Free Telephone Workers Union v.

Minister of Labor
Facts: Sorry no facts were given
Issue: Whether or not the Batas Pambansa Blg. 130 is unconstitutional for being violate
of the octrine of non!elegation of legislative "ower.
#el:
$he court hel that Batas Pambansa Blg. 130 insofar as it em"owers the %inister
of &abor to assume 'urisiction over labor is"utes causing or li(ely to cause stri(es of
loc(outs aversely affecting the national interest an there after ecie it or certify the
same to the )ational &abor *elations +ommission is not on its face unconstitutional for
being violate of the doctrine of non-delegation of legislative power.
------ ,s -ustice %a(alintal sai in the ACCFA v. Confideration of Unions in Govt
Corporations and Offices: .the growing com"le/ities of society0 as well as .the
increasing social challenges of the times.0 It woul be self!efeating in the e/treme if the
legislation inten to co"e with the grave social an economic "roblems of the "resent an
foreseeable future woul founer on the roc( of an unuly restrictive an eciely
unrealistic meaning to be affi/e to the octrine of non!elegation.
------- ."ower shoul be elegate where there is agreement that a tas( must be
"erforme an it cannot be effectively "erforme by legislature without the assistance of
a elegate or without e/"eniture of time so great as to lea to the neglect of e1ually
im"ortant business.0
!!!!!!! , more liberal a""roach has to be use with the regar of the a""lication of the
non!elegation of the legislative "ower.