You are on page 1of 44

THAI TRANSPLANT CARE (TTC)

KIDNEY

Thai Transplantation Society


September 2014

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)


Thai Transplant Care (TTC)



..

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)


Thai Transplant Care



Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)


2


Thai Transplant Care (TTC)





KDIGO .. 2009




(World Health Assembly)



4

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)



Thai Transplant Care

Thai Transplant Care

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

(Glossary)
11
................................................................................................................................................................................................

12
................................................................................................................................................................................................
1.................................................................................................................................................................................................

13
2.................................................................................................................................................................................................
Induction Therapy
17
3.................................................................................................................................................................................................
Maintenance Therapy
20
4.................................................................................................................................................................................................
Acute Rejection
23
5.................................................................................................................................................................................................
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy/Injury (CAN/CAI)
28
6.................................................................................................................................................................................................
CMV
32
7.................................................................................................................................................................................................

35
Index
40
................................................................................................................................................................................................

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

..
.
..
...
..
..
.
..
...
...
.
.
..
..
..
.

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)


Thai Transplant Care
..
..
..
..
.
...
..
..
.
...
.
...
.
.
..
.
.
...
..
.

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)


Thai Transplant Care
..
.
...
...
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
...

..
..
.
..
..
.
..
...
.
.
.

10

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

..
..
..

(Glossary)
ATG
CAN/CAI
CMV
DFPP
DGF
DSA
ECD
HLA
HR
IL-2RA
IVIg
KDIGO
LR
MM
MR
mTOR
PP
PRA
TTC
VHR
VLR

Antithymocyte globulin
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy/Injury
Cytomegalovirus
Double Filtration Plasmapheresis
Delayed Graft Function
Donor Specific Antibody
Expanded Criteria Donor
Human Leukocyte Antigen
High Risk
Interleukin 2 receptor antagonist
Intravenous Immunoglobulin
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes
Low Risk
Mismatch
Moderate Risk
Mammalian Target of Rapamycin
Plasmapheresis
Panel Reactive Antibody
Thai Transplant Care
Very High Risk
Very Low Risk

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

11

12

1
2

A
B
C
D

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

1.

(.) .. 2551








Kidney Disease: Improving
Global Outcomes (KDIGO)


(1) (2)
(3) (4)
(5) European
Renal Best Practice KDIGO (6)
5
Induction Therapy, Maintenance Therapy, Acute Rejection,
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy/Injury (CAN/CAI) Cytomegalovirus (CMV) 18
TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

13




KDIGO (7)

rejection

14

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

1.1: Acute Rejection


1.1.1: (Very Low Risk; VLR)
Human Leukocyte Antigen
(HLA) typing zero mismatch (0-MM) Panel Reactive
Antibody (PRA) 0
1.1.2: (Low Risk; LR)
( 0-MM HLA-DR, HLADQ, HLA-DP mismatch) PRA 0-10
HLA typing zero
mismatch (0-MM) PRA 0-10
1.1.3: (Moderate Risk; MR)
( 0-MM) PRA 10-50

( 0-MM) PRA 1050


HLA-DR mismatch
HLA-DQ mismatch HLA-DP mismatch
1.1.4: (High Risk; HR)

( 0-MM) PRA
50
( 0-MM) PRA
50
TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

15

Expanded Criteria (ECD)


20
specific antibody Luminex PRA negative
cross match
1.1.5: (Very High Risk; VHR)
positive cross match
ABO blood group incompatibility
1.2:
1.1

(VLR)
(LR)
(MR)
(HR)
(VHR)

16

PRA

HLA typing

Cross matching

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

2. Induction Therapy
Induction therapy

2.1:
2.1.1: (VLR) antibody induction
2.1.2: (LR) antibody induction interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA)
(
2.1)
PRA 10 antibody induction [2C] IL-2RA [2B]
( 1-MM HLA-DR mismatch) PRA 0 antibody induction
[2C] IL-2RA [2B]
HLA typing zero
mismatch (0-MM) antibody induction [2D]
IL-2RA [2B]
2.1.3: (MR) IL-2RA
antithymocyte globulin (ATG)
PRA 10-50 IL-2RA [1B] ATG [2B]
IL-2RA [1B] ATG [2B]
TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

