Paraskeuaidou

:
, 2009

.
,
. , ,

, .
,
.
,
,
.
, , ,
, ,
, .
, , .
,
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
, 2009

.................................................................................................................................... 1

1 .......................................................................... 7
1.1 .................................................................................................................................. 7
1.2 ............................................................ 7
1.3 .................................................................. 11
1.4 ............................................................. 13
1.5 - .............. 16
1.6 ............................................................................... 21
1.7 .............................. 25
1.8 , ................................ 27
1.9 ......................................................... 28
1.10 .......................................................... 30
1.11 .................................. 33
1.12 ..................................................... 35
1.13 ......................................... 37
1.14 ...................................... 40
1.15 .............................................. 42
2- .................................................................................................. 45
2.1 ................................................................................ 45
2.2 ............................................................................................................................. 47
2.3 ............................................................................................................................... 48
2.4 ....................................................................................................... 48
2.5 ............................................................................................................. 50
3- ..................................... 54
3.1 ............................................................................................................................... 54
3.2 ........... 55
3.3 ...................... 58
3.4 ............. 60
3
3.5 , ............................... 62
3.6 ................. 64
3.7 ...................................... 65
3.8
................................................................................................................................... 67
3.9 ............................................ 72
3.10 , ............................................ 74
3.11 ....................... 76
4- .................................... 80
4.1 ................................................................................................................................ 80
4.2 ........................................................................................... 81
4.3 ........................................................................................................ 82
4.4 ...................................................................................................... 83
4.5 ......................................................................................................... 84
4.6 ........................................................................................................ 86
4.7 ................................................................................................... 87
4.7.1 ............................................................................................................................. 87
4.7.2 ............................................................................................... 88

5- .. 91
5.1 ................................................................................................... 91
5.2 ............................................................................ 93
5.3 ........................................................................................................... 95
6-
.............................................................................................................. 98
6.1 ........................................................................ 98
6.2 .............................................. 136
7-
.......................................................................................... 156
7.1 ......................................................................................................... 156
7.2 ............................................................ 158
8- ........................................................ 182
8.1 ................................................................................................................. 182
8.2 ........................................................................................................................ 191
.......................................................................................................................... 197
......................................................................................................................... 211
1. ............................................................................... 211
2. ..................................................................................................... 217

, ,
, ,

.
.

, .

,

,
,
, .

- .
.
,

, ,
;

-; ,
;
,
,
.

- - ,
,
.
" "
6
, ,
, .

, .
, ,
- . ,
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
, , ,

.
,

,
.

-
-
, ..
, .
,
,
, .

.
,
,

.
,
-
-
.
,

. ,
.
,

,
, .
'
-
-
.
.

, . ,
,

, ,
, .

.
.

. ,

,
.

.
.
,
, .
,
,
.

, ,
. ,
.
. ,
,
. ,
,
.
,
.
, .
,

.

, .
,

,
.

1 -
1.1

, . ,

, ,
, . ,

.

, .
,
. ,
,
. ,

, .
, ,

, .
, ,
.
,
, ,
.
10
1.2
, .
(, 1985). , ,
. , ,
.
. ,
(, 1998).

.
, ,

, . (,
1985) (, 1998).
, 1776
, .
(, 1978). ,
. , 1971
,
(-, 2000). 1848,
, ,
. , 1850, .
. , 24%
(, 1978).

. 15-16 .
,
(, 1991).
8 1858, ,
(, 1999). ,
.
9 (, 1999).
11
,
.
, 8 1910, ,
, 8
(- ,
1978).
, 1789, ,
, ,
, , ,
,
(, 1981).
.
,

(, 1998). , ,
. , , .
, ,
.
,
. . , ,
,
(, 1985). ,
,
.
, 19 , , ,
.
,
, ,
, (, 1995).
,
.
12

.
.
, .
(Arrichi and Maume,
2000). ,
. ,
,
(Caroline and Milroy-Moore,
1991). , , ,
.
,
(Dolado et al, 2001).
,
.
19 ,
.
. ,
(Kanellopoulos and Mavromaras, 1999). , 19
, ,
. , 19
. .
, , ,
.
1860, ,
, .
1901 (, 1994).
, . 19
. , .
, ,
, ,
, ,
(, 1992).
13
, . ,
, , ,
.
. ,
, ,
2006,
,
( , 2007).
, ,
, .
, ,
,
. 65
20%, 5 , ,
34%. , 4,5%
, 1 , .

( , 2008).
, 2008,
, . ,
(4,5%) ,
(3,5%). ,
,
65 (21%, 5 ) (
, 2007).
,
,
.
14
1.3
, ,
.
.

(-, 1989). ,
(, 1990).
,
.
(, 1996).
.
. .
(, 1982).
,
1821 1940. ,

, (,
1986).
, ,
. , '
,
(, 1989).

(, 1982).

.
,
, ,
.
15
, -
- ,

(, 1998). -
- ,
, .
, (-, 1985).
,
, .
, ,
. , ,

.
,
,
(, 1989).
, .
. , .
, .
.

, ,
(, 1989).
Gotzfried (2004)
,
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
16
1.4

(Jennings and Miemi, 1981; Karp and Banducci, 2008).
(Delli and Keeter, 1996).
...,
. (Christy, 1987; Norris, 2004).

,
. (Burns et al., 2001).
,
. Donan (2006)
...
. ,
Koch (1997)
, , . ,
...
, ,
(Caul, 2001 ; Anderson et al., 2005).
,
, .
1894, ,
(Childs and Withey, 2004).
, ,
(246) . , 9 1916
Jeannette
Rankin (Karp nd Banducci, 2007). , ,

.
1964 , Margaret Chase Smith,
27 . 19
(Tate, 1991). ,
17
, ,
(Ulbig, 2005).
(
) 1964 2004.
1: 1964-2004

(1964-2004)

1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
: Women in Congress (1964-2004)
,
, .
, 1992 1996.

.
18
1.5 -
..
.

(Childs and Withey, 2004).

,
.

(Fennema and Tillie, 1999).
, (European
Commission, 2006d).

. , ,
(Inglehart and Norris, 2003). ,

, .
,
,
,
.
,

. ,
1989 ,

(Welch, 1977).
1991, , . ,
1994
,
(Inglehart and Norris, 2003). 1996 ,
:
19
:

.

(1989).

, 1927 Olga Rudel-Zeynek. 23 , 1950
.
, ,
. (2003), (2004),
(2004).
,
(1963), (1972), (1979), (1982), (1989),
(1991), (1992), (1995), (1996),
(1997), (1998), (1999). ,
, ,
Simone Veil (1979-1982) Nicole Fontaine (1999-2002).
.. 1995

12 .
, 189 (, 1996).
, 1999,
.
,
(European Commission, 2002).
1996, ..
,
..
. , ..
2000
1996 ,
. (European
20
Commission, 2001)
.., .
,
.
(1997) . , .

1996.
, ,
.
,
2,3 1996
1997 ( 14,8% 17,1%) (Cullen-DuPont, 1996 ; United Nations, 2000).

. 1996-1997,
2,5 ( 16,8% 19,3%) (European
Commission, 2006e).
,
. 1997, 23,2% .
1996-1997, 25,1% 26,6%
(Verba et al., 1997).
1999,
BEIS,
: (),
(), () (S).
(48%)
, 15%
, . ( , 2000)
8 15 1999,
,
2003, 14% , ,

21
25. , 2003,

, "",
, /
. ,
30% 25 .
,
,
. (European Commission, 2007)
2005, ,
, .. .
2005 25 -
.. , , .
, 23% 22%
30 . ( , 2008)
, 7 24 2004
. ,
.

, , ,
, . ,
,
, , . ,
, . (European
Commission, 2007)
,
17%
1984 30% 2003. ,
30% 2004.
, ,
, . (
, 2008)
22
2007,
42% ,
,
47%. ,
, 2007.
,
39%, 37%, 36%, 35%, 32%
. , ..
15% 15% 9%.
15%, 12%, 11%, ,
9%. ..,
(36%) (32%). ,
, 91% ,
4% 9%
2007 ( , 2008).
, ,
39%, .. 15
36%.
(BEIS).
(European Commission, 2007)
1.6

. 60,
. 60
, (-, 1996). H
( )
,
,

(, 1995).
23
,
.
(uriazis, 1995).
,
, .

1844 1864,
, (Papageorgiou, 1985).
2159/1952 1956. ,
1905,
1919, 1928, 1944 1945 (
, 1996).

60. ,
Roger Burk (1961),
50,
(Burns et al., 2001).
(), (, 1984). Burk
, ,
.
Keith Legg (1969) (-, 1992).
, ,
, .
70,
, 1974 (, 1993).
80, ,
, ,
(, 1995).

,
1974 2007.
1974, ,
,
24
97,67% (293 ) 2,33% (7 ) (, 2000).

,
. , ,
. , 1977, ,
3,67% (11 )
96,33% (289 ) .
1981 ,
4,33% (13 )
95,67% (289 ).
, 1985,
1977. , 1985
11 (3,67%) 289 (96,33%)
(, 1995).
, 1989
.
287 (95,67%) , 13 (4,33%)
. ,
, 20 (6,67%)
280 (93,33%) (-, 1998).
90,
94,67% (284 ) 5,33% (16 ),
. , 1993
( 2 ), 18
6%,
282 94% (, 1996).
1996,
19 6,33% 281
93,67%.
,
1989 20
.
20
. 2000, 8,67% (26
25
) 91,33% (274 ).
10%. , 2004,
261 (87%), 39 (13%). , 2007
252 (84%)
48 (16%). 3%,
(European Commission,
2007).
,

, .
,
.
1: 1974-2007

60

(1974-2007)
50
40
30
20
10
0
1974 1977 1981 1985 1989 1989 1990 1993 1996 2000 2004 2007
: , 2008
1.7
, .
, , . ,
.
: "
". ,
,
26
(Davis, 2000). ,
, .

,
.
,
. , ,
. ,
.
(Caroline and Milroy-Moore,
1991).
Amaro (2004),
,
, . ,

. ,

(Arrichi and Maume, 2005).
, 20 ...
.
,
,
,
(Durantou et al., 2007).

. ,
,
,
(Kamo, 1994).
Arrighi
Maume (2000)

(Makiko and Cohen, 2007).
27
-,
, ,
,
. ,
.

,
.
1.8 ,
,

.
(Hakim, 1999),
.

.
(Hakim, 1999) ,
( ).
.
.
, .
,
(Ciscel and Sharp, 1995).
,
(Rodriguez-Prieto and
Gutierrez-Rodriguez, 2003).
.
,
7 .

. (Shannon et al, 2007) ,
28

, .
,
,
,
. (Spitze
and Loscocco, 1999)
,
. ,
,
.
,

. (Rohrlich, 2002)
,
,

.
1.9

.
, .
,
, . ,

(-, 2000).
,
,
29

,
.

