Loan Officer Retention:

In a recent article in Origination News by Brad Finkelstein, he cites what drives

mortgage loan officers retention for a mortgage company.

In a nutshell, the argument goes, a mortgage company can increase loyalty by closing
loans on time and believing that their company can and will be able to make market
changes quickly as required to remain nimble and productive.

Ive been a top producing loan officer, a sales manager, an operations
manager/underwriter, and an owner of a direct lender whos decisions and quality of
files made the difference.

The often cited argument that one is only as good as their last deal is absolutely correct
for a loan officer focused on purchase business that is driven by referral sources
(realtors, lawyers, financial advisors, insurance agents, et al). The article discusses that
compensation is not the motivating factor as to where a loan officer will hang their hat.
Closing loans, training and believing your company can make market changes are the
reasons loan officers stay put.

The biggest fear of a loan officer is a realtor telling them that until they move to a new
shop they are off the referral list. Thats the ultimate deal killer, right?

Assuming compensation is equal between lender A and lender B, this argument makes
little sense unless there is consistent chaos in the back office that truly does jeopardize
a deal by over analyzing and over conditioning and re-requesting documentation
thereby dealing a closing.

Many times, in this ever changing mortgage environment, regulations and guidelines
change. There was a time when HUD was issuing FHA regulatory changes at a pace of
three to four major changes in a month. Being able to adjust to that requires that
management and the company adapt and change quickly the very requirement a loan
officer cites as a reason to remain with a lender.

However, the problem often times is one that we dont want to hear. A loan officer no
longer can be a glad handler, taking referral sources out to lunch, smiling and saying
yes. Because yes often times leads to over promise and under deliver and no loan
officer whos face, name and reputation is on the street will admit to dropping the ball.
It is far easier on a loan officers future income to blame faceless names in the back
office and the companys name instead; thereby leading to the fateful words When
youre in a new shop, let me know and Ill send you business.

Obviously, that leads to training. Most firms provide training. However, an adept
professional loan officer will not only avail themselves of training but will take it upon
themselves to fully understand what it will put a file on the top and get it closed quickly.

So many loan officers are reluctant to ask for supporting documentation or for written
explanations and, possibly, proof behind that. Many dont understand how to structure
a deal beyond basic qualifying of a borrower.

To be a successful loan officer, you need to learn to learn as much as you can about
credit approval and the process used by the specific company. You need to understand
that the mortgage market is a moving target. This fiscal quarter appraisal quality is the
big political football in Washington and regulators are looking at it which means
investors are pouring over them which means your lender is reviewing them to avoid
buy backs. One ranch comp against a colonial in a 2 mile radius of a midsized market
all of a sudden becomes a big deal requiring the lender to send the appraiser out to pull
five (5) or six (6) comps.

Next quarter, someone in DC thinks lenders are slacking on the Bank Secrecy Act. So,
within months it trickles to agencies, down to banks, investors and originating lenders
and brokers. All of a sudden those formerly acceptable garage sale receipts for cash
deposits are no longer good, and, even more annoying, despite the fact that you
absolutely can prove that the salaried employees required cash to close can be sourced
to the borrowers income that one deposit is kicked back and you have to go back and
source that.

As a loan officer, I quickly realized that I had to figure out a few moving parts to remain
competitive and drive deals to me. First, I had to understand my companys culture and
its strengths. I got very quickly that the quality of the file determined if the file would
close. I understood that the while I was only as good as my last deal, the Realtor was
only as good as his or her last commission check and the bank that I worked for was
stuck with that borrower for potentially 30 years based on the mortgage contract. One
late payment later on could be sourced to poor underwriting and poor originating and I
did not want that on my professional background.

To be a successful loan officer anywhere, you need to be able to go beyond structuring a
deal. You need to go beyond qualifying a loan. You need to understand what the
moving parts and are in the mortgage world and understand what the potential issues
could be based on todays political environment, which is always changing. And,
understand, that your lender is protecting itself so that it can originate loans tomorrow
and you can earn a living tomorrow.

Educate your Realtor about being a true professional. This will take effort because even
those who understand all of this forget about it as they get into the rush to sell, the rush
to have the house inspected, be there for the appraisal and when that is complete start
sitting on their emails sending you dates for closings.

