection of national internal revenue on
imported articles, the Commissioner of
Customs and his subordinates, together
with the heads of appropriate government
offices and their subordinates and duly
authorized banks are constituted agents of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. It is
also under the supervision of the Secretary
of Finance.
General Duties, Powers, and Jurisdiction of
the BOC:
1. The assessment and collection of the lawful
revenues from imported articles and all other
dues, fees, charges, fines and penalties
accruing under the tariff and customs laws.
2. The prevention and suppression of smuggling
and other frauds upon the customs.
3. The supervision and control over the entrance
and clearance of vessels and aircraft engaged
in foreign commerce.
4. The enforcement of tariff and customs laws
and other laws, rules, and regulations relating
to tariff and customs administration.
5. The supervision and control over the handling
of foreign mails arriving in the Philippines, for
the purpose of the collection of the lawful duty
on the dutiable articles thus imported and the
prevention of smuggling through the medium
of such mails
6. The supervision and control over all import
and export cargoes, landed or stored in piers,
airports, terminal facilities, including container
yards and freight stations for the protection of
government revenue.
7. Exclusive jurisdiction over seizure and
forfeiture cases under the tariff and customs
laws. (Sec. 601, TCC)
Territorial Jurisdiction of the BOC
a. Extent The BOC has the right of
supervision and police authority over all seas
within the jurisdiction of the Philippines, and
over all coasts, ports, airports, harbors, bays,
rivers and inland waters whether navigable
from the sea or not. (Sec. 603 TCC)
b. Exception When a vessel becomes subject
to seizure by reason of an act done in
Philippine waters in violation of the tariff and
customs laws, a pursuit of such vessel begun
within the jurisdictional waters may continue
beyond the maritime zone and the vessel may
be seized on the high seas.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT it is primarily in
charge of the assessment and collection of
the taxes it imposed within its jurisdiction
(local and real property taxes).
Whenever the power to impose and collect a tax
or other revenue is exercised under the Local
Government Code, that power shall be exercised
by the:
a. Sangguniang Panlalawigan in the case of
provinces,
b. Sangguniang Panlungsod in the case of
cities,
c. Sangguni ang Bayan i n t he case of
municipalities, or
d. Sangguniang Barangay in the case of
barangays through an appropriate ordinance.
ORDINARY COURTS The Regional Trial
Courts or the Metropolitan and Municipal
Trial Courts, as the case may be, are given
jurisdiction over civil and criminal actions
for the collection of internal revenue taxes
and customs duties in cases which are not
within the appellate jurisdiction of the Court
of Tax Appeals. The ordinary courts have
j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r n o n - d i s p u t e d
assessment s. They are al so gi ven
jurisdiction over cases involving local taxes
and special taxes not administered by the
BIR and the BOC.
COURT OF TAX APPEALS It was
created by Congress as a centralized court
specializing in tax cases.
Composition of the CTA The CTA consists of a
presiding Justice and 5 Associate Justices each of
whom shall be appointed by the President upon
nomination of the Judicial and Bar Council. (R.A.
1125 as amended by R.A. 9282)
24 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
General Principles
In appropriate cases, the Court shall sit en banc,
or in two Divisions of three (3) justices each,
including the presiding justice, who shall be the
Chairman of its First Division. (A.M. No. 05-11-07-
CTA)
SUPREME COURT In tax cases, as in
other cases, it is the court of last resort to
which an appeal or petition for review may
be taken by the party adversely affected by
a ruling, order or decision of the CA, CTA or
RTC. Furthermore, the SC has exclusive
appellate jurisdiction in all cases involving
the constitutionality or validity of any law, or
those involving the legality of any tax,
impost, assessment or toll, or any penalty
imposed in relation thereto (Secs. 1, 5 [2],
Constitution).
! END OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES "
San Beda College of Law 25
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
TAXATION LAW
INCOME TAXATION
INCOME TAXATION
Definitions and Principles
Definitions and Principles
Income It is a flow of service rendered by
capital by the payment of money from it or any
benefit rendered by a fund of capital in a relation
to such fund through a period of time (Madrigal vs.
Rafferty, G.R. No. 12287, Aug. 8, 1918).
An income is an amount of money coming to a
person or corporation within a specified time,
whether as payment for services, interest or profit
from investment. Unless otherwise specified,
income means cash or its equivalent (Conwi vs.
Commissioner; G.R. No. 48532 August 31, 1992).
Income includes earnings, lawfully or unlawfully
acquired, without consensual recognition, express
or implied, of an obligation to repay and without
restriction as to their disposition (James vs. U.S., 366
U.S. 213).
Tests in Determining Income
1. Flow of Wealth Test The determining factor
for the imposition of income tax is whether
any gain was derived from the transaction.
2. Realization Test there is no taxable income
until there is a separation from capital of
something of exchangeable value, thereby
supplying the realization or transmutation
which would result in the receipt of income.
3. Claim of right doctrine a taxable gain is
conditioned upon the presence of a claim of
right to the alleged gain and the absence of a
definite unconditional obligation to return or
repay that which would otherwise constitute a
gain.
Principle of Constructive Receipt of
Income - Income which is credited to the
account of or set apart for a taxpayer and
which may be drawn upon by him at any time
is subject to tax for the year during which so
credited or set apart, although not then
actually reduced to possession.
4. Economic-Benefit Principle Test any
economic benefit to the employee that
increases his net worth, whatever may have
been the mode by which it is effected, is
taxable.
26 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Income Taxation
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
VISMARCK UY over-all chair, APRIL CABEZA chair academics operations, ALDEAN LIM chair hotel operations,
AYN SARSABA vice chair for operations, ANTHONY PURGANAN vice chair for academics,
RONALD JOHN DECANO vice chair for secretariat, KARLA FUNTILA vice chair for finance,
JEFFREY GALLARDO vice chair for edp, ULYSSES GONZALES vice chair for logistics
TAXATION LAW
IRIS VICTORIA MERIN subject chair
MARK JULIUS ESTUR assistant chair
DICT V. UNTAYAO edp
MARIEL MAILOM general principles, MAUREEN ROSE OBON income taxation, MARK JULIUS ESTUR estate
taxation, MINERVA JIMENEZ donors tax and court of tax appeals, MARK ANTHONY DIZON, value added tax,
ARLENE ALDAY and NELSON SALVA JR. tax remedies, MAUREEN SEYMOUR JAVIER local taxation and real
property taxation, JULIUS BABALCON tariff and customs code, ROWENA MUTIA tables and annexes
MEMBERS: Maria Evitha Abante, Aldren Abrigo, Herbert Abugan, Julian Adarlo, James Agustin, Karren Amparo,
Mary Joy Aquino, Aileen Artificio, Ray John Bangi, Jennifer Bautista, Vincent Cablao, Raul Canon, Jay Martin Celzo, John
Ray Concepcion, Maureen De Castro, Ramon Alfredo Dela Cruz, Karla Funtila, Kathryn Joy Hautea, Irene May Junio,
Erwin Legaspi, Precious Angela Lledo, Micael Ortiz Luis, Katherine Jane Manarang, Masha Mariano, Leonardo Mendoza
II, Joanne Mosquera, Sol Pejo, Ryan Pingol, Donelle Jay Quilates, Diana Rabanal, Mariflor Reyes, Deepee Salazar, Ralph
Jerome Salvador, John Zernan Sambahon, Lauren Rose Tanyag, Maria Joy Toledo, Jan Reiner Uy, Jennylyn Valencia,
Cristiellane Valerio and Sherwin P. Pascua
Capital vs. Income (Madrigal vs. Rafferty supra.)
Income Capital
All wealth, which
flows into the
taxpayer other than
as a mere return of
capital.
Fund or property, existing
at an instant of time,
which can be used in
producing goods or
services
Flow of Wealth Fund or property
Service of wealth Wealth
Fruit Tree
Income is subject to
tax
Return of capital is not
subject to tax
REQUISITES FOR INCOME TO BE TAXABLE
1. There must be a gain or profit
2. The gain must be realized or received
3. The gain must not be excluded by law or
treaty from taxation
Income Classified as to Source
1. Income from sources within the Philippines
2. Income from sources without the Philippines
3. Income from sources partly within and partly
without the Philippines
Taxable Income - The term taxable income
means the pertinent items of gross income
specified in this Code, less the deductions and/or
personal and additional exemptions, if any,
authorized for such types of income by this Code
or other special laws.
Types of Taxable Income
1. Compensation Income income which is
derived from the rendering of services under
an employer-employee relationship.
2. Professional Income fees derived from
engaging in an endeavor requiring special
training as professional as a means of
livelihood, which includes, but is not limited to,
the fees of CPAs, doctors, lawyers, engineers
and the like.
3. Business Income gains or profits derived
from rendering services, selling merchandise,
manufacturing products, farming and long-
term construction contracts
4. Passive Income income in which the
taxpayer merely waits for the amount to come
in. It includes, but is not limited to, interest
income, royalty income, dividend income,
winnings and prizes.
5. Capital Gain gain from dealings in capital
assets
INCOME TAX
tax on all yearly profits arising from property,
possessions, trade or business, or as a tax on a
persons income, emoluments, profits and the like
(61 CJS 1559)
It is the tax on income, whether gross or net (27
Am. Jur. 308).
Tax on income, or that which increases the net
worth of the taxpayer from sources other than the
mere return of capital.
Characteristics of Philippine Income Tax Law
1. It is a direct tax tax burden is borne by the
income tax recipient upon whom the tax is
imposed.
2. Progressive tax tax rate increases as the
tax base increases. Based on the ability to
pay principle.
3. Comprehensi ve syst em adopt s t he
citizenship principle, the residence principle,
and the source principle.