(, 1999). ,
,
'70, (, 1994).

, .
,
.

. ,
, , . ,
,
(Coltrane, 2000).
,
,
( .., 1999).
, ,
(Adam and
Moutos, 2006).
,
, ,
,
.
,

(, 1995).
, ,
,
(-, 2000).
, ,
30

.
,
,
.
. ,
,
.
1.10
, ,
,
(Dolado et al, 2001).
, 1900,
, .
, ,

(Kazutoshi, 1992).
19 ,
.
, .
1900 1940
(Kamo, 1994).
,
, ,
(Kanellopoulos and Mavromaras, 1999).
21 , ,
, .
,
,
31

(Kaufman, 2000).
, ,
,
,

. ,

,
(Eurostat, 2007). , , ,
, ,
,
,
,
(Adam and Moutos, 2006).

, (..
, ). , ,
, ,
(Gudrun, 2007).
,
.
, , ...,
. 1995 2006 65% 68%. 1995
65,8% 2001 67,8%.
,
2001 2004. 2005
... 70% 2007 (
, 2008).
, .. 2010
32
70%, .
... .
2: ...
80
(%)
60
40
20
0
...
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
65,8 66,3 67,1 67,4 67,6 67,8 67,1 66,1 65,7 65,4 65,6 66,1
56,4 56,8 57,6 57,2 56,7 56,7
57
56,5 56,8 57,4 58,1 58,8
: Eurostat, 2008
, .
... ,
(Blossfeld and Hacim, 1997).
,
,
. Davidson Cooper (1984),

.
, ,

. ,
.
,
(Davis, 2000).

, , , . ,

(Gudrun, 2007).
33
1.11

70% 60%
, 2010 (European Commission,
2002).
1994 1998 ..
1% , 1,8 . .
.

, , , , , ,
.
. 1998 40%
, ,
40% ( , 1998).
.. .
2001, .. 64%.
(55%).
, 73%. (Rodriguez-Prieto and
Gutierrez-Rodriguez, 2003) ,
( ),
.
(54,9%) 18
(73%). ,
. , , ,
, 20
2001
(, , , , ,
) 60%
, .. 5,1
34
2,1
57% 2005.

70%
50% 2010 (European Commission, 2006a).
,
18,1 15,2 . ,

(
, 2007). , ,
.. ,
, ,
10 , 20
, , , , ,
(Adam and Moutos, 2006).
, 2007,
.
.. . ,

. ,

.
,

(
, 2008).
1.12
,

35
, (
) ,
(, 1998).
, ,
, 10
( 47% 57% ) (, 2003).
, 47%,
57% (, 2001).

( )
.

, ,
. ,
(, , ..)
.
1998 2002,
.
.
.

(, 2002).
,
. ,
. ,
, ,
80% .
,
,
(, 2005).
,

36
, (,
1994). , ,
. ,
.
( , 2002).
, ,
.

, .
,
. ( .., 2001) 63%
, 37% . ,
,
,
,
, ,
.
,
.
1.13
60 ,
, ,
(, 1989).

. ,
.
,
. .
, ,

37
. 1977
, ,
,
, , ( - ,
1985).
...,
, .

,
.
, ,
, ,
. ,
, , .
,
,
. ,
,
, , ,
(U.S. Department of Education, 2005). ,
.. ,
(Jungho, 2005)
,
,
,

/ (Walby, 1999).
50%
,

,
38

,
31% , 23% 20%
. 4 ,
, -
40% ( , 1993). ,
- -
. ,
,
, . ,
26%, (
, 2007).

, .

,
(Jungho, 2005).
, , ,
. , ,
. ,

(, 1996).
1.14
,
70,
(-, 1989).
,

(Boyle-Baise, 2002).
39
90
.

, (Jungho, 2005).

1990
. ,
. ,

, , ,
. ,
, , , ,

, . ,

1998-1999,
. ,
, 12 15
. ,
. (European Commission, 2001).
, OECD 2006,
. ,

. 55-64 ,
, 25-34
20 30
, 2 10 ( )
0,5 .
,
58,9% 2006 (56,7% 2004).

, ,
(18% ) (20%),
40
, (60 %).

(OECD, 2007).
,
.

.
1.15
, ,
.
19 (, 2007).

. ,
1974
, ,
.
, ,
,
, ,
( & ). ,
,
,
,
,
.
65% 1930.
,
. ,
,
( , 1985). , 1969-1970
41
31,43% ,
, 2000-2001,
58,7%. ,
52,9% 1998,
( ) 44,3% 55,7% .
, ,
, ,

. ,

, ,
,
,
( - , 1988 ; Ouston, 1993).
,
,
.
,
, .
, ,
( .., 2000)

,
, ,
..
, ,
,
,

(, 1998).
, .... 2006,
. ,
,
42
. 27,6% ,
. ,
, .
,

. ,
, .

, ,
, ,
.
,
,
,
(, 1996).
43
2 -
2.1

. ,
, ,
. , 570 ..,
,
. 40 ,
, ,
. 1,5
(23% ),
,
. , 50
( , , , , , ..).
,
. ,
, , .

.
,
,
. (, 1975).

, , ,
. ,
.
"" Islam (
) Salama (, ). 7
.
, .
Allah,
44
,
(, 1981).
,
, .
,
,

.
(, 2006).
,
,
.
.
, , , ,
.
, , ..
, , .
,
, (Bell, 1953).

. , ,
. , ,
.
, (, 1970).

, ,
, , .
.
, .
, ,
. , ,
.
45
,
. , , ,
,
,
"" (, 1981).
2.2
, .
570 .. ,
, .
, . 40
, .
. 622 ..
.
.
. : .
630 .. .
.
, 632 .., - (,
1977).
2.3
, .
. 114 , ,
3 286 . 2 10.000 .
, .. - (
), - ( ) ,
.
. .
46
.
.
, ,

. ,
, . Bell (1953),
, , ,
,

(, 1998).
2.4
:
1) , .
2)
() .
3)
().
.
4)
.
.

:
1)
( ) (
33:40).
2)
.
( 2:144).
47
3) . .
( 24:56).
4) (), ,
,
( 2:180-182).
5) .
( 3:87).
(, 1998)
,
. . ,
, , , ..
.
.
, ,
, . .
, ,

.
, ,
, , ,
,
(, 1997 ; , 1998).
2.5
,
, .
.
.
.
.
48
, ,
, , , .
,
, , , .
, ,
( 17,32).

. ,

.

.
()
. , .
, : , ,
. ,
, , .
.

,
. ,
.
.
. ,
(, 1997), , ,
.
,
.
. ,
,
,
, .
49

,
.

. ,
,
. ,

.

.
, ,
, (, 1980).
50
.
;
,
,;
.
,
,30.08.1925
51
3 -
3.1

. ,
. , ,
,
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
, , .

.

.
,

.
,
, . ,

.
, ,
, ,
.
, , ,
52
3.2

.
, ,
. ,
.
,
. ,
.
,
4 5 . ,
,
2030 20 25 ,
(Esposito, 1995).
, o Barlow (2006)

. ,
,
.
,
,
.
, Castles and Miller (2003)
,
, ,
. , ,
.
, (Choudhury, 2007)
. ,
,

.
53
Pew Research Center

: :
(Choudhury, 2007). ,
, .
,
.
() .
,
.
,
( ,
).
,
,
. ,

. , (63% 32%
)
. 47%
().
. 81%,
66%, 69% 46% (Silvestrl, 2000).
,

(Roy, 2004). ,
.

(Hashmi, 2003).
, ,

,
. ,
(:
54
, : , : ).
,
(De Long-Bas, 2008).
,
(European Womens Lobby, 2007).
,
,
. ,

(
, )
(Rosen, 2004).

. ,
, 2
(Waines, 2003).
,
( ),
. ,

.
, ( )
, ,
,
.
3.3

,
, ' '
(Wilson, 2006).
55

,
, - -
, , ,
(Roded, 1999 ; European Womens Lobby, 2007).

. , .
.
(Wilson, 2006).
, :
, , ,
.
. , , , ,
(Peach, 2006).

,
,
, , (EUMC,
2005). ,
, ,
(Academy of Athens,
1995).

, .
.

" ", " ".
"" ""
,

(Ask and Thomsland, 1998).
, , , ,
56
, , .
, ,
.
, ,

, .
, ,
(Bodman and Herbert,
1998).

.
,
, ,
.
, Middle East Look
, (Kassotakis and Roussakis,
1999).
, , ,
,
.
3.4
, .
,

(, 1975).

. ,
, ,
- ,
57
,
( ) (Eickelman and Piscatori, 1996).

, (Moghadam, 1994).
,
,
. ,
,

.
Emine Bozkurt,
Rachida Dati Alima
Boumediene (Ismail, 2004).
, ,
(, 1995).

.
1993,
, . ,
, 23
(, 2006).
,

(Ismail, 2004).
.

. 1993, ,
1927.
, 80,

(, 2006).
(2006),
( 280 ) ,
58
. , .
,
, , (,
2002).

,
, .

.
.
, ,

( , 2007).
, ,
,
.
3.5 ,

(Tsaoussis and Zervogianni, 2008).
, ,
.
, ,
, , ,
(Brown, 2006).

, .
.
.
,
,
59
,
,
(Castles and Miller, 2003).
,
, .
. ( ),
,
(Choudhury, 2007). , ,

, . ,
,
(Cullen-DuPont, 1996).
,
.
(De Long-Bas, 2008).
, ,
.
,
, ,
. Green (2008),
, ,
( )
.
, ,
( ),
.
(Ask and Thomsland, 1998).
,
, ,
,
, . ,

60
,
, .
3.6
, ,
,
(Bodman and Herbert, 1998).
.
,

. , ,
, (Silvestrl, 2000). ,
,
, ,
.
, Hashmi (2003),
.

. ,
,
(Moghadam, 1994).
, - . ,

. ,
.
,
(European Union, 2006c).

,

61
, ,
(Nielsen, 2004). ,
,
, (Peach, 2006).
3.7
. ,

.
,
-, ,
,
. .
1990 ,

. (, 2001)
, ,
. ,
, ,

(,. 2006).
.
, ,
,
(Mavrommatis and Tsitselikis, 2003).
.
.
. ,
, , ,
.
: (Magos, 2007).
62
,
.
. , ,
. ,
.
, .
,
, ' , ,
. .
(International Centre for Migration Policy Development, 2003).
.

,
.
, .

.
,
(Bodman and Herbert, 1998).
,
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
63
3.8

,
.
, ,

.
.
(, 1981). ,
,
. ,
,
. , ,
, , .
,
, , ,
, : )
,
, )
,
(Brown, 2006).
, Anne Nielsen (2004)
Afshar et al. (2005), ,
, .
, ,
. ,
.
.
,
,
.
64
,
,
, .
,
, ,
,
(Choudhury, 2007).
15
.

, ,
,

.