17

2.1 Induction Therapy

(VLR)
(LR)
(MR)
(HR)
(VHR)

IL-2RA

ATG

Precondition

N*
Y [2B]
Y [1B]
Y [2B]
Y [2C]

N*
N*
Y [2B]
Y [2B]
Y [2B]

N*
N*
N*
Y [2D]
Y [2A]

* Not Graded

HLA-DR mismatch IL-2RA [1B] ATG [2B]


HLA-DQ mismatch HLA-DP mismatch IL2RA [2B] ATG [2D]
2.1.4: (High Risk; HR) IL-2RA
ATG
IL-2RA [2B]
ATG [2B]
Expanded Criteria (ECD)
IL-2RA [2B] ATG [2B]
PRA 50 IL-2RA [2B] ATG
[2B]
20 IL-2RA [2B] ATG [2C]
Specific Antibody Luminex PRA negative
cross match IL-2RA [2B] ATG [2B] desensitization [2D]
18

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

2.1.5: (VHR) desensitization


precondition IL-2RA ATG
ABO incompatibility ATG [2B] IL-2RA [2A]
positive cross match ATG [2B] IL-2RA [2B]
2.2: methylprednisolone
2.3: (VHR) precondition
induction
Anti-CD20 antibody (Rituximab)
Plasmapheresis (PP) double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP)
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)
Tacrolimus day -7 to day 0
Mycophenolate day -7 to day 0
Methylprednisolone
2.4: Induction therapy
Basiliximab 20 mg/dose 0 4
Thymoglobulin 1-1.5 mg/kg/day 7 ATG-Fresenius 35 mg/kg/day 7
2.5: precondition
Methylprednisolone 500-1,000 mg/day 3
PP DFPP 1-1.5 plasma volume 5
IVIg 0.1-0.4 g/kg/dose PP DFPP
Rituximab 375 mg/m2 1-2 doses

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

19

3. Maintenance Therapy
3.1: calcineurin
inhibitor anti-proliferative agent steroid [1B]
3.1.1: calcineurin inhibitor first-line [2A]
Tacrolimus
[2D]
Cyclosporine
[2B]
3.1.2: mycophenolate anti-proliferative agent
[2B]
3.1.3: tacrolimus / prolonged-release tacrolimus
calcineurin inhibitor (MR)
(HR) (VHR)
3.1.4:
steroid (VLR) (LR)
IL2-RA steroid
(severe osteoporosis)
Avascular necrosis of bone
6
3.2: Acute
Rejection [2C]

20

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

3.2.1: calcineurin inhibitor


[2B]
3.2.2: prednisolone
(VLR) [2C]
3.2.3: calcineurin inhibitor Mammalian
Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)
calcineurin inhibitor
3.2.4: mTOR inhibitor
[1B]
3.3:
3.3.1: calcineurin inhibitor
[1B]
3.1 Maintenance Therapy
Regimens
CsA + MPA + Pred
CsA + MPA + Pred
Tac + MPA + Pred
Sirolimus + MPA + Pred
Everolimus + MPA + Pred

Methods

0-3 mo

3-6 mo 6-12 mo >12 mo

C0 (ng/ml) 200-300 150-200 120-150 75-100


C2 (ng/ml) 1300-1500 900-1200 700-900 500-700
C0 (ng/ml) 8-12
8-10
6-8
4-6
C0 (ng/ml) 5-12
4-8
4-8
4-8
C0 (ng/ml) 5-12
4-8
4-8
4-8

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

21


[2C]
[2C]

rejection
[2C]
3.3.2: cyclosporine 12-hour trough (C0)
2-hour post-dose (C2) [Not Graded]
3.3.3: tacrolimus 12-hour trough (C0)
[2C] prolonged-release tacrolimus 24-hour trough (C0)
[2C]
3.3.4: mTOR inhibitor 12-hour trough
2
everolimus [2C] 24-hour trough
5-7 sirolimus [2C]