4. Semi-schedular or semi-global
5. American in origin
Income Tax Systems
GLOBAL TAX
SYSTEM
SCHEDULAR
TAX SYSTEM
SEMI-SCHEDULAR SEMI-
GLOBAL TAX SYSTEM
N
A
T
U
R
E
All items of
deductions
and
personal
and
additional
exemptions
if any are
deducted
from all
items of
gross
income. No
classificatio
n of income.
Income is
classified
into
different
types
upon
which the
tax rate
applicable
is based.
Adopted
by the
Philippines
by virtue
of BP. No.
135.
GLOBAL as to
compensation
income, business or
professional income,
capital gain and
passive income not
subject to final tax,
and other income.
SCHEDULAR as to
passive income
subject to final tax,
capital gains from
sale and transfer of
shares of domestic
corporations and
sale of real
properties.
This is the system
adopted by R.A.
8424.
R
E
T
U
R
N
S
One income
tax return
Separate
return is
filed for
the
appropriat
e type of
income
received.
One income tax
return for global tax
items.
Different sets of
returns for scheduler
tax items.
San Beda College of Law 27
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
GLOBAL TAX
SYSTEM
SCHEDULAR
TAX SYSTEM
SEMI-SCHEDULAR SEMI-
GLOBAL TAX SYSTEM
R
A
T
E
S
One set of
tax rates
Graduated
or flat
income tax
rate.
Graduated tax rates
for global tax items.
Final tax at
preferential rates for
scheduler tax items.
T
A
X
B
A
S
E
Gross
Income
Either
gross
income or
net
income
Either gross or net
Criteria in Imposing Philippine Income Tax
1. Citizenship Principle A citizen of the
Philippines is subject to Philippine income tax:
(a) on his worldwide income, if he resides in
the Philippines; or (b) only on his income from
sources within the Philippines, if he qualifies
as nonresident citizen.
2. Residence Principle a resident alien is
liable to pay income tax on his income from
sources within the Philippines but exempt
from tax on his income from sources outside
the Philippines.
3. Source Principle an alien is subject to
Philippine income tax because he derives
income from sources within the Philippines.
Thus, a nonresident alien is liable to pay
Philippine income tax on his income from
sources within the Philippines such as
dividend, interest, rent, or royalty, despite the
fact that he has not set foot in the Philippines.
Classification of Taxpayers
Classification of Taxpayers
TAXPAYER
The term "taxpayer" means any person subject to
tax imposed by this Title.
Summary:
A. Individuals
a. citizens
1. resident citizens (RC)
2. non-resident citizens (NRC)
b. aliens
1. resident aliens (RA)
2. non-resident aliens (NRA)
i. Engaged in trade or business
within the Phils. (NRAETB)
ii. not engaged in trade or business
w i t h i n t h e P h i l i p p i n e s
(NRANETB)
iii. alien individual employed by
Regional or Area Headquarters
and Regi onal Oper at i ng
Headquarters of Multinational
Companies
iv. alien individual employed by
offshore banking units
v. alien individual employed by
petroleum service contractor and
subcontractor
B. Corporations
a. Domestic (DC)
b. Foreign
1. resident foreign corporation (RFC)
2. non-resident foreign corporation
(NRFC)
C. Estates
D. Trusts
E. Partnerships
a. General Professional Partnership
b. General Co-partnership
28 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Income Taxation
Individuals
1. Citizen
a. Resident
A citizen of the Philippines residing
therein is taxable on all income derived
from sources within and without the
Philippines
b. Non-Resident
Non-resident Citizen They are taxed
for income derived from sources within
the Philippines. A nonresident citizen is
taxable only on income derived from
sources within the Philippines.
Means, a Filipino citizen:
a. who establishes to the satisfaction
of the Commissioner the fact of
his physical presence abroad with
a definite intention to reside
therein;
b. who leaves the Philippines during
the taxable year to reside abroad,
either as an immigrant or for
employment on a permanent
basis;
c. who works and derives income
f r o m a b r o a d a n d wh o s e
employment thereat requires him
to be physically present abroad
most of the time during the
taxable year;
d. who is previously considered as a
non-resident and who arrives in
the Philippines at anytime during
the taxable year to reside thereat
permanently shall be considered
non-resident for the taxable year
i n whi ch he arri ves i n t he
Philippines with respect to his
income derived from sources
abroad until the date of his arrival
[Sec.22 (E), NIRC]
NOTE: An overseas contract worker
(OCW) is taxable only on income
derived from sources within the
Philippines [Sec. 23 (B) (C)].
A seaman is considered as an OCW
provided the following requirements
are met:
1. r ecei ves compensat i on f or
services rendered abroad as a
member of the complement of a
vessel; and
2. Su c h v e s s e l i s e n g a g e d
exclusively in international trade.
An individual citizen of the Philippines
who is working and deriving income from
abroad as an overseas contract worker is
taxable only on income derived from
sources within the Philippines
A seaman who is a citizen of the
Ph i l i p p i n e s a n d wh o r e c e i v e s
compensation for services rendered
abroad as a member of the complement
of a vessel engaged exclusively in
international trade shall be treated as an
overseas contract worker.
Based on the above provisions, there are
three (3) types of nonresident citizens,
namely: (1) immigrants; (2) employees of
a foreign entity on a permanent basis;
and (3) overseas contract workers.
Immigrants and employees of a foreign
entity on a permanent basis are treated
as nonresident citizens from the time they
depart from the Philippines. However,
overseas contract workers must be
physically present abroad most of the
time during the calendar year to qualify as
nonresident citizens.
The taxpayer shall submit proof to the
Commissioner to show his intention of
l eavi ng t he Phi l i ppi nes t o resi de
permanently abroad or to return to and
reside in the Philippines as the case may
be for purpose of this Section.
2. Alien
An alien individual, whether a resident or not
of the Philippines, is taxable only on income
derived from sources within the Philippines.
1. Resident alien for income derived from
sources within the Philippines
Means an individual whose residence
is within the Philippines and who is not
a citizen thereof [Sec.22 (F), NIRC].
One who comes to the Philippines for
a definite purpose which in its nature
would require an extended stay, and
makes his home temporarily in the
country becomes a resident alien.
Length of stay i s i ndi cati ve of
intention. An alien who shall have
stayed in the Philippines for more than
one year by the end of the calendar
year is a resident alien.
2. Non-resident alien engaged in trade or
business within the Philippines.
(NRAETB) - For income derived from
sources within the Philippines. Means an
individual whose residence is not within
the Philippines and who is not a citizen
thereof [Sec.22 (G)].
San Beda College of Law 29
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Engaged in trade or business
The term trade or business includes the
performance of the functions of a public
office [Sec. 22 (S)]. It shall not include
performance of services by the taxpayer
as an employee [Sec. 22 (CC)].
A non-resident alien individual who shall
come to the Philippines and stay therein
for an aggregate period of more than 180
days during any calendar year shall be
deemed a non-resident alien doing
business in the Philippines Section 22(G)
notwithstanding [Sec. 25(A)(1)]
3. Non-resident alien not engaged in
t r ade or busi ness wi t hi n t he
Philippines (NRANETB). For income
der i ved f r om sour ces wi t hi n t he
Philippines.
Special Individuals Individuals
whether Filipino or alien employed
by:
a. Regional or area headquarters and
regional operating headquarters of
mul ti nati onal compani es i n the
Philippines.
b. Offshore banking units established in
the Philippines
c. Foreign Service contractor or sub-
contractor engaged in petroleum
operations in the Philippines.
Corporation
WHO ARE TAXABLE AND FOR WHAT?
Domestic
The term "domesti c", when appl i ed to a
corporation, means created or organized in the
Philippines or under its laws.
Foreign
The term "foreign", when applied to a corporation,
means a corporation which is not domestic.
RESIDENT NATIONALITY DOMICILE
Used to
describe a
corporation
organized
under the
laws of a
foreign
country,
which is
engaged in
trade or
business in
the
Philippines.
Determined by
the application
of control test
nationality of
a corporation
is dependent
on the
nationality of
its controlling
shareholders
or members.
Place fixed by the
law creating or
recognizing them,
and which, in the
absence thereof,
shall be understood
to be the place
where their legal
representation is
established or
where they exercise
their principal
functions.
1. Domesti c Corporati on creat ed or
organized in the Phils. or under its laws [Sec.
22(C), NIRC]
It is taxable for income derived from sources
within and without the Philippines.
2. Resident Foreign Corporation engaged in
trade or business within the Philippines [Sec.
22(H), NIRC]
It is taxable for income derived from sources
within the Philippines.
3. Non-resident Foreign Corporation not
engaged in trade or business within the
Philippines [Sec. 22(I), NIRC]
It is taxable for income derived from sources
within the Philippines.
Special types of Corporations
a. Proprietary educational institutions and non-
profit hospitals
b. Domestic depositary bank (foreign currency
deposit units)
c. Resident international carriers
d. Offshore banking units
e. Regional or Area Headquarters and Regional
Operating Headquarters of multinational
companies
f. Non-resident cinematographic film owners,
lessors or distributors
g. Non-resident owners or lessors of vessels
chartered by Philippine nationals.
h. Non-resident lessors of aircraft, machinery
and other equipment.
A CORPORATION INCLUDES:
1. Partnerships, no matter how created or
organized;
2. Joint-stock companies;
3. Joint accounts (cuentas en participacion)
4. Associations; or
5. Insurance companies [Sec. 22 (B), NIRC]
A CORPORATION EXCLUDES:
1. General professional partnerships;
2. Joint venture or consortium formed for the
purpose of undertaking construction projects
30 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Income Taxation
or engaging in petroleum, coal, geothermal
and other energy operations pursuant to an
operating or consortium agreement under a
service contract with the Government.