.
, , , ,
, ,
.
, ( ),
.
,
, (European
Commission, 2006b).
,
.
.

( , , ,
, ,
,
) (Choudhury, 2007).
65

. ,

. ,

.
( , ) (Nielsen,
2004).
,
,
.
,
, ,
, , ,
.
1900,
1982. ,

(European commission, 2006c).
Raaum (2004)
,
,
.
,
, - ,
.
,
15% 40%,
.
, 38%
(7%).
, , 2004,
20%
66
( 10%). , , 2000,
44% ,
53% (European Commission, 2001).
, , 11% 4% , (European
Commission, 2006b).

, 2004.
,
(13%) .
18%.
16 24 . ,
.

, , ( .
). 2004 56,5%
,
(European Commission, 2006c).
,
,
,
.

.
3.9

,
.
, . ,

,
67
. ,
,
. ,
4.000-4.500/,
3.000-3.500/.
(Liegl et al., 2004).
,
, (
.).
, ,
, ,
., (, 2007).
,
.
,
. ,
. ,
, .

. ,
, , , .

, .
,
,
.

,
(Tsaoussis and Zervogianni, 2008).
,
,
. ,
,
68

(Academy of Athens, 1995).
, .
, ,
, ,
.
,
, .

.
3.10 ,

.
, (Magos,
2007).
,
. , ,
,
,
( ).

(Banks, 2002).

,
(Hashmi, 2003). , ,
,
(Boyle-Baise, 2002).
,
.
.
69
,
,

(Modood, 2006).
,

, 1950. ,
(European Commission, 2006b).

(EUMC) Muslims in the European Union: Discrimination and Islamophobia (
: ),
- .

. (European Commission, 2006c).

,
.

(.. , ),

, .
,

, ,
, .

,
,
(European Commission, 2006b).
, ,
.
, 2002, 80%

70
. .
, 60%-70%
25%, .
,
- .., ,
, , , , . , , ,
(International Centre for Migration Policy
Development, 2003).
,
,
,
.
3.11
1920,

. ,
1881,

.

(1989-1912) (, 1994).

(1912 1913) ,
, , ). (1913)
.
, ( 1923)
. , (1923)
1923 .

71
( , 1947 1972),
. ( , 2001)
, ,
.
,
. 2000
300 ,
.
, 2002 223
7.107 . 2 / 2
905 . (Mavrommatis and Tsitselikis, 2003)
, ,
/, .
1.500 .
15% . (Mavrommatis
and Tsitselikis, 2003) ,
.
,
, -
. , ..
, , - .
1995 - -
(Petrakou and Dimitrakopoulos, 2003).
,
,
. , , , ,
,
.
, ,
, ,
, (Kassotakis and Rousakis, 1999).
,
.
72
.
,
. ,
.
, , .

1991. , ,
, (,
1994).
92% ,
.

, .
. ,
, ,
.
,
, ,
, ( ,
2001).
73
4.1
, , 46.764
, .
724 220 .
56 , 57 , 124
, 80 , 213 .
60. ,
110 .
,
( 200 ,
168 ).
, ,
. ,
. ,
( 39 42C).

.
22,
.
.
'
. 14,
12, 20 30
4.2
,
.. . 549
74
,
, .
(522) .
8 .. , ,
. , () (
). ,
,
879 ..,
.
' .

1385 ..
.

.

,
.
,

. , ,
, , ,
.
, 8 1912
, ,

.
.
28 1920.
, .
(1922-23)
, . . . , , .
. ,
75
,
.

.
, , (14 1944),
.
-
. .
.
, ,
(, 1978).
4.3
,
. ,
, . ,

( , ).
. 180
(, 1996).
4.4
1951, 28.000 , 90.000 .
, 52.000
, (, 1959). 1976
27.000, 5.400
(). 31.541 1981
34.889 1991, 33.897 37.463 .
18 2001
102.959 , 53.598 ,
76
, 46.464 .
, .

,
15 54 . , (23,7%)
25-39 , 40-54
19,7%. ,
, 0-14 (19,6). ,
15-24 18%. , ,
55-79 17,5%, 1,4% 80 .
, 10 .
1991,
(12%
), (16,5% ).
,
, .
,
4,87%.
, 9,68%,
9,77%.
, 2001,
0,83% ,
(0,41%). , ,
12,12%, (20,65%).
,
(44,46%),
(39,64%) ( , 2006).
,
,
. ,
,
.
77
4.5.
, o 1.793
. - 60% -
, .
32%
, .
450.000 .
2003, 1.147
... 11.261 .
() 28,4%
11,8%.
( - ) 26,7%
44,7%. , ( )
39,3%
43,5%.

.
, 66,9% 1998 68,6% 2004. ,
1998-2004, 2004
59,4% 60,7% 1998, 1,3 .
, 2004
30-44 (40,9%) 45-64 (35,4%),
15-19 (2,2%), ,

.
, 2004 39,6%
, 24,2% , 9,1% ,
8,1% , 6,6% , 12,1%
, 0,3%
.
78
,
2005 11%. 2004,
(13,1% 2004). ,
, 13,7% 1998 21,3% 2004%,
, 5,9% 7% 2004.
, 2004
20-24 (33,2%), 15-19 (24,2%) 25-29 (16,6%).
, , ,
2004
(32,6%) (24,6%),
(9,4%).
,
,

. ,
, ,
(, 2007)
4.6

, ,

.

(, 1996).
,
.
, ,
.
.
79
1830 (, 1978).
, ,
. , , ,
, .

.
,
(, 1978).

,
, , ,
.
,
(, 1997).
4.7
4.7.1
,
, , ,
, .

,
, (..
, ..)
,
, .
:
. ( , ..
).
. ( , ).
80
. (
) (, 1998).
4.7.2
3-2-1830,
,
. (1920)
,
.
1922
1923, ,
87.000 , 39.000 , 35.000
12.000 ,
292.000 . ( )

(, 2002). 1923

, ,
, .
, 40%-50% ,
4%. 20
,
.
,
.
,

,
(, 1976). ,
, 120.000 ,
5.000 .
81
, .
,
, .
, 2-3 .
, ,
.

.
, ,
. , ,
.
, , ,
.
, ,
.
, 3
, 400 , 244 , 2
, 2 , 4
. ,
,
.

. ,
, ,
.
35% , 17%
, 48% , .
,

. , , 2341/95
2413/96
82
(, 1996).
0,5%
.
83
5.1
, ,

. : )

, ,
, ,
,

, ) .
( ),
,
.

,

.

.
, ,
, , ,
.
,

, (
).
84
, ,
( , , ).
, . ,

, (
).
.
,
, ( ).
(
) ,
.
,
2. 2 ( Pearson)

.
,
,
. (, 2005) ,
SPSS.
5.2

.
.
.
85
,
, .
, , ,
200.

,
.

.
, ,
, .
,
, .
, ,
, ,
. , ,
, ,
.

, .
, ,
.
.

,
, , , .
, ,
.
,
,
. , ,
86

,
, ,
, . ,
.
(18 2001)
23.416 .

. , 200 .
,
,
.

14/01/2009
27/04/2009.
, .

, ,
,
.
, . , 128
,
123 5 .
.
, .
5.3
, (
), ,
,
.
87
,
. ,
, ,
( ), ,
. , ,
, ,
.
.
.
,
.
, ,
, , .
,
.
, (,
, , , ),
.
, ,
,
, ,
,
.
.
,

, .

, .

, .
88

, .
,
, (, , , ,
), ,

. ,
,
, .
89
6 ,
6.1
,
,
.
, ,
, ( ) ,
. ,
, 200
.
,
.
, .
, ,
18 , 49% (98 )
26 45 , 28% (56 ) 46 60 , 15% (30
) 18 25 8% (16 ) 61
.
18-25
8%
26-45
15%
46-60
28%
> 61
49%
1:
, , 76,5% (153
) , 11,5% (23 ) , 8% (16 ) ,
90
3% (6 ) , 1% (2 ) ,

76,50%
80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
11,50%
30,00%
3%
8%
1%
0%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
2:
, ,
. , , ,
, ,
, .
,
.
, ,
, 21,1751 .

3,75 .

.
, : 57% (114 )
11.000 30.000, 25,5% (51 )
10.000 17,5% (35 )
30.000.
91
17,50%
25,50%
(<10.000)
(10.000 - 30.000)
(>30.000)
57%
3:
,
.
,
, 31,5% (63
), . ,
21% (42 ), . ,
13,5% (27 ), ../... ,
12,5% (25 ).
10,5% (21 ) 10% (20 )
... . ,
, 1% (2 ).
1%
/-/
13,50%
.../...
10,00%
...
21%
10,50%
31,50%
12,50%
10
20
30
40
50
4:
92
60
70

, , 3 4 .

. ,
, 2,2711 .
,
. ,
. 1 5 .
21,1747 , 20,1838 ,
23,14,29 , 21,7 20,5 .
,
, .
: 50,91% (84 ),
49,09% (81 ). 61,03% (83 )
38,97% (53 ). 58% (29 ) 42% (21 ).
, 10 10 ,
50%. , , 4 (100%)
(0%).
100%
5
50%
50%
42%
58%
38,97%
61,03%
1
0%
49,09%
20%
50,91%
40%
60%
80%
5:
93
100%

, .
, ,
18 .
,
.
,
24,1% (40 ).
.../..., 20,48% (34 )
, 18,07% (30 ). 13,25% (22 )
6,02% (10 ) ...
,
0,61%.
/-/
0,61%
20,48%
.../...
6,02%
...
18,07%
13,25%
24,10%
17,47%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
6.1:

. 30 , 21,9%.
, 19,71% (27 ),

. ,
(.../...) 16,78% (23 ),

. 5,12% (7 ),
94
..., ,
.
/-/
0%
16,78%
.../...
5,12%
...
21,90%
16,78%
19,71%
19,71%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
6.2:

, 34,69% (17 ). ,
20,41% (10 ). 18,37% (9 ),

. ..., ... 3 , 6,12% 1
...
.
/-/
0%
6,12%
.../...
...
2,04%
20,41%
18,37%
34,69%
18,37%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
6.3:
95
30,00%
35,00%
, 6.4 ,
.
35% (7 ), .
30% (6 ), .
, 5 , 25% 5% (1 )
, ...
/-/
0%
0%
...
5,00%
5,00%
35%
25,00%
30,00%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00%
6.4:

, ,
. (50%)
(25%) , .../...

: 33,67% (33 ) , ...,
..., 21,43% (21 ),
, ,
16,33% (16 ).
,
11,22% (11 ) 10,2% (10 ),
... , 6 ,
6,12%,
, 1,03%.
96
1,03%
/-/
33,67%
10,20%
...
21,43%
11,22%
16,33%
6,12%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00%
6.5: 18

.
.../... , 30,26% (23 ) 27,63% (21 ), .
, , 14,47%
(11 ), , 11,84% (9 ),
... 9,21% (7 ).
, , ,
6,59% (5 ) ,
.
/-/
0%
30,26%
.../...
9,21%
...
27,63%
14,47%
11,84%
6,59%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00%
6.6: 18
97
, ,
30,3% (10 ), ,
, 27,27% (9 )
21,21% (7 ) .
9,09% (3 ), . , 3 , 9,09%,
.../..., ... , 3,04%.
/-/
0%
9,09%
.../...
...
3,04%
30,30%
21,21%
27,27%
9,09%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00%
6.7: 18

,
. 50% (6 ) ,
16,67% (2 ) , .
98
/-/
0%
0%
...
8,33%
8,33%
50%
16,67%
16,67%

0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00% 20,00% 25,00%
30,00% 35,00%
40,00% 45,00% 50,00%
6.8: 18
,
. ,
.../...
7 200
.
.
,
. ,
, 21,5% (43 ).
, ,
, , 18% (36 ).
, 16% (32 ),
, 12% (24 ),
, 8% (16 ).
, 7% (14 ),
, 6% (12 ), ,
, , 5,5%
(11 ).
, 8 (4%)
, 3 (1,5%) 1 (0,5%),
, , .
99

25,00%
- -
-
21,50%
-
18%
20,00%
16%
-
15,00%
12%
-
7%
10,00%
8%
6%
5,50%

4%
5,00%
-
-
0,00%
0,50%
1,50%
7:
,
. ,
76,35% (113 ), . (35 )
23,65% .

23,65%

76,35%
8:
100
, ,
,
.
45,95% (68 ),
.
22,97% (34 ),
13,51% (20 ), .
12,16% (18 ) 5,41% (8 ),

.
/

45,95%
50,00%
45,00%
40,00%
35,00%
22,97%
30,00%
25,00%
20,00%
13,51%
12,16%
5,41%
15,00%

10,00%
5,00%
0,00%
9:

. , 58,78% (87 )
41,22% (61 ) .
101
41,22%
58,78%
10:

, . , 11.1,
.
. ,
, , .
43,5% (87 ).
, , 26%
(52 ). ,
, 20,5% (41 ) , ,
, 10% (20 ). , ,
, .
20,50%

10%
26%
43,50%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
11.1:
,
.
102
, , 52% (104
). 104
, , ,
.

.
,
. , 24,50% (49 )
, , .
, 27 , 13,50%
.
, 5,50% (11 ),
, 4,50% (9 ).
52%
13,50%
4,50%
5,50%
24,50%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
11.2:

.
.
, ,
, .
103
,
, , ,
. , 91,5% (183 ) ,
8,50% (17 ), .
, 76,5% (153 ) ,
, 23,5% (47 ), .
,
58% (116 ) , 42% (84 ) .
58%
76,50%
23,50%
91,50%
0%
42%
20%
40%
8,50%
60%
80%
100%
12.1:

,
.
, ,
. , (100%)
. ,

,
. 83% (166 )
104
, , 17% (34 )
.
17%
83,00%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
12.2:

, . 48,65% (72 )
5 8 , 36 24,32%,
9 10 .
19,59% (29 ) 7,44% (11 )
5 10 .
48,65%
80
70
60
50
40
24,32%
19,59%
30
7,44%
20
10
0
< 5
5-8
9-10
> 10
13:
105
,
, . ,
53,5% (107 ) 3 4
. 25,5% (51 )
1 2 . , 16% (32 ) 5 ,
, 5% (10 )
.
16%
5%
25,50%
< 1
1-2
3-4
> 5
53,50%
14:

. 54% (108 )
, 46% (92 )
.
46%
54%
15:
106

, .
. :
36,12% (39 ) , 26,85% (29 )
24,07% (26 ) .
: 6,48% (7 ),
, 3,7% (4 ) 2,78% (3
) .
36,12%
40
35
26,85%
24,07%
30
25
20
15
6,48%
10
3,70%
2,78%
5
0
16:

, .

. ,
. 17.1
, 47,47% (75 ),
. 5,06% (8 )
.
107
0%
47,47%
47,47%
5,06%
17.1:

.
, 43,5% (87 )
, 30% (60 ),
.
, 14,5% (29 ),
, ,
. ,
.
12% (24 ) 24
.
108
12%
14,50%
30%
43,50%
17.2:
,
(..
, ).
. , ,
, , 34% (68 ) 33% (66
). ,
. 20,50% (41 )
12,5% (25 ).
12,50%
34%
33%
20,50%
17.3:
109
,
(, ) .

, 81% (162 ).
10% (20 ),
, 7,50% (15 ) ,
3 (1,5%) .
81%
1,50%
7,50%
10%
17.4:
17.5
(, ).

, , 42,56% (40 ),
28,72% (27 ).
25,53% (24 ), 3
, 3,19%.
110
28,72%
3,19%
25,53%
42,56%
17.5:
17.6,
.
, 54,22%
(45 ), , , 24,1%
(20 ), , 20,48% (17
).
, 1,2% (1 ).
20,48%
24,10%
54,22%
1,20%
17.6:
, ,
,
, 56,17% (61 ). ,
, 22,84% (37
111
) 14,2% (23 ),
. 6,79% (11 ),
, .
,
.
14,20%
22,84%

6,79%
56,17%
17.7:
.

, 58,33% (49 ).
28,57% (24 ) , 10,72% (9 ).
,
, 2,38% (2 ).
2,38%
28,57%
58,33%
10,72%
17.8:
112

, .
, 64,58% (62
). 26,04% (25 ),
8,34% (8 )
1,04% (1 ).
8,34%
26,04%
1,04%
64,58%
17.9:
, ,
: 68% (136 )
, 32% (64 ) .
32%
68%
18:
113
,
.
.
,
.
.
, 39,71% (83 ). 31
(14,83%) , ,
internet.
, , , 10,53% (22 ).
, 8,62% (18
) 8,13% (17 ),
.
, 5,74% (12 ), ,
4,78% (10 ). 2,87% (6
), , , 1,92% (4
).
40,00%
39,71%
/
35,00%
30,00%
TV - Internet
25,00%
14,83%
20,00%
15,00%
10,00%
10,53%
8,62%
5,74%
2,87%
1,92%
8,13%
4,78%
2,87%
5,00%
0,00%
19:

.
114
, .

.
,
.
63,4% (97 )
, , 36,4% (56 )
.
36,40%
63,40%

20:
, ,
.
35,50% (71 )
, 27% (54 )
.
: 18% (36 ) , 13% (26
)
6,5%(13 ),
.
115
35,50%
80
70
27%
60
50
18%
40
30
13%
6,50%
20
10
0
21:
.

, . :
, , ,
. ,
,
, .

. ,
33,11% (49 , 25,68% (38
) , 20,27% (30 ) ,
14,18% (21 ) , 6,67%, 10
,
.
116
14,18%
20,27%
33,11%
25,68%
6,76%
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
22.1:

.
27,7% (41 ) ,
. 21,62% (32 ),
14,87% (22 )
. , 8,11% (12
), ,
.
117
14,87%
21,62%
27,70%
27,70%
8,11%
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
22.2:
, ,
, .
35,14% (52 ),
24,32% (36 ) , 36
. , 17,57% (26 ),
.
12,83% (19 )
10,14% (15 ), ,
.
118
12,83%
17,57%
35,14%
24,32%
10,14%
10
20
30
40
50
60
22.3:
,
. ,
, 38,51% (57 ).
, ,
, 24,33% (36 ) 22.97% (34 )
,
, .
17 , 11,49%,
.
2,7% (4 )
.
119
11,49%
24,33%
38,51%
22,97%
2,70%
10
20
30
40
50
60
22.4:

.
, 33,11%
(49 ). 32,43% (48 ),
, 48 ,
.
18,25% (27 )
. 13,51% (20 ) 2,7% (4 ),
20 4
.
13,51%
32,43%
33,11%
18,25%
2,70%
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
22.5:
120
45
50
,
.
, 63% (126 ). ,
, 13,5% (27 ),
,
12% (24 ).
: 6% (12 ) , 5% (10 )
0,5% (1 ),
.
0,50%
5%
63%

6%
12%
13,50%
-
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
23 :

.
87 ,
43,50% .
, 27% (54 ) , ,
25,50% (51 ),
. 3,50% (7 ) 0,50% (1 )
, .
121
0,50%
3,50%
27%
/- /
/
43,50%
25,50%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
24:
,
.
: 57% (114
) ,
31,50% (63 ) 1 2
.
: 8,50% (17 ) 1 2
, 2% (4 ) 1% (2 )
, , , .
1%
2%
1-2
8,50%
31,50%
1-2

57%
0
20
40
60
80
100
25:
122
120
140
,

. ,
. , 40% (80 )
,
27% (54 ) , 16,50%
(33 ) , 12,50% (25 ) 4% (8 )
.
100
40%
80
27%
60
16,50%
12,50%
40
4%
20
0
26:
31,
. ,
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
.
100 ,
50% (100 ), , .
123

0%
50%
50%
27:
6.2

.
. ,
, ,
.
,
.
, : 13-17
(), 18-26 27-35 .

. ,
, 18 ,
27% (24 ), , 6,8% (6
). , 18 26
: 70,8% (63 ),
75% (66 ). , 27 35 , , ,
, , 18,2% (16 )
27-35 ,
2,2% (2 ) .

124
, , ,
.
75%
70,80%
13-17
80,00%
18-26
70,00%
27-35
60,00%
50,00%
27%
40,00%
18,20%
30,00%
20,00%
6,80%
2,20%
10,00%
0,00%
1:
,
, .
,
1 4
5 9 .

, .
,
,
. , 90% (90 )
1 4 ,
65% (65 ).
5 9 ,
35% (35 ), 10% (10
) .
125
1-4
5-9
90%
80%
90%
70%
60%
65%
50%
40%
35%
30%
20%
10%
10%
0%
2:
, ,
. ,
. , 23% (23 )
,
2%. 47 (47%) 16
(16%), 12% (12 )
9% (9 ) .
. , 31% (31 )
, 11% (11 )
. ,
, ..., 17% (17 ) 3% (3 )
. , .../...,
, 24% (24 )
.../.., 3% (3 )
. ,
.

,
, ,
.
, . ,

126
, ,
. ,
. ,
, ,
, .
...
.../...
/-/
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
3:

.
, , .
1 2 ,
(4 5 ).

, 82,1% (64 )
60,2% (53 ) 1 2
. , 12,8% (10 )
20,5% (18 ) . , 17
(19,3%) 4 (5,1%)
.
,
,
. ,
127
,

, ,
.
1-2
82,10%
90,00%
80,00%
60,20%
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
20,50% 19,30%
12,80%
5,10%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
4:
,
. ,
39,2% (29 ),
8,1% (6 ).
, ,
91,9% (68 ),
60,8% (45 ).
,
.
128
91,90%
8,10%
60,80%
0,00%
39,20%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%

60,00%
70,00%
80,00%
90,00% 100,00%
5:
,
. ,
,
. , 17,6%
(13 ) 6,8% (5 )
. 2,7% (2 )
, 8,1% (6 ).
,
43,2% (32 ) 48,6% (36 ) .
, ,
, ,
/ , ..
, .. , 17
(23%) 3 (4,1%).
129
50,00%
48,60%
43,20%
37,80%
45,00%
40,00%
35,00%
23%
30,00%
25,00%
17,60%
20,00%
15,00%
6,80%
8,10%
8,10%
4,10%
10,00%
2,70%
5,00%
0,00%
6:

.
, 75,7% (56 )
, 41,9% (31 ).
, 58,1% (43
), 24,3% (18 )
.
.... ,

....
75,70%
80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
58,10%
41,90%
50,00%
24,30%
40,00%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
7:
130
.
, ,
.

.
, 88% (88 ) 65% (65 )
,
12% (12 ) 35% (35 )
.
, ,
,
.
88%
90%
65%
80%
70%
60%
35%
50%
40%
12%
30%
20%
10%
0%
8:
16 . 42%
(42 ) 74% (74 )
.
, 26% (26 )
58% (58 ) .
131
74%
80%
58%
70%
60%
42%
50%
40%
26%
30%
20%
10%
0%
9:

.
6% (6
) 4% (4 ) . ,
, 19% (19 ) 32% (32
).
, : 48% (48 ) 59%
(59 ) . , ,
14% (14 ) 18% (18 ).
, ,
.
1-2
50%
3-4
32%
40%
> 5
30%
20%
59%
< 1
48%
60%
19%
14%
6%
4%
10%
0%
10:
132
18%

,
. 57% (57 )
, ,
35% (35 ). , ,
43% (43
), 65% (65 ). ,
, .
, ,
.
,
, ( 2).
65%
57%
70%
60%
43%
50%
35%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
11:
,
. ,
.
, ,
, .

35,2% (25
133
), 57,5% (50 ).

, .
, 64,8% (46 )
, 33,3% (29 )
.
,
9,2% (8 ).
.
, , ,
.
0%
33,30%
9,20%
57,50%
0%
0%
64,80%
35,20%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
12:
13 , .
, 18% (18 ),
6% (6 ). ,

, 41% (41 ),
19% (19 ).
56% (56 ),
31% (31 ). ,
, 22%
134
(22 ) 7% (7 ).
, ,
.
56%
60%
41%
50%
31%
40%
30%
18%
22%
19%
20%
6%
7%
10%
0%
13:

, 47% (47% ),
, 21% (21 ). ,

, 30% (30 ), 11% (11
). , 37% (37 )
29% (29 ).

, 30% (30 ), 5% (5 ).
135
47%
50%
45%
37%
40%
30%
35%
30%

29%
30%
21%
25%
20%
11%
15%
5%
10%
5%
0%
14:
15
.
, 58% (58 ) ,
78% (78 ). ,
42% (42 ) 22% (22 ).

, .
42%
58%
22%
78%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
15:
, ,

. ,
, , .
136
,
.

. ,
12,2% (9 ) ,
1,4% (1 ).
31,5% (26 ) 16,2% (12 ) .
29,7% (22 )
36,5% (27 ) . 10,8% (8
) 29,7% (22 )
12,2% (9 ) 16,2% (12
). ,
,
, .. .
35,10%
40,00%
29,70%
35,00%
29,70%
30,00%
25,00%
20,00%
36,50%
12,20%
16,20%
16,20%
10,80%12,20%
15,00%
10,00%
1,40%
5,00%
0,00%
16:
.
. , 12,2% (9
) 4,1% (3 ) ,
. , 40,4% (30
) 14,9% (11 )
, 28,4% (21 ) 26,9% (20 )
. 14,9% (11 )
137
28,4% (21 )
. 4,1% (3 ) 25,7%
(19 ) .
,
, ,,
.
40,40%
45,00%
40,00%
28,40%
35,00%
26,90%
30,00%
25,00%
20,00%
14,90%
12,20%
28,40%
25,70%
14,90%
15,00%
4,10%
10,00%
4,10%
5,00%
0,00%
17:
, 14,9% (11 )
5,4% (4 ) .
31,1% (23 ) 17,6% (13 )
. 37,8% (28 )
32,4% (24 )
. 9,5% (7 ) 25,7% (19 )
6,7% (5
) 18,9% (14 )
.
138
26.3

37,80%
40,00%
35,00%
25,70%
30,00%
25,00%
20,00%
32,40%
31,10%
17,60%
14,90%
18,90%
9,50%
15,00%
6,70%
10,00%
5,40%
5,00%
0,00%
18:

.
5,4% (4 )
,
. ,
25,7% (19 ) , 20,3% (15 )
.
, 43,2% (32 )
, 33,7% (25 ).
20,3% (15 ) 28,4% (21 ),
5,4% (4 ) 17,6% (13
) . , ,
,
, .
139
43,20%
45,00%
40,00%
35,00%
30,00%
33,70%
28,40%
25,70%
20,30%
25,00%
20,30%
17,60%
20,00%
15,00%
10,00%
5,40%
5,40%
0,00%
5,00%
0,00%
19:
, ,
, . ,
, 3
(4,1%) 1 (1,4%). ,
20 , 27% 7 , 9,5%.
31% (23 ) 35,1% (26 )
. 27% (20 )
37,8% (28 ) . , 10,8% (8 )
16,2% (12 ) ,
, , .
40,00%
35,00%
27,00%
35,10%
31,10%
37,80%
27,00%
30,00%
25,00%
16,20%
20,00%
10,80%
15,00%
10,00%
9,50%
4,10%
1,40%
5,00%
0,00%
20:
140
,

.
74% (74 ),
22% (22 ). , 12% (12 )
17% (17 ) . 8% (8 )
29% (29 ), . ,
, 24% (24 )
, 4% (4 ). , 2
(2%), 8 (8%).

, .
,
,
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
,
.
80%
74%
70%
60%
50%
29%
40%
30%
20%
22%
12%
8%
4%
17%

24%
8%
2%
10%
0%
21:
141
7.1
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
. x2.
,
.
,
(, , , ) (, 2002).
, , ,
. .

(, 1998). ,

.

. , ,
, , ,
.
, .

(, 1993).

. (r*c)
ij , i =1,2,r, j = 1,2,c
Eij
Eij = RniCj i, j=1,2

142
Ri: i (r*c),
Cg : j (r*c)
n: .
Eij < 5,
( )
(, 1998).
,
, x2 .
(0 ) (1),
:
0 :
,
1 :
, .
, x2
(..) , =0,05
=0,01 =0,10.
=0,05. , x2 pvalue :
9 p-value > =0,05 0 ,

9 p-value < =0,05 1 ,
,
5%.
7.2
, ,
, .
1, 2 3,
, , .
143
,
. , 1 2.

, .
,
. ,
, .
p-value 0,0000 () 2=21,754. ,
.
, 30 13-17 , 24
80%, 6
20%. , 129 ,
18-26 63 66 ,
48,8% 51,2%, . , 88,9% (16 ) 11,1% (2
) 27 35.

. , (80%)
, (20%).
, ,
,

. , , 18-26
, , 27-35 ,
, 88,9%,
11,1% .
,
.
144
80%
90%
88,90%
80%
48,80%
70%
51,20%
60%
50%
20%
40%
11,10%
30%
20%
10%
0%
13-17
18-26
27-35
1:

. ,
,
,
. , 1-4
5-9 .
, p-value 0,000 () 2=17,921.
, 155 , 90 1 4
(58,1%) 65 (41,9%). 45
5 9 , 35
, 77,8% 10 , 22,2%.

,
, ,
. ,
,
, ,
.
,
,
.
145

80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
77,80%
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
58,10%
41,90%
20,00%
22,20%
10,00%
0,00%
1-4
5-9
2:
,
.
, . 1-2
, 3 () 4-5 (). ,
p-value 0,005 2=10,804,
.
, 117 1-2 , 64 (54,7%)
53 (45,3%) . , 28 , 10
(35,7%) 18 (64,3%) . , 4-5
, 21, 17 4 ,
81% 19%, .

,
. ,
,
1-2 .
146
100,00%
80,00%
60,00%
40,00%
20,00%
45,30%
54,70%
64,30%
35,70%
81%
19%
0,00%
1-2
4-5
3:
, ,
. ,
,
, .
p-value 0,001 2=13,592,
.
26
, 15 (57,7%)
11 (42,3%) . 102 ,
, 60 (58,8%) ,
, , 41,2% (42 )
. ,
20
, 17 , 3
, 85% 15%.
,

, .
( 6
), 15 13
2 . , ,
147

, ,
.
,
. ,
,
, . ,
.
90,00%
80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
20,00%
85%
58,80%
57,70%
42,30%
41,20%
15%
10,00%
0,00%
4:
,
.
, . p-value 0,000
() 2=17,430. , .
, 87 56
31 , 64,4% 35,6%, .
61 ,
43 (70,5%) 18 (29,5%).

( 7).
,
, .
148
29,50%
70,50%
64,40%
35,60%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
80,00%
5:
,
.
p-value
0,022 2=5,207,
.
,
, , .
. 200
, 17 ,
183 . 96
(52,5%) 87 (47,5%) .
, ,
76,5% (13 ),
23,5% (4 ).

, .
,
,
.
,
,
.
149

80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
76,50%
40,00%
52,50%
30,00%
20,00%
47,50%
23,50%
10,00%
0,00%
6:
,
. p-value
0,000 2=14,713. , .
, ,
57,5%
(88 ) 42,5% (65 ).
, 74,5% (35 ) 25,5% (12 ),
, .

.
.
150
80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
74,50%
42,50%
25,50%
57,50%
0,00%
7:
. p-value
(0,0000) 2=21,018. , .
,
.

116, 74 (63,8%) . 42 (36,2%)
. 85
, 69% (58 ) ,
31% (26 ) .
,
,
.

,
.
,
.
151

70%
69%
60%
63,80%
50%
40%
36,20%
31%
30%
20%
10%
0%
8:

, .
, .
200 34 (17%),
, .

,
.
,
.
, ,
. , ,
9. ,
0,021 p value 2=5,307.
, 139
3-5 /, 77 (55,4%)
62 (44,6%) . 61
1-2 / 23 (37,7%) 38
(62,3%) .
9

152
3-5 . , ,
1 2
, .
,
2 . ,
1-2 ,
,
. ,
,
.
44,60%
3-5
55,40%
62,30%
1-2
0,00%
37,70%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
9:
,
.
, p-value 0,002 2=9,742. ,
.
200 , 108
, 92
. ,
60,2% (57 ) 39,8% (43 ) .

38% (35 ) 62% (57 ).
153

, . ,
.

, , , , ,
.
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
60,20%
30,00%
62%
39,80%
38%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
10:

,
( 5
) ,
, . ,

, .
,
, ,
.

