fl Toronta
December 2, 2014
Kathleen Wynne, Premier
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Dear Premier Wynne:
We, the undersigned, are elected Councillors in the City of Toronto. We are writing to ask
that you refer the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act ("Bill C-36"),
which promulgates new anti-prostitution laws in response to the Supreme Court of
Canada's Bedford decision, directly to the Ontario Court of Appeal, so that it can
determine whether the contents of this new legisiation are constitutional. We are
equesting that you do this before pursuing any prosecutions under these laws; we are further
requesting that you direct police not to enforce any provisions of this Act unless and until the
Court of Appeal determines that they are indeed consistent with the Canadian constitution.
Many experts and sex workers have testified that those laws are dangerous for sex workers
and will recreate the harms that previously existed under the old laws that were struck down by
the Supreme Court of Canada in Bedford. The current federal Conservative Goverment has
now passed Bill C-36 despite the objections of those who will be most affected, including the
most marginalized and vulnerable: outdoor sex workers.
As City Councillors, we work to promote measures that increase public safety and that
materially improve the living conditions of marginalized residents. In particular, we are united
in our efforts to end violence against women. To that end, we strive to identify and correct
situations that, however inadvertently, create conditions thal are unsafe for any woman. We
fear that Bill C-36 has introduced such unsafe conditions into Canadian society,
bringing foreseeable detriment and real danger to some of the most vulnerable women
we represent,
We firmly believe that sex workers have the same rights as other Canadian citizens. We
support and uphold both the letter and the spirit of the Canadian Charter of Rights andFreedoms. Specifically, we believe that sex workers have the right to lif, liberty and security
of the person, as well as the rights to freedom of expression and association, and the full
benefit of the equality provisions under the Charter. It is our understanding that the new laws
promulgated under Bedford do not respect these constitutional rights of sex workers.
We therefore respectfully request that you refer the entirety of Bill C-36 immediately to the
Ontario Court of Appeal, before more harm comgs to the sex who will be most
affected by these laws. ue Vatlew.
James Rsterae
AD im Gury Cron hoo
Citta ead
Paula Fletcher
a ond “TAs faa Gatos
Oe Bete tes fog
a Che
ZA Auaslie
Coin id
Senn Geepewhint
TIM vj
5 fab
Gord tes . Rayon Cho
‘Janet Dave’ =
Oo + Dow's SSeS, Does®
mM vine His dale berardicelly
els v
Cothkn, The Miheve Ss
My Hensal Meher
tn. Tathe dD: Ceeine
Answering Brief of Defendants-Appellees: Ronald Pierce et al vs. Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye Judicial Council Chair and Steven Jahr Judicial Council Administrative Director - Federal Class Action Lawsuit for Alleged Illegal Use of California Vexatious Litigant Law by Family Court Judges in Child Custody Disputes - Ventura County - Tulare County - Sacramento County - San Mateo County - Santa Clara County - Riverside County - San Francisco County - US District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Jeffrey S. White - US Courts for the Ninth Circuit - 9th Circuit Court of Appeal Class Action for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas