Embarrassment and Social Organization
Erving Goffman
The American Joumal of Sociology, Vol. 62, No. 3 (Nov., 1956), 264-271.
Stable URL:
http flinksstor.orgsici?sici=0002-9602% 281956114 2062%3A3%3C264%3ABASOWSE2.0.CO®IB2L
The Amencan Journal of Sociology is currently published by The University of Chicago Press,
Your use of the ISTOR archive indicates your acceptance of ISTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
flip: feworwjtor org/aboutterms.htmal. ISTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in par, that unless you
fave obtained pcior permission, you may not dowaload an cnt isus of @ journal or multiple copies of articles, and
you may use content inthe ISTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial uss.
Please contact the publisher cegarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
bhupsferww.jstoc.org/joumals‘ucpresshtel.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or
printed page of such transtnission.
ISTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to creating and preserving.a digital archive of
scholarly journals. For more information regarding ISTOR, please contact jstor-info@umich edu.
hup:thrww itor. orgy
Fri Mar 12.07:07:23 2004EMBARRASSMENT AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION
ERVING COFFMAN
ABSTRACT
Emberrassmen:, a posiity in avery face to face encounter, demonstrates some genere properties of
f
interactlon. Te octrs whenever an incividual is fetta have projeetesincompastbe
Defoe these present. These projections ont gcc at tatdom dr for paycho
Dae coeds yrange pina so cr
rasnens has i socal fsetan
Se of confict between these prince,
‘An individual may recognize extreme
embarrassment in others and even in himself
by the objective signs of emotional dlis-
turbance: blushing, fumbling, stuttering,
an unusually Jow- oF high-pitched voice,
‘quavering speech or breaking of the voice,
sweating, blanching, blinking, tremor of the
hand, hesitating of vacllating movement,
absent-mindecness, end malspropisms. AS
Mack Boldwin remarked about shyness,
there may be “s lowering of tie eves, bowing
of the head, putting of hands hehind the
ack, nervous fingering of the clothing or
‘owisting of the fingers together, and stam-
rmering, with some incoherence of idea as
expressed in speech.” ‘There are also symp.
toms ofa subjective kind: eonstriction of the
diaphragm, a feeting of wobbliness, con-
sciousness of strained and unnatural ges-
tures, a dazed sensation, dryness of the
mouth, and tenseness of the muscles, In
cases of mild discomfture these visible and
invisible flasterings ocour but it ess per
ceptible form,
Ta the popular view it is only natural to
be at ease during interaction, embarrass
rment being a regrettable deviation from the
normal state. The individual, in fact, might
say be felt “natural” or “unnatural” in the
situation, meaning that he felt comfortable
in the interaction or emberrassed in it. He
sho frequently becomes embarrassed in the
presence of athers is regarded as sulfering
Frama fash unjostifed sense of inferiority
and in need of therapy
‘Janes Mark Baldwin, Seca and Bthical Inter
preations ta Mexlet Deon London, 1902),
a
doer a
ial earns out cele
ison preva inthe oc
To utilize the fustering syndrome in
analyzing embarrassment, the twa kinds of
sircumstance in which it'occurs must frst
be distinguished. First, the individual may
hecome flustered while engaged in a task of
no particular value to him in itself, except
that his long-range interests require hien to
perform it with. safety, competence, or
dispatch, and he fears he is inadequate co
the task. Discomfort will be felt in the situa-
toa but in & gense not for it; in fact, often
the individual will nat be able to cope with
St just because he is 90 anxiously taken up
with the eventualities lying beyond it.
Significantly, the individual may become
“rattled” although no others are present.
This paper will not be concemed with
these occasions of instrumental chagrin but
rather with the kind that occurs in cleat-cut
relation to the real or imagined presence of
others. Whatever else, embarrassment has
tn do with the figure the individeal cuts be-
1A sophisticated version is the paychoaralytcal
view that messiness im socal internction isa esl
Of impale expectacians of attention Bated. on
tunteszlved expectatios regarding pasenta support.