, ,

. ,
- .
154

.
, p-value 0,000 2=29,009.
,
.

. ,
, ,
75% (18 ), 25% (6 ).

. , 41 (68,3%)
19 (31,7%)
.
35,6% (31 )
64,4% (56 ) .
29 , 22 (75,9%) ,
7 (24,1%) .

.
,
, ,
. ,

,

. ,
, .

.
, ,
, ,
, .
155

,
.
75%
80%
68,30%
70%
75,90%
64,40%
60%
50%
40%
31,70%
35,60%
25%
24,10%
30%
20%
10%
0%
11:
, ,
,
(,
). p-value 0,000 2=28,716.
, .
68
, 47 , 69,1%, 21
, 30,9%.
30 (73,2%)
11 (26,8%) .
66 , 29 (43,9%)
37 (56,1%) . , , ,
80% (20 ) 20% (5
) .
,
,
, .
156
,
,
.

, .
,
,
.

,
.
, ,
, , .
69,10%
80,00%
73,20%
80%
70,00%
56,10%
60,00%
43,90%
50,00%
40,00%
30,90%
26,80%
20%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
12:
. p
value 0,002 2=9,191,
.
157
126
64 . 57,4% (78
) 42,6% (58 ) ,
, .
65,6% (42 ) 34,4% (22 ).

.
,
.
. ,

. ,
,
.
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
42,60%
65,60%
57,40%
34,40%
0,00%
13:
,

. , p-value 0,0289
2=20,039, , .

.
, ..
158
86,4% (19 ) 13,6% (3 )
. 115
.

, .
,
, .
100,00%
80,00%
86,40%
60,00%
40,00%
65,20%
34,80%
13,60%
20,00%
0,00%
14:

,
.
, , ,
, .

, pvalue 0,001 2=19,030.

. 9 (90%) 1
(10%) . 68,4% (26
) 31,6% (12 ). 27
(55,1%) 22 (44,9%) , 22 (73,3%)
8 (26,7%) . ,
159
21 , 57,1% (12 )
42,9% (9 ) .
90%
90%
68,40%
80%
60%
57,10%
44,90%
50%
42,90%
31,60%
26,70%
40%
20%
55,10%
70%
30%
73,30%
10%
10%
0%
15:

, pvalue 0,000 2=26,591.

86,4% (19 )
13,6% (9 ) . , 11
(34,4%) 21 (65,6%) .
41 , 51,2% (21 )
48,8% (20 ) .
160
90%
75%
73,20%
80%
86,40%
65,60%
70%
48,80% 51,20%
60%
50%
40%
34,40%
25%
26,80%
30%
13,60%
20%
10%
0%
16:
,

. pvalue 0,003 2=16,154.
15
, 4 (26,7%) 11
(73,3%). 13 (36,1%) 23 (63,9%)
. , 42,2% (24 )
, 53,8% (28 ) .
26 , 73,1% (19
) 26,9% (7 ) . ,

, 14 (73,7%) , 5 (26,3%) .
161
80,00%
73,30%
63,90%
70,00%
73,10%
73,70%
53,80%
60,00%
46,20%
50,00%
40,00%
36,10%
26,70%
26,90%
26,30%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%

17:
,

.
. ,
, . ,
,
, .
pvalue 0,040 2=8,309,
.

13 (76,5%) 4 (23,5%) , 36
41,7% (15 ) 58,3% (21 ).
,
56,1% (32 ) 43,9% (25 ).
, 38 ,
23 (60,5%) 15 (39,5%) .
162
80,00%
60,50%
70,00%
56,10%
60,00%
58,30%
43,90%
39,50%
50,00%
76,50%
41,70%
40,00%
23,50%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
18:

, ,
. pvalue 0,023
2=9,575
19 23
(74,2%) 8 (25,8%). 26 (53,1%)
23 (46,9%) . , 48
, 28 (58,3%) , 20 (41,7%).
, 20 ,
60% (12 ) 40% (8 ) .
74,20%
80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
46,90%
41,70%
50,00%
40,00%
60%
58,30%
53,10%
40%
25,80%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
19:
163
,
. ,
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,
, ( 4 ).
,
. p-value
0,000 2=58,833.
.
, 80% (8 )
,
, , 20% (2 )
. , ,
28 , 24 (85,7%) 4 (14,8%)
. , 37
, 29 (78,4%) 8 (21,6%) .
29 , 17 (58,6%)
12 (41,4%%) . ,
96 , 77,1% (74
) , 22,9% (22 )
.

,
. ,

.
,
.
164
77,10%
90,00%
80,00%
58,60%
85,70%
78,40%
80%
70,00%
41,40%
60,00%
50,00%
22,90%
21,60%
40,00%
30,00%
20%
14,30%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
20:
165
8 -
8.1

. ,
,
, .
.

, , ,
. ,
- . , , 1776
, . ,
,
.
19 ,
, .
. ,
.
,
, ,
.
, . ,
.
,

, .
,
, .
. ,

.
166
,

, , , ,
.
, ,
, . 19 ,
, , .
, ,
. 1916
, ,
.
, , , ,
.
,
,
. ,
60.
,
, . , ,
,
, . ,

.
,
.
, ,
. ,
,
. ..., 20 ,

. , . ,

167
. ,
( ). ,
,
.
, ,
,
,
. ,
.
.
, ...
.
, .
,
, .
..
, ,
, . ,
, , .
, ,
() .

, . ,
.

. ,
.
, .
.
,
, ,
. ..,
,
168
. , , ,
,
,
. ,
,
, ..,
. ,

.
,
. ,
,
,
,
,
,
. ,

,
.
, . ,
,
, ,
. ,

, .
.
60
.
. ,
...,
. , , 50%

169
. ,

.

,
. ,
.
.

,

.
,
. ,
,
. ,

,

.

, .
,
.
.
2001 .

.

.
1 4
170
90% 65%,
(35%).

( )

10.000 (25,5%) (57%)
10.000.
76,5%,
, (69,5%).

, ,
.
27%
18 . , ,
,
(47%). ,
(31%), (24%).

.
. ,
, 8,1%
, ,
39,2%. , ,
(2,7%),
(23%),
4,1%.

( ),
,
171
,
.

. , ,
(58,1%),
.

.
, 12%
, (88%).
74%
, .

.
(56%),

- (41%). ,
,
(47%),
(37%). ,
,
(30%). ,

, (42%).

. ,
,
.
,

, .

,
172
,
,
, .
,
.

,
,
.

, ,
.
.

.
,

,
. ,
, , .
,
.
,
.
, ,
,
,
.
173
8.2

. ,
.
,
, , ,
, , ,
.

, ,
.
,
.

,
, .
, ,
, .

,
, .
, ,
, .
, ,
, , ,
,
. ,
, .

174
.

.

(EUMC),
.. EUMC,
-
,
,
-.
,
.
. ,
,
.
, ,
,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
, ,

. ,
175

, ,
. ,
,

.
,
,

,
.

-, ,
, . ,
,
, -
. ,
.
,
,
- , ,

. ,

.
,

, ,

.
.

176

.
,
, .
,
.

.
,

.
, , ,
,
. ,
,
.
, , ,
,
,
, .
.

, .
, ,
.
,
,
,
, .
,
.
,

177

, .
,
,
, .
,
,
,
. , ,
,

.

, ,
,
.

. , ,
,

, .
, ,
.
178

9
1. EUMC, (2005), : ,
,
2. ., (1998), , ,
3. ., ( 2000), , . ,
4. . .., (2001),
:1980-2000, ,
5. , (2006), , . ,
6. , (2002), ,
7. ., (1999), , . ,
8. - ., (1978), , . ,
9. ., (1993),
(1941-1944), , 6, .181-195
10. ., (1981), , . ,
11. ., (1996), ,
, -,
12. , (1996),
,
,
13. ., (1978), :
, . ,
14. , . (1975). ,
15. ., (1995), , ,
16. - ., (1988), " :
, , "
",
17. . ., (1993), :
, . ,
179
18. - ., (1998),
, ,
19. ., (1986), , .
,
20. ., (1994), , . ,
21. ., (1993), , . ,
22. ., (2007), , . ,
23. , (2007), ,
24. , (2008), ,
25. ., (1997), , , .
,
26. , (2007), ,
,
27. , (1998), & :
,
28. , (2000), & :
,
29. , (2001), ,
, EUMC
30. , (1998),
, . -,
31. ., (1959), , , ,
32. ., (1994), , ,
33. ., (1996), -, -, . ,
34. ., (1976), , .
,
35. , , (1981), , ,
180
36. ., (1985),
, ,
37. . .., (1999),

: , , 40, . 91101
38. ., (1992) :
, ,
39. - ., (1989), : ,
, 40, . 91-101
40. ., (1990), , , . ,
41. ., (1996), :
, . ,
42. ., (1996), , . ,
43. ., (1984), , , 27, .4-6
44. ., (2007), : ,
, . ,
45. ., (1994), ., .
,
46. ., (1989), :
. . . , (.), , ,
. :
47. ., (1998), .
, ,
,
48. ., (1998). , .
,
49. E., (2002), : , . ,
50. ., (2002), :
, Gutenberg,
51. ., (2003),
, /: , 91
181
52. ., (2001), ,
....,
53. ., (2001), :
, - (),
54. - ., (1985),
, ,
55. ., (1989), :
, , 40, .25-30
56. ., (2002), 2002, , 90,
.32-43
57. ., (1998), ,
58. - ., (2000),
: ;
, : , .482-498
59. ., (1995),
(1979-81), , 8, .30-72
60. ., (1985), ,
. Gutenberg,
61. ., (2005), : , Gutenberg,
62. . & ., (2001) , . .
,
63. ., (1982), ,
, 39, .33-36
64. - ., (2000),
, : ., .227-240
65. ., (1991), , & , . ,
66. , . (1981). ,
67. , (1970), : , ,
, 4,
68. ., (1998),
, , 66, .112-118
69. - ., (1985), , . ,
182
70. - ., (1992), :
, Gutenberg,
71. - ., (1996), ,
, . , ., ,
, , . ,
72. ., (2006), : , ,
73. ., (1989), :
, , 40, .39-45
74. ., (1989),
, , 74, .105-140
75. ., (1995), ,

, : Praxis
76. ., (1995), . .
, , 57, . 28-31
77. ., (2002), 21 , .
,
78. ., (2005), , . ,
79. ., (1996), , . ,
80. ., (1980), :
,
81. ., (1998), , , Gutenberg,
82. ., (1978), , .
,
83. ., (1977), , . ,
84. - ., (1989), ,
, 2, . 44-49
85. ., (1995), , , :
19 , ,
183
9
1. Academy of Athens, (1995), The development of thrace, Research Center of Greek Society,
Athens
2. Adam A. and Moutos Th., (2006), Minimum wages, inequality and unemployment,
Economic Letters, Vol.92(2), pp.137-151
3. Afshar et al., (2005), Feminisms, Islamophobia and Identities, Political Studies, Vol.53(7),
pp.262-283
4. Anderson J. et al., (2005), Losers Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy, Oxford
University Press, Oxford
5. Arrichi A. and Maume J., (2000), Workplace subordination and mens avoidance of
housework, Journal of Family Issues, Vol.21, pp.464-487
6. Arrichi A. and Maume J., (2005), Workplace subordination and mens avoidance of
housework, Journal of Family Issues, Vol.21(8), pp.464-487
7. Ask K., & Thomsland M., (1998), Women and Islamisation: Contemporary dimensions of
discourse in gender relations, Berg Press, Oxford
8. Banks J., (2002), An introduction to multicultural education, Allyn and Bacon Press,
Boston
9. Barlow S., (2006), Womens rights in the Muslim world: reform or reconstruction?, Third
World Quarterly, Vol.27(8), pp.1481-1494
10. Bell R., (1953), Introduction to the Quran, London
11. Blossfeld P., and Hakim C., (1997), Between Equalization and Marginalization: Women
working part time in Europe and the United States of America, Oxford University Press,
Oxford
12. Bodman H. & Herbert L., (1998), Women in Muslim societies: Diversity within unity,
Lynne Rienner Press, London
13. Boyle-Baise M., (2002), Multicultural service learning, Teachers College Press, New York
14. Brown K., (2006), Realizing Muslim womens rights: The role of Islamic identity among
British Muslim women, womens studies international forum, Vol.29(2006), pp.417-430
15. Burns N. et al., (2001) The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political
Participation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
16. Caroline A. and Milroy-Moore B., (1991), Life spaces: Gender, household, employment,
UBC Press, Canada
184
17. Castles S. & Miller M., (2003), The Age of Migration: International Population Movements
in the Modern World, Macmillan, New York
18. Caul M., (2001), Political parties and the adoption of candidate gender quotas: a crossnational analysis, Journal of Politics, Vol. 63(1223), pp.1214-1229
19. Childs S. and Withey J., (2004), Women representatives acting for women: sex and the
signing of early day motions in the 1997 British parliament, Political Studies, Vol. 52(122),
pp.552-564
20. Choudhury T., (2007), European Islam: Muslims and Discrimination, CEPS/OSI, Brussels
21. Christy C., (1987), Sex Difference in Political Participation: Process of Change in Fourteen
Nations, Praeger, New York
22. Ciscel D. and Sharp D., (1995), Household Labor in Hours by Family Type, Journal of
Forensic Economies, Vol.8(2), pp.115-123
23. Coltrane S., (2000), Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social
embeddedness of routine family work, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol.62(2034),
pp.1208-1233
24. Cullen-DuPont K., (1996), The Encyclopedia of Womens History in America, New York
25. Davidson M. and Cooper C., (1984), Working women in the European Community: The
Future prospect, Long Range Planning, Vol.16(4), pp.49-54
26. Davis P., (2000), Labour and the Family: New directions for Cooperative Associations of
Labour, Leicester University, Athens
27. De Long-Bas N., (2008), Women, Islam, and the Twenty-first Century, Oxford Islamic
Studies Online
28. Delli C. and Keeter S., (1996), What Americans Know about Politics and why it Matters,
Yale University Press, New Haven
29. Dolado J. et al., (2001), Female employment and occupational changes in the 1990s: How
is the EU performing relative to the US?, European Economic Review, Vol.45(4-6), pp.875889
30. Donan K., (2006), Symbolic mobilization?: the impact of candidate sex in American
elections, American Politics Research, Vol.34, pp.687-704
31. Durantou G. et al., (2007), Family Types and the Persistence of Regional Disparities in
Europe, European Economic Research Papers, Vol.10(34), pp.67-81
32. Eickelman D. & Piscatori J., (1996), Muslim Politics, Princeton University Press,
Princeton
185
33. Esposito J., (1995), The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, Oxford
University Press, New York
34. European Commission, (2001), Women and Science: Making change happen, Brussels
35. European Commission, (2002), Employment in Europe 2002: Recent Trends and
Prospects, Luxemburg
36. European Commission, (2006a), Employment in Europe 2006, Luxemburg
37. European commission, (2006b), Perceptions of Discrimination and Islamophobia: voices
from members of Muslim communities in the European Union, EUMC
38. European Commission, (2006c), Muslims in the European Union: Discrimination and
islamophobia, EUMC
39. European Commission, (2006d), Equality between women and men: women and men in
decision making, Luxemburg
40. European Commission, (2006e), Women and men in decision making: analysis of the
situation and trends, Luxemburg
41. European Commission, (2007), Women and decision-making, Luxemburg
42. European Womens Lobby, (2007), Equal Rights, Equal Voices: Migrant Women in the
European Union, Brussels
43. Eurostat, (2007), A statistical illustration of the situation of women and men in the EU27,
Eurostat Press Office, Luxemburg
44. Fennema M. and Tillie J., (1999), Political participation and political trust in Amsterdam:
civic communities and ethnic networks, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol.
24(9), pp.703-726
45. Gotzfried A., (2004), Women, science and technology: Measuring recent progress towards
gender equality, Science and Technology, Vol.9(94), pp.34-45
46. Green M., (2008), Conversing with the minority: relations among Christian, Jewish, and
Muslim women in the high middle ages, Journal of medieval history, Vol.34(2008), pp.105118
47. Gudrun B., (2007), The Employment of Women in the European Union, WIFO Working
papers, No.297
48. Hakim C., (1999), Models of the family, womens role and social policy: A new
perspective from Preference Theory, in Boje T., and Allemendinger J., (eds) European
Societies, Vol.1(1), European Sociological Association, Routledge Publications
186
49. Hashmi N., (2003), Gender and discrimination: Muslim women in living in Europe,
europa-forum, Wien
50. Inglehart R. and Norris P., (2003), Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change around
the world, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
51. International Centre for Migration Policy Development, (2003), Migrants, minorities and
employment: exclusion, discrimination and anti-discrimination in 15 member states of the
European Union, EUMC
52. Ismail S., (2004), Being Muslim: Islam, Islamism and identity politics, Government and
Opposition, Vol. 39(4), pp.614631
53. Jennings K. and Niemi R., (1981), Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young
Adults and Their Parents, Princeton University Press, Princeton
54. Jungho K., (2005), Essays on womens education and pace of childbearing in developing
countries, Working papers, Vol.16(4), pp. 127-143
55. Kamo,Y, (1994), Division of household work in the United States and Japan, Journal of
Family Issues, Vol. 15, pp.348-378
56. Kanellopoulos C. and Mavromaras K., (1999), Male-female labor market participation and
wage differentials in Greece, Centre of Planning and Economic Research
57. Karp J. And Banducci S., (2007), Political mobilization and political participation in new
and old democracies, Party Politics, Vol. 13, pp.217-234
58. Karp J. and Banducci S., (2008), When politics is not just a mans game: Womens
representation and political engagement, Electoral Studies, Vol. 27(2008), pp.105-115
59. Kassotakis M. and Roussakis Y., (1999), Some aspects of minority education in Greece,
Education of Ethnic Minorities: Unity and Diversirty, A.-V. Rigas (eds), Ellinika Grammata,
Athens
60. Kaufman, G, (2000), Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution
among traditional and egalitarian men and women, Journal of Family Issues, Vol.21,
pp.128-144
61. Kazutoshi K., (1992), Employment Security and Labor Market Flexibility: An International
Perspective, Wayne State University Press, Detroit
62. Koch J., (1997), Candidate gender and womens psychological engagement in politics,
American Politics Research, Vol. 25, pp.118-133
63. Kuriazis N., (1995), Feminism and the status of women in Greece in Constas D. - Stavrou
Th., Greece prepares for the 21st Century, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
187
64. Liegl et al., (2004), Combating, religious and ethnic discrimination in Employment: From
the EU and international perspective, European network against racism press, London
65. Magos K., (2007), The contribution of action-research to training teachers in intercultural
education: A research in the field of Greek minority education, Teaching and teacher
education, vol.23(2007), pp.1102-1112
66. Makiko F. and Cohen P., (2007), Housework and Social Policy: Social Science Policy,
Social Science Research, Vol.36(2), pp.512-530
67. Mavrommatis G. & Tsitselikis K., (2003), The Turkish in Greece, Mercator Education,
2003
68. Modood T., (2006), Ethnicity, Muslims and higher education entry in Britain, Teaching in
Higher Education, Vol. 11(2), pp.247-250
69. Moghadam V, (1994), Gender and nationality: Women and politics in Muslim society, Zed
Books, London
70. Nielsen J., (2004), Muslims in Western Europe, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
71. Norris P., (2004), Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior, Cambridge
University Press, New York
72. OECD, (2007), The OECD Employment Outlook, Paris: Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development, U.S.: Department of Labor
73. Ouston J., (1993), Women in Education Management, Longman, Essex
74. Papageorgiou Y., (1985), Political involvement of Greek women: a statistical analysis of
socio-demographic, ecological, attitudinal relationships, , The
Florida State University- College of Social Sciences
75. Peach C., (2006), Muslims in the 2001 Census of England and Wales: Gender and
economic disadvantage, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol.29(4), pp.629-655
76. Petrakou E. & Dimitrakopoulos I., (2003), Migrants, minorities and education in Greece,
exclusion, discrimination and anti-discrimination in 15 member states of the European
Union, EUMC
77. Raaum N., (2004), Interpreting gender in Islam: A case study of immigrant Muslim women
in Oslo, Norway, Gender and Society, vol.18(4), pp.473-493
78. Roded R., (1999), Women in Islam and the Middle East, I.B.Tauris, London
79. Rodriguez-Prieto J. and Gutierrez-Rodriguez C., (2003), Participation of married women in
the European labor markets and the added worker effect, Journal of Socio-Economics,
Vol.12(1), pp.429-446
188
80. Rohrlich B., (2002), Contrasting roles: Eastern and Western European women,
International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol.3(4), pp.487-496
81. Rosen L., (2004), The Culture of Islam: Chicago and London, The University of Chicago
Press
82. Roy O., (2004), Globalised Islam, Hurst, London
83. Shannon D. et al., (2007), Effects of Union Type on Division of Household Labor: Do men
really perform more Housework?, Journal of Family Issues, Vol.28(9), pp.1246-1272
84. Silvestrl S., (2000), Europes Muslim women: potential, aspirations and challenges,
Cambridge university press, London
85. Spitze G. and Loscocco K., (1999), Womens position in the household, The Quarterly
Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.39(5), pp.647-661
86. Tate K., (1991), Black political participation in the 1984 and 1988 presidential elections,
American Political Science Review, Vol.85, pp.1159-1176
87. Tsaoussis A. and Zervogianni E., (2008), Multiculturalism and Family Law: The case of
Greek Muslim, Ellinika grammata, Athens
88. U.S. Department of Education, (2005), Digest of Education Statistics 2004, Washington
89. Ulbig S.G., (2005), Political Realities and Political Trust: Descriptive Representation in
Municipal Government, Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association
90. United Nations, (2000), Women and decision making, Department of economic and social
affairs, New York
91. Verba S. et al., (1997), Knowing and caring about politics: gender and political
engagement, Journal of Politics, Vol. 59, pp.1051-1072
92. Waines D., (2003), An Introduction to Islam, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
93. Walby S., (1999), The European Union and equal opportunities policies, Routledge
94. Welch S., (1977), Women as political animals? A test of some explanations for malefemale political participation differences, American Journal of Political Science, Vol.2(89),
pp.711-730
95. Wilson A., (2006), Dreams, Questions, Struggles: Asian Women in Britain, Pluto Press,
London
189