22

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

4. Acute Rejection
(4, 8-18)
4.1: Acute Rejection
creatinine [1C]
Delayed Graft Function (DGF) [2C]
1-2
[2D]
4.2:
acute rejection [1C] (9, 10, 12, 14,
15)
4.3: Subclinical borderline rejection [2D]
(9, 10, 12, 14, 15)
4.4: pulse methylprednisolone T-cell mediated
acute cellular rejection first line [1D] (4, 18)
4.4.1: steroid acute cellular rejection
steroid [2D]
4.4.2: steroid recurrent/severe acute
cellular rejection (Banff Grade IIA ) ATG
[2C]

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

23

4.5: Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection


steroid [2C] (13, 17)
PP DFPP
IVIg
Anti-CD20 antibody (Rituximab) proteasome inhibitor (Bortezomib)
ATG
4.6: DSA /
[2C]
4.6.1: (VHR) DSA /
3 1

4.6.2: (HR) (MR)


DSA 3 1 DSA

4.6.3: (LR) DSA 1



/


4.7: DSA 1

/


24

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

4.8: Acute Rejection

mycophenolate
mycophenolate azathioprine
azathioprine mycophenolate [2D] (16)
tacrolimus prolonged release tacrolimus
tacrolimus cyclosporine tacrolimus / prolonged release tacrolimus [2D] (8, 11)
calcineurin inhibitors mTOR inhibitor
mTOR inhibitor calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus
prolonged release tacrolimus [2D] (4)
4.9: Acute Rejection
Methylprednisolone 500-1,000 mg/day 10-15 mg/kg/day 35
Thymoglobulin 1-1.5 mg/kg/day 7 ATG-Fresenius 35 mg/kg/day 7
PP DFPP 1-1.5 plasma volume 7

IVIg 0.1-0.4 g/kg/dose PP DFPP 2 g/kg/
dose 1 dose
Rituximab 375 mg/m2 1-2 doses 1-2 Bortezomib
1.3 mg/m2/dose 1, 4, 8 11

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

25

4.1 Acute Cellular Rejection

4.2 Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection


26

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

4.3 Chronic Antibody-mediated Rejection

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

27

5. Chronic Allograft Nephropathy/Injury (CAN/


CAI)
(Chronic Allograft Nephropathy; CAN)

Interstitial Fibrosis Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA)
(Chronic
Allograft Injury; CAI)
(7, 19)
5.1:

[1B] (20)
(Ultrasonography)
(Doppler Color Flow)
DSA
BK
5.2:
[1C]
5.3: calcineurin
inhibitor mTOR inhibitor
[2C] (4, 7)
5.3.1: calcineurin inhibitor mTOR
inhibitor CAN/CAI eGFR 40 mL/min/1.73 m2
28

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

800 mg/g creatinine [2D] (4, 7)


5.3.2: azathioprine mycophenolate
CAN/CAI mTOR inhibitor
eGFR 40 mL/min/1.73 m2
800 mg/g creatinine [2D] (21, 22).
5.3.3 calcineurin inhibitor

positive DSA
de novo DSA (23, 24)

PRA >50%
HLA-DR HLA-DQ mismatch
HLA mismatch
( 20 )

rejection

antibody-mediated rejection (25)

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

29

5.1 CAN/CAI

Calcineurin inhibitor + High immunologic


risk
Mycophenolate

Calcineurin
inhibitor
50%

Creeping
Creatinine1

Recipient with
unfavorable factors
of mTOR inhibitor*

mTOR inhibitor +
Moderate
Calcineurin inhibitor immunologic risk
Minimization

70-90%

ASCERTAIN2 (ns)

mTOR inhibitor +
Mycophenolate

100%

CONVERT3
CONCEPT4
ASCERTAIN2
STN5 (ns)
post-CONCEPT6

Low immunologic
risk

Creeping Creatinine Study (22), 2ASCERTAIN: Assessment of Everolimus in Addition to Calcineurin


Inhibitor Reduction in the Maintenance of Renal Transplant Recipients (26), 3CONVERT (27),
4
CONCEPT (28), 5STN: Spare-The-Nephron (29), 6post-CONCEPT (30)
*Unfavorable factors of mTOR inhibitor proteinuria > 500 mg/, eGFR 40 mL/
min/1.73 m2