Presumably an abject of therapy & t bring the fel
vidunl to see bis symptoms in thie tree prycho-
cdynarsfe light, on the seamptio that thevefter
perhape fe wil not ncad chem (eae Pavl Sehilder,
Nethe Social Neurosis” Payekondnabzal Resin,
XV [193, 1-19; Gerhact Pies and Milton Singer,
‘Sime ad Gui: & Peschasealitzal and 6 Culsrad
‘Siady (Spengtel, IL! Chesles C ‘Thomas, 1953
‘esp. p. 26; Leo Rangell, “The Paychoboay of Poise"
Thternaisuat Tours of Peycheanalsic, XXX
{98H}, 313-32; Sandor Perencal “Embarraced
anda," in Farber Contributions fe the Paar ac
Tecnlque of Payctoenalysis (Landon: Hogarth
ress 1950, pp. 315-16)
264EMBARRASSMENT AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION
fore others felt to be thereat the tise." The
cxucil concern iste impression one makes
‘on athers in the present—whatever the
long-range or unconscious basis of this con-
cem may be. This ductuating configuration
‘of those present is & most important refer-
fence grap.
LYOCARUITARY OP ELERARRASSWENT
A social encounter is an occasion of f2ce-
to-face interaction, beginning when iedic
viduals recognize that they have moved into
one another's immediate presence and end-
ing by an appreciated withdrawal from
mutual participation. Encounters. differ
markedly from one another in purpose,
social function, kind and number of per”
sonnel, setting, ete., and, while only con-
versational encounters will be considered
here, cbviously there are those in which no
word is spoken. And yet, in our Anglo-
American society at least, these seers ta be
‘no social encounter which cannot became
embarrassing to one or more of its partici
pants, giving rise to what is sometimes
called an incident or false note. By listening
for this dissonance, the sociologist can gen
eralize about the ways in which interaction
can go avny and, by implication, the condi-
tions necessary for interaction ia be right.
[At the same time he is given good evidence
that all encounters are members of a single
natural class, amenable to a single frame-
work of analysis.
By whom. is the emberrassing incident
caused? To whom is it embarrassing? For
‘whom is this embarrassment felt? It is not
always an individeal for whose plight
participants feel embarrassment; it may be
for pairs of participants who ate together
having dificulties and even for an encounter
as a whole, Further, if the individual for
‘whom embarrassment is felt happens to be
pecceived as & responsible representative of
2-The themes develope in this paper are exten
sions af the ty the rites (Pace Work”
Payhious, XVUL (985), 213-31; “Alienation
from Iniracion:" amen Ratton (ortheon
ita); and The Prasaaton of Sef on Bierging Life
Universy of Edinburgh, Socal Sdences Research
Cezwe, Monograph No.2 (Edinburgh, 1986),
268
some faction or subgroup (as is very often
the case in three-or-more-person interac
tion}, then the members of this faction are
likely to feel embarrassed and to feel it for
themselves. But, while 2 gage or fous: pos
can mean that 2 single individual is at one
and the same time the cause of an incident,
the one who feels embarrassed by it, and the
fone for whom he feels emharrassment, thisis
not, perhaps, the typical ease, for in these
matters ego boundaries seem especially
‘weak. When an individual finds himsel¥ in a
situation which ought to make him blush,
others present usually will blush with and
for him, though he may not have sufficient
sense of shame or appreciation of the cir-
‘cumstances to blush on his own account.
‘The words “embarrassment,” “discom-
fiture,” and “uneasiness” are used here ina
continwum of meanings. Some occasions of
embarrassment seem to have an abrupt
orgasmic character; a sudden introduction
of the disturbing event is followed by an
immediate peak in the experience of em-
bbarrassment and then by a slow retu to
the preceding ease, all phases being en-
compassed in the same encounter. A bad
moment thus mats aa otherwise euphoric
situation,
‘AC the other extreme we find that some
‘occasions of embarrassment are sustained at
the same level ebroughout che encounter,
heginning when the inceraction begins and
lasting until the encounter is terminated.
‘The participants speak of an uncorafortable
or uneesy situation, not of an embarrassing
ncident. In such case, of course, the whole
‘encounter becomes for ane or more of the
parties an incident that causes embarrass
ment. Abrupt embarrassment may aften be
intense, while sustained uneasiness is more
commonly mild, invalving barely apparent
fiusterings. An encounter which seems likely
to occasion abrupt embarrassment may,
because of this, cast a shadow of sustained
uneasiness upon the participants, transform-
ing the entire encounter into an incident
itself.
Tn forming a picture of the embarrassed
individual, one relies on imagery from