Utility Maximization

Choice

Exercises of Microeconomics
Utility Maximization - Choice (Ch. 7-8 Varian)

Fabio Tramontana (University of Pavia)

slides available at: http://tramontana.altervista.org/teaching.html

PhD in Economics at L.A.S.E.R.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Utility Maximization
Choice

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.1
Consider preferences dened over the nonnegative orthant by

(x1 , x2 )  (y1 , y2 )

if x1 + x2

< y1 + y2 .

Do these preferences exhibit

local nonsatiation?
If these are the only two consumption goods and the consumer
faces positive prices, will the consumer spend all of his income?
Explain.

What does local nonsatiation mean?

Local Nonsatiation

given any x in X and any

with |x

> 0, then there

y | < such that

Tramontana

is some bundle y in X

 x.

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution

In other words,

bundle.

there must always exist a better

Maybe it cannot be reached (it costs too much),

but it exists.
In our case the bundle

(0, 0)

is the best one and no better bundle

exists.
So our consumer does not spend any amount of income.
It is not a real good what we are talking about.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.2

A consumer has a utility function u (x1 , x2 )

= max {x1 , x2 }.

What is

the consumer's demand function for good 1? What is his indirect

utility function? What is his expenditure function?

The meaning of this kind of utility function is obvious. Only a good

is important, the one whose amount is the highest.
So, if prices dier, the better choice for the consumer is to spend
all the income for the lowest priced good.
Otherwise, with the same prices, the better choice is the spend all
the income for only one good, randomly chosen.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution
So, the demand functions are

xi

m/pi

if

pi

0 or m /pi

if

pi

if

pi

< pj
= pj
> pj

We can also build the indirect utility function:

v (p1 , p2 , m) = max {m/p1 , m/p2 }

The expenditure function relates income with utility and prices:

e (p , u ). In our case:
e (p1 , p2 , u ) = u min {p1 , p2 } .
Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2

Utility Maximization

Exercise 7.3

Choice

Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.3
A consumer has an indirect utility function of the form

v (p1 , p2 , m) =

m
min {p1 , p2 }

What is the form of the expediture function for this consumer?

What is the form of a (quasiconcave) utility function for this
consumer? What is the form of the demand function for good 1?

Let us start by writing down the indirect utility function in a

dierent way:

v (p1 , p2 , m) =

m/p1

if

p1

m/p

if

p1

m/p2

if

Tramontana

< p2
= p2
p1 > p2

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution
The best thing consists in starting from the demand function.
In fact, it is clear that the consumer will use all his income for the
good with the lowest price:

x1

m/p1

if

any x1 and x2 such that p1 x1 + p2 x2

=m

if
if

p1

< p2
= p2
p1 > p2
p1

and similarly for the demand function of the good 2.

This means that we have a corner solution, that is typical of a
linear utility function (or any monotonic transformation):

u (x1 , x2 ) = x1 + x2
Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution
Finally, we must obtain the expenditure function, so a measure of
how much the consumer should spend in order to reach a certain
level of utility, given the goods' prices.
Our consumer spends:

xi pi
where i denotes the good with the lowest price.
But the quantity of the good i is equal to m /pi that is also the
amount of utility reached.
In other words:

e (p1 , p2 , u ) = u min {p1 , p2 } .

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.4
Consider the indirect utility function given by

v (p1 , p2 , m) =

m
p1 + p2

(a) What are the demand functions? (b) What is the expenditure
function? (c) What is the direct utility function?

The standard way to obtain the (Marshallian) demand functions

given the indirect utility function is by using the Roy's identity:
Roy's identity

xi (p , m) =

Tramontana

v (p ,m)
pi
v (p ,m)
m

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2

Utility Maximization

Exercise 7.3

Choice

Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution

So we need to calculate the partial derivatives of the indirect utility

function with respect to prices and income:

v
p1
v
m

= pv = (p
= p +1 p
2

m
1

+p2 )2

and by using the Roy's identity we obtain:

x1 (m, p ) = x2 (m, p ) =

m
p1 + p2

so the goods are equally consumed.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution

The expenditure function e (p , u ) gives the information about how

much it costs to obtain a certain level of utility given the market
prices.
Costs substained by the consumer are generally of the following
form:

= x1 p1 + x2 p2

We can use the demand functions to obtain:

m
p1 + p2

Tramontana

p1 +

m
p1 + p2

p2

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution
We know that the level of utility rechaed is exactly u

m
p1

+p2 , so

we have:

e (p1 , p2 , u ) = (p1 + p2 )u
The direct utility function relates the level of utility with the
amount of goods consumed: u (x1 , x2 ).
We know that the consumer buys the same amount of the two
goods:

x1

= x2 =

m
p1 + p2

that also corresponds to the level of utility reached, given the

indirect utility function.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution

In other words we can write down:

u (x1 , x2 ) = min {x1 , x2 } .

