Results imunossensor

Figure 1 - Different Assay Protocols Investigated on the M3G Opiate Analogue

Psi vs ELISA
Less complicated label
Reduced cost
Reduction test time

PSi

ELISA

Figure 2 - Comparison of specificity of developed

competitive binding

Figure 3 - Solution volume effects on sensitivity of PSi competitive

inhibition immunosensor response.

Results chemossensor
High
sensitivity
of sensor

Selectivity
of LSPR
sensor

The response and the recovery times

are in the range of a few seconds.
The response of the sensor is
approximately linear.
The LOD estimated is 0.4ppm for
toluene.
To determine reproducibility, the
relative standard deviation was about
25%

Figure 4- The dynamic response of the sensing

element in the presence of toluene of 150 ppm.

Clear
interaction
between
the
wavelength shift and the VOC refractive
index.
Ratio of VOC gas and air depends of
adsorption parameters, shift of the LSPR
peak is mainly affected by the
adsorption properties rather than the
refractive index of the VOCs.
Figure 5 - The calibration curves obtained from the
dynamic response at every 50 s after the introduction of
toluene gas.

Figure 6 - Differences in calibration curves between different types of VOCs

Table 1 - The slope of calibration curves (10100 ppm and 1001000 ppm), LOD and vapor pressure of
tested VOCs.

Slope (10100
ppm)

Slope (100
1000 ppm)

LOD

Pv

Benzene

2.20

1.12

1.93

100.8

Toluene

10.93

2.06

0.40

28.5

Methanol

2.51

0.75

1.69

127.1

CH2Cl2

0.22

0.21

18.92

435.9

CCl4

0.40

0.47

10.70

115.3