CORPORATIONS EXEMPT FROM INCOME TAXATION
UNDER THE NIRC:
1. Those enumerated under Sec. 30.
Exempt corporations are subject to income
tax on their income from any of their
properties, real or personal, or from any other
activities conducted for profit, regardless of
the disposition made of such income. They
are only exempt for income realized as
such.
2. With respect to GOCCs:
General Rule: these corporations are taxable
as any other corporation.
Except:
a. GSIS
b. SSS
c. PHIC
d. PCSO
NOTE: PAGCOR is now subject to tax under
R.A. No. 9337.
3. Regional or Area Headquarters under Sec.
22 (DD) not subject to income tax
Passive Income
2 5 y e a r s o l d c h i l d b e c a me
i ncapaci t at ed cannot cl ai m
additional exemption
42 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Income Taxation
Premium Payments on Health and/or Hospitalization
Insurance
Amount of pr emi um on heal t h and/ or
hospitalization paid by an individual taxpayer
(head of family or married), for himself and
members of his family during the taxable year.
Requisites for Deductibility:
1. Insurance must have actually been taken;
2. The amount of premium deductible from gross
income does not exceed P2,400 per family or
P200 per month during the taxable year;
3. That said family has a gross income of not
more than P250,000 for the taxable year;
4. In case of married individual, only the spouse
claiming additional exemption shall be entitled
to this deduction.
Who May Avail Of The Deduction?
1. I ndi vi dual t axpayer s ear ni ng pur el y
compensation income during the year.
2. Individual taxpayer earning business income
or in practice of his profession whether
availing of itemized or optional standard
deductions during the year.
Corporations
Corporations
A CORPORATION INCLUDES:
1. Partnerships, no matter how created or
organized;
2. Joint-stock companies;
3. Joint accounts (cuentas en participacion)
4. Associations; or
5. Insurance companies [Sec. 22 (B), NIRC].
A CORPORATION EXCLUDES:
1. General professional partnerships;
2. Joint venture or consortium formed for the
purpose of undertaking construction projects;
and
3. Joint venture or consortium for engaging in
petroleum, coal, geothermal and other energy
operations pursuant to an operating or
consortium agreement under a service
contract with the Philippine Government.
Domestic Corporation
Classes of taxes imposed on a domestic
Corporation
1. Normal Tax
2. Capital Gains Tax
3. Final Tax
4. Minimum Corporate Income Tax
5. Gross Income Tax
6. Improperly Accumulated Earnings Tax
1. Net Income Tax Formula (Normal Tax)
Tax Rates: 35%, as amended
Tax Base: Net Taxable Income
NET INCOME TAX FORMULA:
Gross Sales
Less: Sales Returns
Sales Allowances
Sales Discounts
NET SALES
Less: Cost of Goods Sold
GROSS INCOME FROM SALES
Add: Incidental income/ Other Income
NORMAL TAX GROSS INCOME
Less: Allowable deductions
NET TAXABLE INCOME
x Applicable tax rate
INCOME TAX PAYABLE
R.A. 9337 amended the income tax rate of
corporations from 32% to 35% effective July
1, 2005 but will be reduced to 30% on
January 1, 2009.
San Beda College of Law 43
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
2. Capital Gains Tax
Same rules as those imposed on individuals
3. Final Tax
Same rules as those imposed on individuals
4. Minimum Corporate Income Tax
MINIMUM CORPORATE INCOME TAX
[Section 27 (E)]
MCIT is imposed on domestic and resident
foreign corporations:
a) Whenever such corporation has zero or
negative taxable income; or
b) Whenever the amount of MCIT is greater
than the normal income tax due from
such corporation determined under
Section 27[A].
Tax Rate: 2%
Tax Base: Gross income except income
exempt from income tax and income subject
to final withholding tax
LIMITATIONS:
1. The MCIT shall apply only to domestic
and resident foreign corporations subject
to the normal corporate income tax
(income tax rates under Sec 27[A] of the
CTRP).
2. In case of a domestic corporation whose
operations or activities are partly covered
by the regular income tax system and
partly covered under a special income tax
syst em, t he MCI T shal l appl y on
operations covered by the regular
corporate income tax system.
In computing for the MCIT due from a resident
foreign corporation, only the gross income
from sources within the Philippines shall be
considered for such purpose
MCIT FORMULA:
Gross Sales
Less: Sales Returns
Sales Allowances
Sales Discounts
NET SALES
Less: Cost of Goods Sold
MCIT GROSS INCOME
x 2%
MCIT PAYABLE
FORMULA FOR QUARTERLY INCOME TAX
DUE (as amended)
NORMAL TAX
HIGHER
MCIT HIGHER
Normal Income tax Minimum Corporate
Income tax
Less: Quarterly MCIT
payments of
the current
taxable year
Less: Quarterly
MCIT
payments of
the current
taxable year
Quarterly Income tax
payments of the
current Taxable year
Quarterly Income tax
payments of the
current Taxable year
Expanded
Withholding taxes in
the current year
Expanded
Withholding taxes in
the current year
Expanded
Withholding taxes in
the prior year
Expanded
Withholding taxes in
the prior year
Excess in the MCIT in
the prior year/s
(subject to the
prescriptive period
allowed for its
creditability)
QUARTERLY
INCOME TAX DUE
QUARTERLY
INCOME TAX DUE
on the share of an
individual in the
distributable net income
after tax of a taxable
partnership; or
Domestic Corporations
Domestic Corporations
1. Domestic Corporations
operating as proprietary
educational institutions subject
to 10% on their taxable
income;
2. Domestic Corporations
engaged in Hospital
Operations which are non
profit subject to 10% on their
taxable income
3. FCDUs subject to final income
tax of 10%
4. Firms under special income
tax regime (PEZA and BCDA
registered entities)
Insurance Companies
Publicly-held
Corporations
Taxable Partnerships
General Professional
Partnerships
Non-taxable joint
ventures
Enterprises duly
registered under
special economic zones
declared by law which
enjoy payment of
special tax rate on their
registered operations or
activities in lieu of other
taxes, national or local.
Taxpayers not entitled to deduct
NOLCO:
BOIregistered enterprise
enjoying income tax holiday.
The accumulated net operating
losses incurred or sustained
during the period of the Income
Tax Holiday shall not qualify for
purposes of NOLCO.
Standard deductions
Family home
Medical expenses
Retirement benefits
Estate Tax Credit
A tax credit is granted for estate taxes paid to a
foreign country on the estate of citizens and
resident aliens subject to the following limitations:
Purpose: To provide a relief from too onerous a
taxation of the taxable estate outside the
Philippines
1. One foreign country only
The tax credit is whichever is lower between:
1. Estate tax actually paid to the foreign
country
2. Tax Credit Limit =
NTE, foreign country X Phil. estate
NTE, world tax
(NTE - Net Taxable Estate)
2. More than one foreign country
The credit shall be that which is the lower
amount between Limit A and Limit B.
Limit A. Whichever is lower between:
Estate tax paid to a foreign country
Tax Credit Limit =
NTE, foreign country X Phil. estate
NTE, world tax
Limit B. whichever is lower between:
Total of estate taxes paid to all foreign
countries
Tax Credit Limit =
NTE outside Phil. X Phil. estate tax
NTE, world
Settlement of The Estate Tax
A.
FILING
NOTICE OF DEATH TO BE FILED
In all cases of transfers subject to tax, or where,
though exempt from tax, the gross value of the
est at e exceeds P20, 000, t he execut or,
administrator or any of the legal heirs, within two
months after the decedents death, or within a like
period after qualifying as such executor or
administrator, shall give a written notice thereof to
the Commissioner (Sec. 89).
REPORTORIAL REQUIREMENTS
A. In all cases of transfers subject to tax, or
where, though exempt from tax, the gross
value of the estate exceeds P20,000
- Executor, administrator, or any legal
heirs, as the case may be, within 2
months after decedents death, or within a
like period after qualifying as such
executor or administrator, shall GIVE
WRI TTEN NOTI CE THEREOF TO
COMMISSIONER (Section 89 NIRC).
B. In all cases of transfers subject to tax, or
where, though exempt from tax, the gross
value of the estate exceeds P200,000, or
regardless of the gross value of the estate,
where the said estate consists of registered or
registrable property such as real property,
motor vehicle, shares of stock, or other similar
property for which clearance from BIR is
required as a condition precedent to such
transfer of ownership
- Executor or administrator or any of legal
heirs, as the case may be shall file A
RETURN UNDER OATH IN DUPLICATE
(Section 90 NIRC).
AN ESTATE TAX RETURN IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED
1. when the estate is subject to estate tax; or
2. when the estate is not subject to estate tax
but the gross estate exceeds P200,000; or
3. regardless of the amount of the gross estate,
where the gross estate consists of registered
or registrable property such as motor vehicle
or shares of stock or other similar property for
which clearance from the BIR is required as a
condition precedent for the transfer of
126 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Transfer Taxes
ownership thereof in the name of the
transferee.
CONTENTS OF ESTATE TAX RETURN
The following shall be set forth in the return:
a. The value of the gross estate of the decedent
at the time of his death, or in case of non-
resident, not a citizen of the Philippines, of that
part of his gross estate situated in the
Philippines;
b. The deductions allowed from gross estate in
determining the estate
c. Such part of information as may at the time is
ascertainable and such supplemental data as
may be necessary to establish the correct
taxes.
TIME FOR FILING THE ESTATE TAX RETURN
The estate tax return shall be filed within six (6)
months after the death of the decedent.
Ext ensi on: The Commi ssi oner may, i n
meritorious cases, grant an extension of not
exceeding thirty (30) days for the filing of the
estate tax return.
