Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GSM Frequency Planning With Band Segregation For The Broadcast Channel Carriers
GSM Frequency Planning With Band Segregation For The Broadcast Channel Carriers
1. Introduction
Optimizing the use of the available frequency resources is fundamental in order to increase the overall capacity of a
GSM system. To achieve this, a number of solutions may be adopted, like improved radio resource management
policies, deployment of advanced radio features, introduction of advanced resource planning strategies such as Dynamic
Channel Allocation or Fractional Loading. This paper addresses a fixed frequency planning strategy, based on the use of
dedicated bands for TCH and BCCH carriers respectively. References to this technique can be found in [1] and [2]. In
the following, frequency planning with band segregation is compared to conventional fixed frequency planning with
common TCH/BCCH band. Three cases have been considered:
1] system performance analysis considering an ideal scenario;
2] development of frequency plans with and without band segregation with reference to a realistic cell layout;
3] system performance analysis of a realistic scenario taking into account in field cell dimensioning and parameters.
The simulation results reported in case 2 were obtained with the frequency planning tool FREQUENT (FREQUency
assignmENT) developed in CSELT which takes into account the mutual average interference between cells evaluated on
a priori basis (e.g., without considering system functionalities nor users behavior); these results are therefore relevant
for the planning process. On the contrary, results presented in case 1 and 3 were obtained by means of a software tool
developed in CSELT (TOTO - TDMA Oriented sofTware tOol [3]), which models the main functionalities of the GSM
system and takes into account both propagation data, system functionalities (e.g. power control, DTX), and users'
behavior; these results are therefore relevant for the validation of the frequency plan. The two sets of results, although
referring to two different steps of system deployment and therefore being obtained with different methodologies, show
the same trend.
handover, Power Control (PC, only quality based case was considered) were taken into account, based on GSM
Specification; adjacent channel interference and frequency hopping were not taken into account.
2.2 Simulation results
Results obtained for the downlink are summarized in figure 1, which shows the values at 10% of the C/I cumulative
distribution versus the number of transceivers per cell. Two cases are considered, corresponding to active PC or PC and
DTX. The frequency plan with band segregation provides better overall performance for cell carrier equipment up to 6
transceivers per cell (corresponding to a reuse 7 for TCH) when both PC and DTX are active. Actually, this is the result
of two opposite effects. As figure 2 shows, the performance of the BCCH carriers worsen when moving from the case
without band segregation to the case with band segregation, due to the shorter reuse distance (with band segregation,
only 12 carriers are dedicated to BCCH whereas without band segregation all 48 carriers are available for BCCH
planning). On the contrary, figure 3 reveals that TCH performance improve substantially with band segregation. In this
case, TCH carriers are not affected by the interference coming from the BCCH carriers (which, according to the GSM
Specifications, are always transmitting with the maximum allowed power). This also allows to maximize the benefits of
system functions such as power control. The introduction of DTX further improves TCH performance. However, if the
number of transceivers per cell increases, thus making shorter the reuse distance of the TCH carriers, the performance
improvement gradually disappears.
In figure 1 it can be noted that the results with 4 TRX/cell are not aligned with other cases, in fact the performance
improvement achievable with dedicated bands is slightly worse than the one achievable with 5 TRX/cell. This is due to
the fact that with 4 TRX/cell the quality of the BCCH carriers is substantially lower than the quality of TCH carriers (see
figure 2 and 3); this implies that almost all values in the lower part of the cumulative distribution (from which the 10%
value is extracted) belong to the BCCH carriers, whose relative weight is therefore definitely higher than in other cases.
If we referred to the 20% values of the C/I cumulative distributions (rather than 10%), this phenomena disappears.
Figure 3 highlights that the TCH quality decreases more rapidly with band segregation when the reuse distance
decreases; in fact, with the common band approach, TCH carriers suffers from the interference coming from BCCH
carriers, which is basically constant, regardless of the number of carriers per cell.
Simulation results do not show any advantage of the frequency planning with band segregation for the uplink. In fact, in
the uplink, the increased interference due to a smaller reuse distance of both TCH and BCCH carriers is not balanced by
any positive effect, since the BCCH carriers in uplink do not behave differently than normal TCH carriers (i.e. PC and
DTX can be applied to BCCH carriers as well as to TCH carriers).
TRX/cell
4
5
6
7
Common Band
# carriers
Overall reuse
48
12
48(*)
9.6
48
8
48(**)
6.86
Band Segregation
BCCH reuse
12
12
12
12
# carriers
48
47
48
48
16
15
14
13
C/I 10% dif
C/I 10% com
C/I 10% com DTX
C/I 10% dif DTX
12
11
10
9
3
TRX/cell
TCH reuse
12
9
7
6
21
20
19
18
C/I DL 10% - BCCH
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
C/I 10% bcch dif
C/I 10% bcch com
C/I 10% bcch com DTX
C/I 10% bcch dif DTX
10
9
8
7
3
TRX/cell
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
3
TRX/cell
BCCH band
TCH band
1
2
3
1 50
1 15
1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,
17,19,21,23,25,27,29
1 50
16 50
2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,
22,24,26,28, 30 50
o
o
o
o
cell constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 3 between frequencies assigned to the same cell;
site constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 2 between frequencies assigned to different cells
belonging to the same site;
400 kHz adjacencies constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 2 between frequencies assigned to 400
kHz adjacent cells;
200 kHz adjacencies constraint, implicating a minimum distance equal to 1 between frequencies assigned to 200
kHz adjacent cells.