1.
, ,
. ( 9)
1. :
1) 18-25
2) 26-45
3) 46-60
4) >61
2. :
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
3. , ;
_________
4. (
) _________
5. ;
1) (<10.000)
2) (11.000 30.000)
3) (>30.000)
6. :
1)
2)
3)
4)
5) ...
6) .../...
190
7) /
7. ; _________
8.
1
2
3
9. (: , : )
1
2
3
4
10.
1
2
3
1)
2)
3)
4)
5) ...
6) .../...
7) /

11. ___________________________
12.
1)
2)
13.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
14. , :
1) ( )
2) ( )
191
15.
1)
2)
16. ; (
)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
17. / ;
1) < 5
2) 5 8
3) 9 10
4) > 10
18. / ;
1) < 1
2) 1 2
3) 3 4
4) > 5
19. ;
1)
2)
20. , ; (
)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
21. .
192
1)
2)
3) (,
)
4) (,
)
5) (,
)
6)
7)
8)

9)
22. ;
1)
2)
23. , ;
______________________________________________________________________________
24. , , ;
1)
2)
25. ;
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
26. , :

1)
2)
193
3)
4)
5)
27. ; ( )
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6) (............................................................................)
28. ;
1)
2)
3) /
4)
5)
29. ( ) /
;
1)
2) 1-2
3) 1-2
4)
5)
30. ;
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
31. :
1) /
2)
3) ( )
194
2.
1:

Count
13-17
24
18-26
63
27-35
2
80,0%
48,8%
11,1%
50,3%
% within tria
Count
% within tria
66
16
88
20,0%
51,2%
88,9%
49,7%
Count
% within tria
89
30
129
18
177
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
21,754(a)
24,024
2
2
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
,000
,000
df
21,488
177
a 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,95.
2:

Count
% within tessera
5-9
35
41,9%
77,8%
50,0%
90
10
100
58,1%
22,2%
50,0%
155
45
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Count
% within tessera
1-4
65
Count
% within tessera
100
Value
df
195
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
17,921(b)
,000
16,516
,000
18,760
,000
Fisher's Exact Test
,000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
17,832
N of Valid Cases
200
,000
,000
a Computed only for a 2x2 table

b 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22,50.
3:

Count
1-2
53
3
18
4-5
17
45,3%
64,3%
81,0%
53,0%
64
10
78
54,7%
35,7%
19,0%
47,0%
117
28
21
166
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within efta
Count
% within efta
Count
% within efta
88
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
10,804(a)
11,413
2
2
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,005
,003
,001
df
10,728
166
4:

Count
/
15
42
17
57,7%
41,2%
85,0%
50,0%
% within
196
74
dekatria
Count
11
60
74
42,3%
58,8%
15,0%
50,0%
26
102
20
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within
dekatria
Count
% within
dekatria
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
13,592(a)
14,629
2
2
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,001
,001
,141
df
2,171
148
5:

Count
% within VAR00026
31
43
35,6%
70,5%
50,0%
56
18
74
64,4%
29,5%
50,0%
Count
% within VAR00026
Count
% within VAR00026
74
87
61
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
16,063
,000
17,840
,000
Value
17,430(b)
df
Fisher's Exact Test
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
17,312
N of Valid Cases
148
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,000
,000

197
6:

96
4
23,5%
52,5%
50,0%
13
87
100
76,5%
47,5%
50,0%
17
183
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Count
% within VAR00029
Count
% within VAR00029
Count
% within VAR00029
100
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,022
4,114
,043
5,460
,019
Value
5,207(b)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Fisher's Exact Test
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,040
Linear-by-Linear
Association
5,181
N of Valid Cases
200
,020
,023

7:

Count
% within VAR00030
65
100
74,5%
42,5%
50,0%
12
88
100
25,5%
57,5%
50,0%
Count
% within VAR00030
Count
% within VAR00030
35
47
153
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Value
14,713(b)
df
1
198
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
13,461
,000
15,225
,000
Fisher's Exact Test
,000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
14,639
,000
,000
N of Valid Cases
200
8:

Count
26
74
100
31,0%
63,8%
50,0%
58
42
100
69,0%
36,2%
50,0%
84
116
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
% within VAR00031
Count
% within VAR00031
Count
% within VAR00031
Pearson Chi-Square
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
19,725
,000
21,447
,000
Value
21,018(b)
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear
Association
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,000
20,913
,000
,000
N of Valid Cases
200
9:

Count
% within dekaoxto
Count
199
1-2
23
3-5
77
37,7%
55,4%
50,0%
38
62
100
100
% within dekaoxto
62,3%
Count
% within dekaoxto
44,6%
50,0%
61
139
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,021
4,623
,032
5,348
,021
Value
5,307(b)
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Fisher's Exact Test
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,031
Linear-by-Linear
Association
5,281
,016
,022
N of Valid Cases
200
10:

Count
% within VAR00036
35
100
60,2%
38,0%
50,0%
43
57
100
39,8%
62,0%
50,0%
108
92
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Count
% within VAR00036
Count
% within VAR00036
65
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,002
8,877
,003
9,825
,002
Value
9,742(b)
df
Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear
Association
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
,003
9,694
N of Valid Cases
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,001
,002
200
200
11:

Count
% within
VAR00039
Count
% within
VAR00039
Count
% within
VAR00039
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

6
41
31
22
100
25,0%
68,3%
35,6%
75,9%
50,0%
18
19
56
100
75,0%
31,7%
64,4%
24,1%
50,0%
24
60
87
29
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Value
29,009(a)
29,971
3
3
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
,000
,172
df
1,870
200
12:

Count
% within
VAR00040
Count
% within
VAR00040
Count
% within
VAR00040
21

30
29
Likelihood Ratio
100
30,9%
73,2%
43,9%
80,0%
50,0%
47
11
37
100
69,1%
26,8%
56,1%
20,0%
50,0%
68
41
66
25
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
20
Value
28,716(a)
29,959
201
df
3
3
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
,000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
10,304
,001
200
13:

Count
% within VAR00047
58
42
100
42,6%
65,6%
50,0%
78
22
100
57,4%
34,4%
50,0%
Count
% within VAR00047
Count
% within VAR00047
136
64
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,002
8,295
,004
9,308
,002
Value
9,191(b)
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear
Association
,004
9,145
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,002
,002
N of Valid Cases
200
14:

40
19
Count
% within VAR00053
34,8%
86,4%
43,1%
75
78
65,2%
13,6%
56,9%
Count
% within VAR00053
202
59
Count
% within VAR00053
115
22
137
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
17,990
,000
21,152
,000
Value
20,039(b)
Continuity
Correction(a)
Likelihood Ratio
df
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Fisher's Exact Test
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
,000
Linear-by-Linear
Association
19,893
N of Valid Cases
137
,000
,000

15:

Count
% within
VAR00060
Count
% within
VAR00060
Count
% within
VAR00060
27
22
12
12
10,0%
31,6%
55,1%
73,3%
57,1%
50,0%
26
22
74
90,0%
68,4%
44,9%
26,7%
42,9%
50,0%
10
38
49
30
21
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
19,030(a)
20,378
13,023
4
4
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,001
,000
,000
df
148
203
74
16:
Count
% within
VAR00061
Count
% within
VAR00061
Count
% within
VAR00061
21
19
48,8%
65,6%
86,4%
50,0%
30
21
11
74
75,0%
73,2%
51,2%
34,4%
13,6%
50,0%
12
41
41
32
22
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
11
20
25,0%
26,8%
74
Value
26,591(a)
28,466
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
4
4
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
,000
,000
df
25,425
148
17:
Count
% within VAR00062
13
24
19
14
26,7%
36,1%
46,2%
73,1%
73,7%
50,0%
11
23
28
74
73,3%
63,9%
53,8%
26,9%
26,3%
50,0%
15
36
52
26
19
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,003
Count
% within VAR00062
Count
% within VAR00062
Pearson Chi-Square
Value
16,154(a)
204
74
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
16,713
,002
14,630
,000
148
18:

Count
% within
exintatria
Count
% within
exintatria
Count
% within
exintatria
15
25
39,5%
21
13
43,9%
58,3%
76,5%
50,0%
23
32
15
74
60,5%
56,1%
41,7%
23,5%
50,0%
38
57
36
17
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
74
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
8,309(a)
8,580
3
3
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,040
,035
,006
df
7,529
148
19:
26
28
12
Count
% within exintatessera
25,8%
53,1%
58,3%
60,0%
50,0%
23
23
20
74
Count
205
74
74,2%
Count
46,9%
41,7%
40,0%
50,0%
31
49
48
20
148
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
9,575(a)
9,901
3
3
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,023
,019
,008
df
6,965
148
20:
Count
% within
VAR00068
Count
% within
VAR00068
Count
% within
VAR00068
29
24
22
17
22,9%
58,6%
78,4%
85,7%
80,0%
50,0%
74
12
100
77,1%
41,4%
21,6%
14,3%
20,0%
50,0%
96
29
37
28
10
200
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
100,0%
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
58,833(a)
62,967
51,531
4
4
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
,000
,000
,000
df
200
206
100

Paraskeuaidou

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Paraskeuaidou

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

:

: Women in Congress (1964-2004)

97,67% (293 ) 2,33% (7 ) (, 2000).

56,4 56,8 57,6 57,2 56,7 56,7

56,5 56,8 57,4 58,1 58,8

58,9% 2006 (56,7% 2004).

Pew Research Center

(.../...) 16,78% (23 ),

15,00% 20,00% 25,00%

40,00% 45,00% 50,00%

Eij = RniCj i, j=1,2

86,4% (19 ) 13,6% (3 )

37. . .., (1999),

Fisher's Exact Test

a Computed only for a 2x2 table

Fisher's Exact Test

a Computed only for a 2x2 table

Fisher's Exact Test

a Computed only for a 2x2 table

Fisher's Exact Test

Fisher's Exact Test

Fisher's Exact Test

Fisher's Exact Test

Fisher's Exact Test

Fisher's Exact Test

a Computed only for a 2x2 table

You might also like