Abdel-Rahman Et Al., 2011

Journal of Biotechnology 156 (2011) 286301
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Biotechnology
j our nal home page: www. el sevi er . com/ l ocat e/ j bi ot ec
Review
Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid
bacteria: Overview and limits
Mohamed Ali Abdel-Rahman
a,b
, Yukihiro Tashiro
c
, Kenji Sonomoto
a,d,
a
Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Division of Applied Molecular Microbiology and Biomass Chemistry, Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture,
Graduate School, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
b
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science (Boys), Al-Azhar University, PN:11884, Naser City, Cairo, Egypt
c
Department of Life Study, Seinan Jo Gakuin University Junior College, 1-3-5 Ibori, Kita-ku, Kokura, Kitakyushu City, Fukuoka 803-0835, Japan
d
Laboratory of Functional Food Design, Department of Functional Metabolic Design, Bio-Architecture Center, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581,
Japan
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 2 February 2011
Received in revised form31 May 2011
Accepted 17 June 2011
Available online 23 June 2011
Keywords:
Lignocellulose-derived sugar
Lactic acid production
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB)
Metabolic pathways
Designed biomass
a b s t r a c t
Lactic acid is an industrially important product with a large and rapidly expanding market due to its
attractive and valuable multi-function properties. The economics of lactic acid production by fermenta-
tion is dependent on many factors, of which the cost of the raw materials is very signicant. It is very
expensive when sugars, e.g., glucose, sucrose, starch, etc., are used as the feedstock for lactic acid produc-
tion. Therefore, lignocellulosic biomass is a promising feedstock for lactic acid production considering
its great availability, sustainability, and low cost compared to rened sugars. Despite these advantages,
the commercial use of lignocellulose for lactic acid production is still problematic. This review describes
the conventional processes for producing lactic acid from lignocellulosic materials with lactic acid bac-
teria. These processes include: pretreatment of the biomass, enzyme hydrolysis to obtain fermentable
sugars, fermentation technologies, and separation and purication of lactic acid. In addition, the difcul-
ties associated with using this biomass for lactic acid production are especially introduced and several
key properties that should be targeted for low-cost and advanced fermentation processes are pointed
out. We also discuss the metabolism of lignocellulose-derived sugars by lactic acid bacteria.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
2. Overview of lactic acid production from lignocellulosic biomass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
2.1. Composition of lignocellulosic biomass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
2.2. Conventional processes for lactic acid production by LAB from lignocellulosic biomass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
2.2.1. Pretreatment methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
2.2.2. Enzymatic hydrolysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
2.2.3. Fermentation process with LAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
2.2.4. Separation and purication of lactic acid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
2.3. Difculties in using lignocellulosic biomass for efcient lactic acid production by LAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
2.3.1. Resistant nature of biomass and pretreatment problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
2.3.2. High-cost enzymes and their feedback inhibition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
2.3.3. Formation of by-products due to the heterofermentation of pentose sugars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
2.3.4. Carbon catabolite repression caused by the heterogeneity of the hydrolysate-sugar composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
Corresponding author at: Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Division of Applied Molecular Microbiology and Biomass Chemistry, Department of Bioscience and
Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan. Tel.: +81 92 642 3019; fax: +81 92 642 3019.
E-mail address: sonomoto@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp
(K. Sonomoto).
0168-1656/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.017
M.A. Abdel-Rahman et al. / Journal of Biotechnology 156 (2011) 286301 287
3. Fermentative lactic acid production by LAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
3.1. Improvement of lactic acid production by LAB in the eld of microbial technology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
3.2. Lactic acid production by LAB using lignocellulosic biomass and lignocellulose-derived sugars. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
4. Metabolism of lignocellulose-derived sugars by LAB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
5. Designed biomass study and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
1. Introduction
Lactic acid (2-hydroxypropanoic acid, CH
3
CH(OH)COOH) is
a natural organic acid with a long history of use in the food and
non-food industries, including the cosmetic and pharmaceutical
industries, and for the production of oxygenated chemicals, plant
growth regulators, and special chemical intermediates (Oshiro
et al., 2009; Singhvi et al., 2010; Tashiro et al., 2011). Currently,
there is an increased demand for lactic acid as a feedstock for the
production of biopolymer poly-lactic acid (PLA), which is a promis-
ing biodegradable, biocompatible, and environmentally friendly
alternative to plastics derived frompetrochemicals. PLA has many
uses in surgical sutures, orthopedic implants, drug delivery sys-
tems, and disposable consumer products (Adnan and Tan, 2007),
and its use would signicantly alleviate waste disposal problems.
The physical properties of PLAdepend on the isomeric composition
of lactic acid. Pure isomers, l- and d-lactic acid, are more valuable
than the racemic dl form because each isomer has its own spe-
cic industrial application. l-Lactic acid is used for the synthesis
of poly l-lactic acid (PLLA), a semi-crystalline biodegradable and
thermostable polymer that has a potentially large market in goods
packaging. PLLA has high tensile strength and lowelongation with
a high modulus that makes it suitable for medical products used in
orthopedic xation (e.g., pins, rods, ligaments, etc.), cardiovascular
applications (e.g., stents, grafts, etc.), dental applications, intestinal
applications, and sutures (John et al., 2006a). d-Lactic acid is used
for the production of poly d-lactic acid (PDLA) (John et al., 2009).
These pure polymers are relativelyheat sensitive, while stereocom-
plexes of PLLA and PDLA have a melting point 50
C higher than
their respective pure polymers (Ikeda et al., 1987; Tsuji and Fukui,
2003) and are more biodegradable (de Jong et al., 2001; Tashiro
et al., 2011). The ratio of l- and d-lactic acids inuences the prop-
erties and the degradability of PLA (Kharras et al., 1993).
Lactic acid can be produced either by chemical synthesis or
by microbial fermentation. Chemical synthesis from petrochemi-
cal resources always results in racemic mixture of dl-lactic acid,
which is a major disadvantage of this approach (Hofvendahl and
Hahn-Hgerdal, 2000). Conversely, microbial lactic acid fermenta-
tion offers an advantage in terms of the utilization of renewable
carbohydrate biomass, low production temperature, low energy
consumption, and the production of optically high pure lactic acid
by selecting an appropriate strain (Ilmen et al., 2007; Pandey et al.,
2001). Presently, almost all lactic acid produced globally is man-
ufactured by fermentation routes. In particular, there have been
numerous studies of lactic acid production by lactic acid bacteria
(LAB) in comparison with other microorganisms.
The demand for lactic acid has increased considerably due to its
wide range of applications; however, the highcost of the rawmate-
rials, e.g., starch and rened sugars, which accounts for the highest
portion of the production cost, represents one of the most serious
obstacles for the fermentative production of lactic acid to compete
with chemical synthesis (Datta et al., 1995). Cheap raw materials
are essential for the feasibility of the biotechnological production
of lactic acid because polymer producers and other industrial users
usually require large quantities of lactic acid at a relatively low
cost. The use of low-cost non-food materials for lactic acid pro-
duction appears to be more attractive because they do not have
any impact on the human food chain. Nowadays, lignocellulosic
materials from agricultural, agro-industrial, and forestry sources
represent a potentially inexpensive and renewable carbohydrate
feedstock for the large-scale fermentation of lactic acid due to their
abundance, low price, high polysaccharide content, and renewa-
bility (Duff and Murray, 1996; Parajo et al., 1996; Taniguchi et al.,
2005; Wyman, 1999). However, the cellulose and hemicellulose in
lignocellulose are not directly available for bioconversion to lac-
tic acid because of their intimate association with lignin (Schmidt
and Thomsen, 1998) and the lack of hydrolytic enzymes in LAB
(Tokuhiro et al., 2008).
There have been numerous investigations on the development
of biotechnological processes for lactic acid production, with the
ultimate objective of making the process more effective and eco-
nomical. In this review, we focus on the conventional processes
for lactic acid fermentation by LAB from lignocellulosic biomass
and lignocellulose-derived sugars. Moreover, we describe the lim-
itations of lactic acid production using such materials. We also
describe fermentative processes and technologies with practical
examples, the metabolism of biomass-derived sugars, and the
promising prospects of lactic acid fermentation.
2. Overviewof lactic acid production fromlignocellulosic
biomass
2.1. Composition of lignocellulosic biomass
The global production of plant biomass, of which over 90%
is lignocellulose, amounts to 20010
9
tons per year, where
82010
9
tons of the primary biomass remains potentially
accessible (Lin and Tanaka, 2006). Lignocellulosic biomass is
organic material derived from a biological origin, and represents
the most abundant global source of biomass that has been largely
unutilized (Lin and Tanaka, 2006). It is mainly composed of cellu-
lose (insoluble bers of -1,4-glucan), hemicellulose (noncellulosic
polysaccharides including xylans, mannans, and glucans), and
lignin (a complex polyphenolic structure), which form90% of the
dry matter, plus lesser amounts of minerals, oils, and other com-
ponents (Balat, 2011; Molina-Sabio and Rodrguez-Reinoso, 2004;
Yang et al., 2009). This biomass includes forest and crop residues
(Chen and Lee, 1997; Melzoch et al., 1997), municipal solid waste
(John et al., 2007), waste paper (McCaskey et al., 1994), and wood
(Linko et al., 1984). The structural and chemical composition of lig-
nocellulosic material has varying amounts of these components
because of genetic and environmental inuences and their inter-
actions (Demirbas, 2005). The proportion of biomass constituents
varies between species, and there are distinct differences between
hardwoods and softwoods. The total content of cellulose and hemi-
cellulose is higher in hardwoods (78.8%) than in softwoods (70.3%),
but the total content of lignin is higher in softwoods (29.2%) than in
hardwoods (21.7%) (Balat, 2009). As shown in Table 1, the cellulose,
hemicellulose, andlignincontent depends onthetypeof lignocellu-
losic biomass, which indicates that an appropriate material should
be selected for the corresponding fermentation.
Cellulose, the major component of plant biomass (3060% of
total feedstock dry matter), is a homopolysaccharide composed
of -d-glucopyranose units, linked by -(14)-glycosidic bonds.
288 M.A. Abdel-Rahman et al. / Journal of Biotechnology 156 (2011) 286301
Table 1
The contents of cellulose, hemicellulose, andlignininvarious types of lignocellulosic
biomass (% dry weight).
a
Lignocellulosic materials Cellulose (%) Hemicellulose (%) Lignin (%)
Algae (green) 2040 2050 NA
b
Aspen hardwood 51 29 16
Birch Hardwood 40 39 21
Chemical pulps 6080 2030 210
Coastal Bermuda grass 25 35.7 6.4
Corn cobs 45 35 15
Cornstalks 3947 2631 35
Cotton seed hairs 8095 520 0
Cotton, ax, etc. 8095 520 NA
b
Grasses 2540 2550 1030
Hardwood 452 305 204
Hardwood barks 2240 2038 3055
Hardwood stems 4055 2440 1825
Leaves 1520 8085 0
Newspaper 4055 2540 1830
Nut shells 2530 2530 3040
Paper 8599 0 015
Pine softwood 44 26 29
Primary wastewater
solids
815 NA
b
2429
Softwood 422 272 283
Softwood barks 1838 1533 3060
Softwood stems 4550 2535 2535
Solid cattle manure 1.64.7 1.43.3 2.75.7
Sorted refuse 60 20 20
Spruce softwood 43 26 29
Swine waste 6.0 28 NA
b
Switch grass 45 31.4 12.0
Waste papers from
chemical pulps
6070 1020 510
Wheat straw 3741 2732 1315
WillowHardwood 37 23 21
, Not determined.
a
Source: Balat (2011), Olsson and Hahn-Hgerdal (1996) and Sun and Cheng
(2002).
b
NA not available.
The orientation of the linkages and additional hydrogen bond-
ing make the polymer rigid and difcult to break. Hemicellulose
(2040% of total feedstock dry matter) is a short, highly branched
heterogeneous polymer consisting of pentose (xylose and arabi-
nose), hexose (galactose, glucose, and mannose), and acid sugars
(Saha, 2000). Mannose is the dominant hemicellulose sugar in soft-
woods, while xylose is dominant in hardwoods and agricultural
residues (Taherzadeh and Karimi, 2008). Hemicellulose is more
readily hydrolyzed compared to cellulose because of its branched
and amorphous nature. Lignin (1525% of total feedstock dry mat-
ter) is an aromatic polymer synthesized from phenylpropanoid
precursors. The phenylpropane units of lignin (primarily syringyl,
guaiacyl, and phydroxy phenol) are bonded together by a set of
linkages toforma verycomplexmatrix(Demirbas, 2008). This com-
plex matrix consists of a variety of functional groups, e.g., hydroxyl,
methoxyl, and carbonyl groups, which impart a high polarity to
the lignin macromolecule (Feldman et al., 1991). Lignin is consid-
ered to be difcult to use as a fermentation substrate because it
makes the biomass resistant tochemical andbiological degradation
(Taherzadeh and Karimi, 2008).
2.2. Conventional processes for lactic acid production by LAB
fromlignocellulosic biomass
Despite the advantages in its sustainability and availability,
the commercial use of lignocellulose in lactic acid production is
still problematic due to its complexity. The biochemical conver-
sion of lignocellulosic biomass requires several processing steps
designed to convert structural carbohydrates to monomeric sug-
ars, e.g., glucose, xylose, arabinose, and mannose. These sugars
Lignocellulosic
biomass
Chemical/physical
Pretreatment
Cellulose
Hydrolyzed
Hemicellulose
Enzymatic
hydrolysis
Lignin
Mainly
Glucose
Mainly
Pentoses
Fermentation
Lactic acid
Separation
Fig. 1. A general owchart of the conventional process for lactic acid production
fromlignocellulosic biomass materials.
can be fermented to lactic acid by wild-type and breeding strains,
with varying degrees of effectiveness. Once the technologies are
established and commercialized, a wide range of valuable products
could be produced fromlignocellulosic biomass. The conventional
processes for producing lactic acid from lignocellulosic biomass
include the following 4 main steps (Fig. 1):
(1) Pretreatmentbreaking down the structure of the lignocellu-
losic matrix.
(2) Enzymatic hydrolysisdepolymerizing lignocellulose to fer-
mentative sugars, such as glucose and xylose, by means of
hydrolytic enzymes.
(3) Fermentationmetabolizing the sugars to lactic acid, generally
by LAB.
(4) Separation and purication of lactic acidpurication of lactic
acid to meet the standards of commercial applications.
2.2.1. Pretreatment methods
The enzymatic susceptibility of native lignocellulose is difcult
and slow due to the association of cellulose and hemicellulose
with lignin (Schmidt and Thomsen, 1998). The main goals of
pretreatment are to remove lignin, separate cellulose and hemicel-
lulose, increase the accessible surface area, partially depolymerize
cellulose, and increase the porosity of the materials to aid in
the subsequent access of the hydrolytic enzymes (Chandel et al.,
2007; Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009; Kumar et al., 2009; Sun and
Cheng, 2002; Taherzadeh and Karimi, 2007; Zhang et al., 2009).
The hemicellulose should be removed or altered without degra-
dation for a high ultimate yield of sugars (Mosier et al., 2005).
Pretreatment includes physical (milling and grinding), chemical
(alkali, dilute acid, oxidizing agents, andorganic solvents), physico-
chemical (steamexplosion/autohydrolysis, hydrothermolysis, and
wet oxidation), and biological methods. Some methods disrupt
the lignincarbohydrate complex, and other disrupts the highly
ordered crystalline cellulose structure (Sun et al., 1995).
Different pretreatment methods have been extensively devel-
oped, including ammonia ber explosion and ammonia recycle
percolation (Jorgensen et al., 2007), lime (Kaar and Holtzaple,
2000), organosolv (Pan et al., 2006), liquid hot water (Antal, 1996),
ionic liquid (Dadi et al., 2006), alkaline pretreatment (Lau et al.,
2008), dilute acid and steam explosion (Laser et al., 2002; Mosier
et al., 2005; Parisi, 1989; Yang and Wyman, 2008), and enzymatic
treatment (Anderson et al., 2005; Converse, 1993; Hayn et al.,
1993; Ladisch et al., 1983). Among these methods, dilute acid pre-
treatment is still the method of choice in several model processes
(Wyman et al., 2005). The initial pretreatment reaction involves a
mild acid-catalyzing hydrolysis of the glycosidic bonds of hemi-
cellulose and the ether linkages in lignin (Fengel and Wegener,
1989), in which the organic acids, formed by the cleavage of labile
ester groups, catalyze the hydrolysis of hemicellulose. Fractiona-
tion is achieved by the enlargement of the inner surface. The effects
of different pretreatment methods upon different lignocellulosic
materials, e.g., corn stover (Chen et al., 2009), wheat straw (Sun
and Chen, 2008), switchgrass (Esteghlalian et al., 1997), rice straw
(Zhang and Cai, 2008), and sugarcane bagasse (Rabelo et al., 2009),
have been investigated.
The pretreatment process is a very critical stage in lignocellu-
lose bioconversion. If pretreatment is not sufciently efcient, the
resultant residue is not easily saccharied by hydrolytic enzymes
and, if it is too severe, toxic compounds can be produced that
inhibit microbial metabolism and growth (Kodali and Pogaku,
2006). Therefore, pretreatment has a great potential to inuence
the downstreamcosts by determining fermentation toxicity, enzy-
matic hydrolysis rates, enzyme loading, mixing power, product
concentrations, product purication, waste treatment demands,
power generation, and other process variables. An effective pre-
treatment process should meet the following requirements: (1)
highly digestible pretreated solid; (2) no signicant degradation
of sugars; (3) good recovery of high sugar concentrations; (4) sugar
formation by subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis; (5) effective at low
moisture contents; (6) form minimal or no microbial inhibitory
by-products; (7) require minimal energy input; (8) high degree of
simplicity; (9) not require biomass size reduction; (10) low cost
materials for the construction of pretreatment reactors and to be
easily managed at large volumes; (11) produce less residues; (12)
consume fewand cheap chemicals; and (13) have environmentally
acceptable features (Galbe and Zacchi, 2007; Lynd, 1996; Sun and
Cheng, 2002; Wu et al., 2011; Yang and Wyman, 2008).
2.2.2. Enzymatic hydrolysis
Enzymatic hydrolysis is the most promising means to yield fer-
mentable sugars from pretreated lignocellulosic biomass, and is
necessary to allowLABto utilize polysaccharides as a carbonsource
(Hinman et al., 1992; Lin and Tanaka, 2006; Lynd et al., 1996; Ogier
et al., 1999; Taniguchi et al., 2005; Yu and Zhang, 2004). The goal
of enzymatic hydrolysis is to depolymerize the polysaccharides in
the water-insoluble solid fraction that remains after pretreatment.
There are 2 general categories of enzymes necessary to convert
cellulose and hemicellulose into soluble sugars: cellulases and
hemicellulases, respectively. To maximize enzymatic hydrolysis,
mixtures of these enzymes are needed to increase hemicellulose
hydrolysis and thus increase the access of cellulase, leading to a
decreased hydrolysis time and process cost (hgren et al., 2007; Tu
and Saddler, 2010; Zhang et al., 2010a).
The rate of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose is greatly
affected by its degree of polymerization (Chang and Holtzapple,
2000; Cohen et al., 2005; Kumar et al., 2008). Efcient degradation
