Course Information

PA 5303 Public Policymaking and Institutions

Fall 2006

Thursday 7:00 – 9:45 PM

Location: WSTC 1.216

Professor Contact Information

Dr. Don Arbuckle

Office: Westec 1.208
Email:
Tele: 972-883-5340

Course Description

PA 5303 provides a broad introduction to public policymaking and the many institutions
that make up the dynamic, complex, and raucous American policymaking process. We
will examine the scholarly literature on political institutions and public policy, including
both nongovernmental and governmental institutions. Regarding the former, we will look
at political parties, interest groups, and that great amorphous body that is the object of all
public policymaking, the public. Regarding the latter, we will survey the major
governmental institutions - legislative, executive, and judicial - and the bureaucracies that
comprise these bodies. We will examine institutional behavior and the policy process
from several important theoretical perspectives, including pluralism, rational choice
theory and institutionalism, as will various approaches to decisionmaking. We will also
examine policymaking as it occurs at ground level in the day to day business of
governance.

This course requires significant student participation. You are expected to complete
reading assignments and come to class prepared to summarize and analyze the reading.
You also are expected to bring your experience with you and incorporate it into your
evaluation of the reading. Finally, clear, cogent, and concise writing is a mainstay of all
graduate work and improvement in your writing will be another goal of this course.

Student Learning Objectives

This course will provide students with an overview and understanding of the broad field
of public policymaking. We will examine and analyze various policymaking institutions,
both public and private, and will read and discuss classics in the field and recent
publications; theoretical approaches to institutional behavior and operational details of
policymaking.

By the end of the semester, you will have:

 1. A sound understanding of the basic theory, structure, and institutions of public
policymaking.
2. The ability to discuss and analyze the major issues, debates, and competing
theories associated with public policymaking and institutional behavior.
3. An improved ability to write clearly and effectively.

Expectations

This is a graduate level course, and you are expected to attend class and participate in
class discussions. There is a substantial reading load associated with the course – you are
expected to complete reading assignments on time and come to class prepared to discuss
what you have read. If you cannot attend class, are going to be late, or are going to be
delayed in handing in assignments, see or contact me before the due date. Professors get
cranky when confronted with excuses after the fact.

Course Requirements

1. Weekly Assignments and Groups. Everyone in the class is expected to complete

all the reading for that week. In addition, each of you is assigned to one of five
workgroups. A list of the members of each group can be found at the end of this
syllabus. As indicated on the syllabus, each group has a weekly assignment from
the assigned reading. As a group member, you are expected to come to class with
a short written summary of the assigned work (2 to 3 pages), prepared to discuss
the assignment as a group member. Groups are not required to meet before class
to organize a group presentation, but you may find this useful. Groups are
expected to lead the discussion of their assignment with the rest of the class. You
will turn the papers in at the end of the discussion. They will be graded and
returned to you with feedback from me. It bears repeating that everyone is
responsible for all the reading (not just the reading assigned to the group).

2. Journal Articles. You will select from peer-reviewed journals two articles on the
subject of the readings that have been published within the past decade. You will
be expected to write a thorough review (not more than 4 pages) of the journal
articles you select, including your analysis of the author’s arguments and
research. The deadlines for each of these journal reviews (also indicated in the
class schedule and assignments) are:

September 21st and

November 9th

3. Research Paper. A major requirement of the course is the preparation of a high-

quality research paper. The paper should be 15 to 20 pages in length and on a
topic covered by the course. You will write a proposal (300 to 500 words) on
your topic and submit it to me by September 28th. In the proposal, explain why
you have chosen this topic and how you plan to research it. Also be prepared to
 discuss your proposal with the class. The subject of your paper must address a
major issue in pubic policymaking. The paper should be carefully written and
follow the requirements for style listed at the end of the syllabus. Once your topic
has been approved, you may begin your research.

When your paper is complete, you will make a presentation to the class discussing
your major findings. After this presentation, you will hand in your paper. The
papers and presentations will be due on November 16th.

Grading

Your grade will be based on the following:

1. Research paper and presentation 40%

2. Weekly group assignments (papers and discussion) 30%
3. Journal article review 15%
4. Class participation in general 15%

Required Reading Materials. There are 5 required books and a course packet.

