The Bible: The Word of G-d?

By Gary Konecky

There are those who believe the bible is the word of G-d. There is no doubt in my mind
that the Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible) is the word of G-d. That said, I
believe Joshua may have written the account of Moses’ death at the end of Deuteronomy.

The problem is that many of those who say the bible is the word of G-d, then cite a
fundamentalist, literalist interpretation of the bible as authority for their beliefs and
prejudices. They then act on those beliefs and prejudices to impose their will upon
others. There are several scriptural problems with this approach, in addition to the lack
of respect for those of differing faith traditions.

The first scriptural problem is that G-d no longer sends us prophets. No one today can
speak for G-d, as no one today is a prophet.

Second, I have yet to see an accurate translation of the Hebrew Bible into English. The
reason for this is very simple. It is impossible to translate Hebrew into English
accurately. Hebrew is a very nuanced language in regard to scriptural matters. For
example, there are different names for G-d used in the Hebrew Bible. These different
names all indicate different attributes of G-d. If we are to properly understand the
Almighty and his intent, it would be useful to know what attribute the original Hebrew
text is mentioning; just as it is useful to understand the difference between a drizzle and a
thunderstorm if one has to go out in the rain.

Another example involves the Hebrew word “et” (also transliterated as “es” or “eth”). Et
appears many times in the Hebrew Bible. Et is a word that has no meaning. Yet every
time et appears, it alludes to something important, something important yet unspoken. Et
is so important it is discussed in the Talmud (Kiddushin 57a). The Talmud is second
only to the Bible in the Jewish tradition. This important word, this word so full of
meaning that it appears numerous times in the bible as well as being discussed in the
Talmud, is not translated into English. How can one know the will of G-d when not all
the words of G-d are present?

Third, is the issue of mistranslation. An example of this can be found in the English
name for one of the books of the bible, Deuteronomy. Deuteronomy comes from ancient
Greek via Latin, with the Greek being a mistranslation of the original Hebrew (note 1).
Deuteronomy “literally means 'second law' coming from the Greek words nomos (law)
and deutero (second).” (note 2) The problem is not only is this word mistranslated, but
its meaning is incorrect as Moses did not merely retell the law in Deuteronomy. In
Deuteronomy, Moses also discussed commandments that are given only in Deuteronomy
(and that are not given in any of the other books of the Hebrew Bible). If you are giving
additional commandments, then you are not merely retelling the law, which is what the
name Deuteronomy means.
The Hebrew name for Deuteronomy is “Devarim” meaning “events” and “which can also
be translated as ‘words.’” (note 3) It is interesting to note that the Hebrew name provides
a very accurate insight into the content of this book of the bible, as this book consists of
Moses’ final address to the Jewish people (words); with the address consisting of Moses;
explaining the law, recounting the wondering in the desert (events), and providing final
instructions for the Jewish people as they enter the Land of Israel upon his passing.

Fourth, there are three different versions of the Ten Commandments. There is the Jewish
version, the Protestant version, and the Catholic version. Surely, if the English
translation of the bible that is being used were an accurate translation of the word of G-d
there would be only one version. It is also worth noting that there are subtle differences
in the text of the Hebrew Bible, as the two sets of tablets were slightly different. This
raises the question; what is G-d telling us with these two slightly different versions?

Lastly, the Hebrew Bible is filled with instances that cry out for explanation. For
example in the account of creation; day and night is created on the first day, yet the sun
and moon are not created until the fourth day. We also have the example of chapter one
of Genesis telling us that G-d created man and woman. Yet chapter two of Genesis
seemingly contradicts this when the account of the creation of woman is given, thereby
implying that woman was not created as stated in chapter one. Another example would
be the unusual word choice in Genesis 1:26 which states: “And G-d said: ‘Let us make
man.’” Who is the us? Did G-d create man or was it a group undertaking? If creating
man was a group undertaking, who are the other members of the group? If G-d created
man, why is us used? These few examples are all from the biblical account of creation.
In addition to these examples, there are numerous other examples like this throughout the
Hebrew Bible.

In conclusion, I believe that part of the Bible is the word of G-d. I also believe only an
arrogant fool would think that he or she has the knowledge and the wisdom of the
Almighty, and can therefore state with absolute certainty G-d’s intent based upon a
literalist reading of a text filled with ambiguity, mistranslations, missing words, and
seeming contradictions.

Note 1: http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=Deuteronomy&gwp=13

Note 2:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_meaning_of_the_Bible_word_Deuteronomy

Note 3: Page 319 of The Torah Anthology / Me’Am Lo’Ez, Book Two, The Patriarchs by
Rabbi Yaakov Culi, translated by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, Moznaim Publishing Corp.,
copyright 1989