WHEN THE GROSS ESTATE EXCEEDS P2, 000,000,
THE ESTATE TAX RETURN SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED
BY A STATEMENT WHICH IS CERTIFIED BY AN
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
STATING
1. the itemized assets of the decedent with its
corresponding gross value at the time of his
death, or in the case of a non-resident, not
citizen of the Philippines, that part of his gross
estate situated in the Philippines;
2. the itemized deductions from the gross estate;
3. The amount of tax due, whether paid or still
due and outstanding.
B.
PAYMENT
PAYMENT OF THE ESTATE TAX DUE
The estate tax due shall be paid at the time when
the estate tax return is filed (Pay as you file
system)
When the Commissioner finds that the payment of
the estate tax on the due date would impose
undue hardships upon the estate or any heir:
a. the payment of the estate tax may be
extended for a period not to exceed five (5)
years if there is a judicial settlement of the
estate; or
b. The payment of the estate tax may be
extended for a period not to exceed two (2)
years if there is an extrajudicial settlement of
the estate.
CONDITIONS FOR THE GRANT OF EXTENSION
1. The taxpayer is not guilty of negligence,
intentional disregard of the rules and
regulations, and fraud.
2. The executor or admi ni strator or the
beneficiary may be required to furnish a
bond in such amount not exceeding double
the amount of tax and with such sureties as
the Commissioner deems necessary.
NOTE: In case the available cash is not sufficient
to pay its total estate tax liability, the estate may
be allowed to pay tax by installment (Sec. 9F, R.R.
No. 2-2003).
The estate may be allowed to pay the tax by
installment and a clearance shall be released only
with respect to the property the corresponding/
computed tax on which has been paid. Therefore,
there may be many clearances as there are many
properties released.
LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT
The estate tax shall be paid by the executor or
administrator before delivery of the distributive
share in the inheritance to any heir or beneficiary.
It is the primary obligation of the executor or
administrator to pay the estate tax due but the heir
or beneficiary has subsidiary liability for the
payment of that portion of the estate which his
distributive share bears to the value of the total
net estate [Sec. 9 (G), R.R. No. 2-2003].
I f t her e ar e t wo or mor e execut or s or
administrators, all of them shall be severally liable
for the payment of the tax. The estate tax
clearance will serve as authority to distribute the
remaining/distributable properties/share in the
inheritance to the heir or beneficiary.
If there is no executor or administrator appointed,
qualified and acting within the Philippines, then
any person in actual, or constructive possession
of any property of the decedent.
An heir is liable for the assessment as an heir and
as holder-transferee of property belonging to the
estate/taxpayer. As an heir, he is individually
answerable for the part of the tax proportionate to
the share he received from the inheritance (CIR vs.
Pineda G.R. No. L-22734, September 15, 1967).
No judge shall authorize the distribution of the
est at e unl ess a cer t i f i cat i on f r om t he
Commissioner that the tax has been paid is shown
(Sec. 94).
Register of Deeds shall not register in the Registry
of Property any document transferring real
property or real rights therein or any chattel
mortgage, by way of gifts inter vivos or mortis
causa, legacy or inheritance, unless a certification
from the Commissioner that the tax actually due
thereon had been paid is shown, and they shall
immediately notify the Commissioner, Regional
San Beda College of Law 127
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Director, Revenue District Officer or Revenue
Collection Officer or Treasurer of the city or
municipality where their offices are located, of the
non-payment of tax discovered by them (Section 95
NIRC).
Any lawyer, notary public, or any government
officer, who, by reason of his official duties,
intervenes in the preparation or acknowledgment
of documents regarding partition or disposal of
donation inter vivos or mortis causa, legacy or
inheritance, shall have the duty of furnishing the
Commissioner, Regional Director, Revenue
District Officer or Revenue Collection Officer of the
place where he may have his principal office, with
copies of such documents and any information
whatsoever which may facilitate the collection of
the estate tax (Section 95 NIRC).
A debtor of the deceased shall not pay his debts
to the heirs, legatee, executor or administrator of
his creditor, unless the certification of the
Commissioner that the estate tax imposed by
NIRC has been paid is shown, but he may pay the
executor or judicial administrator without said
certification if the credit is included in the inventory
of the estate of the deceased (Section 95 NIRC).
If after payment of the estate tax, new obligations
of the decedent shall appear, and the persons
interested shall have satisfied them by order of the
court, they shall have a right to the restitution of
the proportional part of the tax paid (Section 96
NIRC).
No shares or other forms of securities shall be
transferred in the books of any corporation,
partnership, business or industry organized in the
Philippines, unless a similar certification by the
Commissioner is shown (Sec. 97).
When a bank has knowledge of the death of a
person who maintained a joint account, it shall not
allow any withdrawal by the surviving depositor
without the above certification (Sec. 97).
Provided: that the administrator of the estate or
any one (1) of the heirs of the decedent may, upon
authorization by the Commissioner, withdraw an
amount not exceeding twenty thousand pesos
(P20, 000) without the said certification.
There is nothing in the Tax Code and in the
pertinent remedial law provisions that imply the
necessity of the probate court or estate settlement
of courts approval of the States claim for estate
taxes before the same can be enforced and
collected by the BIR. On the contrary, under
Section 94, it is the probate or settlement court
which is bidden not to authorize the delivery of the
distributive share to any interested party without a
certification from the CIR showing the payment of
the estate tax (Marcos II vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
120880, June 5, 1997).
STATUTE OF NON-CLAIMS DOES NOT BAR
CLAIMS OF GOVERNMENT
Section 5, Rule 86 of the Rules of Court, the
statute of non-claims does not bar government for
unpaid taxes, still within the period of limitation
prescribed in the NIRC (Vera vs. Fernandez, G.R. No.
L-31364, March 30, 1979).
COLLECTION OF TAX FROM THE HEIRS
An estate or inheritance tax, whether assessed
before or after the death of the deceased, can be
collected from the heirs even after the distribution
of the properties of the decedent (Palanca vs.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 16661, January
31, 1962).
The Government has two ways of collecting taxes
due from the estate.
a. By going after all the heirs and collecting from
each one of them the amount of the tax
proportionate to the inheritance received, or
b. Pursuant to the lien created by Section 219 of
the Tax Code upon all property and rights to
property belonging to the taxpayer for unpaid
income tax, is by subjecting said property of
the estate which is in the hands of an heir or
transferee to the payment of the tax due the
estate (CIR vs. Pineda, G.R. No. L 22734, September
15, 1967).
C.
PLACE OF FILING OF ESTATE TAX RETURN
AND PAYMENT
a. In case of resident decedent, the administrator
shall register the estate of the decedent and
secure a new TIN therefore from the Revenue
District Office (RDO) where the decedent
was domiciled at the time of his death and
shall file the estate tax return and pay the
corresponding estate tax with the Accredited
Agent Bank, Revenue Di stri ct Offi cer,
Collection Officer, or duly authorized Treasurer
of the city or municipality where the decedent
was domiciled at the time of his death,
whichever is applicable, following prevailing
collection rules and procedures.
b. In case of non-resident decedent, whether
non-resident citizen or non-resident alien, with
executor or administrator in the Philippines, the
estate tax return shall be filed with and the TIN
for the estate shall be secured from the RDO
where such executor or administrator is
registered.
If not registered, filed with and the TIN of
estate shall be secured from the RDO having
j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h e e x e c u t o r o r
administrators legal residence.
c. In case of non-resident decedent having no
executor or administrator in the Philippines, the
128 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Transfer Taxes
estate tax return shall be filed with and TIN for
the estate shall be secured from the Office of
the Commissioner.
Note: The Commissioner may continue to
exercise his power to allow a different venue/place
in filing of tax returns.
Donors Taxes
Donor!s Taxes
DEFINITION: A tax on the privilege of transmitting
ones property or property rights to another or
others without adequate and full valuable
consideration.
DONORS TAX ESTATE TAX
Tax on privilege to
transfer property during
ones lifetime
Tax on privilege to
transfer property upon
ones death
Generally imposed on
Donations Inter Vivos
Generally imposed on
Donations Mortis Causa
Coverage Of The Tax (Sec. 104)
RESIDENT &
NON-RESIDENT
CITIZEN,
RESIDENT
ALIEN DONOR
NON-RESIDENT ALIEN
DONOR
All properties,
real or personal,
tangible or
intangible,
wherever
situated.
Only properties situated in the
Philippines provided that, with
respect to intangible personal
property, its inclusion in the
gross estate is subject to the
rule of reciprocity provided
for under Section 104 of the
NIRC.
Requisites:
1. Capacity of the donor;
2. Donative intent (intention to donate);
3. Delivery, whether actual or constructive, of the
subject gift;
4. Acceptance by the donee.
DONATIVE INTENT
Donative Intent is a creature of mind. It cannot be
perceived except by the material and tangible acts
that manifests its presence. Hence, it is presumed
to exist when one gives a part of ones patrimony
to another without consideration. It is not negated
when the person donating has other intentions,
motives, or purposes that do not contradict
donative intent (Abello, Concepcion, Regala and Cruz vs.
CIR G.R. No. 120721).
LAW THAT GOVERNS THE IMPOSITION OF DONORS
TAX
The law in force at the time of the completion of
donation shall govern the imposition of donors tax
(R.R. 2-2003) .
When Donors Tax Applies
The donors tax shall not apply unless and until
there is a completed gift. The transfer is perfected
from the moment the donor knows of the
acceptance by the donee; it is completed by the
delivery, either actually or constructively, of the
donated property to the donee.
When Incomplete Gift Becomes Complete
A gift that is incomplete because of reserved
powers becomes complete when either:
1. the donor renounces the power; or
2. his right to exercise the reserved power
ceases because of the happening of some
event or contingency or the fulfillment of some
condition, other than because of the donor's
death.