and saccharication of cellulose require a synergistic reaction of
the following 3 classes of cellulolytic enzymes:
(a) Endo--1,4-glucanases (EG; EC 3.2.1.3): randomly hydrolyze
accessible intramolecular -1,4-glucosidic bonds of cellulose
chains and insert a water molecule in the -(1,4) bond, creating
a newreducing and non-reducing chain end pair.
(b) Exo--1,4-glucanases or cellobiohydrolases (CBH; EC 3.2.1.91):
cleave cellulose chains at the ends of the polymer, releasing
soluble cellobiose or glucose.
(c) -Glucosidases (-G; EC 3.2.1.21) (cellobiases): complete the
hydrolysis bycleavingcellobiose into2glucose molecules (Lynd
et al., 2002) and thus relieve the system from end-product
inhibition (Fujii et al., 1995). They are also active on cello-
oligosaccharides (Kumar et al., 2008).
Individual cellulases have very limited hydrolytic activity, while
a mixture of cellulases can exhibit a synergistic effect (Nidetzky
et al., 1994; Zhang et al., 2007). Extensive research has been per-
formedtoimprove the hydrolytic efciencyof suchenzymes (Baker
et al., 1998; Mais et al., 2002; Selig et al., 2008). In addition to these
3 major groups of cellulases, accessory or helper enzymes that
attack hemicellulose (Berlin et al., 2005) and lignin (Palonen and
Viikari, 2004) may also play a role in hydrolysis by clearing the
access of the main enzymes to cellulose.
Unlike cellulose, xylans are chemically quite complex, and
their degradationrequires multiple enzymes. Enzymatic hydrolysis
of hemicellulose requires endo-1,4--xylanase, -xylosidase, -
glucuronidase, -l-arabinofuranosidase, and acetylxylan esterase,
which act on xylan degradation and saccharication (Carvalheiro
et al., 2008; Saha, 2004), and -mannanase and -mannosidase,
which cleave the glucomannan polymer backbone (Kumar et al.,
2008). Although more enzymes are required for xylan hydrolysis
than for cellulose hydrolysis, the substrate is more easily accessible
because xylan does not formtight crystalline structures (Keshwani
and Cheng, 2009).
The hydrolytic efciency of a multi-enzyme mixture in the
process of lignocellulose hydrolysis depends on the properties of
the individual enzymes and their ratio in the multi-enzyme cock-
tail (Irwin et al., 1993; Zhou et al., 2009). Recently, Lin et al.
(2011) constructed a cellulase cocktail for a more efcient enzy-
matic hydrolysis of lignocellulose and a more rational utilization of
enzymes by using combinations of the 3 enzymes, 2 cellulases, and
1 xylanase.
2.2.3. Fermentation process with LAB
The hydrolysate of a lignocellulosic biomass is a mixture of
hexoses (e.g., glucose) and pentoses (e.g., xylose and arabinose).
Lignincannot be used for lactic acid fermentation. The effective uti-
lization of cellulose- and hemicellulose-derived sugars can reduce
the production cost of biomaterials by as much as 25% (Hinman
et al., 1989). Fermentation technologies must be cost competitive
withchemical synthesis to validate the use of biotechnological pro-
cesses on an industrial scale (Bustos et al., 2007). The key economic
drivers inthe fermentationprocess are highproduct yields, produc-
tivity, and the concentration of products formed, which strongly
inuences the product recovery costs. In order to achieve maxi-
mum lactic acid yield and productivity, a large number of studies
have investigated lactic acid fermentation by LAB from lignocel-
lulosic biomass in the eld of microbial technology, as described
in detail in Section 3.2. Biomass materials have been used as
substrates for lactic acid production by LAB, including lignocel-
lulose/hemicellulose hydrolysates (Karel et al., 1997), cottonseed
hulls (Vickroy, 1985), corncob (Guo et al., 2010; Moldes et al., 2006;
Shen and Xia, 2006; Wang et al., 2010), corn ber hydrolysates and
stalks (Saha and Nakamura, 2003; Vickroy, 1985), apple pomace
(Gullon et al., 2008), wood hydrolysate (Wee et al., 2004), beet
molasses (Gksungur andGvenc , 1999; Kotzamanidis et al., 2002),
sugar cane press mud and bagasse (Xavier and Lonsane, 1994;
Laopaiboonet al., 2010), cassava bagasse (Johnet al., 2006a,b; Rojan
et al., 2005), cellulose (Venkatesh, 1997; Singhvi et al., 2010), paper
sludge(Marques et al., 2008), carrot processingwaste(Pandeyet al.,
2001), molasses spent wash (Sharma et al., 2003), and wheat bran
(John et al., 2006c; Naveena et al., 2005a,b).
2.2.4. Separation and purication of lactic acid
In the traditional chemical separation process, the fermentation
brothis rst neutralized by calciumcarbonate. The calciumlactate-
containing broth is then ltered to remove cells, carbon treated,
decolored, evaporated, and acidied with sulfuric acid to produce
lactic acid and insoluble calcium sulfate (Datta and Henry, 2006).
Pure lactic acid is further obtained by hydrolysis, esterication, and
distillation. The disadvantages of this process include the produc-
tion of a large amount of calciumsulfate (gypsum) as a by-product
and high sulfuric acid consumption (Qin et al., 2010). Other alter-
native lactic acid separation technologies such as adsorption (Chen
and Ju, 1998), reactive distillation (Kumar et al., 2006), ultraltra-
tion and electrodialysis (Choi et al., 2002; Datta and Henry, 2006;
Hbov et al., 2004; Kim and Moon, 2001; Madzingaidzo et al.,
2002), and nanoltration (Gonzalez et al., 2008; Li and Shahbazi,
2006) have also been studied as lactic acid separation and puri-
cation processes that do not yield salt waste. These separation
processes are more cost and energy efcient when compared with
traditional chemical separation processes. In addition, they have
several advantages including the lack of energy-intensive phase
changes or potentially expensive solvents or adsorbents as well as
the potential for the simultaneous separation and concentration of
lactic acid (Li et al., 2008).
2.3. Difculties in using lignocellulosic biomass for efcient lactic
acid production by LAB
The effective utilization of lignocellulosic biomass has some
inherent limitations due to its seasonal availability, scattered dis-
tributions, and the high costs of storage and transportation (Lin
and Tanaka, 2006; Polman, 1994). In addition, the main problems
encountered in the efcient conversion of lignocellulosic biomass
to lactic acid are: (a) the resistant nature of biomass and pre-
treatment problems; (b) high cost enzymes and their feedback
inhibition; (c) formation of by-products due to the heterofermen-
tation of pentose sugars; and (d) carbon catabolite repression
caused by the heterogeneity of hydrolysate-sugar composition.
These obstacles are briey discussed as follows:
2.3.1. Resistant nature of biomass and pretreatment problems
Crystalline nonreactivity and, inparticular, resistance to hydrol-
ysis are the major problems for efcient lignocellulose utilization
(Kumar et al., 2008). Although various pretreatment procedures
have been evaluated, its utilization is a major drawback and affects
the total economy of the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass
(Zhang et al., 2009). Pretreatment is an expensive step and has a
major inuence on the cost of the enzymatic hydrolysis and fer-
mentation processes (Lynd et al., 1996; Wooley et al., 1999). Also,
lignin limits the rate of cellulose hydrolysis by acting as a physi-
cal barrier that prevents the digestible parts of the substrate from
being hydrolyzed (Chang and Holtzapple, 2000; Esteghlalian et al.,
2001). Different strategies have been examined to overcome the
nonproductive adsorption of lignin to cellulase by alkali extraction
and the addition of proteins or other additives, e.g., polyethylene
glycol and Tween (Brjesson et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2005).
Another obstacle is the release of inhibitory compounds dur-
ing the pretreatment process. Although the composition of the
released compounds depends not only on the type of lignocellu-
losic material and the chemistry but also on the characteristics of
the pretreatment process. These inhibitory compounds interfere
with the hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates by cellulase (Mes-
Hartree et al., 1987). In addition, many potentially inhibitory
compounds released by pretreatment processes have been iden-
tied for the microorganisms used for fermentation (Mussatto
and Roberto, 2004; Palmqvist and Hahn-Hgerdal, 2000). Although
detoxication methods such as bioabatement (Lopez et al., 2004;
Nichols et al., 2005) and overliming (Nilvebrant et al., 2003) have
been proposed, the efciency of fermentation is still in need of
improvement. The isolation of superior LAB strains or genetically
engineered strains that are resistant to inhibitors, and advances
and improvements in the pretreatment of lignocellulose are still
needed to reduce the overall cost. Recently, wild-type Lactobacillus
brevis S3F4 was shown to have strong resistance to fermentation
inhibitors such as ferulic acid and furfural (Guo et al., 2010). Biolog-
ical delignication with white rot fungi, which selectively degrade
lignin and leave cellulosic materials, also has potential advantages
such as low-capital cost, low-energy input, no chemical require-
ments, mild environmental conditions, and high yields without
generating polluting by-products (Chaudhary et al., 1994; Kuhad
and Johri, 1992; Kumar et al., 2009). However, drawbacks of this
process include its long treatment period and low hydrolysis rate
(Kumar et al., 2008; Sun and Cheng, 2002).
2.3.2. High-cost enzymes and their feedback inhibition
The high costs of enzyme production, feedback inhibition, and
the excessive enzymatic dosages necessary to hydrolyze pre-
treatedbiomass aresomeof thedrawbacks limitingthecommercial
application of lignocellulose hydrolysis as a lignocellulosic-lactate
industry (Himmel et al., 1999; Wooley et al., 1999). During cellu-
lose saccharication, the sugar end products of hydrolysis do not
accumulate quickly because the sacchariedglucose andcellobiose
inhibit the EGandCBHactivities byfeedbackinhibition(Adsul et al.,
2007b; Ghosh and Das, 1971; Holtzapple et al., 1990; Lee and Fan,
1983). Several methods have been developed to reduce this inhi-
bition, including the improvement of -G activity in the cellulase
system (Shen and Xia, 2004), removing the released sugars dur-
ing hydrolysis by ultraltration or simultaneous saccharication
and fermentation (SSF) (Rezaei et al., 2008), optimizing cellulase
enzyme conditions (i.e., temperature, pH, and enzyme loading
amounts) (Sun and Cheng, 2002; Ou et al., 2009), or supplying -G
during hydrolysis to avoid cellobiose accumulation (Caminal et al.,
1985; Moldes et al., 2001; Ramos and Saddler, 1994). Studies to
remove such forms of inhibition are still in progress.
2.3.3. Formation of by-products due to the heterofermentation of
pentose sugars
Lignocellulosic hydrolysates contain not only hexoses but also
pentoses. Hexoses can easily be fermented by LAB, while pen-
tose sugars cannot be fermented by most LAB (Hofvendahl and
Hahn-Hgerdal, 2000; Tanaka et al., 2002). In general, a few LAB
metabolize pentose sugars via the phosphoketolase (PK) pathway,
whichexhibits heterofermentationwithequimolar amounts of lac-
tic acidandacetic acidproducedandreaches only0.60C-mol/C-mol
in terms of the theoretical yield of lactic acid to pentose sugars
(Abdel-Rahman et al., 2011b; Oshiro et al., 2009; Patel et al., 2006;
Tanaka et al., 2002). This co-productionof acetic acid and lactic acid
also results in an increase of the lactic acid purication cost (Garde
et al., 2002; Patel et al., 2006); therefore, this approach is not con-
ducive for the industrial fermentation of pentoses to lactic acid. To
overcome this obstacle, we previously isolated a LAB strain, Lac-
tococcus lactis IO-l, which could utilize xylose with a high lactate
yield and lowacetate production (Tanaka et al., 2002). Okano et al.
(2009a,b) engineered the LAB Lb. plantarum strain to produce lac-
tic acid fromxylose and arabinose via the pentose phosphate (PP)
pathway, leadingtohomolactateproduction. Recently, we reported
that a novel LAB, Enterococcus mundtii QU 25, consumed xylose
homofermenatively without acetate production (Abdel-Rahman
et al., 2010a, 2011b); therefore, the purication cost will be sig-
nicantly decreased with this strain.
2.3.4. Carbon catabolite repression caused by the heterogeneity
of the hydrolysate-sugar composition
One of the major obstacles in using lignocellulosic biomass as
a feedstock is the inherent heterogeneity of its sugar composition
(Kim et al., 2010a). To achieve maximum product yield and pro-
ductivity, the complete utilization of these sugars is essential (Kim
et al., 2010b; Saha, 2003). In many LAB, fermentation of mixed
carbohydrates is achieved sequentially, whereby the utilization of
glucose represses the consumption of alternative sugars due to car-
bon catabolite repression (Saier, 1998; Stulke and Hillen, 1999;
Titgemeyer and Hillen, 2002). This sequential utilization of mixed
sugars makes the fermentation process complex and often reduces
the yield and productivity (Bothast et al., 1999). Carbon catabolite
repression by LAB has been reported in many strains, e.g., Lb. casei
(Gosalbes et al., 1999; Veyrat et al., 1994; Viana et al., 2000), Lb.
pentosus (Chaillou et al., 1999, 2001; Mahr et al., 2000), Lb. plan-
tarum (Marasco et al., 1998), Lb. sakei (Zuniga et al., 1998), and Lb.
delbrueckii (Morel et al., 1999; Schick et al., 1999). AfewLAB strains
have been reported to simultaneously consume lignocellulose-
derived sugars, e.g., Lb. brevis (Guo et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2009),
Lb. plantrum (Guo et al., 2010), and our newly isolated strain E.
mundtii QU 25 (Abdel-Rahman et al., 2010a,b, 2011a). Mixed LAB
cultures havealsobeenusedtomaximizetheyieldandproductivity
frommixed sugars (Cui et al., 2011; Taniguchi et al., 2004). There-
fore, it is essential to isolate LAB strains or to establish genetically
engineered strains for efcient lignocellulose utilization.
3. Fermentative lactic acid production by LAB
3.1. Improvement of lactic acid production by LAB in the eld of
microbial technology
It has generally been observed that pH, nutrient concentration,
substrate concentration, end products concentration, and tem-
perature signicantly affect the growth of LAB and lactic acid
production. These factors may decrease cell density and the lac-
tic acid titer, yield, and productivity in some cases. Researchers in
the eldof microbial technology have conductednumerous studies
to establish an efcient method of lactic acid production by LAB.
In lactic acid fermentation, low pH has an inhibitory effect on
cellular metabolismand lactic acid production. The majority of LAB
cannot grow below pH 4, although the pK
a
of lactic acid is 3.78
(Adachi et al., 1998); therefore, neutralizing agents such as cal-
ciumcarbonate, sodiumhydroxide, or ammoniumhydroxide must
be added to keep the pH at a constant value in order to reduce
the inhibitory effects of lowpH. pH-controlled batch fermentation
signicantly improves lactic acid production, yield, and produc-
tivity by different LAB strains, e.g., Lb. delbrueckii (Tashiro et al.,
2011), E. mundtii QU 25 (Abdel-Rahman et al., 2011a,b), and E. fae-
cium (Shibata et al., 2007). Batch fermentation is a simple closed
culture systemthat contains an initial and limited amount of nutri-
ent, and nothing is added during fermentation except possibly acid
or alkali for pH control. The low levels of nutrient limit the cell
concentration, nal lactic acid concentration, and productivity. It
was reported that the addition of nutrients to a culture broth of E.
mundtii QU 25 during batch fermentation increased the cell mass
and lactic acid production and productivity (Abdel-Rahman et al.,
2011a). In addition, batch fermentation was superior to contin-
uous fermentation in some respects, particularly lactic acid titer
(Buyukgungor and Bueschelberger, 1986; Hofvendahl and Hahn-
Hgerdal, 2000; Nomura et al., 1987). High lactic acid production
has been obtained with batch fermentation of LAB with the pro-
duction of 150g/L l-lactate fromglucose (Bai et al., 2004), 87.2g/L
d-lactate from glucose (Tashiro et al., 2011), and 119g/L l-lactate
(Abdel-Rahmanet al., 2011a) and80g/L d-lactate (Joshi et al., 2010)
fromcellobiose.
Substrate inhibition always occurs at high sugar concentra-
tions (Ding and Tan, 2006; Gatje and Gottschalk, 1991; Oshiro
et al., 2009). To overcome or reduce substrate inhibition, fed-batch
cultures were a better fermentation systemthan batch and contin-
uous cultures because they allowfor an increased maximumviable
cell concentration and prolonged culture lifetime, which result in
product accumulation to a higher concentration. Bai et al. (2004)
developed a process for the production of ammoniumlactate with
Lb. lactis in pH-controlled fed-batch fermentation with 161.2g/L
of lactic acid. Ding and Tan (2006) developed a high lactic acid
concentration process using 4 different fed-batch feeding strate-
gies with Lb. casei: pulse fed-batch, constant feed rate fed-batch,
constant residual glucose concentrationfed-batch, andexponential
feed rate fed-batch fermentations. They generated up to 210g/L of
lactic acid and a 97% yield with an exponential rate of feeding glu-
cose solution and yeast extract (Ding and Tan, 2006). However, in
all fed-batch technologies, the substrate concentration in the fer-
mentation broth is unstable, thereby generating more stress on the
producing strain. Recently, a method was developed to control the
concentration of the substrate through the automatic adjustment
of pH. Using this method, 96.3g/L and 170g/L of lactic acid were
obtained with Lb. lactis-11 (Zhang et al., 2010b) and Lb. rhamnosus
LA-04-1 (Li et al., 2010), respectively. Chang et al. (2011) suggested
multi-stage continuous high cell density culture as a new produc-
tion platform for obtaining high lactic acid titers (212.9g/L) and
productivity (10.6gL
1
h
1
) with Lb. rhamnosus. In addition to fed-
batchfermentation, continuous andsemi-continuous fermentation
processes have been used for lactic acid production by reducing
substrate inhibition (Amrane and Prigent, 1996; Nolasco-Hipolito
et al., 2002; Tashiro et al., 2011). The choice of the most suitable fer-
mentation process will depend upon the kinetic properties of the
LAB species used, the type of substrates, and the economic aspects
of the process.
High productivity was achieved with a high LAB cell density
without reducing the yield (Ohleyer et al., 1985). Many reports
showed that high cell density by cell recycling through ltration
drastically increased lactic acid productivity with Lb. helveticus
(Kulozik and Wilde, 1999), E. faecium(Shibata et al., 2007), and Lb.
delbrueckii (Tashiro et al., 2011). The cell recycling system, along
with repeated batch and continuous processes, generated a high
cell concentration and productivity in these processes (Kwon et al.,
2001; Oh et al., 2003). The immobilization of cells has been one
of the means used for high cell retention in bioreactors; however,
manystudies were not verysuccessful interms of yieldandproduc-
tivity (Cotton et al., 2001; Gksungur and Gvenc , 1999; Senthuran
et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2011).
One of the major problems associated with lactic acid pro-
duction by fermentation is end-product inhibition; therefore, to
decrease the inhibitory effect of lactic acid during fermentation, it
must be selectively removed from the fermentation broth. Many
attempts have been directed to develop processes that remove
lactic acid from the fermentation broth, e.g., extraction from the
fermentation broth (Hano et al., 1993; Honda et al., 1995; Iyer and
Lee, 1999a,b; Yabannavar and Wang, 1991; Ye et al., 1996), elec-
trodialysis (Boyaval et al., 1987; Hongo et al., 1986; Kimand Moon,
2001; Min-Tian et al., 2005; Nomura et al., 1998; van Nispen and
Jonker, 1991; Vonktaveesuk et al., 1994), and nanoltration mem-
branes and ion exchange resins (Jeantet et al., 1996; Monteagudo
andAldavero, 1999; Srivastava et al., 1992; Vaccari et al., 1993). The
continuous removal of lactic acid with extraction or electrodialysis
results in even higher lactic acid concentrations and yields com-
pared to conventional batch fermentation processes. Li et al. (2004)
developed a bioreactor combining conventional electrodialysis and
bipolar membrane electrodialysis for product removal and pHcon-
trol inlactic acidfermentation. Min-Tianet al. (2005) achievedhigh
lactic acid productivity and yields with a continuous electrodial-
ysis fermentation system. Even though these methods lower the
purication cost, the price of the membranes and decreases in the
permeate owrate make the process less cost efcient and are still
considerable drawbacks. Other methods, e.g., two phase systems,
have been developed; however, the extracting material must be
biocompatible and not harm the organism in order to be efcient
(Planes, 1998).
The inuence of temperature on lactic acid fermentation is
related to the growth kinetic parameters of LAB, lactic acid pro-
duction, and substrate consumption. Among LAB, most lactic acid
productivity studies have been conducted at temperatures of
3043
C. We recently isolated a newLAB strain, Lb. delbrueckii QU

