To sump up here are the main points

First I want to make clear that social deprivation means deprivated of basic
rights, and our posture in this debate is that this one causes crime.
So, we have to have in mind that we dont born whit an innate sense of what is
right and what is wrong, either of what is legal and ilegal. And for this is
necessar a good education, and we get this one in our school and in our
house, but people who are deprivated of basic rights arent in the best
enviroment and in a lot of cases the are e!posed to negative role models with
their famil or communit. As a result, the might become criminals. "ike the
e!ample that m partner gave of Andrea, e!plaining the theor of the doctor
#obert Agnew.
$oreover, the second point is directl related with education, someone without
education or with a bad one cant have a good %ob in the future, so this means
that the famil can not a&ord food, shelter or healthcare. I mean the less
mone ou have, the harder is to survive, so ou will commit crime to tr to
survive. 'owever in this case it seems clear that it is the desesperation of
povert that causes this. (ut also, there are man people who are poor but still
choose to live a life of high moral standards and to have some respect for the
societ.
Finall some people, particularl those from deprived social ma feel that their
government is not helping them and the ma feel crime is the onl wa the
can have their problems heard. In spite of we know that government help this
people, but I think that more social programs, subsidies, funded education and
others, onl create more dependenc and people alwas want more and more.

In conclusion I want to )nish with a phrase that said *The true social progress is
not about of increasing the needs, is about reduce them, but for that is
necessar be more humble+.