Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LNT HE Quality
LNT HE Quality
Quality
a Way of Life
Commitment to Quality
16 May 2013
1 of 40
Topics
16 May 2013
2 of 40
L&T Businesses
Heavy Engineering
Infrastructure
& Construction
Hydrocarbon
E&C
Industrial
Machinery
16 May 2013
Power E&C
Larsen & Toubro Limited
Electrical
& Automation
3 of 40
IQRS Level 8
L&T Hazira
16 May 2013
4 of 40
Manufacturing locations
Ranoli :
Exotic Materials
Hazira :
Powai :
Heavy Engg
Talegaon :
Defense
Oman :
Heavy Engineering
Bengaluru :
Avionics
Coimbatore :
Precision Mfg
16 May 2013
Kattupalli :
Ship Building
Larsen & Toubro Limited
5 of 40
Manufacturing Locations
Year established
Area (Sq. m)
Capacity (p. a)
16 May 2013
: 2009
: 400,000
: 10,000 MT
Larsen & Toubro Limited
6 of 40
Workshops
Cross transfer
Area
Ship Lift
Finger Jetty
Ship Lift
16 May 2013
Platform Raised
with Ship
Platform Lowered
Larsen & Toubro Limited
7 of 40
JV (74: 26)
Special Steel
100,000
MT/annum
16 May 2013
Forgings Up to
Diameter : 6.5 m
Height : 5.0 m
Nuclear grade
Alloy
Stainless steel
8 of 40
2010
1999
2007
9 of 40
Site Assembly
2009
16 May 2013
Weight 1300 MT
10 of 40
Trishul Launcher
Namica
11 of 40
Ship Building
Defense:
Indias 1st Nuclear Submarine INS Arihant
Commercial:
Special Purpose Vessel
16 May 2013
12 of 40
Challenges
Labour Intensive:
Custom Built:
Large Workforce
Engineer-to-order
Multi-skilling
Modular Manufacturing
Quality in
ETO Industry
Project Industry:
Mission Critical:
Multi-location
Multi-Site
16 May 2013
13 of 40
Topics
16 May 2013
14 of 40
Quality Formula
P
Q = -----E
Performance
----------------Expectation
>1
15 of 40
Is there a Conflict?
Reliability
Business
Need
012 Larsen & Toubro Limited : All rights reserved
Cost
16 May 2013
Delivery
Q
U
A
L
I
T
Y
16 of 40
Accuracy OR Speed?
Long term Needs
Product
Reliability
Work
Carefully
Meet
Customers
Needs
&
Work
Fast
Speed
012 Larsen & Toubro Limited : All rights reserved
As per
QUALITY SYSTEM
Quality
Larsen & Toubro Limited
&
Speed
&
Cost Effective
17 of 40
Topics
16 May 2013
18 of 40
Number of Incidents
ZEROonly through
Behavioral Aspects
012 Larsen & Toubro Limited : All rights reserved
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Nonconformity
19 of 40
Specification
Stage-based
Inspection
QC
Product Control
16 May 2013
Design Intent
In-Process
Audit
QA
User Need
Natural
Behaviour Based
BBQ
Process Control
Larsen & Toubro Limited
Mind Control
20 of 40
Image of NC
Plan
Act
Do
Chk
21 of 40
1
Incident
MajorMajor
Nonconformity
29
Minor
Incident
Minor
Nonconformity
Observation or Alert
Based on:
Actual Event or Condition
For Avoiding:
POTENTIAL Damage/ Re-work
Enhancing:
Sensitivity to Quality
300
Near Misses
CAQ: Conditions
Adverse to Quality
22 of 40
KLEPPA
Confucius:
Knowing is012not
as good as Loving;
Larsen & Toubro Limited : All rights reserved
Loving is not as good as Enjoying
BBQ:
Love my work
Enjoy Doing It
Part of Winning Team Aware of Big Picture
Larsen & Toubro Limited
23 of 40
Topics
16 May 2013
24 of 40
Organization
Quality
Quality Management
(QM)
Control of QMS
ISO Manual & Procedures
Monitor Organizational
Quality Objectives
Planning & Arranging Audits
Monitoring CAQs
Monitoring CARs
Management Review
Quality MIS
16 May 2013
Quality Planning
(QP)
Quality Control
(QC)
Inspection, Documentation
Interface with TPI/ Customer