I did this as a loan officer and quickly became the top producer because my Agents
knew that if I said the loan would close, it would close. If I said there was a problem but
we had to fix it, they knew it would close but not on time and that the issue was not the
fault of anyone but had to be addressed. And, I got the next deal.

I will never forget the many loan officers who were high producing because they would
smile, say yes and go on. But time caught up with so many of them causing once high
producing loan officers to fail in the mortgage world. They were the ones who refused
to change their formerly successful ways despite their requirement that their lender be
able to make quick market pivots, pay above average commissions and provide support.

One North Carolina loan officer took a mortgage and the borrowers credit score was
below our floor. As in 50 points below. Thats all he focused upon. He felt that the new
way to get past the changes was simply to hire a credit repair company and viola, he
had a deal.

He was furious and threatened to quit because his Agent was furious when, after
months of getting the borrower to a 600 credit score, we had conditioned the loan
despite the fact that he had given all supporting documents.

He just did not look at them at the supporting documents:

He did not address the mortgage late payments on the credit report, let alone the
collection accounts and the judgment that had to be paid off. He must have taken the
bank statements and scanned them up to the Underwriter because he simply did not
address the un-sourced deposits. And, he calculated the borrowers social security
income at 100%.

The social security income was what he looked at in anger. How dare the Underwriter
not count the social security income at full value, he argued. The Underwriter told him
to look at the tax returns that he submitted showing that the borrower was paying taxes
on the SSI income because the borrower made over the limit and it was right there on
the first page of the borrowers IRS return.

That was not good enough. That had to be wrong. It turned into a three day email war
until finally the underwriter simply went to the IRS website and copied and pasted the
section on SSI and how it can be taxed and sent that to the loan officer. At that point
there were cricket noises for days coming from North Carolina. And the clock was
ticking as the borrower wanted to close. In retrospect, the loan officer was doing a
duck and cover because he had not read the tax returns and he realized he made an
egregious error that only could be sourced to him because he incorrectly qualified the
borrower by over stating the allowable income.

I suggested using the allowable income and flipping him into a VA loan (the borrower
was a vet) if the borrower had eligibility and was okay with going VA. The Loan Officer
was forever grateful, called the realtor, told her we had a fix (without telling her why
there was a problem leading her to believe it was his bad employer) and - - I stood
there listening to him tell her he could close the borrower next week. Next week? This
was a completely new loan and would require a new appraisal. This was not a new
loan officer; this loan officer had been doing govy loans for 10 years. What was I
missing? Why did he over promise again? How could he take a bad situation and set
himself up to have another bad situation on the very same loan?

Well, that fell on deaf ears and he took a beating from the Realtor over the next three
weeks as a completely new package went out for a new loan with new disclosures that
confused the borrower and made the Realtor go nuclear. Clearly in her mind the
company had lost its wits and was going to blow the deal and kill the commission
check.

Finally..three and a half weeks later we had the explanations for the deposits (we took
the garage sale excuse as they were less than the income and irregular), we had the
credit explanations and we cleared it to close in underwriting.

The file went to closing and, as the loan officer was told, all files go for one last QC 48
hours prior to closing. Real Info came up with the borrower owning not one, not two
but four properties in Philadelphia which the borrower indicated that they had lived on
their 1003. None had mortgages. So, a more complete check was done and title was
pulled in PA and of the four (4), three (3) were non-owner occupied homes that the
borrower actually owned but did not tell anyone about.

Management decided that the borrower was not one in which we wanted to lend.

We lost the loan officer, we lost the realtor. But, we avoided a bad borrower.

The loan officer later told us he experienced nothing different at the new lender.

Which told me that the loan officer has got to go through that file with a fine tooth comb
and completely get what it takes to get a loan to close. Otherwise, even the best lender
wont close that loan on time.

Buy backs are not worth the one off commission earned by a banker, a loan officer or a
Realtor

And, eventually, Realtors will get that the problem follows the loan officer regardless of
where the loan officer works. And, instead of telling the loan officer they will no longer
refer to them until they move to a new lender, they will simply not say anything and not
return the loan officers phone calls

So, true professional loan officers best fully understand the front and the back. Be a
master at what moving parts are required to get the loan closed and what hot button
issue of the day could be slowing down loans or getting three and four sets of eyes
reviewing certain documentation.

Andnever, ever over promise and under deliver. Ever. Thats a deal killer.