Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activin A in Preeclampsia PDF
Activin A in Preeclampsia PDF
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecologya and Liggins Institute and Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology,b
University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences.
Supported by Auckland Medical Research Foundation, Health Research
Council of New Zealand.
Received for publication July 19,2002; revised November 4, 2002; accepted November 15, 2002.
Reprint requests: Robyn A North, MBChB, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019,
Auckland 1001, New Zealand. E-mail: r.north@auckland.ac.nz
2003, Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
0002-9378/2003 $30.00 + 0
doi:10.1067/mob.2003.173
women with early onset disease.4-7 Because activin A is increased before 20 weeks in women who later have preeclampsia, it has been investigated as a predictive marker
of preeclampsia.3,7-9 In a low-risk population, Muttukrishna et al3 reported that serum activin A concentrations
at 15 to 19 weeks could discriminate preeclampsia with a
sensitivity of 41%, a specificity of 89%, and a likelihood
ratio of 3.8, which gives a posttest probability of preeclampsia of 16%. At 21 to 25 weeks, the sensitivity was
59%, and the specificity was 87%. Similar sensitivity
(60%) and specificity (90%) for activin A to predict preeclampsia in women who were at a low risk was reported
by Silver and Canick.9 Activin A appears to be more predictive of early onset preeclampsia, by detecting almost
90% of these women at 21 to 25 weeks of gestation, with a
likelihood ratio of 11.4.3
To date, there have been no comparable studies in
women who were at a high risk of the development
of preeclampsia, such as those women with previous preeclampsia (14%-20% risk),10,11 chronic hypertension
(12%-45% risk),12,13 and renal disease (24%-54%
risk).14,15 The aim of the present study was to determine,
in women at high risk of the development of preeclampsia, whether serum activin A is altered before the onset of
clinical disease and is a clinically useful predictor of preeclampsia.
807
808 Blackburn et al
March 2003
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Figure. Total serum activin A concentrations (milli-international units per liter) were assayed in control subjects, women
with gestational hypertension, and women with preeclampsia. Median and interquartile ranges are shown. No significant
differences were found between control subjects and two hypertensive groups (mixed-models procedure of SAS; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
Blackburn et al 809
Age (y)*
Ethnicity (%)
European
Asian
Polynesian
Nulliparous (%)
Early pregnancy <20 wk
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)*
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)*
Proteinuria 2+ or >0.3 g/24 h (%)
Creatinine level >0.10 mmol/L (%)
Urate (mmol/L)*
End of pregnancy
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)*
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)*
Proteinuria 2+ or >0.3 g/24 h (%)
Creatinine level >0.10 mmol/L (%)
Urate (mmol/L)*
Control subjects
(n = 37)
Gestational
hypertension (n = 26)
Preeclampsia
(n = 17)
P value
30.3 5.7
30.4 5.3
32.2 6.5
.51
60
8
32
51
77
0
23
42
71
6
23
41
.51
.73
137 18
90 12
20
11 (n = 27)
0.24 0.08 (n = 24)
141 20
87 12
12
5 (n = 21)
0.25 0.07 (n = 20)
142 17
91 12
18
27 (n = 15)
0.31 0.11 (n = 15)
.57
.58
.83
.14
.02
133 12
90 9
16
9 (n = 33)
0.32 0.07 (n = 31)
158 14
104 8
12
9 (n = 22)
0.36 0.09 (n = 25)
170 26
108 10
100
18
0.43 0.11
.0001
.0001
.0001
.63
.0004
Statistical analysis was by analysis of variance, 2, and Fisher exact test (group comparisons).
*Data are given as mean SD.
Post hoc Tukey analysis: preeclampsia versus control, P = .0001; gestational hypertension versus control, P = .0001.
Stable chronic proteinuria.
Post hoc Tukey analysis: preeclampsia versus control, P = .001.
nancy are shown in Table I. Proteinuria in control subjects and women with gestational hypertension reflects
their underlying renal disease and remained stable in
pregnancy. In 3 women in the control group, proteinuria
improved in pregnancy; in 2 control subjects, proteinuria
worsened, but the women did not meet other criteria for
preeclampsia. Women with preeclampsia were delivered
earlier than control subjects; their babies had lower birth
weights, and almost one third of the babies were small for
gestational age (Table II).
Serum activin A concentrations are shown in the Figure. Activin A levels in all three groups increased significantly throughout gestation (P < .0001). There was no
difference among the three groups in the concentration of activin A that was measured longitudinally
throughout pregnancy (P = .75). As a screening test for
the prediction of the development of preeclampsia
using the 90th percentile activin A level at 21 to 25
weeks in control subjects as a cutoff value (4.34
mIU/L), the sensitivity was 18% (95% CI, 4-43), the
specificity was 88% (95% CI, 71-96), the likelihood
ratio was 1.41 (95% CI, 0.4-5.6), and posttest probability was 43% (95% CI, 10-82).
Comment
This is the first report to investigate serum activin A
concentrations throughout pregnancy in women at high
risk of the development of preeclampsia. Although maternal serum activin A concentrations increased with advancing gestation, as previously reported,2,3 we found no
significant difference in activin A levels in women who
810 Blackburn et al
March 2003
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Control subjects
(n = 37)
Gestational hypertension
(n = 26)
Preeclampsia
(n = 17)
P value
38.7 1.9
37.8 2.7
35.5 3.3
.0002
0
16
84
3279 491
4
19
77
2996 836
24
35
41
2363 790
.005
.0001
0
3
15
16
18
12
.009
had preeclampsia compared with those women who remained normotensive. At 35 to 38 weeks of gestation, a
trend toward higher activin A levels in the preeclamptic
group was seen, but this did not reach statistical significance. Before 25 weeks of gestation, maternal serum activin A concentrations were very similar in women who
were destined to have preeclampsia and those women
whose condition remained normotensive or who had stable chronic hypertension. Consequently, activin A performed poorly as a screening test when it was evaluated at
21 to 25 weeks of gestation, with a sensitivity of only 18%
and a specificity of 86%. This is in marked contrast to the
findings in women who are at low risk in whom activin A
is significantly elevated before the onset of preeclampsia.3,7,8 This study was not designed to investigate women
with preeclampsia at the time of clinical disease, and we
cannot exclude the possibility of elevated activin A levels
once the disease is manifest.
There may be several reasons for the similar activin A
levels in high-risk women who remained healthy and
those women who had preeclampsia. The diagnosis of
preeclampsia is always difficult in the presence of underlying renal disease, and it is possible the women who are
classified as having preeclampsia may not have had the
disorder. We attempted to minimize this possibility by
using stringent clinical criteria to classify the groups; the
characteristics of the women with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension support the validity of our classifications. Women with preeclampsia had significantly
higher blood pressure, proteinuria, and serum urate levels compared with the control subjects. In addition, they
were delivered at an earlier gestation, with one quarter of
the babies were delivered by 32 weeks of gestation, and
one third of the babies were small for gestational age.
An alternative explanation for the similar activin A levels in the different groups could lie in the influence of abnormal renal function in some women, which could
modify the renal excretion of activin A.19 Abnormal renal
Blackburn et al 811
In conclusion, we report that serum activin A is not predictive for the development of subsequent preeclampsia
in a cohort of women at high-risk of the development of
the disease. The search for predictive markers in this
group remains a worthwhile objective but should focus
on other biochemical markers.
REFERENCES
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.