A quick maths question (trying to understand poker a bit better)

This is something Paul Thompson was asking me about on AIM, but due to not much timer
and me [censored] up the maths, we never really got out at the answer. I'm pretty sure I got
the right answer now though, so just want to make sure and also see what we can infer from
the answer.
The question was basically to establish, in a way, where we get money from in poker. Do we
make more money from our opponent making a mistake (Read: a -EV decision) or from us
getting all our money in as a decent favourite.
Im sure this might not be too interesting for some, but me and paul thought it was intersting to
know the maths surrounding the game.
So heres the situation he gave me: you have 500 left in your stack, and so does villain and
there is 200 in the pot (we are on the flop), he then bets 100, and you push for 400 more. You
have an overpair and he has a FD and is a 2:1 dog. So he can call here and he has not made a EV decision.
Lets say, that you can see that he has a FD and you also know that he might call a bet (that is
pot odds -EV) on the turn even if he misses, but not a PSB+
You will obv not pay him off at all if he hits, as you know what he has.
So my question is, is it better to push on the flop, or to wait till the turn? What is the amount
he has to call on the turn for pushing the flop and calling flop and betting turn to be the same
EV wise? And lastly, what, if anything, does this tell us about whats more important: "an
opponent making a -EV decision" vs. "getting a lot of money in as a fave"?
thanks
dan