Renunciation by the surviving spouse of
his/her share in the conjugal partnership
or absol ut e communi t y af t er t he
dissolution of the marriage in favor of the
heirs of the deceased spouse or any
other person/s is subject to donor's tax.
General renunciation by an heir, including
the surviving spouse, of his/her share in
the hereditary estate left by the decedent
is not subject to donor's tax, unless
specifically and categorically done in
favor of identified heir/s to the exclusion
or disadvantage of the other co-heirs in
San Beda College of Law 129
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
the hereditary estate (Sec. 11, R.R. No.
2-2003).
DONATION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY TO BE
VALID
In order for a donation of an immovable property
to be valid, it must be made in a public document
specifying therein the property donated, The
acceptance may be made in the same Deed of
Donation or in a separate public document, but
shall not take effect unless it is done during the
lifetime of the donor. If the acceptance is made in
a separate instrument, the donor shall be notified
thereof in an authentic form, and this step shall be
noted in both instruments (R.R. 2-2003).
Notes:
1. Where property, other than a real property
that has been subjected to the final capital
gains tax, is transferred for less than an
adequate and full consideration in money or
moneys worth, then the amount by which the
fair market value of the property at the time of
the execution of the Contract to Sell or
execution of the Deed of Sale which is not
preceded by a Contract to Sell exceeded the
value of the agreed or actual consideration or
selling price shall be deemed gift, and shall be
included in computing the amount of gifts
made during the calendar year.
2. Net gifts mean the net economic benefits from
the transfer that accrues to the donee.
Accordingly, if a mortgaged property is
transferred as a gift, but imposing upon the
donee the obligation to pay the mortgage
liabilities, then the net gift is measured by
deducting from the fair market value of the
property the amount of mortgage assumed.
TAX RATES
A. If the donee is a stranger, the rate of tax shall
be 30% of the net gifts.
NET GIFT
The net economic benefit from the transfer that
accrues to the donee.
STRANGER - a person who is not a brother,
sister, spouse, ancestor and lineal descendant,
or a relative by consanguinity in the collateral
line within the 4
th
civil degree.
Professional practitioners
It is a summary, extra-judicial or
administrative enforcement remedy.
substantial underdeclaration
( exceedi ng 30% of t hat
declared) of taxable sales,
receipts or income; or
or a substantial overstatement
(exceeding 30% of actual
deductions) of deductions (Sec.
248)
B. INTEREST 20% per annum or such
higher rate as may be prescribed by
the rules and regulations
a. Deficiency interest (Sec. 249[B]) -
The i nt er est assessed and
collected on any unpaid amount of
tax
20% interest per annum or
such higher rate assessed and
col l ect ed f r om t he dat e
prescribed for its payment until
the full payment thereof.
b. Delinquency interest (Sec. 249[C])
In case of failure to pay:
1. the amount of tax due on
any return required to be
filed;
2. the amount of tax due for
which no return is required
to be filed
186 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Tax Remedies Under The NIRC
3. 20% interest per annum or
s u c h h i g h e r r a t e
prescribed on the unpaid
amount in case of failure
to pay a deficiency tax or
any surcharge or interest
thereon
c. Interest on Extended Payment
(Sec. 249[D])
20% interest per annum or
such higher rate as may be
prescri bed on the tax or
deficiency tax or any part
unpaid if: a person required to
pay tax elects to pay on
installment but fails to pay the
tax or installment; or the CIR
has authorized an extension of
time within which to pay a tax,
deficiency or part thereof.
DEFICIENCY TAX VS.
DELINQUENCY TAX
DEFICIENCY TAX
DELINQUENCY
TAX
Exists when:
1. the amount by which
the tax imposed by
the CIR exceeds the
amount shown as
the tax by the
taxpayer upon his
return;
2. the amount by which
the tax as
determined by the
CIR exceeds the
amounts previously
assessed (or
collected without
assessment) as a
deficiency, if no
amount is shown as
tax by the taxpayer
upon his return or if
no return is made by
the taxpayer
Exists when:
1. the self-
assessed tax
per return
filed by the
taxpayer on
the
prescribed
date was not
paid at all or
was only
partially
paid
2. the
deficiency
tax assessed
by the BIR
became final
and
executory
Can be collected
through administrative
and judicial remedies
but has to go through
the process of filing
the protest against the
assessment by the
taxpayer and denial of
such protest by BIR
Can
immediately
be collected
administratively
through the
issuance of
warrant of
distraint and
levy and by
judicial action
Filing of an action for
collection of a
deficiency tax during
the pendency of the
protest may be the
subject of a motion to
dismiss
Filing of a civil
action for the
collection of
delinquent tax
in the ordinary
court is a
proper remedy.
DEFICIENCY TAX
DELINQUENCY
TAX
Subject to deficiency
interest
Subject to
delinquency
interest and
compromise
penalty
B. JUDICIAL REMEDIES
(1)CIVIL ACTION
DEFINITION: For tax remedy purposes,
these are acti ons i nsti tuted by the
government to COLLECT internal revenue
taxes including the filing by the government
of claims against the deceased taxpayer
with the probate court.
TWO WAYS TO ENFORCE CIVIL LIABILITY
THROUGH CIVIL ACTIONS:
1. By filing a civil case for collection of a
sum of money with proper regular
court; or
2. By filing an answer to the petition for
review filed by TP with CTA.
WHEN RESORTED TO?
1. When a tax is assessed and the
assessment becomes f i nal and
unappealable because the taxpayer
fails to file an administrative protest
with the CIR within 30 days from
receipt; or
2. When a protest against assessment is
filed and a decision of the CIR was
rendered but t he sai d deci si on
becomes f i nal , execut or y, and
demandabl e f or f ai l ure of t he
taxpayer to appeal the decision to
the CTA within 30 days from receipt
of the decision.
3. When the protest is not acted upon
within 180 days from submission of
documents and the taxpayer failed to
appeal with the CTA within 30 days
from the lapse of the 180-day period.
NOTE: Judicial action may be resorted to
even before assessment al t hough
impractical, as stated in Sec. 203, 1997
NIRC, and no proceeding in court
without assessment for the collection of
such taxes shall be instituted after the
expiration of such (3-year) period.
FORM AND MODE OF PROCEEDING (Sec. 220,
NIRC)
1. Civil actions shall be brought in the
name of the Government of the
Philippines
2. It shall be conducted by legal officers of
the BIR.
San Beda College of Law 187
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
3. No civil or criminal action for the
recovery of taxes shall be filed in court
wi t h o u t t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e
Commissioner.
The approval of the CIR is essential in
civil cases. However, under Sec. 7,
1997 NIRC, the Commissioner may
delegate such power to a Regional
Director. Further, the approval by the
Solicitor General for civil actions for
collection of delinquent taxes is
required before they are filed.
WHERE TO FILE:
1. Court of Tax Appeals where the
principal amount of taxes and fees,
exclusive of charges and penalties
claimed is One million pesos and
above.
2. Regional Trial Court, Municipal Trial
Court, Metropolitan Trial Court
where the principal amount of taxes
and fees, exclusive of charges and
penalties claimed is less than One
million pesos (Sec. 7, R.A. No. 9282).
JURISDICTION
COURTS
AMOUNT OF
TAXES CLAIMED
MTCs, MCTCs,
MeTCs outside Metro
Manila
Amount does not
exceed P300,000
MTCs, MCTCs,
MeTCs within Metro
Manila
Amount does not
exceed P400,000
RTCs outside Metro
Manila
P300,001 to
P999,999
RTCs within Metro
Manila
P400,001 to
P999,999
NOTE: A deci si on on a request for
rei nvest i gat i on i s NOT a condi t i on
precedent to the filing of an action for
collection of taxes already assessed. The
requirement for CIR to rule on disputed
assessments before bringing an action for
collection is applicable ONLY in cases
where the assessment was actually
disputed, adducing reasons in support
thereto (Dayrit vs. Cruz, G.R.No. 39910 Sept. 26,
1988).
DEFENSES PRECLUDED BY FINAL AND
EXECUTORY ASSESSMENTS
a. validity or legality of the assessments;
and
b. prescription of the Governments right
to assess.
(2)CRIMINAL ACTION
TWO COMMON CRIMES PUNISHABLE
UNDER TAX CODE:
a. attempt to evade or defeat tax (Sec. 254)
b. failure to file return, supply correct and
accurate information, pay tax, withhold
and remit tax and refund excess taxes
withheld on compensation (Sec. 255)
The judgment in the criminal case shall not
only impose the penalty but shall also order
the payment of taxes subject of the criminal
c a s e a s f i n a l l y d e c i d e d b y t h e
Commissioner (Sec. 205, NIRC).
FORM AND MODE OF PROCEEDING (Sec. 220)
Same as Civil Action.
WHERE TO FILE:
1. Court of Tax Appeals on criminal
offenses arising from violations of the
NI RC or TCC and ot her l aws
administered by the BIR and the BOC
where the principal amount of taxes
and fees exclusive of charges and
penalties claimed is One million pesos
and above.
2. Regional Trial Court, Municipal Trial
Court, Metropolitan Trial Court on
criminal offenses arising from violations
of the NIRC or TCC and other laws
administered by the BIR and the BOC,
where the principal amount of taxes
and fees, exclusive of charges and
penalties claimed is less than One
million pesos or where there is no
specified amount claimed (Sec. 7, RA No.
9282).
JURISDICTION
COURTS PENALTY
MTCs, MCTCs,
MeTCs
Imprisonment of 6 years
and below
RTCs Imprisonment of 6 years
and 1 day
IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES ON CRIMINAL
ACTIONS
1. EFFECT OF ACQUITTAL OF THE TAXPAYER
IN A CRIMINAL ACTION
It does NOT necessarily result in the
exoneration of said taxpayer from his
civil liability to pay taxes.