41, that exhibits a high thermotolerance and produces d-lactic acid
at temperatures 50
C (Tashiro et al., 2011).

3.2. Lactic acid production by LAB using lignocellulosic biomass
and lignocellulose-derived sugars
Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) is a process with
separate enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation steps. The main
advantage of SHF is the ability to carry out each step under opti-
mal conditions for each process. However, the main disadvantage
of this method is the feedback inhibition of saccharied sugars,
e.g., glucose, xylose, cellobiose, and other oligosaccharides, on the
activity of hydrolytic enzyme during the hydrolysis process, which
demands lower loadings of the lignocellulosic biomass and higher
loadings of the hydrolytic enzymes to achieve reasonable yields
(Jeffries and Jin, 2000; Philippidis, 1996). In addition, this 2-step
process increases the total processing time. To overcome these
problems, SSF for lactic acid production by LAB has been devel-
oped as described in detail below. In comparison with SHF, SSF
offers many advantages, including: (1) reduced reactor volume due
to the usage of only a single reactor; (2) rapid processing time;
(3) reduced feedback inhibition; (4) increased productivity; (5)
enhanced rate of hydrolysis; (6) lower enzyme loading; and (7)
higher lactic acid yields (Ehrman and Himmel, 1994; Hofvendahl
and Hahn-Hgerdal, 2000; Iyer and Lee, 1999a,b; John et al., 2006c;
Linko and Javanainen, 1996; Moritz and Duff, 1996; Sun and Cheng,
2002; Tsai and Moon, 1998; Zheng et al., 1998).
SSF technology is a good strategy for lactic acid production by
LAB from renewable bioresources such as lignocellulosic mate-
rials. In SSF, cellulases and xylanases convert the lignocellulosic
materials to fermentable sugars. These enzymes are notoriously
susceptible to feedback inhibition by the saccharied sugars, e.g.,
glucose, xylose, cellobiose, and other oligosaccharides (Jeffries and
Jin, 2000). As described above, one of the advantages of SSF is that
the immediate consumptionof sugars by microorganismmaintains
the sugar concentrationat a lowlevel inthe bioreactor, thereby sig-
nicantly reducing feedback inhibition (Balat et al., 2008; Mosier
et al., 2005). In SSF, hydrolysis is usually the rate-limiting process
(Philippidis and Smith, 1995). SSF with cellulose has been stud-
ied with Lb. delbrueckii (Abe and Takagi, 1991) and Lb. rhamnosus
(Parajo et al., 1997; Schmidt and Padukone, 1997). Other studies
have reported lactic acid production by SSF from lignocellulosic
biomasses such as corncob, waste wood, wheat straw, and alfalfa
ber (Adenis et al., 1999; Cui et al., 2011; Gardeet al., 2002; Junet al.,
1998; Leeet al., 2004; Miuraet al., 2004; Moldes et al., 1999; Romani
et al., 2008; Sreenath et al., 2001; Yanez et al., 2003). SSF technol-
ogy with lignocellulosic materials needs to be further improved,
including the co-fermentation of multiple sugar substrates, i.e., the
saccharication of cellulose to glucose and hemicellulose to xylose,
and the fermentation of saccharied glucose and xylose.
Compared to SHF, the disadvantages of SSF lie in the differ-
ent temperatures and pH optima required for saccharication and
fermentation(Krishna et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2005), and the inhi-
bition of enzyme function by lactic acid. In general, the optimal
conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis and lactic acid fermentation
are 50
C and 3743
C, and a pH<5.0 and 5.07.0, respectively

(Hofvendahl and Hahn-Hgerdal, 2000). To performSSF more ef-
ciently, thermotolerant LAB are expected to raise the temperature
close to the optimal hydrolysis temperature, as have succeeded
in high lactic acid production with SSF technology by thermotol-
erant Bacillus coagulans (Ou et al., 2009, 2011). In addition, Iyer
and Lee (1999a) studied the effect of lactic acid on the enzy-
matic hydrolysis of cellulose in SSF. They found that the enzymatic
digestibility decreased from 79% to 56% as the lactic acid concen-
tration increased from0 to 90g/L. At levels higher than 90g/L lactic
acid, they observed a 50% inhibition of the digestibility. However,
the inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by lactic acid is much lower
than the feedback inhibition caused by glucose buildup (Takagi,
1984).
Depending on the source of lignocellulosic biomass (Table 1),
hemicellulose forms a substantial fraction of the lignocellulosic
biomass as well as cellulose, which yields pentose sugars such
as xylose and arabinose by saccharication. The majority of LAB
strains, e.g., Lb. delbrueckii (Monteagudo et al., 1997), Lb. helveti-
cus (Tango and Ghaly, 2002), and Lb. acidophilus (Portilla et al.,
2008), can convert cellulose-derived glucose to lactic acid, but not
hemicellulose-derived sugars. Others are capable of utilizing pen-
tose sugars for lactic acid production, including Lb. pentosus ATCC
8041 (Bustos et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2007), Lb. bifermentans DSM
20003 (Givry et al., 2008), Lb. brevis (Chaillou et al., 1998), Lb. plan-
tarum (Helanto et al., 2007), Leuconostoc lactis (Ohara et al., 2006),
Lc. lactis (Tanaka et al., 2002), and E. mundtii QU25 (Abdel-Rahman
et al., 2010a, 2011b). Recently, Okano et al. (2009a,b) succeeded
in replacing the PK pathway with the PP pathway in Lb. plan-
tarum ldhL1 in order to obtain a higher yield and production of
d-lactic acid from xylose and arabinose with very low amounts of
by-products. Among the LAB reported so far, only the wild-type E.
mundtii QU 25 (Abdel-Rahman et al., 2011a,b) and the genetically
modied Lb. plantarumldhL1 (Okano et al., 2009a,b) can perform
homo-lactate fermentation of pentose sugars, which is expected to
generate signicant levels of lactic acid production from lignocel-
lulosic biomass.
To date, direct lactic acid fermentation from xylan or cel-
lulose has not been demonstrated, and very few studies have
examinedlactic acidproductionfromxylooligosaccharides andcel-
looligosaccharides. Leu. lactis SHO-47 and SHO-54 were reported to
assimilate xylooligosaccharides fromdisaccharides to hexasaccha-
rides to produce d-lactic acid (Ohara et al., 2006). Recently, lactic
acid production from cellobiose with LAB has been established,
including Lb. delbrueckii mutant Uc-3 (Adsul et al., 2007b), Lb. plan-
tarum (Okano et al., 2010a), Lb. lactis mutant RM2-24 (Joshi et al.,
2010; Singhvi et al., 2010), and E. mundtii QU 25 (Abdel-Rahman
et al., 2011a). To our knowledge, only 2 reports have examined lac-
tic acid production fromcellooligosaccharides. Adsul et al. (2007b)
used the Lb. delbrueckii mutant Uc-3 strain for the utilization of
cellotriose, while Okano et al. (2010a) developed genetically mod-
Fig. 2. Pathways for lactic acid production fromlignocellulose-derived sugars (glucose, xylose, and arabinose) by lactic acid bacteria. Enzymes: (1) hexokinase; (2) glucose-6-
phosphate isomerase; (3) glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; (4) 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase; (5) arabinose isomerase; (6) ribulokinase; (7) ribulose-5-phosphate
3-epimerase; (8) xylose isomerase; (9) xylulokinase; (10) phosphoketolase; (11) acetate kinase; (12) phosphotransacetylase; (13) aldehyde dehydrogenase; (14) alcohol dehy-
drogenase; (15) lactate dehydrogenase; (16) transketolase; (17) transaldolase; (18) 6-phosphofructokinase; (19) fructose-bisphosphate aldolase; and (20) triosephosphate
isomerase. Solid lines indicate the homofermentative pathway. Thick-solid lines and dashed lines indicate PP/glycolytic pathway and PK pathway, respectively.
ied Lb. plantarum for cellotriose and cellopentaose fermentation
to produce lactic acid.
As mentioned above, lignocellulosic biomass yields several
types of sugars by hydrolysis, e.g., glucose, cellooligosaccharides,
xylose, and xylooligosaccharides; therefore, the mixed sugars in
lignocellulose hydrolysates need to be utilized simultaneously for
effective fermentation. Lb. buchneri NRRL B-30929 simultaneously
and completely ferments lignocellulosic hydrolysates (glucose
2
9
4
M
.
A
.