1. James E. Anderson. Public Policymaking, 6th edition. 2006.

2. Paul S. Hernnson, Ronald G. Shaiko and ClydeWiclox, eds. The Interest Group
Connection.. 2nd edition. 2005
3. Charles O. Jones, Separate But Equal Branches: Congress and the Presidency. 2nd
edition. 1999.
4. Kenneth J.Meier. Politics and the Bureaucracy. 4th edition. 2000.
5. James A. Stimson. PublicOpinion in America: Moods,Cycles and Swings. 1999.

These books and the course packet are on reserve at the library and may be purchased at
the UTD bookstore or Off Campus Books.
UTD POLICIES

Student Conduct & Discipline

The University of Texas System and The University of Texas at Dallas have rules
and regulations for the orderly and efficient conduct of their business. It is the
responsibility of each student and each student organization to be knowledgeable
about the rules and regulations which govern student conduct and activities.
General information on student conduct and discipline is contained in the UTD
publication, A to Z Guide, which is provided to all registered students each
academic year.

The University of Texas at Dallas administers student discipline within the

procedures of recognized and established due process. Procedures are defined
and described in the Rules and Regulations, Board of Regents, The University of
Texas System, Part 1, Chapter VI, Section 3, and in Title V, Rules on Student
Services and Activities of the university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures.
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the
Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist students in
interpreting the rules and regulations (SU 1.602, 972/883-6391).

A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the responsibilities
of citizenship. He or she is expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well
as the Regents’ Rules, university regulations, and administrative rules. Students
are subject to discipline for violating the standards of conduct whether such
conduct takes place on or off campus, or whether civil or criminal penalties are
also imposed for such conduct.

Academic Integrity

The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic
honesty. Because the value of an academic degree depends upon the absolute
integrity of the work done by the student for that degree, it is imperative that a
student demonstrate a high standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic
work.

Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions
related to applications for enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the
submission as one’s own work or material that is not one’s own. As a general
rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one of the following acts: cheating,
plagiarism, collusion and/or falsifying academic records. Students suspected of
academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings.

Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and
from any other source is unacceptable and will be dealt with under the
 university’s policy on plagiarism (see general catalog for details). This course
will use the resources of turnitin.com, which searches the web for possible
plagiarism and is over 90% effective.

Email Use

The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and efficiency of

communication between faculty/staff and students through electronic mail. At the
same time, email raises some issues concerning security and the identity of each
individual in an email exchange. The university encourages all official student
email correspondence be sent only to a student’s U.T. Dallas email address and
that faculty and staff consider email from students official only if it originates
from a UTD student account. This allows the university to maintain a high degree
of confidence in the identity of all individual corresponding and the security of
the transmitted information. UTD furnishes each student with a free email
account that is to be used in all communication with university personnel. The
Department of Information Resources at U.T. Dallas provides a method for
students to have their U.T. Dallas mail forwarded to other accounts.

Withdrawal from Class

The administration of this institution has set deadlines for withdrawal of any
college-level courses. These dates and times are published in that semester's
course catalog. Administration procedures must be followed. It is the student's
responsibility to handle withdrawal requirements from any class. In other words, I
cannot drop or withdraw any student. You must do the proper paperwork to
ensure that you will not receive a final grade of "F" in a course if you choose not
to attend the class once you are enrolled.

Student Grievance Procedures

Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules on Student Services
and Activities, of the university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures.

In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding grades, evaluations, or

other fulfillments of academic responsibility, it is the obligation of the student
first to make a serious effort to resolve the matter with the instructor, supervisor,
administrator, or committee with whom the grievance originates (hereafter called
“the respondent”). Individual faculty members retain primary responsibility for
assigning grades and evaluations. If the matter cannot be resolved at that level,
the grievance must be submitted in writing to the respondent with a copy of the
respondent’s School Dean. If the matter is not resolved by the written response
provided by the respondent, the student may submit a written appeal to the School
Dean. If the grievance is not resolved by the School Dean’s decision, the student
may make a written appeal to the Dean of Graduate or Undergraduate Education,
and the deal will appoint and convene an Academic Appeals Panel. The decision
 of the Academic Appeals Panel is final. The results of the academic appeals
process will be distributed to all involved parties.

Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the
Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist students in
interpreting the rules and regulations.

Incomplete Grade Policy

As per university policy, incomplete grades will be granted only for work
unavoidably missed at the semester’s end and only if 70% of the course work has
been completed. An incomplete grade must be resolved within eight (8) weeks
from the first day of the subsequent long semester. If the required work to
complete the course and to remove the incomplete grade is not submitted by the
specified deadline, the incomplete grade is changed automatically to a grade of F.

Disability Services

The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with disabilities educational

opportunities equal to those of their non-disabled peers. Disability Services is
located in room 1.610 in the Student Union. Office hours are Monday and
Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.; Tuesday and Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30
p.m.; and Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

The contact information for the Office of Disability Services is:

The University of Texas at Dallas, SU 22
PO Box 830688
Richardson, Texas 75083-0688
(972) 883-2098 (voice or TTY)

Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those reasonable
adjustments necessary to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability. For
example, it may be necessary to remove classroom prohibitions against tape
recorders or animals (in the case of dog guides) for students who are blind.
Occasionally an assignment requirement may be substituted (for example, a
research paper versus an oral presentation for a student who is hearing impaired).
Classes enrolled students with mobility impairments may have to be rescheduled
in accessible facilities. The college or university may need to provide special
services such as registration, note-taking, or mobility assistance.

It is the student’s responsibility to notify his or her professors of the need for such
an accommodation. Disability Services provides students with letters to present
to faculty members to verify that the student has a disability and needs
accommodations. Individuals requiring special accommodation should contact
the professor after class or during office hours.
Religious Holy Days

The University of Texas at Dallas will excuse a student from class or other
required activities for the travel to and observance of a religious holy day for a
religion whose places of worship are exempt from property tax under Section
11.20, Tax Code, Texas Code Annotated.

The student is encouraged to notify the instructor or activity sponsor as soon as

possible regarding the absence, preferably in advance of the assignment. The
student, so excused, will be allowed to take the exam or complete the assignment
within a reasonable time after the absence: a period equal to the length of the
absence, up to a maximum of one week. A student who notifies the instructor and
completes any missed exam or assignment may not be penalized for the absence.
A student who fails to complete the exam or assignment within the prescribed
period may receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.

If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the
purpose of observing a religious holy day] or if there is similar disagreement
about whether the student has been given a reasonable time to complete any
missed assignments or examinations, either the student or the instructor may
request a ruling from the chief executive officer of the institution, or his or her
designee. The chief executive officer or designee must take into account the
legislative intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and instructor will abide by
the decision of the chief executive officer or designee.

Off-Campus Instruction and Course Activities

Off-campus, out-of-state, and foreign instruction and activities are subject to state
law and University policies and procedures regarding travel and risk-related
activities. Information regarding these rules and regulations may be found at the
website address given below. Additional information is available from the office
of the school dean. (http://www.utdallas.edu/Business
Affairs/Travel_Risk_Activities.htm)
PA 5303 COURSE SCHEDULE [The descriptions and time below may be modified at
the discretion of the Professor.]

August 17 Introduction to PA 5303

August 24 Dr. Ellen Safley, Introduction to the UTD Library

Historical Context of the U.S. Public Policy Process

o The Declaration of Independence [not in packet. Available on internet]

Group 1
From the course packet:
o The Articles of Confederation Group 2
o The Constitution of the U.S. Group 3
o From the Federalist Papers, Nos. 10 and 51 Group 4

August 31 The Policy Process

Anderson, Public Policymaking (entire)

Chs 1 & 2 Group 5
Ch 3 Group 1
Ch 4 Group 2
Ch 5 Group 3
Chs 6 & 7 Group 4
Ch 8

September 7 Theories of Policymaking and Institutional Behavior 1

Pluralism David Truman, “Group Politics and Representative Democracy” (in packet)
Group 5
Rational Choice Herbert Simon, Reason in Human Affairs (in packet)
pp. 1 – 53 Group 1
pp. 54-107 Group 2
Todd Sandler, Collective Action (in packet) Group 3

