Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Day-Night Changes in Downstream Regulatory Element Antagonist Modulator Potassium Channel Interacting Protein Activity Contribute To Circadian Gene Expression in Pineal Gland
Day-Night Changes in Downstream Regulatory Element Antagonist Modulator Potassium Channel Interacting Protein Activity Contribute To Circadian Gene Expression in Pineal Gland
Cellular/Molecular
The molecular mechanisms controlling the oscillatory synthesis of melatonin in rat pineal gland involve the rhythmic expression of
several genes including arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT), inducible cAMP early repressor (ICER), and Fos-related antigen-2
( fra-2). Here we show that the calcium sensors downstream regulatory element antagonist modulator/potassium channel interacting
protein (DREAM/KChIP)-3 and KChIP-1, -2 and -4 bind to downstream regulatory element (DRE) sites located in the regulatory regions
of these genes and repress basal and induced transcription from ICER, fra-2 or AA-NAT promoters. Importantly, we demonstrate that the
endogenous binding activity to DRE sites shows daynight oscillations in rat pineal gland and retina but not in the cerebellum. The peak
of DRE binding activity occurs during the day period of the circadian cycle, coinciding with the lowest levels of fra-2, ICER, and AA-NAT
transcripts. We show that a rapid clearance of DRE binding activity during the entry in the night period is related to changes at the
posttranscriptional level of DREAM/KChIP. The circadian pattern of DREAM/KChIP activity is maintained under constant darkness,
indicating that an endogenous clock controls DREAM/KChIP function. Our data suggest involvement of the family of DREAM repressors
in the regulation of rhythmically expressed genes engaged in circadian rhythms.
Key words: calcium; repressor DREAM; cAMP; proteolysis; pineal gland; circadian rhythms
Introduction
Circadian clocks are cellular oscillators that generate daily
rhythms also in the absence of external timing cues (Pittendrigh,
1993; Dunlap, 1999). For vertebrates, the pineal gland is an important component of the circadian timing system that translates
a clock-derived neuronal signal into rhythmic production and
secretion of the hormone melatonin (Foulkes et al., 1997; Li et al.,
1998). Melatonin is produced in the pineal gland and the retina
from serotonin in a two-step process in which the arylalkylamine
N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT) is the rate-limiting enzyme (Borjigin et al., 1995; Coon et al., 1995). Melatonin synthesis is controlled by both cAMP and the intracellular concentration of Ca 2
ions, which act synergistically during the subjective night (SugReceived July 8, 2003; revised May 5, 2004; accepted May 5, 2004.
M.P. is supported by a FEBS Long-Term Fellowship. M.S. is supported by the Marie Curie Program from European
Community. This work was supported by grants from Ministerio Ciencia y Tecnologia, Comunidad Autonoma de
Madrid, and the Human Frontiers Science Program to J.R.N. We thank Drs. R. Baler, N. S. Foulkes, and P. SassoneCorsi for discussions and Drs. R. Baler and P. Sassone-Corsi for providing the constructs pAA-NATCAT and pP2CAT,
respectively.
*W.A.L., F.L., and B.T. contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. J. R. Naranjo, Departamento Biologa Molecular y Celular, Centro
Nacional de Biotecnologia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas, Campus Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid,
Spain. E-mail: naranjo@cnb.csic.es.
W. Links present address: Centro Nacional Investigaciones Oncologicas, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1460-04.2004
Copyright 2004 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/04/245346-10$15.00/0
that displaces CREB from CRE sites and prevents the recruitment
of CREB-binding protein to phospho-CREB. In this way,
DREAM downregulates CRE-dependent transcription without
direct binding of DREAM to CRE sites (Ledo et al., 2002).
DREAM belongs to a group of structurally and functionally
related Ca 2-binding proteins (KChIP-1 to -4) that interact with
voltage-dependent K channels of the Kv4 class modulating potassium currents in a Ca 2-dependent manner in the plasma
membrane (An et al., 2000; Holmqvist et al., 2002). Importantly,
KChIP-3 corresponds to DREAM, suggesting that the transcriptional repressor activity of DREAM may be shared by these
closely related KChIP proteins.
Here, we have investigated whether the presence of functional
DRE sites within the fra-2, ICER, and AA-NAT genes indicate a
role for transcriptional repressor DREAM in the transcriptional
control of pineal-specific genes and hence a role in circadian gene
expression.