A
b
d
e
l
-
R
a
h
m
a
n

e
t

a
l
.

/

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

B
i
o
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y

1
5
6

(
2
0
1
1
)

2
8
6

3
0
1
Table 2
Lactic acid production fromlignocellulosic biomass materials and lignocellulose-derived sugars by lactic acid bacteria.
Microorganism Substrate Ferment. process C
LA
a
(g/L) Y
LA
b
(g/g) P
LA
c
(gL
1
h
1
) Reference
E. mundtii QU 25 Cellobiose Batch 119 0.83 1.12 Abdel-Rahman et al. (2011a)
Xylose Batch 86.7 0.84 0.90 Abdel-Rahman et al. (2010a, 2011b)
Glucose/cellobiose Batch 35.1 0.91 2.99 Abdel-Rahman et al. (2010b, 2011a)
Glucose/xylose Batch 0.83 3.6
d
Abdel-Rahman et al. (2010b)
Glucose/xylose/cellobiose Batch 0.79 2.6
d
Abdel-Rahman et al. (2010b)
E. faecalis RKY1 Wood hydrolysate Batch 93.0 0.93 1.7 Wee et al. (2004)
E. casseliavus and Lb. casei Xylose and glucose Batch 95.0 Taniguchi et al., 2004
Lb. bifermentans DSM20003 Wheat bran hydrolysate Batch with cell
immobilization
62.8 0.83 1.17 Givry et al. (2008)
Lb. brevis Corncob Batch 39.1 0.70 0.81 Guo et al. (2010)
Lb. brevis and Lb. pentosus Wheat strawhemicellulose Batch 7.1 0.95 Garde et al. (2002)
Lb. casei NCIMB 3254 Cassava bagasse Batch SSF 83.8 0.96 1.40 John et al. (2006a)
Lb. casei subsp rhamnosus Soft wood Batch 21.123.75 0.740.83 0.150.23 Iyer et al. (2000)
Lb. coryniformis ATCC 25600 Cellulose SSF 54.0 0.89 0.5 Yanez et al. (2003)
Lb. coryniformis spp. torquens ATCC 25600 Pretreated cardboard Batch SSF 23.4 0.56 0.48 Yanez et al. (2005)
Lb. delbreuckii Alfalfa bers SSF 35.4 0.35 0.75 Sreenath et al. (2001)
Lb. delbreuckii NRRL-B445 Cellulose SSF 65.0 0.18 Iyer and Lee (1999a,b)
Lb. delbrueckii IFO 3202 Defatted rice bran SSF 28.0 0.28 0.77 Tanaka et al. (2006)
Lb. delbrueckii mutant Uc-3 Cellobiose Batch 90.0 0.90 2.25 Adsul et al. (2007b)
Molasses Batch 166 0.95 4.15 Dumbrepatil et al. (2008)
Lb. delbrueckii NCIM2025 Cassava bagasse Batch SSF 81.9 0.94 1.36 John et al. (2006a)
Lb. delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii Mutant Uc-3 Sugar cane bagasse Batch SSF 67.0 0.83 0.93 Adsul et al. (2007a)
Lb. delbrueckii UFV H2B20 Brewers spent grain Batch 35.5 0.99 0.59 Mussatto et al. (2008)
Lb. delbrueckii ZU-S2 Corn cob residue Batch/continuous 48.7/44.2 0.95/0.92 1.01/5.7 Shen and Xia (2006)
Lb. casei and Lb. lactis Date juice Batch 60.3 3.2
d
Nancib et al., 2009
Lb. lactis RM2-24 Cellobiose Batch 80.0 0.8 1.66 Singhvi et al. (2010)
-Cellulose SSF 73.0 0.73 1.52 Singhvi et al. (2010)
Lb. pentosus Vine shoots Batch 24.0 0.76 0.51 Moldes et al. (2006)
Barley bran husks hydrolysates Batch 33.0 0.57 0.60 Moldes et al. (2006)
Corncob Batch 26.0 0.53 0.34 Moldes et al. (2006)
Lb. pentosus ATCC 8041 Vine-trimming wastes Batch 0.77 0.84 Bustos et al. (2004)
Corn stover Fed-batch SSF 74.8 0.65 Zhu et al. (2007)
Lb. planlarum Alfalfa bers SSF 46.4 0.46 0.64 Sreenath et al. (2001)
Lb. plantarum(Recombinant) -Glucan/cellopentaose/cellohexaose Batch 1.47/ Okano et al. (2010a)
1.27/
1.27
Lb. plantarum(Recombinant) Arabinose Batch 38.6 0.82 3.78
d
Okano et al. (2009a)
Lb. plantarum(Recombinant) Xylose Batch 41.2 0.89 1.6
d
Okano et al. (2009b)
Lb. rhamnosus and Lb. brevis Corn stover SSF 20.95 0.70 0.58 Cui et al. (2011)
Lb. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 Paper sludge Batch SSF 73.0 0.97 2.9 Marques et al. (2008)
Lb. rhamnosus ATCC 9595 (CECT288) Apple pomace Batch 32.5 0.88 5.41 Gullon et al. (2008)
Cellulosic biosludge SSF 39.4 0.36 0.82 Romani et al. (2008)
Lactobacillus sp. RKY2 Rice and wheat bran Batch 129 0.95 2.9 Yun et al. (2004)
Lignocellulosic hydrolysates Continuous with
cell-recycle
27.0 0.9 6.7 Wee and Ryu (2009)
Lc. lactis IO-1 Xylose Batch 33.26 0.68 Tanaka et al. (2002)
Sugar cane baggase Batch 10.9 0.36 0.17 Laopaiboon et al. (2010)
Leuconostoc lactis SHO-47 and SHO-54 Hydrolyzed xylan
(Xylooligosaccharides)
Batch 2.3 Ohara et al. (2006)
E, Enterococcus; Lb, Lactobacillus; Lc, Lactococcus; SSF, simultaneous saccharication and fermentation.
a
Lactic acid concentration (g/L).
b
Yield of lactic acid produced (g) to substrate consumed (g).
c
Lactic acid productivity.
d
Maximumvolumetric productivity.
Fig. 3. A owchart of the approaches used for useful substance production fromrenewable resources in a recent study and a designed biomass study.
and xylose) with the production of lactate, acetate, and ethanol
(Liu et al., 2009). Lc. lactis IO-1 has been used to convert glu-
cose, xylose, and arabinose in sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates
to a mixture of lactic acid, acetic acid, formic acid, and ethanol
(Laopaiboon et al., 2010). Marques et al. (2008) used Lb. rham-
nosus ATCC 7469 to produce lactic acid from short ber cellulose
of paper sludge by SSF without any pretreatment, and obtained
a lactic acid yield of 0.97g/g carbohydrates and a productiv-
ity of 2.9gL
1
h
1
(Marques et al., 2008). SSF of Lb. rhamnosus
ATCC 9595 with kraft pulp mill biosludge also produced lac-
tic acid with a yield of 0.38g/g biosludge and a productivity of
0.87gL
1
h
1
(Romani et al., 2008). Several authors have reported
biotechnological lactic acid production from lignocellulosic mate-
rials, agricultural waste, and forestry, industrial, or municipal solid
materials, e.g., unpolished rice (Lu et al., 2009), defatted rice bran
(Tanaka et al., 2006), and waste cardboard (Yanez et al., 2005).
Recently, in order to increase the conversion efciency of sub-
strates, co-cultures of LAB (e.g., E. casseliavus and Lb. casei or Lb.
casei and Lc. lactis) have been reported fromlignocellulose-derived
mixed sugars (Cui et al., 2011; Nancib et al., 2009; Taniguchi et al.,
2004). Lactic acidfermentationfromvarious types of lignocellulosic
biomass materials and lignocellulose-derived sugars by LAB strains
were achieved with different fermentation modes, as summarized
in Table 2.
As a result of these kinds of fermentation, cellulose- and
hemicellulose-derived sugars from lignocellulosic biomass can be
utilized with higher efciency and productivity; however mixed
sugar cultures have not been used on an industrial scale because of
their many limitations. In mixed sugar cultures, the strains used do
not always have similar optimum culture conditions for pH, tem-
perature, nutrients, oxygen demand, etc.; therefore, it is not easy to
dene the optimumcondition or to maintain stable conditions for
such cultures during fermentation, and corresponding studies are
scarce. The discovery of LAB that have the capability to homofer-
mentatively utilize a wide range of sugars, including C5 and C6
sugars, and can resist the inhibitory compounds generated during
the pretreatment process is still a major challenge in fermenta-
tiontechnologyfor theproductionof lactic acidfromlignocellulosic
biomass.
4. Metabolismof lignocellulose-derived sugars by LAB
LABcanbeclassiedinto2groups onthebasis of theendproduct
of their fermentation: homofermentative and heterofermentative.
Homofermentative LAB virtually produce only lactic acid, whereas
other products aregeneratedbyheterofermentativeLABalongwith
lactic acid (Axelsson, 1993; Hofvendahl and Hahn-Hgerdal, 2000).
Fig. 2 shows the metabolic pathways of hexose and pen-
tose in LAB. When hexose sugars such as glucose are used, they
are consumed by the Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, and
Pediococcus genera and some Lactobacillus species to produce lactic
acid homofermentatively (Naveena, 2004), while additional prod-
ucts, e.g., carbon dioxide, ethanol, and acetic acid, are produced by
heterofermentative LAB, the Leuconostoc genera, and certain Lacto-
bacillus species (Carr et al., 2002; CowanandSteel, 1965; Schillinger
and Lcke, 1987; Singleton and Sainsbury, 1987; Stamer, 1976).
In the metabolism of homofermentative LAB, glucose is metabo-
lizedtolactic acidviatheEmbdenMeyerhof pathway, wherebythe
theoretical yield of lactic acid to glucose is 1.0g/g or 2.0mol/mol.
On the other hand, heterofermentative LAB possess the pentose
monophosphate pathway, in which glucose 6-phosphate (6 car-
bons) is initially converted to ribulose 5-phosphate (5 carbons) and
carbon dioxide (1 carbon) catalyzed by several enzymes (Reddy
et al., 2008). The resulting ribulose 5-phosphate is cleaved to 1mol
of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) andacetyl phosphate (acetyl-
P). GAP is further metabolized to lactic acid (3 carbons), while
the acetyl-P is reduced to ethanol (2 carbons) via acetyl-CoA and
acetaldehyde intermediates (Zaunmuller et al., 2006) and/or con-
verted to acetate via acetate kinase. Therefore, the theoretical yield
of lactic acid to glucose reaches only 0.5g/g or 1.0mol/mol with
heterofermentative LAB.
There are very few reports describing lactic acid fermentation
from pentose sugars by LAB (Fred et al., 1919; Patel et al., 2006).
Some species of LABcanmetabolize pentose sugars as a substrate to
lactic acid, e.g., Lc. lactis IO-1(Oshiroet al., 2009; Tanakaet al., 2002),
Streptococcus sp. (Enterococcus sp.) and Lb. thermophilus T
1
(Fukui
et al., 1957), Lactobacillus strainMONT4(Barre, 1978), E. mundtii QU
25 (Abdel-Rahman et al., 2011b), Lb. pentosus (Bustos et al., 2005),
Lb. brevis (Chaillou et al., 1998), Lb. plantarum(Helanto et al., 2007),
and Leu. lactis (Ohara et al., 2006). Two different pathways, the PK
and PP/glycolic pathways, are proposed as the metabolic pathways
of pentoses in LAB (Fig. 2) (Tanaka et al., 2002). In the PK pathway,
which is used by the majority of pentose-utilizing LAB, xylulose
5-P (5 carbons) is cleaved to GAP and acetyl-P. The resulting GAP
is converted to pyruvic acid and then to lactic acid (3 carbons) as
a nal product, while acetyl-P is metabolized to synthesize acetic
acid or ethanol (both 2 carbons). As a result, the theoretical yield
of pentose sugars to lactic acid is 0.6g/g or 1.0mol/mol via the PK
pathway (Patel et al., 2006). On the other hand, a few species of
LAB possess the PP/glycolic pathway for the metabolism of pen-
tose sugars. The PP/glycolic pathway produces 5mol of lactic acid
from3mol of pentose without carbonloss, thereby providing a the-
oretical yield of lactic acid to pentose of 1.0g/g or 1.67mol/mol
(i.e., homo-lactate fermentation) (Oshiro et al., 2009; Tanaka et al.,
2002). Therefore, to improve the lactate yield, the PP/glycolic path-
way is more useful and valuable than the PK pathway (Oshiro et al.,
2009). Among wild-type LAB, E. mundtii QU 25 (Abdel-Rahman
et al., 2011b), Streptococcus sp. (Enterococcus sp.), Lb. thermophilus
T
1
(Fukui et al., 1957), and Lactobacillus strain MONT4 (Barre, 1978)
were reported to only showhomo-lactate fermentation of pentose
sugars. In addition, Okano et al. (2009a,b) recently demonstrated
homo-lactate fermentation with arabinose and xylose using genet-
ically modied Lb. plantarumby replacing the PK pathway with the
PP pathway.
The conversion of pyruvic acid to lactate can be affected by
stereospecic NAD-dependent enzymes of l- or d-lactate dehy-
drogenase. Both enzymes have been found to be active in most
lactobacilli, for example, Lb. plantarum (Ferain et al., 1996) and Lb.
casei (Viana et al., 2005). The stereospecicity and optical purity of
the lactic acid produced depends onthe type of LAB, whose enzyme
used in its production. In addition, when xylose was used as the
sole carbon source, substrate concentration has been shown to be
a factor for the metabolic ux of lactic acid production in the batch
culture of E. mundtii QU 25 (Abdel-Rahman et al., 2011b) and the
continuous culture of Lc. lactis IO-1 (Tanaka et al., 2002); a higher
concentration of xylose and a higher yield of lactic acid to xylose
was obtained. Thus, further investigations of culture conditions
with LAB are suggested to be necessary for the efcient conversion
of lignocellulosic biomass to lactic acid.
5. Designed biomass study and conclusions
Currently, the fermentative production of useful substances,
e.g., biomaterials and biofuels, from various renewable resources
by microorganisms has become more attractive. For this purpose,
it is essential that the used strain should consume the renew-
able resources as substrates to produce the useful substances. In
a number of recent studies, a targeted substrate is initially decided
upon, e.g., several types of biomass andby-products fromindustrial
factories. Two main approaches are then applied to achieve ef-
cient bioconversion (Fig. 3). One approach is a screening method to
isolate wild-type strains from natural sources. The isolated strain
should show a great potential in terms of its degrading enzyme
for the targeted substrate, broad substrate specicity for compo-
nents derived from renewable resources, high product yield, low
by-product yield, capacity for high product concentration and pro-
ductivity, and so on. An efcient process can then be investigated
using the isolated strain, e.g., batch, fed-batch, or continuous fer-
mentation, SHF, or SSF. The second approach is breeding a strain
to improve its ability to produce or degrade renewable resources,
to modify metabolic pathways and their ux, including their incre-
ment or decrement, and to provide de novo degradation enzymes.
To date, many breeding strains have been created using mutagene-
sis with physical or chemical mutagens and genetic manipulation.
On the other hand, the active selection of substrates is also
signicant for the highly efcient bioconversion of renewable
resources to useful substances. Recently, we proposed a designed
biomass study for this purpose. Designed biomass refers to
competent substances that can be designed for the corresponding
fermentation, conversionprocesses, etc. Inthis type of study, all the
technologies and engineering methods developed to date can be
used, i.e., excellent strains or highly efcient processes; thereafter,
substrates couldbe modiedor identiedfor the existing technolo-
gies (Fig. 3). The targeted renewable resources should include not
only several types of components (mono-, oligo-, or polysaccha-
rides) derived from various non-edible biomass sources but also
organic acids or glycerol that are readily available and inexpen-
sive as ready-made waste. On the basis of this concept, lactic acid
(Oshiro et al., 2010) and butyric acid (Tashiro et al., 2004; Tashiro
et al., 2007), both are produced fermentatively, were indicated as
designed biomass material for acetonebutanolethanol fermen-
tation by using the Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4
strain. In terms of lactic acid fermentation, we assessed sago starch
as a designed biomass for E. faecium from among several starches
derived from different plants (Shibata et al., 2007). Of course, our
concept also involves investigations on pretreatments and enzy-
matic hydrolysis of renewable resources, as mentioned in Section
2.2.
Inthis review, we mainly describedfermentative lactic acidpro-
ductionprocesses by LAB. Other microorganisms canbe considered
as genetically modied hosts for industrial lactic acid production
such as yeasts and Escherichia coli, which generally produce little
lactic acid (Okano et al., 2010b). Yeasts can grow in simpler syn-
thetic media and are more tolerant to low pHs than LAB, which
can eliminate a generation of the precipitated lactate by neutraliz-
ing agents for pH control during fermentation (Abbott et al., 2009;
Skory, 2003). Lactic acid production using several recombinant
yeasts has been reported in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Tokuhiro
et al., 2008; van Rooyen et al., 2005), Kluyveromyces lactis (Bianchi
et al., 1996; Porro et al., 1999), Candida boidinii (Ikushima et al.,
2009; Osawa et al., 2009). On the other hand, E. coli can grow in a
simple mineral salt medium, and the easy and reproducible meth-
ods of genetic manipulation have been established in E. coli (Zhou
et al., 2006). Veryrecently, therehavebeenafewinterestingreports
on the direct productions of PLA and its copolymers from glucose
using recombinant E. coli strains equipped with several genes for
thepolymerization(JungandLee, 2011; Junget al., 2010; Yanget al.,
2010). Conventionally, PLA is industrially produced by two steps:
lactic acid fermentation for lactic acid production and followed
by chemical process for PLA synthesis. Therefore, the constructed
E. coli can develop a novel strategy for PLA production by one-step
process. Althoughrecombinant yeasts andE. coli as describedabove
could not utilize lignocellulose-derived sugars efciently, further
researches should have potential and application for lactic acid
production fromlignocellulosic materials.
In conclusion, we described many studies and the ndings of
lactic acid fermentation by LAB fromlignocellulosic materials and
also compared the features of LAB with other microorganisms.
Nevertheless, industrial lactic acid production fromlignocellulosic
materials has not been sufciently protable. One of the reasons
for this is the high cost of hydrolytic enzymes for the sacchari-
cation of cellulose and hemicellulose. To address this problem,
attempts to isolate LAB that can ferment cellulose or xylan directly
to lactic acid, and the development of genetically modied LAB
that have hydrolytic enzymes with high activity should be con-
tinued. Designed biomass studies using those LAB would facilitate
the industrial production of lactic acid.
References
Abbott, D.A., Zelle, R.M., Pronk, J.T., van Maris, A.J.A., 2009. Metabolic engineering of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of carboxylic acids: current status and
challenges. FEMS Yeast Res. 9, 11231136.
Abdel-Rahman, M.A., Tashiro, Y., Zendo, T., Hanada, K., Shibata, K., Sonomoto, K.,
2011b. Efcient homofermentative l-(+)-lactic acid production from xylose by
a novel lactic acid bacterium, Enterococcus mundtii QU 25. Appl. Environ. Micro-
biol. 77, 18921895.
Abdel-Rahman, M.A., Tashiro, Y., Zendo, T., Shibata, K., Sonomoto, K., 2011a. Isola-
tion and characterization of lactic acid bacterium for effective fermentation of
cellobiose into optically pure homo l-(+)-lactic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
89, 10391049.
Abdel-Rahman, M.A., Tashiro, Y., Zendo, T., Sonomoto, K., 2010a. Isolation and char-
acterization of novel lactic acid bacteriumfor efcient production of l (+)-lactic
acid fromxylose. J. Biotechnol. 150 (S1), 347.
Abdel-Rahman, M.A., Tashiro, Y., Zendo, T., Sonomoto, K., 2010b. Effective l (+)-
lactic acid production by co-fermentation of mixed sugars. J. Biotechnol. 150
(S1), 347348.
Abe, S., Takagi, M., 1991. Simultaneous saccharicationandfermentationof cellulose
to lactic acid. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 37, 9396.
Adachi, E., Torigoe, M., Sugiyama, M., Nikawa, J., Shimizu, K., 1998. Modication
of metabolic pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the expression of lactate
dehydrogenase and deletion of pyruvate decarboxylase genes for the lactic acid
fermentation at lowpH value. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 86, 284289.
Adenis, L., Woiciechowski, A.L., Soccol, C.R., Ramos, L.P., Pandey, A., 1999. Experimen-
tal design to enhance the production of l-(+)-lactic acid from steam-exploded
wood hydrolyzate using Rhizopus oryzae in a mixed-acid fermentation. Process
Biochem. 34, 949955.
Adnan, A.F.M., Tan, I.K.P., 2007. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria fromMalaysian foods
and assessment of the isolates for industrial potential. Bioresour. Technol. 98,
13801385.
Adsul, M.G., Varma, A.J., Gokhale, D.V., 2007a. Lactic acid production from waste
sugar cane bagasse derived cellulose. Green Chem. 9, 5862.
Adsul, M.G., Khire, J.M., Bastawade, K.B., Gokhale, D.V., 2007b. Lactic acid production
from cellobiose and cellotriose by Lactobacillus delbrueckii mutant Uc-3. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 73, 50555057.
Amrane, A., Prigent, Y., 1996. Anovel concept of bioreactor: specializedfunctiontwo-
stage continuous reactor, and its application to lactose conversion into lactic
acid. J. Biotechnol. 45, 195203.
Anderson, W.F., Peterson, J., Akin, D.E., Morrison, W.H., 2005. Enzyme pretreatment
of grass lignocellulose for potential high-value co-products and an improved
fermentable substrate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 121, 303310.
Antal Jr., M., 1996. Water: a traditional solvent pregnant with newapplications. In:
White Jr., H.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the
Properties of Water and Steam. Begell House, NewYork, pp. 2432.
Axelsson, L.T., 1993. Lactic acid bacteria: classication and physiology. In: Salminen,
S., Wright, A. (Eds.), Lactic AcidBacteria. Marcel Dekker, NewYork, USA, pp. 163.
Bai, D.M., Wei, Q., Yan, Z.H., Wei, Q., Zhao, X.M., Li, X.G., Xu, S.M., 2004. Ammonium
lactate production by Lactobacillus lactis BME5-18Min pH-controlled fed-batch
fermentations. Biochem. Eng. J. 19, 4751.
Baker, J.O., Ehrman, C.I., Adney, W.S., Thomas, S.R., Himmel, M.E., 1998. Hydrol-
ysis of cellulose using ternary mixtures of puried cellulases. Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol. 70, 395403.
Balat, M., 2009. Gasication of biomass to produce gaseous products. Energy Source
31, 516526.
Balat, M., 2011. Production of bioethanol fromlignocellulosic materials via the bio-
chemical pathway: a review. Energy Convers. Manage. 52, 858875.
Balat, M., Balat, H., z, C., 2008. Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog. Energ.
Combust. 34, 551573.
Barre, P., 1978. Identication of thermobacteria and homofermentative, ther-
mophilic, pentose-utilizing Lactobacilli from high temperature fermenting
grape musts. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 44, 125129.
Berlin, A., Gilkes, N., Kilburn, D., Bura, R., Markov, A., Skomarovsky, A., Okunev, O.,
Gusakov, A., Maximenko, V., Gregg, D., 2005. Evaluation of novel fungal cellulase
preparations for ability to hydrolyze softwood substratesevidence for the role
of accessory enzymes. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 37, 175184.
Bianchi, M., Tizzani, L., Destruelle, M., Frontali, L., Wesolowski-Louvel, M., 1996.
The petite-negative yeast Kluyveromyces lactis has a single gene expression
pyruvate decarboxylase activity. Mol. Microbiol. 19, 2736.
Brjesson, J., Engqvist, M., Sipos, B., Tjerneld, F., 2007. Effect of poly (ethylene gly-
col) on enzymatic hydrolysis and adsorption of cellulase enzymes to pretreated
lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 41, 186195.
Bothast, R.J., Nichols, N.N., Dien, B.S., 1999. Fermentations with new recombinant
organisms. Biotechnol. Prog. 15, 867875.
Boyaval, P., Corre, C., Terre, S., 1987. Continuous lactic acid fermentation with con-
centrated product recovery by ultraltration and electrodialysis. Biotechnol.
Lett. 9, 207212.
Bustos, G., de la Torre, N., Moldes, A.B., Cruz, J.M., Dominguez, J.M., 2007. Revaloriza-
tion of hemicellulosic trimming vine shoots hydrolyzates trough continuous
production of lactic acid and biosurfactants by L. pentosus. J. Food Eng. 78,
405412.
Bustos, G., Moldes, A.B., Cruz, J.M., Domnguez, J.M., 2004. Production of fermentable
media from vine-trimming wastes and bioconversion into lactic acid by Lacto-
bacillus pentosus. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 84, 21052112.
Bustos, G., Moldes, A.B., Cruz, J.M., Domnguez, J.M., 2005. Inuence of the
metabolism pathway on lactic acid production from hemicellulosic trimming
vine shoots hydrolyzates using Lactobacillus pentosus. Biotechnol. Prog. 21,
793798.
Buyukgungor, H., Bueschelberger, H.G., 1986. Production of lactic acid from
lactose by free and immobilized Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Biotech-Forum. 3,
8085.
Caminal, G., Lbpez-Santin, J., Sola, C., 1985. Kinetic modelingof theenzymatic hydrol-
ysis of pretreated cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27, 12821290.
Carr, F.J., Chill, D., Maida, N., 2002. The lactic acid bacteria: a literature survey. Crit.
Rev. Microbiol. 28, 281370.
Carvalheiro, F., Duarte, L.C., Giri, F.M., 2008. Hemicellulose bioreneries: a review
on biomass pretreatments. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 67, 849864.
Chaillou, S., Bor, Y.C., Batt, C.A., Postma, P.W., Pouwels, P.H., 1998. Molecular cloning
and functional expression in Lactobacillus plantarum 80 of xylT, encoding the
d-xylose-H
+
symporter of Lactobacillus brevis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64,
47204728.
Chaillou, S., Postma, P.W., Pouwels, P.H., 2001. Contributionof thephosphoenolpyru-
vate: mannose phosphotransferase system to carbon catabolite repression in
Lactobacillus pentosus. Microbiology 147, 671679.
Chaillou, S., Pouwels, P.H., Postma, P.W., 1999. Transport of d-xylose in Lacto-
bacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus plantarum: evidence for
a mechanism of facilitated diffusion via the phosphoenolpyruvate: mannose
phosphotransferase system. J. Bacteriol. 181, 47684773.
Chandel, A.K., ES, C., Rudravaram, R., Narasu, M.L., Rao, L.V., Ravindra, P., 2007. Eco-
nomics and environmental impact of bioethanol production technologies: an
appraisal. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2, 1432.
Chang, H.N., Kim, N.J., Kang, J., Jeong, C.M., Choi, J.D., Fei, Q., Kim, B.J., Kwon, S.,
Lee, S.Y., Kim, J., 2011. Multi-stage high cell continuous fermentation for high
productivity and titer. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 34, 419431.
Chang, V.S., Holtzapple, M., 2000. Fundamentals factors affecting biomass reactivity.
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 8486, 537.
Chaudhary, L.C., Singh, R., Kamra, D.N., 1994. Biodelignicationof sugar cane bagasse
by Pleurotus orida and Pleurotus cornucopiae. Indian J. Microbiol. 34, 5557.
Chen, C.C., Ju, L.K., 1998. Adsorption characteristics of polyvinylpyridine and
activated carbon for lactic acid recovery fromfermentation of Lactobacillus del-
brueckii. Sep. Sci. Technol. 33, 14231437.
Chen, M., Zhao, J., Xia, L., 2009. Comparison of four different chemical pretreat-
ments of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestibility. Biomass Bioenergy
33, 13811385.
Chen, R., Lee, Y.Y., 1997. Membrane-mediated extractive fermentation for lactic
acid production from cellulosic biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 6365,
435448.
Choi, J.H., Kim, S.H., Moon, S.H., 2002. Recovery of lactic acid fromsodiumlactate by
ion substitution using ion-exchange membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 28, 6979.
Cohen, R., Suzuki, M.R., Hammel, K.E., 2005. Processive endoglucanase active in
crystalline cellulose hydrolysis by the brown rot basidiomycete Gloeophyllum
trabeum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 24122417.
Converse, A.O., 1993. Substratefactors limitingenzymatic hydrolysis. In: Saddler, J.N.
(Ed.), Bioconversionof Forest andAgricultural Plant Residues. CABInternational,
Wallingford, UK, pp. 93106.
Cotton, J.C., Pometto, A.L., Gvozdenovic-Jeremic, J., 2001. Continuous lactic acid
fermentation using plastic composite support biolm reactor. Appl. Microbiol.
Cowan, S.T., Steel, K.J., 1965. Manual for the Identication of Medical Bacteria. Cam-
bridge University Press, NewYork, pp. 4460.
Cui, F., Li, Y., Wan, C., 2011. Lactic acid production from corn stover using mixed
cultures of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus brevis. Bioresour. Technol.
102, 18311836.
Dadi, A.P., Varanasi, S., Schall, C.A., 2006. Enhancement of cellulose saccharication
kinetics usinganionic liquidpretreatment step. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 95, 904910.
Datta, R., Henry, M., 2006. Lactic acid: recent advances in products, processes and
technologiesa review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 81, 11191129.
Datta, R., Tsai, S.P., Bonsignor, P., Moon, S., Frank, J., 1995. Technological and eco-
nomical potential of polylactic acid and lactic acid derivatives. FEMS Microbiol.
Rev. 16, 221231.
de Jong, S.J., van Eerdenbrugh, B., van Nostrum, C.F., Kettenes-van den Bosch, J.J.,
Hennink, W.E., 2001. Physicallycrosslinkeddextranhydrogels bystereocomplex
formation of lactic acid oligomers: degradation and protein release behavior. J.
Control. Release 71, 261275.
Demirbas, A., 2008. Products from lignocellulosic materials via degradation pro-
cesses. Energy Source 30, 2737.
Demirbas, A., 2005. Bioethanol from cellulosic materials: a renewable motor fuel
frombiomass. Energy Source 27, 327337.
Ding, S.F., Tan, T.W., 2006. l-Lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei fer-
mentation using different fed-batch feeding strategies. Process Biochem. 41,
14511454.
Duff, S.J.B., Murray, W.D., 1996. Bioconversion of forest products industry waste
cellulosics to fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 55, 133.
Dumbrepatil, A., Adsul, M., Chaudhari, S., Khire, J., Gokhale, D., 2008. Utilization
of molasses sugar for lactic acid production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
delbrueckii mutant Uc-3 in batch fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74,
333335.
Ehrman, C.I., Himmel, M.E., 1994. Simultaneous saccharication and fermentation
of pretreated biomass: improving mass balance closure. Biotechnol. Tech. 8,
99104.
Esteghlalian, A., Hashimoto, A.G., Fenske, J.J., Penner, M.H., 1997. Modeling and opti-
mization of the dilute-sulfuric-acid pretreatment of corn stover, poplar and
switchgrass. Bioresour. Technol. 59, 129136.
Esteghlalian, A.R., Svivastava, V., Gilkes, N., Gregg, D.J., Saddler, J.N., 2001. An
overviewof factors inuencing the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic feed-
stocks. In: Himmel, M.E., Baker, W., Saddler, J.N. (Eds.), Glycosyl Hydrolases for
Biomass Conversion. ACS, pp. 100111.
Feldman, D., Banu, D., Natansohn, A., Wang, J., 1991. Structureproperties relations
of thermally cured epoxy-lignin polyblends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 42, 15371550.
Fengel, D., Wegener, G., 1989. Wood Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de
Gruyter, Berlin NewYork, pp. 437466.
Ferain, T., Hobbs Jr., J.N., Richardson, J., Bernard, N., Garymn, D., Hols, P., Allen, N.E.,
Delcour, J., 1996. Knockout of the two ldh genes has major impact onpeptidogly-
can precursor synthesis in Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Bacteriol. 178, 54315437.
Fred, E.B., Peterson, W.H., Davenport, A.J., 1919. Acid fermentation of xylose. J. Biol.
Chem. 39, 347383.
Fujii, M., Mori, J.I., Homma, T., Taniguchi, M., 1995. Synergy between an endoglu-
canase andcellobiohydrolases fromTrichoderma koningii. Chem. Eng. J. Biochem.
Eng. J. 59, 315319.
Fukui, S., Oi, A., Obayashi, A., Kitahara, K., 1957. Studies on the pentose metabolism
by microorganism. 1. A new type-lactic acid fermentation of pentose by lactic
acid bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 3, 258268.
Galbe, M., Zacchi, G., 2007. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efcient
bioethanol production. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 108, 4165.
Garde, A., Jonsson, G., Schmidt, A.S., Ahring, B.K., 2002. Lactic acid production from
wheat strawhemicellulose hydrolysate by Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacil-
lus brevis. Bioresour. Technol. 81, 217223.
Gatje, G., Gottschalk, G., 1991. Limitation of growth and lactic acid production
in batch and continuous cultures of Lactobacillus helveticus. Appl. Microbiol.
Ghosh, T.K., Das, K., 1971. Kinetics of hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose by cellulase.
Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1, 4955.
Givry, S., Prevot, V., Duchiron, F., 2008. Lactic acid production from hemicellulosic
hydrolyzate by cells of Lactobacillus bifermentans immobilized in Ca-alginate
using response surface methodology. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24,
745752.
Gksungur, Y., Gvenc , U., 1999. Production of lactic acid frombeet molasses by cal-
ciumalginate immobilized Lactobacillus delbrueckii IFO 3202. J. Chem. Technol.
Gonzalez, M.I., Alvarez, S., Riera, F.A., Alvareza, R., 2008. Lactic acid recovery from
whey ultraltrate fermentation broths and articial solutions by nanoltration.
Desalination 228, 8489.
Gosalbes, M.J., Monedero, V., Perez-Martinez, G., 1999. Elements involved in catabo-
lite repression and substrate induction of the lactose operon in Lactobacillus
casei. J. Bacteriol. 181, 39283934.
Gullon, B., Yanez, R., Alonso, J.L., Parajo, J.C., 2008. l-Lactic acid production from
apple pomace by sequential hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour. Technol.
99, 308319.
Guo, W., Jia, W., Li, Y., Chen, S., 2010. Performances of Lactobacillus brevis for produc-
ing lactic acid from hydrolysate of lignocellulosics. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
161, 124136.
Hbov, V., Melzoch, K., Rychtera, M., Sekavov, B., 2004. Electrodialysis as a useful
technique for lactic acid separation from a model solution and a fermentation
broth. Desalination 162, 361372.
Hano, T., Matsumoto, M., Uenoyama, S., Ohta, T., Kawano, Y., Miura, S., 1993. Sepa-
ration of lactic acid fromfermented broth by solvent extraction. Bioseparation
3, 321326.
Hayn, M., Steiner, W., Klinger, R., Steinmtiller, H., Sinner, M., Esterbauer, H., 1993.
Basic research and pilot studies on the enzymatic conversion of lignocellulosics.
In: Saddler, J.N. (Ed.), Bioconversion of Forest and Agricultural Plant Residues.
CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 3372.
Helanto, M., Kiviharju, K., Leisola, M., Nyyssl, A., 2007. Metabolic engineering of
Lactobacillus plantarum for production of l-ribulose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73, 70837091.
Hendriks, A.T., Zeeman, G., 2009. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lig-
nocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1018.
Himmel, M.E., Ruth, M.F., Wyman, C.E., 1999. Cellulase for commodity products from
cellulosic biomass. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 358364.
Hinman, N.D., Schell, D.J., Riley, C.J., Bergeron, P.W., Walter, P.J., 1992. Preliminary
estimate of the cost of ethanol production for SSF technology. Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol. 34/35, 639649.
Hinman, N.D., Wright, J.D., Hoagland, W., Wyman, C.E., 1989. Xylose fermentation,
an economic analysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 391401.
Hofvendahl, K., Hahn-Hgerdal, B., 2000. Factors affecting the fermentative lac-
tic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26,
87107.
Holtzapple, M., Cognata, M., Shu, Y., Hendrickson, C., 1990. Inhibition of Trichoderma
reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 36, 275287.
Honda, H., Toyama, Y., Takahashi, H., Nakazeko, T., Kobayashi, T., 1995. Effective
lactic acid production by two-stage extractive fermentation. J. Ferment. Bioeng.
79, 589593.
Hongo, M., Nomura, Y., Iwahara, M., 1986. Novel method of lactic acid production
by electrodialysis fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 314319.
Huang, L.P., Jin, B., Lant, P., Zhou, J.T., 2005. Simultaneous saccharication and fer-
mentation of potato starch wastewater to lactic acid by Rhizopus oryzae and
Rhizopus arrhizus. Biochem. Eng. J. 23, 265276.
Ikeda, Y., Jamshidi, K., Tsuji, H., Hyon, S.H., 1987. Stereocomplex formation between
enantiomeric poly(lactides). Macromolecules 20, 904906.
Ikushima, S., Fujii, T., Kobayashi, O., Yoshida, S., Yoshida, A., 2009. Genetic engineer-
ing Candida utilis yeast for efcient productionof l-lactic acid. Biosci. Biotechnol.
Biochem. 73, 18181824.
Ilmen, M., Koivuranta, K., Ruohonen, L., Suominen, P., Penttila, M., 2007. Efcient
productionof l-lactic acidfromxylose by Pichia stipitis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73, 117123.
Irwin, D.C., Spezio, M., Walker, L.P., Wilson, D.B., 1993. Activity studies of eight puri-
ed cellulases: specicity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 42, 10021013.
Iyer, P.V., Lee, Y.Y., 1999b. Simultaneous saccharication and extractive fer-
mentation of lignocellulosic materials into lactic acid in a two-zone
fermentorextractor system. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 78, 409419.
Iyer, P.V., Lee, Y.Y., 1999a. Product inhibition in simultaneous saccharication and
fermentation of cellulose into lactic acid. Biotechnol. Lett. 21, 371373.
Iyer, P.V., Thomas, S.A., Lee, Y.Y., 2000. High-yield fermentation of pentoses into
lactic acid. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 8486, 665677.
Jeantet, R., Maubois, J.L., Boyaval, P., 1996. Semicontinuous production of lactic acid
in a bioreactor coupled with nano-ltration membranes. Enzyme Microb. Tech-
nol. 19, 614619.
Jeffries, T.W., Jin, Y.S., 2000. Ethanol and thermotolerance in the bioconversion of
xylose by yeasts. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 47, 221268.
John, R.P., Anisha, G.S., Nampoothiri, K.M., Pandey, A., 2009. Direct lactic acid fer-
mentation: focus on simultaneous saccharication and lactic acid production.
Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 145152.
John, R.P., Nampoothiri, K.M., Pandey, A., 2006a. Simultaneous saccharication and
fermentation of cassava bagasse for l-(+)-lactic acid production using Lacto-
bacilli. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 134, 263272.
John, R.P., Nampoothiri, K.M., Pandey, A., 2006b. Solid-state fermentation for l-
lactic acid production from agro wastes using Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Process
Biochem. 41, 759763.
John, R.P., Nampoothiri, K.M., Pandey, A., 2006c. Simultaneous saccharicationandl-
(+)-lactic acid fermentation of protease treated wheat bran using mixed culture
of lactobacilli. Biotechnol. Lett. 28, 18231826.
John, R.P., Nampoothiri, K.M., Pandey, A., 2007. Fermentative production of lactic
acid frombiomass: an overview on process developments and future perspec-
tives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74, 524534.
Jorgensen, H., Kristensen, J.B., Felby, C., 2007. Enzymatic conversionof lignocellulose
into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref.
1, 119134.
Joshi, D.S., Singhvi, M.S., Khire, J.M., Gokhale, D.V., 2010. Strain improvement of
Lactobacillus lactis for d-lactic acid production. Biotechnol. Lett. 32, 517520.
Jun, L., Liming, L., Wenxu, W., Peilin, C., 1998. Kinetics of cellulose enzymatic hydrol-
ysis and simultaneous saccharication and lactic acid fermentation process. J.
Chem. Ind. Eng. 49, 161169.
Jung, Y.K., Kim, T.Y., Park, S.J., Lee, S.Y., 2010. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli
for the production of PLA and its copolymers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105, 161171.
Jung, Y.K., Lee, S.Y., 2011. Efcient production of polylactic acid and its copolymers
by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. J. Biotechnol. 151, 94101.
Kaar, W.E., Holtzaple, M.T., 2000. Using lime pretreatment tofacilitate the enzymatic
hydrolysis of corn stover. Biomass Bioenergy 18, 189199.
Karel, M., Jaroslav, V., Vera, H., Mojmir, R., 1997. Lactic acid production in a cell
retention continuous culture using lignocellulosic hydrolysate as a substrate. J.
Keshwani, D.R., Cheng, J.J., 2009. Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added
applications: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 15151523.
Kharras, G.B., Sanchez-Riera, F., Severson, D.K., 1993. Polymers of lactic acid. In:
Molby, D.B. (Ed.), Plastics from Microbes: Microbial Synthesis of Polymers and
Polymer Precursors. Hanser Publ., pp. 93137.
Kim, J.H., Mills, D.A., Block, D.E., Shoemaker, S.P., 2010a. Atypical ethanol pro-
duction by carbon catabolite derepressed lactobacilli. Bioresour. Technol. 101,
87908797.
Kim, J.H., Mills, D.A., Block, D.E., Shoemaker, S.P., 2010b. Conversion of rice straw
to biobased chemicals: an integrated process using Lactobacillus brevis. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86, 13751385.
Kim, J.H., Shoemaker, S.P., Mills, D.A., 2009. Relaxed control of sugar utilization in
Lactobacillus brevis. Microbiology 155, 13511359.
Kim, Y.H., Moon, S.H., 2001. Lactic acid recovery fromfermentation broth using one
stage electrodialysis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76, 169178.
Kodali, B., Pogaku, R., 2006. Pretreatment studies of rice bran for the effective pro-
duction of cellulose. Electron J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 5, 12531264.
Kotzamanidis, C., Roukas, T., Skaracis, G., 2002. Optimizationof lactic acidproduction
frombeet molasses by Lactobacillus delbrueckii NCIMB 8130. World J. Microbiol.
Krishna, S.H., Reddy, T.J., Chowdary, G.V., 2001. Simultaneous saccharication and
fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes to ethanol using a thermotolerant yeast.
Bioresour. Technol. 77, 193196.
Kuhad, R.C., Johri, B.N., 1992. Fungal decomposition of peddy straw: light and scan-
ning microscopic study. Indian J. Microbiol. 32, 255258.
Kulozik, U., Wilde, J., 1999. Rapid lactic acid production at high cell concentrations
in whey ultraltrate by Lactobacillus helveticus. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 24,
297302.
Kumar, R., Singh, S., Singh, O.V., 2008. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: bio-
chemical and molecular perspectives. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35, 377391.
Kumar, P., Barrett, D.M., Delwiche, M.J., Stroeve, P., 2009. Methods for pretreatment
of lignocellulosic biomass for efcient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 37133729.
Kumar, R., Nanavati, H., Noronha, S.B., Mahajani, S.M., 2006. Acontinuous process for
the recovery of lactic acid by reactive distillation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
81, 17671777.
Kwon, S., Yoo, I.K., Lee, W.G., Chang, H.N., Chang, Y.K., 2001. High-rate continuous
production of lactic acid by Lactobacillus rhamnosus in a two-stage membrane
cell-recycle bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 73, 2534.
Ladisch, M.R., Lin, K.W., Voloch, M., Tsao, G.T., 1983. Process considera-
tions in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 5,
82102.
Laopaiboon, P., Thani, A., Leelavatcharamas, V., Laopaiboon, L., 2010. Acid hydrol-
ysis of sugarcane bagasse for lactic acid production. Bioresour. Technol. 101,
10361043.
Laser, M., Schulman, D., Allen, S.G., Lichwa, J., Antal, M.J., Lynd, L.R., 2002. A com-
parison of liquid hot water and steampretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for
bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 81, 3344.
Lau, M.W., Dale, B.E., Balan, V., 2008. Ethanolic fermentation of hydrolysates from
ammonia ber expansion(AFEX) treatedcornstover anddistillers grainwithout
detoxication and external nutrient supplementation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99,
529539.
Lee, S.M., Koo, Y.M., Lin, J., 2004. Production of lactic acid from paper sludge by
simultaneous saccharication and fermentation. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.
87, 173194.
Lee, Y.H., Fan, L.T., 1983. Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis insoluble cellulose
(II). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25, 959966.
Li, H., Mustacchi, R., Knowles, C.J., Skibar, W., Sunderland, G., Dalrymple, L., Jack-
man, S.A., 2004. An electrokinetic bioreactor: using direct electric current
for enhanced lactic acid fermentation and product recovery. Tetrahedron 60,
655661.
Li, Y., Shahbazi, A., Williams, K., Wan, C., 2008. Separate and concentrate lactic
acid using combination of nanoltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Appl.
Biochem. Biotechnol. 147, 19.
Li, Y.B., Shahbazi, A., 2006. Lactic acidrecoveryfromcheesewheyfermentationbroth
using combined ultraltration and nanoltration membranes. Appl. Biochem.
Li, Z., Lu, J., Zhao, L., Xiao, K., Tan, T., 2010. Improvement of l-lactic acid produc-
tion under glucose feedback controlled culture by Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Appl.
Lin, Y., Tanaka, S., 2006. Ethanol fermentation frombiomass resources: current state
and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 69, 627642.
Lin, Z.X., Zhang, H.M., Ji, Z.J., Chen, J.W., Huang, H., 2011. Hydrolytic enzyme of cellu-
lose for complex formulation applied research. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 164,
2333.
Linko, P., Stenroos, S.L., Linko, Y., Koistinen, T., Harju, M., Heikonen, M., 1984. Appli-
cations of immobilized lactic acid bacteria. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 434, 406417.
Linko, Y.Y., Javanainen, P., 1996. Simultaneous liquefaction, saccharication, and
lactic acid fermentation on barley starch. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 19, 118123.
Liu, S., Bischoff, K.M., Hughes, S.R., Leathers, T.D., Price, N.P., Qureshi, N., Rich, J.O.,
2009. Conversion of biomass hydrolysates and other substrates to ethanol and
other chemicals by Lactobacillus buchneri. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48, 337342.
Lopez, M.J., Nichols, N.N., Dien, B.S., Moreno, J., Bothast, R.J., 2004. Isolation of
microorganisms for biological detoxication of lignocellulosic hydrolysates.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64, 125131.
Lu, Z., Lu, M., He, F., Yu, L., 2009. An economical approach for d-lactic acid production
utilizing unpolished rice fromaging paddy as major nutrient source. Bioresour.
Technol. 100, 20262031.
Lynd, L.R., Weimer, P.J., vanZyl, W.H., Pretorius, I.S., 2002. Microbial cellulose utiliza-
tion: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 506577.