September 14 Theories of Policymaking and Institutional Behavior 2

Institutionalism J.W. Meyer and B. Rowan, “Institutionalized Organizations…” (in

packet) Group 4
Robert Scott, Institutions and Organizations (in packet) Group 5

September 21 Incrementalism, Nonincrementalism, and Punctuated Equilibrium

Charles E. Lindblom, “The ‘Science’of Muddling Through”(in packet)

Paul R. Schulman, “Nonincremental Policymaking” (in packet) Group 1
James L. True, Bryan Jones, and Frank Baumgartner, “Punctuated
Equilibrium Theory” (in packet) Group 2

First journal article review due

September 28 Policy Institutions - - Political Parties and Public Opinion

James A. Stimson. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles and Swings.

Chapters 1 – 3 Group 3
Chapters 4 – 6 Group 4
David Brady, “Critical Elections….” (in packet) Group 5
Samuel J. Eldersveld, “Parties, the Government and the Policy Process”
(in packet)
Mark A. Smith, “Public Opinion, Elections and….” (in packet) Group 1

Research paper proposals due

October 5 Interest Groups and Institutional Relationships

Ronald G. Shaiko, “Making the Connection: Organized Interests….” In The Interest

Group Connection [hereafter, ICG], pp. 1-24 Group 2
John C. Green and Nathan Bigelow, “The Christian Right Goes to Washington….” in
IGC, pp. 189-211 Group 3
Scott R. Furlong, “Exploring Interest Group Participation in Executive Policy-
Making” in IGC, pp. 282-297 Group 4
Paul J. Quirk and Bruce F. Nesmith, “Who Serves special Interests?....” in IGC, pp. 298-
318. Group 5

Research paper proposal presentations, Groups 1, 2, and 3

October 12 Legislative and Executive Interaction

Charles O. Jones, Separate But Equal Branches
Chs 1 – 4 Group 1
Chs 5 – 8 Group 2
Chs 9 – 11 Group 3
Research paper proposal presentation, Groups 4, 5
October 19 Bureaucracy and the Administrative State
Kenneth Meier, Politics and the Bureaucracy.
Chs 1 and 2 Group 4
Chs 3 and 4 Group 5
Chs 5 and 6 Group 1
Chs 7 and 8 Group 2
James Q. Wilson, “The Rise of the Bureaucratic State” (in packet)
B. Dan Wood and Richard W. Waterman, “The Dynamics of Political Control of the
Bureaucracy” (in packet) Group 3

October 26 Managing the Executive Branch – The Office of Management

And Budget

The Federal Budget, Improving Management, Regulatory and Information Collection

Policy, Information Policy, Statistical Policy.

Reading materials and group assignments will be assigned prior to class

November 2 Regulatory Dynamics

The regulatory process. Regulatory Statutes - the Administrative Procedure Act, the
Regulatory Flexibility, the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Unfunded Mandates Act, the
Information Quality Act. OMB review of regulation.

Reading materials and group assignments will be assigned prior to class

November 9 Adjudicatory Institutions and Policymaking

David Adamany, “The Supreme Court” (in packet)

Donald R. Singer, “The Circuit Courts of Appeal” (in packet) Group 4
Laurence Baum, “Courts and Policy Innovation” (in packet)
Karen O’Connor, “Lobbying the Justices or Lobbying for Justice” in
IGC, pp. 319-364.
Wayne V. MacIntosh and Cynthia L.Cates, “Cigarettes, Firearms and the New Litigation
Wars….” in IGC, pp 341-364. Group 5

Journal article 2 due

November 16 Conclusion

Presentation of research papers, by groups.

Research papers due.

PA 5303 GROUP ASSIGNMENTS

Group 1 Michelle Alvarez

Abra Colwill
Lorri Kennedy
Mark Monroe
Jawad Raja

Group 2 Aaron Arnold

Christine Curtis-Carr
Kadia Khan-Roberts
Tiffany Ornelas
Jonathan Rector

Group 3 Anne Caldwell

Kristin Delong
Amy Latham
Lisa Palomba
Repsie Schirmer

Group 4 Daniel Calhoun

Jennifer Hoffman
Adeniyi Latinwo
Patricia Pan
Daniel Tangumonkem

Group 5 Kristin Choate

Christy Holcomb
Julie Lovell
Michael Pose