Results
Figure 1. DREAM/KChIPs are expressed in the pineal gland and the retina. A, Putative DRE
sites present in ICER, AA-NAT, and fra-2 regulatory regions. Arrows indicate the orientation of
the DRE sequence. B, Western blot analysis of whole-cell extracts from pineal gland and retina.
For comparison, brain and C6 rat glioma cell extracts are shown. C, RT-PCR using total RNA from
brain, pineal gland, and retina and specific primers for the different KChIPs.
Figure 2. DREAM/KChIPs bind DRE sites in pineal-related genes. A, EMSA using recombinant
DREAM protein and representative DREs from pineal-related genes as probes. Competitions
with 5- to 50-fold DREDYN are shown for each probe. B, EMSA using whole-cell extracts from
HeLa cells transfected with KChIP-1, -2, and -4 and the DREAA-NAT probe. Competitions with
fivefold cold DRE2AA-NAT or Sp1 oligonucleotides are shown. C, Supershift of specific DRE retarded bands (arrow) obtained with pineal gland whole-cell extracts, the indicated DRE probes,
and the Ab1013 for DREAM/KChIPs. D, Chromatin immunoprecipitation using affinity-purified
polyclonal Ab1013 and DNA samples from pineal gland and retina. PCR amplification of the
AA-NAT promoter was not detected when no antibody was added.
Figure 3. DREAM/KChIPs regulate ICER, AA-NAT, and fra-2 promoters. A, Schematic representation of the reporter plasmids used in these experiments. Arrows indicate the transcription
start site for ICER (P2) and the AA-NAT genes. Relevant regulatory elements are indicated. B,
DREAM and KChIP-2 repress basal transcription from ICER, AA-NAT, and fra-2 reporter plasmids.
Shown is basal reporter activity (open bars), activity after DREAM (black bars), and KChIP-2
(gray bars) overexpression. C, Mutation of DRE1 or DRE2 sites, or both, flanking the transcription
start site blocked DREAM-mediated repression of the AA-NAT reporters. D, Transactivation of
the AA-NAT reporter in basal conditions (open bars) and after potassium (black bars) or cAMP
(gray bars) stimulation. Effects of the Ca 2insensitive (EFmDREAM) and of the double Ca 2
- and cAMP-insensitive (EF/LCDmDREAM) dominant-negative mutants are shown. Asterisks
represent statistically significant differences between the means relative to corresponding controls (***p 0.001; **p 0.01; *p 0.05; Students t test). Statistically significant blockage
of EFmDREAM or EF/LCD mDREAM relative to potassium-induced (ap 0.001; Students t test)
or cAMP-induced transactivation (bp 0.001; Students t test), respectively.
Figure 4. Circadian oscillations of DRE binding activity in the pineal gland: EMSA with the
DREAA-NAT probe and whole-cell extracts from pineal gland collected at the indicated times.
Animals were kept under normal light/dark (L/D) cycling conditions or under constant darkness
(D/D). As control, EMSA using the same extracts and CRESOM as a probe is shown in the bottom
panel. The L/D experiment was repeated three times, and the D/D experiment was repeated
twice.
Figure 5. Circadian oscillations of DRE binding activity in the pineal gland and in the retina:
EMSA with the DREAA-NAT probe and whole-cell extracts from the indicated tissues collected at
noon (12) or midnight (24). Animals were kept under normal light/dark cycling conditions. As
control, EMSA using the same extracts and CRESOM as a probe is shown in the bottom panel.
Arrowheads show the DRE- or CRE-specific retarded bands, respectively.
observed between L/D and D/D samples. These data indicate that
a circadian clock controls the endogenous DRE binding activity
and suggest that oscillatory repression and derepression of DRE
sites may participate in the circadian expression of ICER, fra-2,
and AA-NAT genes.
To further substantiate these results, we next wondered
whether the cycling DRE binding activity is specific for the pineal
gland, is a feature present in other central pacemakers, or is simply a general property of DREAM/KChIPs. For this, we performed EMSA using extracts from retina and cerebellum, a brain
area not directly related to the generation of circadian rhythms.
Tissues were harvested at noon (L) or at midnight (D) from rats
kept under standard light/dark conditions. Importantly, extracts
Figure 6. Expression of DREAM/KChIP mRNAs is not modified during the circadian cycle.
Quantification was by real-time RT-PCR using specific primers and TaqMan MGB probes for the
different KChIPs.