Rationale: The duty to pay tax is
imposed by statute prior to and
independent of any attempt on the part
of the tax payer to evade payment. It is
neither a mere consequence of the
felonious acts charged nor is it a mere
civil liability derived from a crime
188 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Tax Remedies Under The NIRC
(Republic vs. Patanao, GR No. L-14142, May 30,
1961)
The civil liability to pay taxes arises not
because of felony but upon taxpayers
failure to pay taxes. Criminal liability in
taxation arises as a result of ones
liability to pay taxes.
2. EFFECT OF SUBSEQUENT SATISFACTION
OF CIVIL LIABILITY
The subsequent satisfaction of civil
liability by payment or prescription
DOES NOT extinguish the taxpayers
criminal liability.
3. NO SUBSIDIARY IMPRISONMENT
In case of insolvency on the part of
the taxpayer, subsidiary imprisonment
CANNOT be imposed as regards the
tax which he is sentenced to pay.
However, it may be imposed in cases
of failure to pay the fine imposed (Sec.
280, 1997 NIRC).
4. CRIMINAL ACTION MAY BE FILED DURING
THE PENDENCY OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE
PROTEST IN THE BIR
It is NOT a requirement for the filing
thereof that there be a preci se
computation and assessment of the
tax, since what is involved in the
criminal action is not the collection of
tax but a criminal prosecution for the
violation of the NIRC. Provided,
however, that there is a prima facie
showing of a willful attempt to evade
taxes or failure to file the required
return (See Ungab vs. Cusi, GR Nos.
L-41919-24, May 30, 1980 in relation to
Commissioner vs. Court of Appeals, GR No.
119322, June 4, 1996, CIR vs. Pascor Realty
Development Corp., GR No. L-128315, June 29,
1999).
Before anyone is prosecuted for willful
attempt to evade or defeat any tax, the
fact that a tax is due must first be
proved.
5. CRIMINAL ACTION MAY BE FILED DESPITE
THE LAPSE OF THE PERIOD TO FILE A CIVIL
ACTION FOR COLLECTION OF TAXES
When the civil action arising from tax
delinquency has prescribed, the BIR
has only 5 years from assessment
within which to collect the tax through
criminal action in which case, would
prescribe after lapse of 5 years from
discovery of crime AND institution of
proceedings (Sec. 281, NIRC)
To Cancel Tax Liability
A. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY
(1)ABATEMENT (also see R.R. No. 15-2006
Abatement Program)
DEFINITION: It means that the entire tax
liability of the taxpayer is cancelled.
GROUNDS:
(1) the tax or any portion thereof appears
to be unjustly or excessively assessed;
or
(2) The administration and collection costs
involved do not justify the collection of
the amount due.
INSTANCES WHEN THE TAX LIABILITIES,
PENALTIES AND/OR INTEREST IMPOSED ON THE
TAXPAYER MAY BE ABATED ON THE GROUND
THAT THE IMPOSITION THEREOF IS UNJUST OR
EXCESSIVE: (WESIBLO)
a. Filing of the return/payment of tax at
the Wrong Venue;
b. TPs mistake in payment of tax is due
to Erroneous written official advice of a
Revenue Officer;
c. TPs failure to file the return and pay
the tax on time is due to Substantial
losses from prolonged labor dispute,
force majuere, legitimate business
reverses such as labor strike for more
than 6 months which has caused
temporary shutdown of business,
natural calamity, public turmoil etc.,
Provided that the abatement shall
cover only the surcharge and the
compromise penalty and not the
interest imposed under Sec. 249,
NIRC;
d. Assessment resulted from TPs non-
compliance with the law due to a
difficult Interpretation of said law;
e. TPs failure to file the return and pay
the correct tax on ti me due to
circumstances Beyond his control;
Provided, that abatement shall cover
o n l y t h e s u r c h a r g e a n d t h e
compromi se penal ty but not the
interest;
f. Late payment of tax under meritorious
circumstances; (ex. Failure to beat
bank c ut - of f t i me, s ur c har ge
erroneously imposed, use of wrong tax
form but correct tax amount)
g. Other similar or analogous cases
San Beda College of Law 189
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
INSTANCES WHEN THE TAX LIABILITIES,
PENALTIES AND/OR INTEREST IMPOSED ON THE
TAXPAYER MAY BE ABATED ON THE GROUND
THAT THE TAX ADMINISTRATION AND
COLLECTION COSTS ARE MORE THAN THE
AMOUNT SOUGHT TO BE COLLECTED:
(AWARD)
a. Abatement of penalties on assessment
confirmed by the lower court but
Appealed by TP to a higher court;
b. Abatement of penalties on Withholding
tax assessment under meritorious
circumstances;
c. Abatement of penalties on Delayed
installment payment under meritorious
circumstances;
d. Abatement of penalties on assessment
reduced after Reinvestigation but TP is
still contesting reduced assessment;
and
e. Other Analogous instances
COMPROMISE VS. ABATEMENT
COMPROMISE ABATEMENT
Involves a
reduction of the
taxpayers
liability
Involves the cancellation
of the entire tax liability of
a taxpayer
Officers
authorized to
compromise:
CIR and
Regional
Evaluation
Board
Officer authorized to
abate or cancel tax,
penalties and/or interest:
CIR
Grounds:
1. Reasonable
doubt as to
validity of
assessment; or
2. Financial
incapacity of
TP
Grounds:
1. The tax or any portion
thereof appears to be
unjustly or excessively
assessed; or
2. The administration and
collection costs involved
do not justify the
collection of the amount
due.
Prescriptive Periods for the Assessment
and Collection of Taxes
Prescriptive Periods for the Assessment and Collection of Taxes
RATIONALE OF PRESCRIPTIVE PERIODS
Such periods are designated to secure the
taxpayers against possible harassment and
unreasonable investigation after the lapse of the
period prescribed. They are also beneficial to the
government because tax officers will be obliged to
act promptly (CIR vs. Philippine Global Communications, Inc,
G.R. No. 167146, October 31, 2006).
RULES ON PRESCRIPTION
1. When the tax l aw i tsel f i s si l ent on
prescription, the tax is imprescriptible;
2. When no r et ur n i s r equi r ed, t ax i s
imprescriptible;
NOTE: Remedy of taxpayer is to file a return.
3. Defense of prescription is waivable;
4. The law on prescription should be liberally
construed in order to afford protection to TP
while its exceptions should perforce be
strictly construed.
P R E S C R I P T I V E P E R I OD F OR T H E
ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF TAXES
AND VIOLATION OF NIRC
1. ASSESSMENT OF TAXES
General Rule:
Within three (3) years from due date of filing of
return if return is filed on or before due date or
three (3) years from date of actual filing if filed
beyond due date (Sec. 203, 1997 NIRC).
If the return is amended substantially, the
period starts from the filing of the amended
return (CIR vs. Phoenix Assurance Co., Ltd., G.R. No.
L-19127, May 20, 1965).
Exceptions:
1. Failure to file a return: ten (10) years
from the date of the discovery of the
omission to file the return (Sec. 222[A]);
2. False or fraudulent return with intention
to evade the tax: ten (10) years from the
date of the discovery of the falsity or fraud
(Sec. 222 [A]);
3. Agreement in writing to the extension of
the period to assess between the CIR and
190 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Tax Remedies Under The NIRC
the taxpayer before the expiration of the 3-
year period.
NB: The extended period agreed upon can
further be extended by a subsequent
written agreement made before the
expi rat i on of t he ext ended peri od
previously agreed upon (Sec. 222[b]).
2. COLLECTION
a. 5 yrs. from date of assessment (Sec. 222,
NIRC)
b. In case of non-filing, false or fraudulent
return
If proceeding for collection is made
without assessment, 10 years from
discovery (Sec. 222, par. (a), NIRC).
If the BIR choose to make assessment
after discovery of the non-filing, false
or fraudulent return, collection must be
made within 5 years from date of
assessment (Sec. 222, par. (c), NIRC).
c. Agreed period pursuant to agreement in
writing before the expiration of the 5 year
period (Sec. 222, NIRC)
FRAUDULENT RETURN VS. FALSE RETURN
FRAUDULENT
RETURN
FALSE RETURN
It must be alleged and proved as a fact.
It must be the product
of a deliberate intent
to evade taxes.
It constitutes a deviation
from the truth due to
mistake, carelessness or
ignorance.
Established by the
a. Intentional and
substantial
understatement of
tax liability by the
taxpayer;
b. Intentional and
substantial
overstatement of
deductions of
exemptions; and/or
c. Recurrence of the
above
circumstances
There must appear a
design to mislead or
deceive on the part of the
taxpayer, or at least
culpable negligence. A
mistake, not culpable in
respect of its value would
not constitute a false
return (Commissioner of
Internal Revenue vs. Ayala
Hotels, Inc., CA-G.R. SP No.
70025, April 19, 2004).
There is fraud in the following decided
cases:
1. Fraud must be the product of a deliberate
intent to evade taxes (Jalandoni vs. Republic
G.R. No. 18384, Sept. 20, 1965)
2. Simple statement that return filed was not
fraudulent does not disprove existence of
fraud (Tayengco vs. Collector G.R. No. 23766)
3. Substantial underdeclarations of income
for six consecutive five years demonstrate
fraudulence of return (Perez vs. CTA G.R. No.
30403, July 3, 1969)
4. Presence of fictitious expenses, with no
evidence presented, proves existence of
fraud (Tan Guan vs. Commissioner G.R. No. 23676,
Apr. 27, 1967)
However, the courts did not consider the tax
returns filed as false or fraudulent with intent to
evade payment of tax in the following cases:
a. Mere understatement in the tax return will
not necessarily imply fraud (Jalandoni vs.