30

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

5.2
Regimen

Level

Calcineurin inhibitor +
Mycophenolate

Cyclosporine level:
C0: 60-80 ng/mL
C2: 400-600 ng/mL
Tacrolimus level:
C0: 4-5 ng/mL

mycophenolate
CNI

mTOR inhibitor +
Calcineurin inhibitor
Minimization

mTOR inhibitor level:


C0: 5-10 ng/mL
Cyclosporine level:
C0: 30-60 ng/mL
C2: 200-300 ng/mL
Tacrolimus level:
C0: 2-3 ng/mL

mTOR inhibitor +
Mycophenolate

mTOR inhibitor level:


C0: 5-10 ng/mL

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

31

6. CMV
4 (31-34)
6.1: ATG CMV [1A]
6.1.1: ganciclovir valganciclovir 100

6.1.2: CMV
induction therapy
6.1.3:
CMV (ganciclovir/valganciclovir associated neutropenia)
CMV 1-2
100

6.1.4: oral valganciclovir 100
CMV modified preemptive therapy
intravenous ganciclovir 14-21
CMV 1-2 100 (35)
6.1.5: 6.1.3 6.1.4
CMV viremia oral valganciclovir
CMV replication
tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolates

32

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

6.1.6: ATG induction therapy acute rejection therapy ATG


oral valganciclovir

prophylactic therapy
modified preemptive therapy

6.2: CMV [(-) CMV IgG]


CMV IgG (D+/R-) ganciclovir valganciclovir 100
[1A]
6.2.1: CMV
induction therapy
6.2.2:
CMV (ganciclovir/valganciclovir associated neutropenia)
CMV
100

6.3: CMV IgG CMV IgG


(D+/R+, D-/R+) IL-2RA CMV
CMV (1B)
6.3.1: CMV
2 3 6

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

33

6.4: acute rejection lymphocyte depleting agent, pulse methylprednisolone,


ganciclovir valganciclovir 100
CMV 100 [1A]
6.4.1: rejection
rejection CMV

6.5: CMV

6.6: ganciclovir

6.7: valganciclovir

34

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

7.
1. Bia M, Adey DB, Bloom RD, Chan L, Kulkarni S, Tomlanovich S. KDOQI
US commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the
care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(2):189-218.
2. Knoll GA, Blydt-Hansen TD, Campbell P, Cantarovich M, Cole E, Fairhead
T, et al. Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of
Nephrology commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for
the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(2):21946.
3. Baker R, MacTier R. How do the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines on
the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients apply to the UK? 2010. Available
from: http://www.renal.org/docs/default-source/guidelines-resources/kdigo/
Implementation of the KDIGO guideline on the management of the kidney
transplant recipient in the UK 2010.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
4. Chadban SJ, Barraclough KA, Campbell SB, Clark CJ, Coates PT, Cohney
SJ, et al. KHA-CARI guideline: KHA-CARI adaptation of the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients. Nephrology. 2012;17(3):204-14.
5. Klble T, Alcaraz A, Budde K, Humke U, Karam G, Lucan M, et al. Guidelines on renal transplantation. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology (EAU); 2009.
6. Heemann U, Abramowicz D, Spasovski G, Vanholder R, European Renal
Best Practice Work Group on Kidney T. Endorsement of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines on kidney transplantation: a European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement.
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European
Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.
2011;26(7):2099-106.
7. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Transplant Work G. KDIGO
clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am
J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 3:S1-155.
TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