Figure 7. Oscillations of DREAM/KChIP protein levels in the pineal gland during the photoperiod: Western blot analysis with polyclonal antibody 668 ( A) or polyclonal antibody 671 ( B) of
extracts from the pineal gland at indicated times. Bands corresponding to monomer DREAM/
KChIP are indicated by arrows. Faster migrating immunoreactive bands are indicated by asterisks. For each case, control for loading is shown in the bottom panel using an antibody for CREB.
Intraperitoneal injection of isoproterenol at noon mimics the entrance in the dark phase of the
photoperiod.
experiments (Fig. 7A). Importantly, appearance of the low molecular weight immunoreactive bands coincided with the reduction in DRE binding activity at the entrance to the dark phase of
the cycle, suggesting a link between these two events. Similar
results were observed in extracts from retina, whereas in the cerebellum the low molecular weight bands were not observed at any
time (data not shown). Use of a CREB polyclonal antibody demonstrated the integrity of the CREB protein and no variation in
the levels of CREB protein in the different pineal samples (Fig.
7A). These results suggest that a clock-dependent posttranslational mechanism is operating on DREAM/KChIP proteins to
regulate their binding to DRE sites in target genes at the entrance
to the dark phase. Alternatively, an accumulation of the shorter
splice variants of the different KchIPs, like KChIP-1a and -2c not
Figure 8. Oscillation of tetramer DREAM levels in the pineal gland during the photoperiod.
Southwestern blot analysis of pineal extracts at indicated times using a DREAMAA-NAT oligonucleotide probe.
pineal gland at the beginning of the dark phase of the photoperiod by intraperitoneal administration of the -adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol (Drijfhout et al., 1996). Interestingly,
administration of isoproterenol at 11:00 A.M. resulted in the appearance of the same group of fast-migrating DREAM/KChIP
immunoreactive bands in pineal extracts prepared 1 hr after the
injection (Fig. 7B). Detection of DREAM processed bands in pineal extracts 1 hr after isoproterenol was also observed with Ab
668 (data not shown). Thus, the clock-related posttranslational
modification of DREAM/KChIP in pinealocytes appears to be
cAMP-dependent and regulated by external inputs to the pineal
gland.
Discussion
detected by the TaqMan probes used in this study or new short
splice variants not yet described in rat pineal gland or retina,
could also be responsible for the appearance of smaller KChIP
isoforms coinciding with the reduction in light intensity. So far,
this last possibility has not been investigated further.
Posttranslational processing of DREAM/KChIP proteins has
been studied in more detail for DREAM/KChIP-3 (Choi et al.,
2001; Sanz et al. 2001; Takimoto et al., 2002). Among posttranslational modifications, cleavage of DREAM by caspase 3 has been
described as a Ca 2-dependent process that occurs at position 63
in the DREAM protein (Choi et al., 2001) and could account for
the fast migrating immunoreactive band. To investigate a potential clock-dependent proteolytic process, we performed Western
blot analysis of pineal extracts using a different peptide-specific
polyclonal antibody (Ab 671). Western blots with Ab 671 showed
monomer DREAM as a unique band of 29 kDa that was not
modified at the different circadian time points (Fig. 7B). Importantly, a group of several immunoreactive bands of lower molecular weight were observed also with Ab 671 at the beginning of the
dark phase. Thus, similar results were obtained with two peptidespecific antibodies targeting different epitopes in DREAM/
KChIP proteins.
Because the levels of monomer DREAM/KChIP remained
practically unchanged through the different time points, a proteolytic mechanism could only be understood if we assume a
clock-dependent proteolytic process modifying the levels of multimeric DREAM protein. To check this hypothesis, we analyzed
pineal extracts by Southwestern analysis, a technique that allows
visualization of tetramer DREAM (Carrion et al., 1998, 1999). In
Southwestern blots prepared with rat pineal extracts, DREAM/
KChIP binds to the DRE probe as a tetramer with an apparent
molecular mass of 110 kDa (Fig. 8) as reported previously for
brain extracts (Carrion et al., 1998, 1999). Importantly, the intensity of the 110 kDa band showed a circadian pattern with a
peak at noon and a drastic reduction at the beginning of the dark
phase (Fig. 8). Whether other KChIPs participate in the 110 kDa
band observed in Southwestern analysis is presently unknown,
although formation of multimers has also been shown recently
for KChIP-1 (Chang et al., 2003). Thus, a clock-dependent posttranslational modification of DREAM/KChIPs tetramers is responsible for the regulation of DRE binding activity. Whether
this involves proteolysis of DREAM/KChIP proteins remains to
be studied further.