The area on which the three frequency plans are accomplished is constituted by 622 cells and 2435 carriers, the
elaboration time (CPU time) used for the definition of each plan is equal to 10 hours on a Sun Spark Ultra Workstation.
The different plans are compared as a function of:
the minimum C/I ratio associated to the BCCH carriers set;
the minimum C/I ratio associated to the TCH carriers set;
the number of carriers under the threshold of 9 dB;
the C/I quality distribution of the BCCH carriers within the cells;
the distribution of the C/I associated to the BCCH carriers;
the distribution of the C/I associated to the TCH carriers.
The results are shown in the following tables and diagrams:
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
9.08 dB
9.07 dB
0
7.41 dB
7.13 dB
27
8.62 dB
7.54 dB
20
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
100%
48.5%
37.8%
27.8%
33.1%
15%
17.5%
6.4%
8.8%
1.8%
2.6%
0.5%
0.2%
Table 4: BCCH quality distribution within the cells (maximum cell equipment is equal to 6 TRX)
700
622
BCCH carriers
600
500
400
300
plan 1
302
235
plan 2
206
173
200
plan 3
93 109
100
40 55
0 11 16
0 3 1
0
1
4
Quality
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
< 9 dB
9-15 dB
15-20 dB
20-25 dB
25-30 dB
30-35 dB
> 35 dB
0.3%
0.2%
10.4%
17%
20.6%
33.3%
37.6%
41.3%
32.8%
28.6%
25.5%
15%
10.5%
7.1%
5.1%
3.9%
3.9%
3.4%
2.1%
1.4%
300
257
234
207
BCCH carriers
250
200
204
178
159
128
106
150
100
plan 1
plan 2
93
65
plan 3
65
44
50
32 24 24
0 2 1
21 13
0
<9
9-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
> 35
dB
Plan 1
Plan 2
Plan 3
< 9 dB
9-15 dB
15-20 dB
20-25 dB
25-30 dB
30-35 dB
> 35 dB
1.4%
1%
29.4%
30.7%
30.6%
41%
37.6%
38.3%
20.9%
20.8%
19%
5.6%
5.7%
7%
1.7%
2%
2.4%
1.4%
1.8%
1.7%
800
700
532556555
TCH carriers
600
500
plan 1
379378
345
400
plan 2
300
plan 3
200
100
102104127
0 25 19
31 36 43
26 32 30
30-35
> 35
0
<9
9-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
dB
mobility user terminals. Discontinuous transmission (DTX), handover, Power Control (PC, only quality based case was
considered) were considered, based on GSM Specifications; adjacent channel interference was taken into account.
4.2 Simulation Results
Simulations have shown an high load in the network characterized by an overall blocking probability higher than the 2%
considered in the ideal case. In this case the overall downlink performance in terms of C/I cumulative distribution do not
improve by adopting the frequency planning with band segregation (see figure 7). Anyway, this result is not in
contradiction with the one obtained by the analysis of the ideal scenario considered in section 2 above, since different
conditions apply. In the realistic scenario studied here, the network load is higher and non-uniformly distributed. Under
these conditions, the interference contributions from BCCH and TCH carriers tend to become more balanced; as a
consequence, the use of dedicated bands do not lead to a more efficient use of functionalities such as power control and
DTX. Moreover, in the scenario considered here, the number of transceivers per cell is quite high (up to 7, 5 on average)
and therefore the reuse factor is quite low. Finally, the frequency planning considered for this realistic scenario was
evaluated taking into account all adjacent constraints due to technology, which were not considered in the ideal case
(where the cluster approach was used) and which effectively reduce the degrees of freedom available for the planning
algorithm (in particular, when the number of available carriers is low, as in the dedicated bands case) with obvious
impact on the final frequency plan. Therefore, in the considered realistic case, the TCH performance in the band
segregation case are not capable of balancing the degradation of the BCCH performance. In the uplink, simulation
results do not show any advantage of the frequency planning with band segregation, in line with results previously
obtained in the ideal case.
100
90
80
70
60
COM
SEG
50
40
30
20
10
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
-1
0
C/I
5. Conclusion
The system performance analysis carried out considering an ideal scenario (section 2) has shown that the frequency
planning with band segregation can lead to a better performance in the downlink, reducing the quality of BCCH carriers
and increasing the carrier to interference ration of TCH carriers, thanks to an increased efficiency of network
functionalities such as power control. The system performance analysis carried out in section 4 considering a realistic
scenario under heavy traffic load has shown that the advantages of the frequency planning with dedicated bands
disappear.
This is confirmed by the analysis carried out with reference to the development of frequency plans with and without
band segregation considering a realistic cell layout.
Based on the analysis carried out in this paper, we conclude that, under the hypothesis and assumptions considered
herein, the frequency planning with band segregation can be a viable solution only in case of a small number of
transceivers (e.g, high reuse factor) per cell and under low traffic load.
References
[1] M. Madfors et al., High capacity with limited spectrum in cellular systems, IEEE Communications Magazine, Aug 1997
[2] F. Kronestedt, M. Frodigh, Frequency planning strategies for frequency hopping GSM, Proc. VTC97, Phoenix, Arizone, USA,
May 4-7 1997, vol III, pp 1862-1866
[3] F. Delli Priscoli, N.P. Magnani, V. Palestini, F. Sestini, Application of Dynamic Channel Allocation Strategies to the GSM
Cellular Network, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol 15, No 8, Oct 1997
[4] E. Damosso, F. Grimaldi, M. SantAgostino, Network Planning Tools and Activities in Italy, Proc. Mobile Radio Conference,
Nov 1991