35

8. Jirasiritham S, Sumethkul V, Mavichak V, Na-Bangchang K. The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in Thai kidney transplant recipients.
Transplant Proc. 2004;36(7):2076-8.
9. Kasiske BL, Andany MA, Danielson B. A thirty percent chronic decline in
inverse serum creatinine is an excellent predictor of late renal allograft
failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(4):762-8.
10. Kurtkoti J, Sakhuja V, Sud K, Minz M, Nada R, Kohli HS, et al. The utility
of 1- and 3-month protocol biopsies on renal allograft function: a randomized controlled study. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(2):317-23.
11. Mycophenolate Mofetil Acute Renal Rejection Study G. Mycophenolate
mofetil for the treatment of a first acute renal allograft rejection: three-year
follow-up. The Mycophenolate Mofetil Acute Renal Rejection Study Group.
Transplantation. 2001;71(8):1091-7.
12. Qureshi F, Rabb H, Kasiske BL. Silent acute rejection during prolonged
delayed graft function reduces kidney allograft survival. Transplantation.
2002;74(10):1400-4.
13. Roberts DM, Jiang SH, Chadban SJ. The treatment of acute antibodymediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review.
Transplantation. 2012;94(8):775-83.
14. Rush D, Arlen D, Boucher A, Busque S, Cockfield SM, Girardin C, et al.
Lack of benefit of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients
receiving TAC and MMF: a randomized study. Am J Transplant.
2007;7(11):2538-45.
15. Rush D, Nickerson P, Gough J, McKenna R, Grimm P, Cheang M, et al.
Beneficial effects of treatment of early subclinical rejection: a randomized
study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9(11):2129-34.
16. Tait BD, Susal C, Gebel HM, Nickerson PW, Zachary AA, Claas FH, et al.
Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):19-47.
17. Waiser J, Budde K, Schutz M, Liefeldt L, Rudolph B, Schonemann C, et al.
Comparison between bortezomib and rituximab in the treatment of anti36

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

body-mediated renal allograft rejection. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2012;27(3):1246-51.
Webster AC, Pankhurst T, Rinaldi F, Chapman JR, Craig JC. Monoclonal
and polyclonal antibody therapy for treating acute rejection in kidney
transplant recipients: a systematic review of randomized trial data. Transplantation. 2006;81(7):953-65.
Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Sis B, Halloran PF, Birk PE, et al. Banff
05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and
elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Am J Transplant.
2007;7(3):518-26.
Transplantation EEGoR. European best practice guidelines for renal transplantation. Section IV: Long-term management of the transplant recipient.
IV.6.3. Cancer risk after renal transplantation. Solid organ cancers: prevention and treatment. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal
Association. 2002;17 Suppl 4:32, 4-6.
Gonzalez Molina M, Seron D, Garcia del Moral R, Carrera M, Sola E, Jesus
Alferez M, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces deterioration of renal
function in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy. A follow-up study
by the Spanish Cooperative Study Group of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy. Transplantation. 2004;77(2):215-20.
Dudley C, Pohanka E, Riad H, Dedochova J, Wijngaard P, Sutter C, et al.
Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant
recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the creeping
creatinine study. Transplantation. 2005;79(4):466-75.
Everly MJ, Rebellato LM, Haisch CE, Ozawa M, Parker K, Briley KP, et al.
Incidence and impact of de novo donor-specific alloantibody in primary
renal allografts. Transplantation. 2013;95(3):410-7.
Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Karpinski M, Ho J, Storsley LJ, et
al. Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific
HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(5):1157TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

37

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.
33.

38

67.
Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Haas M, Sis B, Mengel M, et al. Banff 07
classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions.
Am J Transplant. 2008;8(4):753-60.
Holdaas H, Rostaing L, Seron D, Cole E, Chapman J, Fellstrom B, et al.
Conversion of long-term kidney transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to everolimus: a randomized, multicenter, 24-month study.
Transplantation. 2011;92(4):410-8.
Schena FP, Pascoe MD, Alberu J, del Carmen Rial M, Oberbauer R,
Brennan DC, et al. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus
maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-month efficacy and
safety results from the CONVERT trial. Transplantation. 2009;87(2):233-42.
Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Toupance O, Westeel PF, Etienne I, Thervet E, et
al. Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to
sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: concept study. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(5):1115-23.
Weir MR, Mulgaonkar S, Chan L, Shidban H, Waid TH, Preston D, et al.
Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal
transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial. Kidney
international. 2011;79(8):897-907.
Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Thervet E, Buchler M, Etienne I, Westeel PF, et al.
Efficacy and safety of early cyclosporine conversion to sirolimus with
continued MMF-four-year results of the Postconcept study. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(8):1665-75.
Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Asberg A, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L,
et al. Updated international consensus guidelines on the management of
cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation.
2013;96(4):333-60.
Razonable RR, Humar A, Practice ASTIDCo. Cytomegalovirus in solid
organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13 Suppl 4:93-106.
Watcharananan SP, Louhapanswat S, Chantratita W, Jirasiritham S,
Sumethkul V. Cytomegalovirus viremia after kidney transplantation in ThaiTTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

land: predictors of symptomatic infection and outcome. Transplant Proc.