25 of 40
Key Processes
Quality Circles &
Six Sigma Projects
QC Tools Training
Fortnightly Review
Structured Evaluation & Recognition
Major-Minor
Severity & Frequency Analysis
Monthly QRMs
Quality Circles
Customer Feedbacks,
Top NCRs, RCA results
16 May 2013
26 of 40
Key Processes
Aligning Quality Objectives
Quality Planning:
Critical To Quality
Identification at Project Start
QA Plan, Procedures & Check Lists
In Local language
27 of 40
Topics
16 May 2013
28 of 40
Team Leader
Team members
Object of
Concern
(Item, Process,
Area, Machine)
Effect
(What is wrong)
Size
(Extent, Occurrences,
Frequency, Severity)
16 May 2013
Item
: Weld Joints in Gasifier Coils
Process : Manual Welding
Shops
: Mulund Shop (Contract
welders)
29 of 40
Month/Year
Aug-09
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Total No of RT Spots
1612
1286
1297
1656
2910
Monthly Repair %
% RT Repair
6
5
4
3
Total No of Repairs
85
57
45
57
67
Repair %
5.27
4.43
3.46
3.44
2.3
2
1
0
16 May 2013
30 of 40
I
Uncertainty
II
Awakening
Quality
Department
Valuable, But
No resources
Management
Driven
Management
Participation
Everyone
Quality
Function
Hidden
Support
Function
Line
Function
Business
Function
Quality
Director
on Board
Problem
Solving
Fire
Fight
Short term
Focussed
Methodical
Approach
Early Problem
Identification
Preventive
Action
COPQ
Unknown
Maybe >20%
Reported 3%
Maybe >18%
Reported 8%
Maybe >12%
Reported 6%
Maybe >8%
Reported 3%
Really is 3%
Responsibility
for Quality
Quality
Improvement
No Formal
System
What you
hear ?
Why do
we GET
Problems?
16 May 2013
IV
Wisdom
We Identify
& Resolve
Problems
Defect
Prevention
is our motto
V
Certainty
Continual
Improvement
We do not
have Quality
Problems !
31 of 40
14 Step Methodolgy
1
Management
Commitment
2
Cross-Functional
QI Team
3
Measurement
Philosophy:
Full commitment & support from Top Management
ZERO is Possible and Will be achieved
No Shortcuts to Quality
No Quick fixes
Cross Functional Approach:
All are responsible for welding 012
defects
Larsen & Toubro Limited
and not the welding engineer or Quality Engineer
Participation of all employees is a MUST
32 of 40
14 Step Methodolgy
4
Cost of Quality
Evaluation
5
Quality
Awareness
6
Habit: Identify
& Correct
Habit
Daily Feedback is a must
(Before, During & After Welding)
Elimination of all possible reasons before welding
33 of 40
14 Step Methodolgy
7
Zero
Defect
Task-force
Action Plan
1. Analysis
2.
3.
4.
5.
Interaction
Training
Checklist
Recording
6. Feedback
7. Solve
8
Supervisor Trg:
Understanding
Problems
9
Zero
Defects
Day
10
Goal
Setting
Plan
Do
Chk
34 of 40
14 Step Methodolgy
11
Act on Problems
told by Workers
12
Recognition
13
Quality
Council
14
Do it again!
35 of 40
16 May 2013
36 of 40
Active Interactions
Appreciation:
Zero Defect
Welders
16 May 2013
37 of 40
Result
Statement of Cost Saving due to improved process of RT/UT
Period
Aug 08 to July 09
Total
Red in no. Cost per
Total Repair Repair Reduction in
Spots RT
of defects defect in
Spots (Nos) Spot % Repair %
Rs
(Nos)
(Nos)
25755
1091
4.2%
FY 10-11
24469
330
1.3%
2.9%
FY 11-12
19925
107
0.5%
3.7%
Cost per defect calculated based on Through-put per hour saved
Cost Saving in
Lacs Rs
707
737
6,582
6,976
46,50,005
51,41,877
= ZERO Defects
16 May 2013
38 of 40
Summary
Plan
Act
Do
Chk
Observation
System
39 of 40
16 May 2013
Thank you
40 of 40