Lynd, L.R., 1996. Overviewand evaluation of fuel fromcellulosic biomass. Annu. Rev.
Energy Environ. 21, 403465.
Lynd, L.R., Elander, R.T., Wyman, C.E., 1996. Likely features and costs of mature
biomass ethanol technology. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58, 741761.
Madzingaidzo, L., Danner, H., Braun, R., 2002. Process development andoptimisation
of lactic acid purication using electrodialysis. J. Biotechnol. 96, 223239.
Mahr, K., Hillen, W., Titgemeyer, F., 2000. Carbon catabolite repression in Lactobacil-
lus pentosus: analysis of the ccpA region. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 277283.
Mais, U., Esteghlalian, A.R., Saddler, J.N., Manseld, S.D., 2002. Enhancing the enzy-
matic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials using simultaneous ball milling. Appl.
Marasco, R., Muscariello, L., Varcamonti, M., DeFelice, M., Sacco, M., 1998. Expression
of the bglH gene of Lactobacillus plantarum is controlled by carbon catabolite
repression. J. Bacteriol. 180, 34003404.
Marques, S., Santos, J.A.L., Girio, F.M., Roseiro, J.C., 2008. Lactic acid production
fromrecycled paper sludge by simultaneous saccharication and fermentation.
Biochem. Eng. J. 41, 210216.
McCaskey, T.A., Zhou, S.D., Britt, S.N., Strickland, R., 1994. Bioconversionof municipal
solid waste to lactic acid by Lactobacillus species. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
4546, 555563.
Melzoch, K., Votruba, J., Habova, V., Rychtera, M., 1997. Lactic acidproductionina cell
retention continuous culture using lignocellulosic hydrolysate as a substrate. J.
Mes-Hartree, M.M., Yu, E.K.C., Reid, I.D., Saddler, J.N., 1987. Suitability of aspen wood
biologically delignied with Pheblia tremellosus for fermentation of ethanol or
butanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 120125.
Min-Tian, G., Koide, M., Gotou, R., Takanashi, H., Hirata, M., Hano, T., 2005. Devel-
opment of a continuous fermentation system for production of lactic acid by
Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Process Biochem. 40, 10331036.
Miura, S., Arimura, T., Itoda, N., Dwiarti, L., Feng, J.B., Bin, C.H., Okabe, M., 2004.
Production of L-lactic acid fromcorncob. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 97, 153157.
Moldes, A.B., Alonso, J.L., Parajo, J.C., 2001. Strategies to improve the bioconver-
sion of processed wood into lactic acid by simultaneous saccharication and
fermentation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76, 279284.
Moldes, A.B., Torrado, A., Converti, A., Dominguez, J.M., 2006. Complete biocon-
version of hemicellulosic sugars from agricultural residues into lactic acid by
Lactobacillus pentosus. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 135, 219227.
Moldes, B.N., Alonso, L.J., Parajo, C.J., 1999. Cogeneration of cellobiose and glucose
frompretreated wood and bioconversion to lactic acid: a kinetic study. J. Biosci.
Bioeng. 87, 787792.
Molina-Sabio, M., Rodrguez-Reinoso, F., 2004. Role of chemical activation in the
development of carbon porosity. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. 241,
1525.
Monteagudo, J.M., Aldavero, M., 1999. Production of l-lactic acid by Lactobacillus
delbrueckii in chemostat culture using an ion exchange resins system. J. Chem.
Technol. Biotechnol. 74, 627634.
Monteagudo, J.M., Rodriguez, L., Rincon, J., Fuertes, J., 1997. Kinetics of lactic acid fer-
mentationby Lactobacillus delbrueckii grownonbeet molasses. J. Chem. Technol.
Morel, F., Frot-Coutaz, J., Aubel, D., Portalier, R., Atlan, D., 1999. Characterization of
a prolidase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CNRZ 397 with an
unusual regulation of biosynthesis. Microbiology 145, 437446.
Moritz, J.W., Duff, S.J.B., 1996. Simultaneous saccharication and extractive fermen-
tation of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 49, 504511.
Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Holtzapple, Y.Y.L.M., Ladisch, M., 2005.
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass.
Mussatto, S.I., Fernandes, M., Mancilha, I.M., Roberto, I.C., 2008. Effects of medium
supplementation and pH control on lactic acid production frombrewers spent
grain. Biochem. Eng. J. 40, 437444.
Mussatto, S.I., Roberto, I.C., 2004. Alternatives for detoxication of diluted acid lig-
nocellulosic hydrolysates for use in fermentative process: a review. Bioresour.
Technol. 93, 110.
Nancib, A., Nancib, N., Boudrant, J., 2009. Production of lactic acid from date juice
extract with free cells of single and mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei and
Lactococcus lactis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 14231429.
Naveena, B.J., 2004. Amylolytic bacterial l(+) lactic acid production in solid state
fermentation and molecular identication of the strain. Ph.D. thesis, Osmania
University, Hyderabad, India.
Naveena, B.J., Altaf, M., Bhadrayya, K., Madhavendra, S.S., Reddy, G., 2005b. Direct
fermentation of starch to l(+) lactic acid in SSF by Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6
using wheat bran as support and substratemedium optimization using RSM.
Process Biochem. 40, 681690.
Naveena, B.J., Altaf, M., Bhadriah, K., Reddy, G., 2005a. Selection of medium com-
ponents by PlackettBurman design for production of l(+) lactic acid by
Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6 in SSF using wheat bran. Bioresour. Technol. 96,
485490.
Nichols, N.N., Dien, B.S., Guisado, G.M., Lpez, M.J., 2005. Bioabatement to remove
inhibitors frombiomass-derived sugar hydrolysates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
121, 379390.
Nidetzky, B., Steiner, W., Hayn, M., Claeyssens, M., 1994. Cellulose hydrolysis by
the cellulases fromTrichoderma reesei: a newmodel for synergistic interaction.
Biochem. J. 298, 705710.
Nilvebrant, N.O., Person, P., Reimann, A., Sousa, F.D., Gorton, L., Jonsson, L.J., 2003.
Limits for alkalinedetoxicationof dilute-acidlignocellulosehydrolysates. Appl.
Nolasco-Hipolito, C., Matsunaka, T., Kobayashi, G., Sonomoto, K., Ishizaki, A., 2002.
Synchronised fresh cell bioreactor system for continuous l-(+)-lactic acid pro-
duction using Lactococcus lactis IO-1 in hydrolysed sago starch. J. Biosci. Bioeng.
93, 281287.
Nomura, Y., Iwahara, M., Hallsworth, J.E., Tanaka, T., Ishizaki, A., 1998. High-speed
conversion of xylose to l-lactate by electrodialysis bioprocess. J. Biotechnol. 60,
131135.
Nomura, Y., Iwahara, M., Hongo, M., 1987. Lactic acid production by electrodialysis
fermentationusing immobilizedgrowing cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30, 788793.
Ogier, J.C., Ballerini, D., Leygue, J.P., Rigal, L., Pourquie, J., 1999. Ethanol production
fromlignocellulosic biomass. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 54, 6794.
Oh, H., Wee, Y.J., Yun, J.S., Ryu, H.W., 2003. Lactic acidproductionthroughcell-recycle
repeated batch bioreactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105, 603613.
Ohara, H., Owaki, M., Sonomoto, K., 2006. Xylooligosaccharide fermentation with
Leuconostoc lactis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101, 415420.
hgren, K., Bura, R., Saddler, J., Zacchi, G., 2007. Effect of hemicellulose and lignin
removal on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated corn stover. Bioresour.
Technol. 98, 25032510.
Ohleyer, E., Blanch, H.W., Wilke, C.R., 1985. Continuous production of lactic acid in
a cell recycle reactor. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 11, 317332.
Okano, K., Tanaka, T., Ogino, C., Fukuda, H., Kondo, A., 2010b. Biotechnologi-
cal production of enantiomeric pure lactic acid from renewable resources:
recent achievements, perspectives, and limits. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85,
413423.
Okano, K., Yoshida, S., Tanaka, T., Fukuda, H., Kondo, A., 2009a. Homo d-lactic acid
fermentationfromarabinosebyredirectionof phosphoketolasepathwaytopen-
tose phosphate pathway inl-lactate dehydrogenase gene-decient Lactobacillus
plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 51755178.
Okano, K., Yoshida, S., Yamda, R., Tanaka, T., Ogino, C., Fukuda, H., Kondo, A.,
2009b. Improved production of homo-d-lactic acid via xylose fermentation
by introduction of xylose assimilation genes and redirection of the phospho-
ketolase pathway to pentose phosphate pathway in l-lactate dehydrogenase
gene-decient Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 78587861.
Okano, K., Zhang, Q., Yoshida, S., Tanaka, T., Ogino, C., Fukuda, H., Kondo,
A., 2010a. d-Lactic acid production from cellooligosaccharides and -
glucan using genetically modied l-lactate dehydrogenase gene-decient and
endoglucanase-secreting Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
85, 643650.
Olsson, L., Hahn-Hgerdal, B., 1996. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for
ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 18, 312331.
Osawa, F., Fujii, T., Nishida, T., Tada, N., Ohnishi, T., Kobayashi, O., Komeda, T., Yoshida,
S., 2009. Efcient production of l-lactic acid by Crabtree-negative yeast Candida
boidinii. Yeast 26, 485496.
Oshiro, M., Hanada, K., Tashiro, Y., Sonomoto, K., 2010. Efcient conversion of lac-
tic acid to butanol with pH-stat continuous lactic acid and glucose feeding
method by Clostridiumsaccharoperbutylacetonicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
87, 11771185.
Oshiro, M., Shinto, H., Tashiro, Y., Miwa, N., Sekiguchi, T., Okamoto, M., Ishizaki,
A., Sonomoto, K., 2009. Kinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of xylose
metabolismin Lactococcus lactis IO-1. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 108, 376384.
Ou, M.S., Ingram, L.O., Shanmugam, K.T., 2011. l-(+)-Lactic acid production from
non-food carbohydrates by thermotolerant Bacillus coagulans. J. Ind. Microbiol.
Ou, M.S., Mohammed, N., Ingram, L.O., Shanmugam, K.T., 2009. Thermophilic Bacillus
coagulans requires less cellulases for simultaneous saccharication and fermen-
tation of cellulose to products than mesophilic microbial biocatalysts. Appl.
Palmqvist, E., Hahn-Hgerdal, B., 2000. Fermentationof lignocellulosic hydrolysates.
II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 74, 2533.
Palonen, H., Viikari, L., 2004. Role of oxidative enzymatic treatments on enzymatic
hydrolysis of softwood. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 86, 550557.
Pan, X., Gilkes, N., Kadla, J., Pye, K., Saka, S., Gregg, D., Ehara, K., Xie, D., Lam, D.,
Saddler, J., 2006. Bioconversionof hybridpoplar to ethanol andcoproducts using
an organosolv fractionation process: optimization of process yields. Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 94, 851861.
Pan, X., Arato, C., Gilkes, N., Gregg, D., Mabee, W., Pye, K., Xiao, Z.Z., Zhang, X., Saddler,
J., 2005. Biorening of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping: preliminary
evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-
products. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90, 473481.
Pandey, A., Soccol, C.R., Rodriguez-Leon, J.A., Nigam, P., 2001. Production of organic
acids by solid state fermentation. In: solid state fermentation in biotechnology:
fundamentals and applications. Asiatech Publishers, NewDelhi, p. 127.
Parajo, J.C., Alonso, J.L., Moldes, A.B., 1997. Production of lactic acid from lignocel-
lulose in a single stage of hydrolysis and fermentation. Food Biotechnol. 11,
4558.
Parajo, J.C., Alonso, J.L., Santos, V., 1996. Lactic acid fromwood. Process Biochem. 31,
271280.
Parisi, F., 1989. Advances in lignocellulosics hydrolysis and in the utilization of the
hydrolysates. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 38, 5387.
Patel, M.A., Ou, M.S., Harbrucker, R., Aldrich, H.C., Buszko, M.L., Ingram, L.O., Shan-
mugam, K.T., 2006. Isolation and characterization of acid-tolerant, thermophilic
bacteria for effective fermentationof biomass-derivedsugars tolactic acid. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 72, 32283235.
Philippidis, G.P., Smith, T.K., 1995. Limiting factors in the simultaneous sacchari-
cation and fermentation process for conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuel
ethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 5152, 117124.
Philippidis, G., 1996. Cellulose bioconversion technology. In: Wyman, C.E. (Ed.),
Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization. Taylor & Francis, Wash-
ington, DC, pp. 253285.
Planes, J., 1998. Lactic acid production: extractive fermentation in aqueous two-
phase systems. University of Lund, PhD., Thesis, Lund, Sweden.
Polman, K., 1994. Review and analysis of renewable feedstocks for the production
of commodity chemicals. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45, 709722.
Porro, D., Bianchi, M.M., Brambilla, L., Menghini, R., Bolzani, D., Carrera, V., Lievense,
J., Liu, C.L., Ranzi, B.M., Frontali, L., Alberghina, L., 1999. Replacement of a
metabolic pathway for large scale production of lactic acid from engineered
yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 42114215.
Portilla, O.M., Rivas, B., Torrado, A., Moldes, A.B., Domingues, J.M., 2008. Revalorisa-
tion of vine trimming wastes using Lactobacillus acidophilus and Debaryomyces
hansenii. J. Sci. Food Agric. 88, 22982308.
Qin, J., Wang, X., Zheng, Z., Ma, C., Tang, H., Xu, P., 2010. Production of l-lactic acid by
a thermophilic Bacillus mutant using sodium hydroxide as neutralizing agent.
Rabelo, S.C., Filho, R.M., Costa, A.C., 2009. Lime pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse
for bioethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 153, 139153.
Ramos, L.P., Saddler, J.N., 1994. Enzyme recycling during fed-batch hydrolysis of
cellulose derived from steam-exploded Eucalyptus viminalis. Appl. Biochem.
Reddy, G., Altaf, M.D., Naveena, B.J., Venkateshwar, M., Vijay Kumar, E., 2008. Amy-
lolytic bacterial lactic acid fermentationa review. Biotechnol. Adv. 26, 2234.
Rezaei, F., Richard, T.L., Logan, B.E., 2008. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose cou-
pled with electricity generation in a microbial fuel cell. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101,
11631169.
Rojan, P.J., Nampoothiri, K.M., Nair, A.S., Pandey, A., 2005. l(+)-Lactic acid produc-
tion using Lactobacillus casei in solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol. Lett. 27,
16851688.
Romani, A., Yanez, R., Garrote, G., Alonso, J.L., 2008. SSF productionof lactic acidfrom
cellulosic biosludges. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 42474254.
Saha, B.C., Nakamura, L.K., 2003. Production of mannitol and lactic acid by fer-
mentation with Lactobacillus intermedius NRRL B-3693. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82,
865871.
Saha, B.C., 2000. Alpha-l-arabinofuranosidasesbiochemistry, molecular biology
and application in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 18, 403423.
Saha, B.C., 2003. Hemicellulose bioconversion. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30,
279291.
Saha, B.C., 2004. Lignocellulose biodegradation and applications in biotechnology.
ACS Symp. Ser. 889, 234.
Saier, M.H., 1998. Multiple mechanisms controlling carbon metabolismin bacteria.
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 58, 170174.