cAMP-dependent posttranslational processing of
DREAM/KChIP proteins
To further understand the molecular mechanisms controlling the
rhythmic changes of DREAM/KChIP proteins in the pineal
gland, we mimicked the cAMP stimulation that occurs in the
may directly account for the circadian changes in DREAM binding activity. During the daynight cycle, signals from the retina
use a multisynaptic pathway to reach the pineal gland. The last
step in this pathway is a rhythmic nocturnal norepinephrine input that is transduced by adrenergic receptors into intracellular
increases of cAMP (Vanecek et al., 1985; Sugden et al., 1986;
Sugden et al., 1987; Moore, 1996). cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of CREM repressor isoforms or results in an increased interaction with DREAM, the block of DREAMDRE binding, and the
derepression of the DRE site (Ledo et al., 2000). Blockage of the
CREMDREAM interaction using mutant EFmDREAML47,52V
notably reduced transactivation of the AA-NAT reporter in C6 glioma cells after isoproterenol exposure. Whether a similar protein
protein interaction occurs between CREM and KChIP-1, -2, or -4 is
presently unknown. Second, circadian variations in Ca 2 levels in
pinealocytes have been shown to be the result of increased expression of the nonselective cationic channel ILOT in chick pineal cells
during the night (DSouza and Dryer, 1996). Increased activity of
ILOT channels would facilitate Ca 2 entry through voltage-dependent calcium channels and unbinding of DREAM/KChIP from
DNA. Interestingly, increased Ca 2 entry would in turn activate
Ca 2/calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase, which increases
cAMP levels (Choi et al., 1992). Thus, cyclic changes in intracellular
Ca 2 and cAMP levels provoke a coordinated and rhythmic regulation of the affinity of DREAM/KChIPs for DRE sites in target genes
(Carrion et al., 1999). Third, the change in DRE binding activity may
reflect a change in the posttranslational processing of the DREAM/
KChIP proteins. Interestingly, posttranslational modifications have
been shown to regulate the activity of several clock-related proteins
in vivo (Lee et al., 2001). Thus, phosphorylation of clock proteins
modifies subcellular localization and the interactions between mammalian Per (Period), CLOCK (circadian locomotor output cycles
Kaput), and BMAL (brain muscle ARNT-like) proteins, which are
normally present in the nucleus as multimeric complexes containing
also cryptochromes and casein kinase I (Lee et al., 2001). Interestingly, it has been proposed that DREAM binds DNA as a tetramer
(Carrion et al., 1999), and phosphorylation by downstream kinases
of the PI3 kinase pathway modifies DREAM binding activity (Sanz et
al., 2001). Whether a clock-dependent change in the phosphorylation status of specific residues in DREAM is the signal that controls
tetramer formation and function is presently unknown. Fourth and
last, the circadian variation in DREAM activity may reflect a change
in the stability of the DREAM/KChIP proteins. Indeed, the reduction in DRE binding activity at the beginning of the subjective night
coincides with the appearance of a group of faster migrating
DREAM/KChIP bands on Western blots. It is noteworthy that a
proteolytic pathway could represent a rapid mechanism to eliminate
DNA-bound DREAM/KChIP proteins necessary to derepress the
target genes ICER, AA-NAT, and fra-2 and to increase melatonin
synthesis in the pineal gland as soon as the light photoperiod is finished. A light-dependent activation of the proteosomal degradation
pathway has been involved in the rapid degradation of AA-NAT
protein in the fish pineal organ (Falcon et al., 2001) as well as in the
mammalian retina (Fukuhara et al., 2001). Moreover, clockdependent degradation of Per proteins in the mammalian circadian
clock by Slimb, an F-box/WD40-repeat protein of the ubiquitin ligase Skp1/cullin/F-box protein complex, is preceded by the hyperphosphorylation of Per by casein kinase I and , the mammalian
functional homologs of the Drosophila Timeless protein (Akashi et
al., 2002; Grima et al., 2002; Ko et al., 2002). Light-dependent degradation of Timeless follows after phosphorylation of tyrosine residues and ubiquitinization (Naidoo et al., 1999) and is regulated by
the levels of the putative circadian cryptochrome cryptochrome (Lin
References