2012;44(3):701-5.
34. Issa NC, Fishman JA. Infectious complications of antilymphocyte therapies in solid organ transplantation. Clinical infectious diseases : an official
publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2009;48(6):77286.
35. Hibberd PL, Tolkoff-Rubin NE, Conti D, Stuart F, Thistlethwaite JR, Neylan
JF, et al. Preemptive ganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus antibody-positive renal transplant recipients. A
randomized controlled trial. Annals of internal medicine. 1995;123(1):1826.

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

39

INDEX
Page
A
ABO incompatibility/ABO blood group incompatibility
Acute antibody-mediated Rejection
Acute cellular rejection
Acute rejection
Antibody induction
Anti-CD20 antibody
Anti-proliferative agent
Antithymocyte globulin (ATG)
ATG-Fresenius
Avascular necrosis of bone
Azathioprine

16,19
24,26
23,26
13,15,20,23,25,33,34
17
19,24
20
17
19,25
20
25,29

B
Banff
Basiliximab
Borderline rejection
Bortezomib

23
19
23
24,25

C
Calcineurin inhibitor
Chronic Allograft Injury (CAI)
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN)
CMV IgG
CMV replication
CMV viremia
Creatinine
Cross matching
Cyclosporine
40

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

20,21,25,28,29,30,31
28
11,13,28
33
32
32
23,29,30
16
20,22,25,31,32

Page
D
Delayed Graft Function (DGF)
Desensitization
Doppler color flow
Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP)

11,23
18,19
28
19

E
eGFR
Everolimus
Expanded Criteria donor (ECD)

28,29,30
21,22,30
11,16,18

F
First-line

20

G
Ganciclovir
Ganciclovir/valganciclovir associated neutropenia
Glossary

32,33,34
32,33
11

H
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)
High immunologic risk
High Risk (HR)
HLA typing
HLA-DP mismatch
HLA-DQ mismatch
HLA-DR
HLA-DR mismatch
Hour post-dose (C2)
Hour trough (C0)
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)

21
30
11,15,16,18
15,16,17
15,18,29
15,18,29
15,29
15,17,18
22
22
11,15

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

41

Page
I
Induction Therapy
Interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA)
Interstitial Fibrosis
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)

13,17,18,19,32,33
11,17
28
11,19

L
Low immunologic risk
Low Risk (LR)
Luminex PRA
Lymphocyte depleting agent

30
11,15
16,18
34

M
Maintenance Therapy
Methylprednisolone
Moderate immunologic risk
Moderate Risk (MR)
Modified preemptive therapy
MPA
mTOR inhibitor
Mycophenolate

31,20,21
19,23,25,34
30
11,15
32,33
21
21,22,25,28,29,30,31
19,20,25,29,30,31,32

N
Negative cross match

16,18

O
Osteoporosis

20

P
Panel Reactive Antibody
Plasma volume
Plasmapheresis (PP)
Positive cross match
42

TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

11,15
25
11,19,41
11,19

Page
Precondition
Prolonged-release
Prophylactic therapy
Proteasome inhibitor
Proteinuria

18,19
20,22
33
24
30

R
Recurrent/severe acute cellular rejection
Regimens
Rejection
Rituximab

23
21
14,22,29,34
19,24,25

S
Sirolimus
Specific antibody
Steroid
Subclinical

21,22
16,18
20,23,24
23

T
Tacrolimus
T-cell mediated acute cellular rejection
Thymoglobulin
Tubular Atrophy

19,20,22,25,31,32
23
19,25
28

U
Ultrasonography

28

V
Valganciclovir
Very High Risk (VHR)
Very Low Risk (VLR)

32,33,34
11,16
11,15

Z
Zero mismatch (0-MM)

15,17
TTC: Kidney (September, 2014)

43

THAI TRANSPLANT CARE (TTC) KIDNEY

1 2557
500
:

:
4 2
10310
0-2716-6181, 0-2716-6184, 0-2716-6661 4001
0-2716-6183
E-mail: webmaster@transplantthai.org
Website: www.transplantthai.org

3/3 49
10110
. 02-258-7954
02-258-7954

You might also like