FERNANDO LAVERDE

ENC 1101
JOURNAL: Perl
Tonys writing is more detailed, and contains a better understanding when it comes from his
own personal experience. Rather than Tony writing about something that he didnt experience
personally, his writing seems to have an entirely different finishing context. I understand Tonys method,
and agree that I find it easier to write about my personal experiences.

Perl takes that idea that all the participants composing processes are consistent, because it gives
her a strong idea that her method was influential. Perl provided a system of composing a writing, and all
the participants writings were replicable, and contained the same consistency.

Perls questions of whether a writing can be systematic, replicable shows that she is curious
about the writing process. Perl provided an idea that the writing process can contain a system, and
replication. The analysis is question whether or not writing can stand behind a certain system.

The section titled, the code shows the behaviors Perl puts together to show the writing
process. The section is primarily put together by importance, and organization. The code first contains
ideas of brainstorming, planning, and understanding the context before actually putting the words onto
paper.

I do believe Perls writing method did shape the writing of the participants. Perl provided a
design for the writings, and the fact that majority of the writings are similar show the method was
influential. If Perl had not provided the design, it is not impossible the writings would have been the
same, but very slim chances.

Perl does not count the changes, rather she keeps the errors as ideas. Perl hangs on the idea that was
primarily put into the draft, to create new ideas for the final copy. Perl revises the idea before
completely eliminating it.