Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
725
will be shifted out and the new coming one will be moved in,
and the correlation and threshold comparisons repeat. Many
strategies can be used for searching a new cell [2], [3]. Here,
only the straight line search strategy will be used as an example
for evaluating the mean acquisition time.
The case of returning false alarm will be considered which
means that the tracking loop can always detect the false
alarm after some time, called the penalty time, and return the
synchronization to the code acquisition. The penalty time will
with
be modeled as a fixed value and denoted by
This model is a bit simplified. Nevertheless, it is commonly
employed in the study of acquisition systems.
and
By using the chip synchronous model [8], i.e.,
, the inphase and quadrature outputs at the
assume that
MF correlators are given by
(2)
and
(3)
respectively, where
is the maximum length sequence,
is the integer
726
part of , and
and
independent Gaussian noise with
for a large
Since
are Gaussian random variables,
uncorrelation implies independency. Therefore, the decision
variables
for
denotes the expectation value of the random variable
From (2) and (3), we have
(13)
(4)
and
(5)
where
(6)
and
(7)
Note that
otherwise
(8)
In (8), we have used the property of the periodic autocorrelation of a maximum length sequence. From (4) and (5), it can
be shown that
(9)
and
(10)
otherwise
or
where
correlation coefficient
depend only on
Conventionally, the performance analysis of the rapid acquisition using MF correlators is based on the assumption of
independency between cell detections. As shown in (12), this
In the following, a new method is
is not the case for
proposed to analyze the performance of mean acquisition time
that takes the correlations between cell detections into account.
(11)
is approximated by
(14)
,
, and
are to
where
and
when
denote the events of
respectively. In (14), is the decimal
detecting the cell
representation of the state content where the left-most bit is
the most significant bit. The state transition diagram for the
is shown in Fig. 3. As can be seen, there are
case of
cells, and for each substate in the
region, there is
five
Note that in the
a transition to the acquisition state
region, two transitions have been associated with the substate
and
pairs
This is attributed to that if
at
the first dwell, then two events could happen. One is that
is exceeded, and the system enters
the second threshold
the tracking mode. The other is that the second threshold
is not exceeded, and a new cell is searched and tested. The
acquisition process can be initiated at any state, say , with
As to be shown, it is appropriate to use the
probability of
as the starting substate.
substate
The next step is to define transition gains in the state
transition diagram such that the mean acquisition time can
be evaluated. To this end, we define the transition gains as
the transition gains for
follows. For
in the
region are defined
the substate pair
is exceeded)
by (the event that
(12)
(15)
and
(16)
respectively, and for
727
TABLE I
GENERAL EXPRESSIONS FOR THE Pd ji
( ) AND
l
f ji
IN
FIG. 3
In (15)(17),
is the false alarm
where
is the originating
probability for the first dwell given that
and
are the false
substate of the transition, and
alarm probability and dwell time of the second dwell. Since
the channel is stationary, the false alarm probabilities
and
are independent of the cell index For the substate
in the
region, the transition gain is
pair
defined as
(18)
for
and is defined as
(19)
1=1 3
= :
728
TABLE II
GENERAL EXPRESSIONS FOR THE Pd ji M
( 0 5) AND
d ji
( 0 4) IN FIG. 4
M
1=1 3
(23)
= :
(25)
and
Fig. 5. The simplified state transition diagram for no correlations from the
H0 to H1 region with
= :
1=13
To derive the mean acquisition time, the following definitions are useful.
The detection probability for one passes through the
region. Let
denote a sequence of state tranand the final state
and
sitions with the initial state
denote the probability of this particular sequence
of transitions. Then, the overall detection probability is
given by
(22)
denote the set of all possible sequences
where
and final state
of state transitions with the initial state
(26)
and
with
In (25) and (26),
and
denote the transition probability and dwell time for the
transitions associated with the substate pair
respectively. Recall that there may be two transitions
and that
associated with the substate pair
and
are independent of with
For
(the
region)
(27)
729
For
where
(28)
is the average dwell time from
to
and
(35)
(29)
and
, where
with
the last term is due to the fact that it is possible to acquire
region when
the code phase without searching through the
Consequently, the overall mean
is given by
acquisition time
(36)
is used in calculating
(30)
where
(31)
is the average dwell time for missing the
region and
(38)
where
known that
(32)
is used in calculating
With these definitions, the mean acquisition time for the
is given as follows. For
case that the starting cell is
(39)
is the zeroth-order modified Bessel function of
where
, and
is defined
the first kind,
in (9). Therefore, (37) can be evaluated as
(40)
where
(41)
is the Marcum generalized function, which can be evaluated
very efficiently by the saddle point integration method [21].