Republic G.R. No. 18384, Sept. 20, 1965)
b. Sale of a real property for a price less than
its fair market value is not necessarily a
false return (Commissioner vs. Ayala Securities
G.R. No. 29485, Mar. 31. 1976)
c. Fraud is a question of fact and the
circumstances constituting fraud must be
alleged and proved in the trial court
(Commissioner vs. Ayala Securities)
d. Fraud is never imputed and the courts
never sustain findings of fraud upon
circumstances that only create suspicion
(Commissioner vs. Javier G.R. No. 78963, July
31,1991)
e. Mistakes of revenue officers on three
different occasions remove element of
fraud (Aznar vs. CTA and Collector. G.R. No.
20569, Aug. 23, 1974)
NOTE: Notice of the assessment is released,
mailed or sent to the taxpayer also within the 3
year period. It is not required that the notice
be received by the taxpayer within the
prescribed period. But the sending of the
notice must clearly be proven (Basilan Estate, Inc.
vs. Commissioner, GR No. L-22492, September 5, 1967).
3. VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION OF THE
TAX CODE (Sec. 281, 1997 NIRC)
a. 5 years from the (a) day of the
commission of the violation of the law,
and if the same be not known, from the (b)
discovery thereof and the institution of
t he j udi ci al proceedi ngs f or i t s
investigation and punishment.
The running of prescription shall be
interrupted when proceedings are
instituted against the guilty persons
and shall begin to run again if the
proceedi ngs are di smi ssed f or
reasons not constituting jeopardy.
The term of prescription shall not run
when the offender is absent from the
Philippines. (Sec. 281, NIRC)
b. Illustrative case (Lim vs. Court of Appeals G.R.
Nos. 48134-37, October 18, 1990):
(1) charge is failure or refusal to pay
deficiency income tax committed
onl y af t er t he f i nal i t y of t he
assessment coupl ed wi t h t he
taxpayers willful refusal to pay the
San Beda College of Law 191
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
taxes within the allotted period (i.e.
cannot be committed upon filing the
return).
(2) charge is filing of false or fraudulent
return with intent to evade the
assessment in addition to the fact of
discovery, there must be a judicial
proceeding for the investigation and
punishment of the tax offense before
the 5 year prescriptive period begins
to run.
ASSESSMENT COLLECTION
Return filed on or before due date or filed
beyond due date
3 years
from due date or
from actual filing,
respectively
5 years
from assessment
Filing of false or fraudulent return
10 years
from discovery of
falsity or fraud
5 years
If there is assessment
Non-filing of return
10 years
from discovery of
non-filing
5 years
If there is assessment
In case there is NO ASSESSMENT
In case of false or fraudulent return or non-
filing of return, the BIR may file an ordinary
action to collect even without an assessment.
The period to collect is 10 years, reckoned
from the date of discovery of falsity or fraud or
non-filing.
Period agreed upon/extension of period
If before expiration
of the period of
assessment of tax
as prescribed in
Section 203 NIRC,
both Commissioner
and taxpayer
agreed in writing
after such time-
The period agreed
upon will govern
and may be
extended by
subsequent written
agreement made
before expiration of
period previously
agreed upon.
Any internal revenue tax,
which has been
assessed within the
period agreed upon as
provided for in the
assessment (period
agreed upon in writing
by Commissioner and
taxpayer) Collection
made within period
agreed upon in writing
before expiration of 5
year period but may be
extended by subsequent
written agreements
made before expiration
of period previously
agreed upon.
What is the Prescriptive Period where the
Governments action is on a BOND which
the taxpayer executes in order to secure
the payment of his tax obligation?
Ten (10) years under Art. 1144(1) of the Civil
Code and not three (3) years under the NIRC.
In this case, the Government proceeds by
court action to forfeit a bond. The action is for
the enforcement of a contractual obligation
(Republic vs. Araneta, G.R. No. L-14142, May 30, 1961).
WAIVER OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
DEFINITION: an agreement between TP and BIR
that a period to issue an assessment and collect
taxes due is extended to a date certain (Philippine
Journalists, Inc. v. CIR, G.R. No. 162852, Dec. 16 2004).
NATURE OF WAIVER
Preliminary Findings
END
Related Revenue Regulations
(Annex)
Related Revenue Regulations (Annex)
Revenue Regulations No. 13-01
Implementing Section 204(B), in Relation to Section 290 of the Tax
Code of 1997, Regarding Abatement or Cancellation of Internal
Revenue Tax Liabilities
SECTION 1.
Scope. Pursuant to Section 244 of the National
Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (Code), these
Regulations are hereby promulgated for the
purpose of implementing Section 204(B), in
relation to Sections 7(c) and 290 of the same
Code, r egar di ng t he aut hor i t y of t he
Co mmi s s i o n e r o f I n t e r n a l Re v e n u e
(Commissioner) to abate or cancel internal
revenue tax liabilities of certain taxpayers based
on any of the following grounds, viz:
i. The tax or any portion thereof appears to be
unjustly or excessively assessed; or
ii. The administration and collection costs
involved do not justify the collection of the
amount due."
Disputed assessments pursuant to the provisions
of Section 228 of the Code and its implementing
rules and regulations, and assessments which are
void from the beginning are not covered by these
Regulations.
SECTION 2.
Instances When The Penalties And/Or Interest
Imposed On The Taxpayer May Be Abated Or
Cancelled On The Ground That The Imposition
Thereof Is Unjust Or Excessive.
2.1 When the filing of the return/payment of the
tax is made at the wrong venue;
2.2 When taxpayer's mistake in payment of his
tax is due to erroneous written official advice
of a revenue officer;
2.3 When taxpayer fails to file the return and pay
the tax on time due to substantial losses from
prolonged labor dispute, force majeure,
legitimate business reverses such as in the
following instances, provided, however, that
the abatement shall only cover the surcharge
and the compromise penalty and not the
interest imposed under Section 249 of the
Code:
2.3.1 Labor strike for more than six (6)
months which has caused the temporary
shutdown of business;
2.3.2 Public turmoil;
2.3.3 Natural calamity such as lightning,
earthquake, storm, flood and the like;
San Beda College of Law 195
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Unfavorable to the taxpayer
If Commissioner does not act on
the protest within 180 days from
receipt of the documents
Taxpayer may appeal to the
Commissioner within 30 days
from receipt of full decision
2.3.4 Armed confl i cts such as war or
insurgency;
2.3.5 Substantial losses sustained due to
fire, robbery, theft, embezzlement;
2.3.6 Continuous heavy losses incurred by
the taxpayer for the last two (2) years;
2 3.7 Liquidity problem of the taxpayer for the
last three (3) years; or
2.3.8 Such other i nstances whi ch the
Commissioner may deem analogous to
the enumeration above.
2.4 When the assessment is brought about or the
result of taxpayer's non-compliance with the
law due to a difficult interpretation of said law;
2.5 When taxpayer fails to file the return and pay
the correct tax on time due to circumstances
beyond his control, provided, however, that
abatement shall cover only the surcharge and
the compromise penalty and not the interest;
2.6 Late payment of the tax under meritorious
circumstances such as those provided
hereunder:
2.6.1 One day late filing and remittance due
to failure to beat bank cut-off time:
2.6.2 Use of wrong tax form but correct
amount of tax was remitted;
2.6.3 Fi l i ng an amended ret urn under
meritorious circumstances, provided,
however, that abatement shall cover
only the penalties and not the interest;
2.6.4 Surcharge erroneously imposed;
2.6.5 Late filing of return due to unresolved
issue on classification/valuation of real
property (for capital gains tax cases,
etc.);
2.6.6 Offsetting of taxes of the same kind, i.e.,
overpayment in one quarter/month is
offset against underpayment in another
quarter/month;
2.6.7 Automatic offsetting of overpayment of
one kind of withholding tax against the
underpayment in another kind;
2.6.8 Late remittance of withholding tax on
compensation of expatriates for services
rendered in the Philippines pending the
i ssuance by t he Secur i t i es and
Exchange Commission of the license to
t he Phi l i ppi ne br anch of f i ce or
subsidiary, provided, however, that the
abat ement shal l onl y cover t he
surcharge and the compromise penalty
and not the interest;
2.6.9 Wrong use of Tax Credit Certificate
(TCC) where Tax Debit Memo (TDM)
was not properly applied for; and
2.6.10 Such other instances which the
Commissioner may deem analogous to
the enumeration above.
2.7 Other cases similar or synonymous thereto.
SECTION 3.
Instances When The Tax Liabilities, Penalties
And/Or Interest Imposed On Taxpayer May Be
Abated Or Cancelled On The Ground That The
Administration And Collection Costs Are More
Than The Amount Sought To Be Collected.
When the administrative and collection costs,
including cost of litigation, are much more than the
amount that may be collected from the taxpayer,
the assessment may be reduced through
abatement, or entirely cancelled pursuant to
Section 204(B) of the Code. The instances that
may fall under this category are the following:
3.1 Abatement of penalties on assessment
confirmed by lower court but appealed by the
taxpayer to a higher court;
3.2 Abatement of penalties on withholding tax
assessment under meritorious circumstances;
3.3 Abatement of penalties on delayed installment
payment under meritorious circumstances;
3.4 Abatement of penalties on assessment
reduced after reinvestigation but taxpayer is
still contesting reduced assessment; and
3.5 S u c h o t h e r i n s t a n c e s wh i c h t h e
Commissioner may deem analogous to the
enumeration above.
Note: For items 3.1 to 3.4 above, the abatement
of the surcharge and compromise penalty shall be
allowed only upon written application by the
taxpayer signifying his willingness to pay the basic
tax and interest or basic tax only, whichever is
applicable under the prevailing circumstance.
SECTION 4.
The Commissioner Has The Sole Authority To
Abate Or Cancel Tax, Penalties And/Or
Interest. The Commissioner has the sole
authority to abate or cancel internal revenue
taxes, penalties and/or interest pursuant to
Section 204(B), in relation to Section 7(c), both of
the Code.
This authority is generally applicable to surcharge
and compromise penalties only, however, in
meritorious instances, the Commissioner may
likewise abate the interest as well as basic tax
assessed, provided, however, that cases for
abatement or cancellation of tax, penalties and/or
interest by the Commissioner shall be coursed
through the following officials:
4.1 The Deputy Commissioner (Operations
Group), who shall constitute a Technical
Working Committee (TWC) for the evaluation
and review of any application for abatement
or cancellation of tax, penalties and/or interest
processed by the Revenue District Office
196 MEMORY AID IN TAXATION LAW
Tax Remedies Under The NIRC
(RDO) as reviewed by the Regional Office
(RO), or by the Large Taxpayers' Service's
Collection or Audit Division and Large
Taxpayers District Office (LTDO) as reviewed
by the Large Taxpayers Service (LTS), or by
Collection Enforcement Division/Withholding
Agent and Monitoring Division as reviewed by
the Collection Service, or by the Legal
Service, or any other office that has
jurisdiction over the case; and
4.2 The Deputy Commissioner (Legal and
Inspection Group), who shall evaluate the
legal issue involved in the case.
The application for abatement or cancellation of
tax, penalties and/or interest should state the
r easons and causes f or such r equest .
Documentary proofs for the underlying reasons
and causes aforestated should be appended to
the "Application for Abatement or Cancellation of
Tax, Penalties and/or Interest. On the other hand,
denial of the application for abatement or
cancellation of tax, penalties and/or interest
should state the reasons therefor.
SECTION 5.
Processing Time. The application for
abatement or cancellation of tax, penalties and/or
interest should be acted upon by the processing
office and reviewing office within five (5) days from
receipt by said office. The BIR National Office has
thirty (30) days within which to act on the case.
SECTION 6.
Repor t of t he Commi ssi oner t o t he
Congressional Oversight Committee (COC).
The Commi ssi oner shal l submi t t o t he
Congressional Oversight Committee (COC),
through the Chairmen of the Committee on Ways
and Means of both the Senate and House of
Representatives, every six (6) months of each
calendar year, a report on the exercise of his
power to abate or cancel tax liabilities, penalties
and/or interest imposed on taxpayers. In this
regard, all the originating offices which processed
the application for abatement or cancellation of
tax, penalties and/or interest shall likewise
prepare for this activity/process (abatement) all
the reports being prepared in the collection of
taxes under the compromise power of the
Commissioner, unless the Commissioner provides
otherwise.
Revenue Regulations No. 30-2002
Revenue Regulation Implementing Sections 7(c), 204(A) and 290
of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 on Compromise
Settlement of Internal Revenue Tax Liabilities Superseding
Revenue Regulations Nos. 6-2000 and 7-2001
-and-
Revenue Regulations No. 8-04
Revenue Regulations Implementing Sections 7(c), 204 (A) and 290
of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 on Compromise
Settlement of Internal Revenue Tax Liabilities Superseding
Revenue Regulations Nos. 7-2001 and 30-2002
SECTION 2.
CASES WHICH MAY BE COMPROMISED.
e. The following cases may be the subject
matter of compromise settlement:
(a) Delinquent accounts;
(b) Cases under administrative protest after
issuance of the Final Assessment Notice
to the taxpayer which are still pending in
the Regional Offices, Revenue District
Offices, Legal Service, Large Taxpayer
Servi ce (LTS), Col l ecti on Servi ce,
Enforcement Service and other offices in
the National Office;
(c) Civil tax cases being disputed before the
courts;
(d) Collection cases filed in courts;
(e) Criminal violations, other than those
already filed in court or that involving
criminal tax fraud.
g. The following cases are not subject to
compromise:
Ca s e s wh e r e f i n a l r e p o r t s o f
reinvestigation or reconsideration have
been issued resulting to reduction in the
original assessment and the taxpayer is
agreeable to such decision by signing the
required agreement form for the purpose.
On the other hand, other protested cases
shal l be handl ed by the Regi onal
Evaluation Board (REB) or the National
Evaluation Board (NEB) on a case to
case basis;
10% for
a. taxpayer is
1. an individual whose only source
of income is from employment;
and
2. whose monthly salary, if single, is
P10,500 or less, or if married,
whose salary together with his
spouse is P21,000 per month, or
less; and
3. it appears that the taxpayer
possesses no other leviable/
distrainable assets, other than
his family home
b. taxpayer is an individual without any
source of income;
c. Where the taxpayer is under any of
the following conditions:
1. Zero networth computed in
accordance with Sec. 3.2(c)
hereof;
2. Negative networth computed in
accordance with Sec. 3.2(c)
hereof.
3. Al r e a d y n o n - o p e r a t i n g
companies for a period of three
(3) years or more as of the date
of application for compromise
settlement.
20%
a. Already non-operating companies for
a period of less than 3 years; and
b. Dissolved corporations; and
San Beda College of Law 199
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
c. Taxpayer Declared insolvent or
bankrupt
40%
a. taxpayer whose Surplus or earnings
deficit resulting to impairment in the
original capital by at least 50%
2. For cases of doubtful validity
i. A minimum compromise rate equivalent
to forty percent (40%) of the basic
assessed tax.
ii. The taxpayer may, nevertheless, request
for a compromise rate lower than forty
percent (40%): Provided,
1. that he shall be required to submit his
request in writing stating therein the
reasons, legal and/or factual, why he
should be entitled to such lower rate:
2. The same shall be subject to the prior
approval by the NEB.
iii. The prescribed minimum percentages
shall likewise apply in compromise
settlement of assessments consisting
solely of increments, i.e., surcharge,
interest, etc., based on the total amount
assessed.
SECTION 5.
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS.
! If the application for compromise is premised
on the financial incapacity of a taxpayer who
is a compensation income-earner, applicant
shall submit with his application the following:
a certification from his employer on his
prevailing monthly salary, including
allowances; and
a sworn statement that he has no other
source of income other than from
employment.
! If the application is premised on the financial
incapacity of a person without any source
income, the taxpayer applicant shall submit
with his application a sworn statement that he
derives no income from any source whatever.
! If the application is premised on the financial
incapacity of a taxpayer under the condition of
zero or negative networth, a copy of the
applicant's latest audited financial statements
or audited Account Information Form filed with
t he BI R shal l be submi t t ed wi t h t he
application.
For financial incapacity by reason of
dissolution:
" A copy of the applicant's latest
audited financial statements or
audited Account Information Form
filed with the BIR shall be submitted
with the application; and
" The Notice of Dissolution submitted
to SEC or other similar or equivalent
document shoul d l i kewi se be
submitted.
For situation of financial incapacity in
condition of bankruptcy or insolvency a
copy of the order declaring bankruptcy or
insolvency shall be submitted.
! In all cases of offer based on financial
incapacity, Waiver of the Secrecy of Bank
Deposi t under R.A. 1405 and Sworn
Statement saying that he has no Tax Credit
Certificate (TCC) on hand or in transit or claim
for tax refund or TCC under the National
Internal Revenue Code of 1997 and Executive
Order No. 226 pending in any office shall be
submitted.
SECTION 6.
APPROVAL OF OFFER OF COMPROMISE.
! Except for offers of compromise where the
approval is delegated to the REB pursuant to
the succeeding paragraph, all compromise
settlements within the jurisdiction of the
National Office (NO) shall be approved by a
majority of all the members of the NEB
composed of the Commissioner and the four
(4) Deputy Commissioners.
! All decisions of the NEB, granting the request
of the taxpayer or favorable to the taxpayer,
shal l have t he concur r ence of t he
Commissioner.
! Offers of compromise of assessments subject
to the approval of the Regional Evaluation
Board:
1. Assessments issued by the Regional
Offices involving basic deficiency taxes of
Fi v e Hundr ed Thous and Pes os
(P500,000) or less; and
2. Minor criminal violations discovered by
the Regional and District Offices.
Numbers 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10
2. Taxes, fees, etc. which are imposed under the
Tariffs and Customs Code
Number 4
3. Taxes, fees and charges where the imposition
of which contravenes existing governmental
policies or which are violative of the
fundamental principles of taxation
Number 12
San Beda College of Law 211
2008 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Situs of Local Taxation
A. According to Cases
Excise Tax not dependent on the domicile of
the taxpayer, but on the place in which the act
is performed or the occupation is engaged in;
not upon the location of the office, but the
place where the sale is perfected (Allied Thread
Co., Inc. vs. City Mayor of Manila, G.R. No.40296 Nov.
21, 1984).
Sal es Tax i t i s t he pl ace of t he
consummation of the sale, associated with the
delivery of the things which are the subject
matter of the contract that determines the situs
of the contract for purposes of taxation, and
not merely the place of the perfection of the
contract (Shell Co., Inc. vs. Municipality of Sipocot,
Camarines Sur G.R.No.12680 March 20, 1959).
B. According to Sec. 150, LGC
Branch or sales office a fixed place in the
locality which conducts the operation of the
business as an extension of the principal
office.
Principal office the head or the main office
of the business; the city or the municipality
specifically mentioned in the Articles of
Incorporation or official registration papers as
being the official address of said principal
office shall be considered the situs thereof.
1. When there is a branch or sales outlet -
distraint
levy
levy