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.5

A consumer has a direct utility function of the form

U (x1 , x2 ) = u (x1 ) + x2 .
Good 1 is a discrete good; the only possible levels of consumption
of good 1 are x1

=0

and x1

For convenience, assume

= 1.
that u (0) = 0

and p2

= 1.

(a) What kind of preferences does this consumer have?

These preferences are called quasi-linear, because they are

additive and linear in at least one good.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.5(b)

(b) The consumer will denitely choose x1

=1

if p1 is strictly less

than what?

In order to answer to this question, let us consider the maximum

utility that can be reached with x1

=0

and with x1

= 1.

If the consumer only consumes the good 2, given that its price is
equal to 1 and given that (from the utility function) there is 1-1
correspondence between level of utility and amount of good 2, we
have:

u |x =0
1

Tramontana

=m

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution

On the other hand, one unit of good 1 gives to the consumer an

utility of u (1).
The consumer now can only buy an amount equal to m p1 of the,
that is also the value of the utility brought by good 2.
So we have:

u |x =1
1

= u (1) + m p1

Now, in order to make the consumer preferer the situation with one
unity of good 1, this condition must be realized:

u |x =0
1

Tramontana

< u |x

=1

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Solution

That is:

p1

< u (1).

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 7.1
Utility Maximization
Choice

Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Exercise 7.5(c)

(c) What is the algebraic form of the indirect utility function

associated with this direct utility function?

It is a consequence of the previous point that the utility reached

will be the higher between the two considered, that is:

v (p1 , p2 , m) = max {m p1 + u (1), m} .

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Exercise 8.5

Find the demand bundle for a consumer whose utility function is

3

u (x1 , x2 ) = x12 x2 and her budget constraint is 3x1 + 4x2

= 100.

The Lagrangian function for this optimization problem is the

following:
3

L (x , ) = x1 x2 (3x1 + 4x2 100)

2

But it is more useful to see the utility function in logaritmic form

L (x , ) =

3
2

ln x1 + ln x2 (3x1 + 4x2 100)

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution
The rst order conditions are obtained by dierentiating the
Lagrangian function with respect to x1 , x2 and

are equal to zero for the optimum bundle values:

3

3 = 0
4 = 0
x
3x1 + 4x2 100 = 0
2x1
1
2

The rst two equation can be seen as:

=
=

1
2x1
1
4x2

from which we obtain:

x1
Tramontana

= 2x2
Exercises Micro

These derivatives

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

By substituting x1

= 2x2

in the third f.o.c. we get:

6x2 + 4x2

= 100

x2 = 10

and then:

x1

= 20;

x2

Tramontana

= 10; =

Exercises Micro

1
40

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Exercise 8.6
1

= p1 x1 + p2 x2

to calculate

= x1 x2 and the budget constraint

x (p , m), v (p , m), h(p , u ) and e (p , u ).

Use the utility function u (x1 , x2 )

The Lagrangian function is the following:

1

L (x , ) = x1 x2 (p1 x1 + p2 x2 m)
while the f.o.c. are:
1
2
1
3

21

x1

x23

23

x12 x2

= p1
= p2
=m

p1 x1 + p1 x2

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

by following a procedure similar to the one followed in the previous

exercise we obtain the Marshallian demand functions:

x1 (p , m) =
x2 (p , m) =

3 m
5 p1
2 m
5 p2

The indirect utility function can be obtained if we put the

Marshallian demand functions into the utility function:


v (p , m ) =

3 m
5 p1

 
2

2 m
5 p2

Tramontana

m 
6

Exercises Micro

p1

 
2

p2

1
3

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

It is now simple to obtain the expenditure function.

It is sucient to take the indirect utility function and replace
 v (p , m ) with  u  and  m  with  e (p , u ):


u

e (p , u )

 
6

 

p1

p2

and solve it for e (p , u ):

3

e (p , u ) = 5

p  p 

Tramontana

2
5

u5

Exercises Micro

1
3

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution
One of the properties of the expenditure function is the following:
Property of e (p , u )
If h (p , u ) is the expenditure-minimizing bundle necessary to achieve
utility level u at prices p (Hicksian demand), then

hi (p , u ) =

e (p , u )
pi

for i

= 1, ..., k

so we need to calculate the partial derivatives of the expenditure

function, obtaining:

h1 (p , u ) =
h2 (p , u ) =

e (p ,u )
p1
e (p ,u )
p2

Tramontana

p1

p1

2
5

p2

2
5

3
5

p2

Exercises Micro

3
5

u5
6

u5

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Exercise 8.7
Extend the previous exercise to the case where

u (x1 , x2 ) = (x1 1 )1 (x2 2 )2 andcheck the symmetry of the

matrix of substitution terms

hj (p ,u )
.
pi

An alternative way to solve this problem consists in considering the

expenditure minimization problem, whose Lagrangian is:

h
i
L (x , ) = p1 x1 + p2 x2 (x1 1 ) (x2 2 ) u
1

from which we can derive the f.o.c.:

= 1 (x1 1 ) 1 (x2 2 )
p2 = 2 (x1 1 ) (x2 2 ) 1
(x1 1 ) (x2 2 ) = u
p1

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution
If we divide the rst equation by the second we obtain:

p1 2
p2 1

x2 2
x1 1

The term x2 2 can be obtained from the third equation:

1

x2 2

h
i

= (x1 1 ) u

We can substitute it in the ratio between the rst two equations

and solve it for x1 , obtaining the Hicksian demand:


h1 (p , u ) = 1 +

Tramontana

p2 1
p1 2

u 2

2
1 +2

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

The other demand is:


h2 (p , u ) = 2 +

p1 2
p2 1

u 1

1
1 +2

The symmetry of the substitution matrix is proved by showing that:

"
    #
h1 (p , u ) h2 (p , u )
1
2
u
=
=
p2
p1
1 + 2 p1
p2
2

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

1
1 +2

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution
The expenditure function is obtained by using the Hicksian
demands in p1 x1 + p2 x2 :

e (p , u ) = p1 1 +

p2 1
p1 2

u 2

2
1 +2

+ p2 2 +

p1 2
p2 1

u 1

1
1 +2

The following step consists in substituting  e (p , u ) with  m  and

 u  with  v (p , m ) in the expenditure function and solve it for

v (p , m) to obtain the indirect utility function:

1
v (p , m ) =
1 + 2

m 2 p2
p1

 
1

Tramontana

2
1 + 2

Exercises Micro

m 1 p1
p2



Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

Finally, we can use Roy's law to get the Marshallian demands:

1

x1 (p , m) = +
1
2
1

x2 (p , m) = +
1
2

Tramontana


1 2 + 2 m
p

m
2 1 + 1 p

1 p1

2
2 p2

Exercises Micro


 .

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Outline

Utility Maximization
Exercise 7.1
Exercise 7.2
Exercise 7.3
Exercise 7.4
Exercise 7.5

Choice
Exercise 8.5
Exercise 8.6
Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Exercise (not from Varian)

Let there be two commodities, x1 and a composite commodity
called money M . assume a utility function

= log(x1 ) + M

and income level Y . The price of x1 is p1 and the price of M is 1.

(a) Derive the Marshallian demand function for x1 .

We can write down the constrained maximization problem:

maxU

x1 M

= log(x1 ) + M

s .t . Y

Tramontana

= M + p1 x1
Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution
The Lagrangian is the following:

L (x1 , M , ) = log(x1 ) + M (M + p1 x1 Y )
The f.o.c. are:

L
x1
L
M
L

= x p1 = 0
= = 0
= Y M p1 x1 = 0
1

from the rse f.o.c. we have that:

x1

Tramontana

p1
Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

from the second we have that

= ,

x1

so:

.
p1

Note that the demand for the good 1 is independent of income (has
zero income elasticity).

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Exercise (b)

(b) Derive the Hicksian demand curve for x1 .

To answer to this question it is better to write down the

constrained minimization problem:

min M

x1 M

s .t . u

+ p1 x1

= log(x1 ) + M

The Lagrangian is the following:

L (x1 , M , ) = M + p1 x1 + [ log(x1 ) + M u ]

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution
The f.o.c. are:

L
x1
L
M
L

= p1 x = 0
= 1 = 0
= u log(x1 ) M = 0
1

from the rst f.o.c. we have that:

x1

p1

given that, from the second f.o.c., we know that

x1

= 1/ :

p1

that is the demand for good 1 is indipendent of the level of utility

reachable.
Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Exercise (c)

(c) What is the relationship between the Marshallian and the

Hicksian demands?
Is this a general relationship which holds for all utility functions
and, if not, why does it hold in this case?

Marshallian and Hicksian demands are the same;

In the Marshallian demand function, the quantity of good
demand depends upon its price and the income of the
consumer, while in the Hicksian demand function it depends
upon its price and the utility that the consumer wants to reach;

Tramontana

Exercises Micro

Exercise 8.5
Utility Maximization

Exercise 8.6

Choice

Exercise 8.7
Exercise

Solution

In our case the demand for the good 1 has zero elasticity (that
is, it's independent) both with respect to income and to
respect to utility. It only depends on the parameters and on
the price of the good. This is why the two demands are equal;
Obviously, this cannot be considered a general result, but only
what happens in this peculiar case.

Tramontana

Exercises Micro