then (40) becomes
For
(42)
(33)
From (33), it is easy to see that
(34)
and
take the
For active correlators, the probabilities
form of (37) and can be evaluated similarly as in (40). Unfortunately, there is no efficient method to calculate (38) due
to that
are correlated central or noncentral
chi-square random variables. To the best of our knowledge,
for central chi-square cases, one way to do it is to express the
joint pdf of
in a convergent infinite series
730
Fig. 6. Effects of the cell correlations on the performance of mean acquisition time.
(43)
or
1=13
= 127
=0
V. NUMERICAL EXAMPLES
can be evaluated numerically [22], [23]. However, for noncentral chi-square cases, no such convergent infinite series
have been found in the open literature. Moreover, since a
numerical integration is still needed in the above infinite series
method, the method would not be easier than the Monte Carlo
integration employed in this study. Note that all conditional
probabilities for the thresholds of interest can be found by
using one integration. This is important in the process of
finding the optimum threshold. Let
where
and
Since
and
are approximately
It can be shown that
for a large
and, hence,
uncorrelated, if
they are independent Gaussian variables. Equation (45) can be
used to efficiently generate the random variables
Taking
as an example, the Monte-Carlo
integration can be used to calculate the probability
(46)
(48)
we have
(44)
By using (44), (4) and (5) become
(45)
and
accord-
731
VI. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, a new method has been proposed to analyze
the matched-filter PN code acquisition for DS spread-spectrum
systems. By using a time-domain approach along with a state
transition diagram, the mean acquisition time performance
can be evaluated with the cell correlations being taken into
account (the effects of the cell correlations have been neglected
in the previous analyses). Numerical results show that: 1)
the effects of the cell correlations are more significant for
a smaller cell size and/or a larger SNR; 2) for SNRs of
practical interest, over 10% and 20% acquisition time error
and
(at the optimum thresholds) are observed for
, respectively; and 3) the effects of cell correlations
at the optimum thresholds are quite insensitive to the value
of penalty time.
APPENDIX
DERIVATION OF (33)
is used
In this Appendix, a simple example with
to explain the derivation of (33) more clearly. Fig. 9 depicts
is used to denote
the state transition diagram, where
the transition gain for easy presentation. Using our notation,
for the first pass, the average acquisition time (if acquired) is
region)
given by ( in the
where
is the mean acquisition time without
considering the cell correlations. As can be seen, the larger
the SNR, the larger the relative acquisition time error. Also,
over 20% of errors are observed. Note that the largest relative
error does not necessarily occur at the optimum threshold.
(The optimum thresholds in the figure can be read from
Table III.) Once again, the result shows that the effects of
the cell correlations are more significant for a smaller
Table III shows the optimum threshold, minimum mean
for various system
acquisition time, and the associated
where
and
For the second pass, the
732
[16] R. B. Ward, Acquisition of pseudonoise signals by sequential estimation, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-13, pp. 475483, Dec.
1965.
[17] R. B. Ward and K. P. Yiu, Acquisition of PN signals by recursion
aided sequential estimation, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-25, pp.
784794, Aug. 1977.
[18] H. Meyr and G. Poltzer, Performance analysis for general PN spread
spectrum acquisition techniques, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-31,
pp. 13171319, Dec. 1983.
[19] V. M. Jovanovic, Analysis of strategies for serial-search spread spectrum code acquisitiondirect approach, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 36,
pp. 12081220, Nov. 1988.
[20] S. M. Pan, D. E. Dodds, and S. Kumar, Acquisition time distribution
for spread spectrum receivers, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 8,
pp. 800807, June 1990.
[21] C. W. Helstrom, Approximate evaluation of detection probabilities in
radar and optical communications, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.,
vol. AES-14, pp. 630640, July 1978.
[22] A. S. Krishnamoorthy and M. Parthasarathy, A multivariate Gammatype distribution, Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 22, pp. 549557, 1951.
[23] T. Royen, Expansions for the multivariate Chi-square distribution, J.
Multivariate Anal., vol. 38, pp. 213232, 1991.