Peer Blog Assessment for Bill Board (example feedback)

Q1

You have used the correct URL protocol. The text is clear against the background
and easy to read. Good font choice and size. You have one or two spelling errors
(for example continuety). Some of your spacing is a little distracting and you
have some alignment issues when you post embedded media. 6/10

Q2

Your welcome post invites the reader to follow your media journey and explains
the purpose of the blog. There is no reference to the exam board or a summary of
the coursework requirements. 5/10

Etc, etc.

At the end of your feedback, provide a currently aiming for grade.

Summary

You are currently posting evidence that suggests you are aiming for a grade X.

What Grade To Suggest

Grade Description
A
Beautifully presented. Fully comprehensive posts supported by
appropriate embedded media. The blog has an ongoing narrative
linking each post. Very little that could be improved.
B
Beautifully presented. Fully comprehensive posts supported by
appropriate embedded media. Links between posts could be stronger
though, providing an ongoing narrative for the reader to follow.
C
The blog can be read and followed easily. Sufficient written detail in all
posts but not all posts are supported by embedded media (where it
would have been appropriate). Ongoing narrative linking posts is
inconsistent.
D
The blog can be read and followed easily. Most posts are fully
comprehensive but some information is missing in one or two and
there is a lack of embedded media support. There isnt an ongoing
narrative linking individual posts; just a shopping list of evidence.
E
The blog is perhaps a little difficult to negotiate. There is a lack of detail
in all posts and very little in the way of appropriate embedded media
support. There is no attempt to link posts.
F
Blog is difficult to read or follow. Many posts are missing or in an
illogical order. Individual posts lack detail and there is no support from
embedded media.