Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We examine the relationship between the fair value measurement and the
audit quality. Our evidence suggests that the fair value measurement has a
negative impact on the overall CPAs audit quality. And this negative effect
depends on the application scale of the fair value measurement. Nowadays,
large-scale application of the fair value measurement does decrease the
overall audit quality, but a modest application reflects the intention of
improving the value relevance of accounting information and plays its proper
role.
They should pay more attention to the audit of fair value and reduce the
adverse effect of fair value measurement on external audit, so that this
measurement can play its proper role as soon as possible.
INTL Page 31
6-5
6-6
Low R2
6-7
Auditor Liability
Better measurement may reduce auditor liability
when firms become financially distressed
6-8
Behavioural finance
Behavioural characteristics that question market
efficiency
Limited attention
Overconfidence
Representativeness
Self-attribution bias
Leading to momentum
6-9
10
11
Nominal scales
Number used only for labels;
Numbers represent classifications;
e.g. the classification of assets and liabilities into
different classes
Ordinal scales
Rank orders objects with respect to a given
property
Intervals between the numbers are not
necessarily equal
12
Interval scale
Ratio scale
13
14
RATIO SCALE
Intl 28
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Intl 29
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Intl 27
33
34
transaction based
revenue recognition
matching
profit measurement
35
36
Objective of accounting
Information for decision making
Basis of historic cost
Matching
Notions of investor needs
37
38
Recognition principle
violates the conservatism principle - but actual
phenomena
are holding gains profits or revaluation
adjustments?
Technological change
appears to ignore technological advances
39
40
41
42
6 - 43
6 - 45