Schick, J., Weber, B., Klein, J.R., Henrich, B., 1999. PepR1, a CcpA-like transcription
regulator of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis. Microbiology 145, 31473154.
Schillinger, U., Lcke, F.K., 1987. Identication of lactobacilli from meat and meat
products. Food Microbiol. 4, 199208.
Schmidt, A.S., Thomsen, A.B., 1998. Optimization of wet oxidation pretreatment of
wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 64, 139151.
Schmidt, S., Padukone, N., 1997. Production of lactic acid from wastepaper as a
cellulosic feedstock. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18, 1014.
Selig, M.J., Knoshaug, E.P., Adney, W.S., Himmel, M.E., Decker, S.R., 2008. Synergistic
enhancement of cellobiohydrolase performance on pretreated corn stover by
addition of xylanase and esterase activities. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 49975005.
Senthuran, A., Senthuran, V., Hatti-Kaul, R., Mattiasson, B., 1999. Lactic acid produc-
tion by immobilized Lactobacillus casei in recycle batch reactor: a step towards
optimization. J. Biotechnol. 73, 6170.
Sharma, N., Wati, L., Singh, D., 2003. Production of lactic acid during bioremediation
of anaerobically digested molasses spent wash. Indian J. Microbiol. 43, 119121.
Shen, X., Xia, L., 2004. Production and immobilization of cellobiase fromAspergillus
niger ZU-07. Process Biochem. 39, 13631367.
Shen, X.L., Xia, L.M., 2006. Lactic acid production from cellulosic material by
synergetic hydrolysis and fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 133,
251262.
Shibata, K., Flores, D.M., Kobayashi, G., Sonomoto, K., 2007. Direct l-lactic acid
fermentation with sago starch by a novel amylolytic lactic acid bacterium, Ente-
rococcus faecium. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 41, 149155.
Singhvi, M., Joshi, D., Adsul, M., Varma, A., Gokhale, D., 2010. d-()-Lactic acid pro-
duction from cellobiose and cellulose by Lactobacillus lactis mutant RM2-24.
Green Chem. 12, 11061109.
Singleton, P., Sainsbury, D., 1987. Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology,
2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, NewYork.
Skory, C.D., 2003. Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a
Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30,
2227.
Sreenath, H.K., Moldes, A.B., Koegel, R.G., Straub, R.J., 2001. Lactic acid production by
simultaneous saccharication and fermentation of alfalfa ber. J. Biosci. Bioeng.
92, 518523.
Srivastava, A., Roychoudbury, P.K., Sashi, V., 1992. Extractive lactic acidfermentation
using ion-exchange resin. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 39, 607613.
Stamer, J.R., 1976. Lactic acid bacteria. In: Degueiredo, M.P., Spllittstoesser, D.F.
(Eds.), Food Microbiology. Public Health and Spoilage Aspects, AVI Publishing
Co. Inc., Westport, Connecticut, pp. 404426.
Stulke, J., Hillen, W., 1999. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr. Opin.
Microbiol. 2, 195201.
Sun, F., Chen, H., 2008. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw by aqueous
glycerol pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 61566161.
Sun, R., Lawther, J.M., Banks, W.B., 1995. Inuence of alkaline pretreatments on the
cell wall components of wheat straw. Ind. Crops Prod. 4, 127145.
Sun, Y., Cheng, J., 2002. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol produc-
tion: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 111.
Taherzadeh, M.J., Karimi, K., 2007. Enzymatic-basedhydrolysis processes for ethanol
fromlignocellulosic materials: a review. BioResources 2, 707738.
Taherzadeh, M.J., Karimi, K., 2008. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve
ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 9, 16211651.
Takagi, M., 1984. Inhibition of cellulase by fermentation products. Biotechnol. Bio-
eng. 26, 15061507.
Tanaka, K., Komiyama, A., Sonomoto, K., Ishizaki, A., Hall, S.J., Stanbury, P.F., 2002.
Two different pathways for d-xylose metabolism and the effect of xylose con-
centration on the yield coefcient of l-lactate in mixed-acid fermentation by
the lactic acid bacteriumLactococcus lactis IO-1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60,
160167.
Tanaka, T., Hoshina, M., Tanabe, S., Sakai, K., Ohtsubo, S., Taniguchi, M., 2006. Pro-
duction of d-lactic acid fromdefatted rice bran by simultaneous saccharication
and fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 211217.
Tango, M.S., Ghaly, A.E., 2002. A continuous lactic acid production systemusing an
immobilized packed bed of Lactobacillus helveticus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
58, 712720.
Taniguchi, M., Hoshina, K., Tanabe, S., Higuchi, Y., Sakai, K., Ohtsubo, S., Hoshino,
K., Tanaka, T., 2005. Production of l-lactic acid by simultaneous saccharication
and fermentation using unsterilized defatted rice bran as a carbon source and
nutrient component. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 11, 400406.
Taniguchi, M., Tokunaga, T., Horiuchi, K., Hoshino, K., Sakai, K., Tanaka, T., 2004.
Productionof l-lactic acidfroma mixture of xylose andglucose byco-cultivation
of lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66, 160165.
Tashiro, Y., Kaneko, W., Sun, Y., Shibata, K., Inokuma, K., Zendo, T., Sonomoto, K., 2011.
Continuous d-lactic acid production by a novel thermotolerant Lactobacillus
delbrueckii subsp lactis QU 41. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 89, 17411750.
Tashiro, Y., Shinto, H., Hayashi, M., Baba, S., Kobayashi, G., Sonomoto, K., 2007. Novel
high-efcient butanol production from butyrate by non-growing Clostridium
saccharoperbutylacetonicumN1-4 (ATCC 13564) with methyl viologen. J. Biosci.
Bioeng. 104, 238240.
Tashiro, Y., Takeda, K., Kobayashi, G., Sonomoto, K., Ishizaki, A., Yoshino, S., 2004.
High butanol productionbyClostridiumsaccharoperbutylacetonicumN1-4infed-
batch culture with pH-stat continuous butyric acid and glucose feeding method.
J. Biosci. Bioeng. 98, 263268.
Titgemeyer, F., Hillen, W., 2002. Global control of sugar metabolism: a Gram-positive
solution. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 82, 5971.
Tokuhiro, K., Ishida, N., Kondo, A., Takahashi, H., 2008. Lactic fermentation of cel-
lobiose by a yeast strain displaying -glucosidase on the cell surface. Appl.
Tsai, S.P., Moon, S.I.L., 1998. An integrated bioconversion process for production
of l-lactic acid from starchy potato feedstocks. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 72,
417428.
Tsuji, H., Fukui, I., 2003. Enhanced thermal stability of poly(lactide)s in the melt by
enantiomeric polymer blending. Polymer 44, 28912896.
Tu, M., Saddler, J.N., 2010. Potential enzyme cost reduction with the addition of sur-
factant during the hydrolysis of pretreatedsoftwood. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
161, 274287.
Vaccari, G., Gonzalez-Vara, R.A.Y., Campi, A.L., Doci, E., Brigidi, P., 1993. Fermentative
production of l-lactic acid by Lactococcus lactis DSM20011 and product recovery
using ion exchange resins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40, 2327.
van Nispen, J.G.M., Jonker, R., 1991. Process for the fermentative preparation of
organic acids. US Patent, 5:002,881.
van Rooyen, R., Hahn-Hgerdal, B., La Grange, D.C., van Zyl, W.H., 2005. Construc-
tion of cellobiose-growing and fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. J.
Venkatesh, K.V., 1997. Simultaneous saccharication and fermentation of cellulose
to lactic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 62, 9198.
Veyrat, A., Monedero, V., Perez-Martinez, G., 1994. Glucose transport by the phos-
phoenolpyruvate: mannose phosphotransferase system in Lactobacillus casei
ATCC 393 and its role in carbon catabolite repression. Microbiology 140,
11411149.
Viana, R., Monedero, V., Dossonnet, V., Vadeboncoeur, C., Perez-Martinez, G.,
Deutscher, J., 2000. Enzyme I and HPr fromLactobacillus casei: their role in sugar
transport, carbon catabolite repression and inducer exclusion. Mol. Microbiol.
36, 570584.
Viana, R., Yebra, M.J., Galn, J.L., Monedero, V., Prez-Martnez, G., 2005. Pleiotropic
effects of lactate dehydrogenase inactivation in Lactobacillus casei. Res. Micro-
biol. 156, 641649.
Vickroy, T.B., 1985. Lactic acid. In: Blanch, H.W., Drew, S. (Eds.), Comprehensive
BiotechnologyThe Principles, Applications and Regulation of Biotechnology
in Industry, Agriculture and Medicine, vol. 3. Pergamon Press, Toronto, pp.
761776.
Vonktaveesuk, P., Toyokawa, M., Ishlzaki, A., 1994. Stimulationof the rate of l-lactate
fermentationusing Lactococcus lactis IO-1 by periodic electrodialysis. J. Ferment.
Technol. 77, 508512.
Wang, L., Zhao, B., Liu, B., Yu, B., Ma, C., Su, F., Hua, D., Li, Q., Ma, Y., Xu, P., 2010. Ef-
cient production of l-lactic acid from corncob molasses, a waste by-product
in xylitol production, by a newly isolated xylose utilizing Bacillus sp. strain.
Wee, Y.J., Ryu, H.W., 2009. Lactic acid production by Lactobacillus sp. RKY2 in a
cell-recycle continuous fermentationusing lignocellulosic hydrolyzates as inex-
pensive rawmaterials. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 42624270.
Wee, Y.J., Yun, J.S., Park, D.H., Ryu, H.W., 2004. Biotechnological production of l(+)
lactic acidfromwoodhydrolyzate bybatchfermentationof Enterococcus faecalis.
Biotechnol. Lett. 26, 7174.
Wooley, R., Ruth, M., Glassner, D., Sheehan, J., 1999. Process design and costing
of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of
research and development. Biotechnol. Prog. 15, 794803.
Wu, X., Jiang, S., Liu, M., Pan, L., Zheng, Z., Luo, S., 2011. Production of l-lactic acid by
Rhizopus oryzae using semicontinuous fermentation in bioreactor. J. Ind. Micro-
biol. Biotechnol. 38, 565571.
Wyman, C.E., 1999. Biomass ethanol: technical progress, opportunities, and com-
mercial challenges. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 24, 189226.
Wyman, C.E., Dale, B.E., Elander, R.T., Holtzapple, M., Ladish, M.R., Lee, Y.Y., 2005.
Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Biore-
sour. Technol. 96, 19591966.
Xavier, S., Lonsane, B.K., 1994. Sugarcane pressmud as a novel and inexpensive sub-
strate for production of lactic acid in a solid state fermentation system. Appl.
Yabannavar, V.M., Wang, D.I.C., 1991. Extractive fermentation for lactic acid produc-
tion. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 37, 10951100.
Yanez, R., Alonso, J.L., Parajo, J.C., 2005. d-Lactic acid production from waste card-
board. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 80, 7684.
Yanez, R., Moldes, A.B., Alonso, J.L., Parajo, J.C., 2003. Production of d-()-lactic
acid from cellulose by simultaneous saccharication and fermentation using
Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. torquens. Biotechnol. Lett. 25, 11611164.
Yang, B., Wyman, C.E., 2008. Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic
ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 2, 2640.
Yang, S.J., Kataeva, I., Hamilton-Brehm, S.D., Engle, N.L., Tschaplinski, T.J., Doeppke,
C., Davis, M., Westpheling, J., Adams, M.W.W., 2009. Efcient degradation of
lignocellulosic plant biomass, without pretreatment, by the thermophilic anaer-
obe Anaerocellum thermophilum DSM 6725. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75,
47624769.
Yang, T.H., Kim, T.W., Kang, H.Y., Lee, S.H., Lee, E.J., Lim, S.C., Oh, S.O., Song, A.J.,
Park, S.J., Lee, S.Y., 2010. Biosynthesis of polylactic acid and its copolymers using
evolved propionate CoA transferase and PHA synthase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105,
150160.
Ye, K., Jin, S., Shimizu, K., 1996. Performanceimprovement of lactic acidfermentation
by multistage extractive fermentation. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 81, 240246.
Yu, Z.S., Zhang, H.X., 2004. Ethanol fermentation of acid-hydrolyzed cel-
lulosic hyrolysate with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 93,
199204.
Yun, J.S., Wee, Y.J., Kim, J.N., Ryu, H.W., 2004. Fermentative production of dl-lactic
acid from amylase treated rice and wheat brans hydrolyzate by a novel lactic
acid bacterium, Lactobacillus sp. Biotechnol. Lett. 26, 16131616.
Zaunmuller, T., Eichert, M., Richter, H., Unden, G., 2006. Variations in the energy
metabolism of biotechnologically relevant heterofermentative lactic acid bac-
teria during growth on sugars and organic acids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 72,
421429.
Zhang, M.J., Su, R.X., Qi, W., He, Z.M., 2010a. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of lig-
nocellulose by optimizing enzyme complexes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 160,
14071414.
Zhang, Q., Cai, W., 2008. Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated rice straw by
Trichoderma reesei ZM4-F3. Biomass Bioenergy 32, 11301135.
Zhang, Y., Cong, W., Shi, S., 2010b. Application of a pH feedback-controlled sub-
strate feeding method in lactic acid production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162,
21492156.
Zhang, Y., Cong, W., Shi, S.Y., 2011. Repeated fed-batch lactic acid production in
a packed bed-stirred fermentor system using a pH feedback feeding method.
Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 34, 6773.
Zhang, Y., Pan, Z., Zhang, R., 2009. Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic
ethanol production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2, 5168.
Zhang, Y.H.P., Ding, S.Y., Mielenz, J.R., Cui, J.B., Elander, R.T., Laser, M., Michael, E.,
Himmel, M.E., McMillan, J.R., Lynd, L.R., 2007. Fractionating recalcitrant ligno-
cellulose at modest reaction conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97, 214223.
Zheng, Y.Z., Lin, H.M., Tsao, G.T., 1998. Pretreatment for cellulose hydrolysis by
carbon dioxid explosion. Biotechnol. Prog. 14, 890896.
Zhou, S., Grabar, T.B., Shanmugam, K.T., Ingram, L.O., 2006. Betaine tripled the vol-
umetric productivity of d()-lactate by Escherichia coli strain SZ132 in mineral
salts medium. Biotechnol. Lett. 28, 671676.
Zhou, J., Wang, Y.H., Chu, J., Luo, L.Z., Zhuang, Y.P., Zhang, S.L., 2009. Optimization
of cellulase mixture for efcient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by
statistically designed experiments. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 819825.
Zhu, Y.M., Lee, Y.Y., Elander, R.T., 2007. Conversion of aqueous ammonia-treated
corn stover to lactic acid by simultaneous saccharication and cofermentation.
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 137-140, 721738.
Zuniga, M., Champomier-Verges, M., Zagorec, M., Perez-Martinez, G., 1998. Struc-
tural and functional analysis of the gene cluster encoding the enzymes
of the arginine deiminase pathway of Lactobacillus sake. J. Bacteriol. 180,
41544159.

Abdel-Rahman Et Al., 2011

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Abdel-Rahman Et Al., 2011

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Biotechnology 156 (2011) 286301

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

C. We recently isolated a newLAB strain, Lb. delbrueckii QU

C (Tashiro et al., 2011).

C, and a pH<5.0 and 5.07.0, respectively

You might also like