A Manual for the Use of the
Motivated Strategies for
Learning Questionnaire
(MSLQ)
Paul R. Pintrich,
David A. F. Smith,
Teresa Garcia, and
Wilbert J. McKeachie
Grant Number O€RI-86-0010
Joon S. Stare, Director
Wilbert J. McKeachie. Associate: director
Suite 2400 Schoo! of Education
The University of Michigan
‘Ann Aibor, Michigan 48109-1259
31396-2741
“7DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 338 122 HE 024 935,
AUTHOR Pintrich, Paul R.; And Others
TITLE A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for
Learning Questionnaire (HSLO).
INSTITUTION National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary
Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, ¥I.
SPONS AGENCY OF fice of Educational Research and Improvenent (ED),
Washington, DC.
REPORT NO NCRIPTAL-91-B-004
PUB DATE 91
‘CONTRACT OERT~B6-0010
NOTE 76p.; From the National Center for Researcn to
Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning Project
on Instructional Processes ané Educational Outcomes.
For a related document, see HE 024 936.
Pua TYPE Guides - Won-Classroom Use (055) ~~ Tests/Evaluation
Instruments (160)
EDRS PRICE MFO1/PCO4 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS College Students; Higner Education; *Learning
Motivation? *Learning Strategies; Questionnaires;
Research Methodology; Scientific and Technical
Information; *Student Educational Objectives:
*Student Hotavation
IDENTIFIERS sot ivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
ABSTRACT
This manual 15 a guide to the "Motivated Strategies
for Learning Questionnaire" for assessing college students!
au i
: 9, based on a general
cognitive View 6f motivation and learning strategies, contasns two
Sections. The motivation secticn consists of 21 itens that assess
Students’ coals and value beliefs for a course. The learning
strategies section includes 3 items regarding students’ use of
ditterent cognitive and metacognitive stratecies and 19 ivens
concerning student managenent of different resources. The guide
contains an introduction that details the survey's development,
scoring, organization, and administration suggestions. Two sections
explain the two components of the instrument in detail, listing tne
items, explaining their significance, and offering descriptive
statistics. Also included in other sections are a sanple fact sheet;
a sample denographic sheet; a copy of the questicnnaire itself; a
sample feedback form; 11 references; and an appendix listing
denographic information, scale correlations, and confirmatory factor
analysis resuits. (38)
+ Reproductions suppised by EDRS are the best that can be made +
. from the original document. .
wMotlvated Strategies for Leaming Questionnaire Manual
Ill. LEARNING STRATEGIES SCALESMotivated Strategies for ‘Leaming Questionnaire Manual
Intrinsic Goal Orientation
Extrinsic Goal Orientation
Task Value
Control Beliefs about Learning
Self-Efficacy for Learning & Performance
Test Anxiety y
Rehearsal
Elaboration
Organization
Critical Thinking
Metacognitive Self-Regulation
Time and Study Environment
Effort Regulation
Prirn: Peer Learning
Hsk: Help Seeking
~ /
Ine Ex Tskv Cont/Sifef Tax Reh Elab Org Cat Meg Tidy Elf Prien
53S
a
x
2B
2
=
8
8
g
B
&Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
MOTIVATION SCALES: The first three scales refer to your motivation for
the course, confidence in doing well in school, and your anxiety about taking
tests.
1. Motivation: Interest
This is a measure of how interested you are in the material being covered in
this course. A high score means you like the subject matter and are very
interested in the content area of this class.
Your score:
Class mean:
Bottom 25%:
Middle 50%: ——.
Top 25%:
Suggestions: Skim the table of contents of the class textbook or take a look at
the course syllabus and make a list of the three topics that most interest you
and of the three topics that least interest you. Pay particular attention to these
topics. What is it about the three most interesting topics that makes you like
them so much? What is it about the other three topics that makes them
uninteresting? Can you find any of the characteristics of the three most
interesting topics in the three least interesting topics? If you identify what it
is about the three most interesting topics that makes you like them so much,
you may be able to apply what you found to the three least interesting ones,
and perhaps you'll find that those uninteresting topics aren't so uninteresting
after all!
i 4hfe
‘~' Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Value Component: Intrinsic Goal Orientation
Goal orientation refers to the student's perception of the reasons why she is
engaging in a learning task. On the MSLQ, goal orientation refers 19 student's
general goals or orientation to the course as a whole. Intrinsic goal
orientation concerns the degree to which the student perceives herself to be
participating in a task for reasons such as challenge, curiosity, mastery.
Having an intrinsic goal orientation towards an academic task indicates that
the student's participation in the task is an end all to itself, rather than
participation being a means to an end. ae
Item
1. Ina dass like this, I prefer course material that really challenges
me so I can learn new things.
16. Ina class like this, I prefer course material that arouses my
curiosity, even if it is difficult to learn.
22. The most satisfying thing for me in this course is trying to
understand the content as thoroughly as possible.
24, When I have the opportunity in this class, I choose course
assignments that I can learn from even if they don't guarantee a
good grade.
Alpha: 74
Descriptive Statistics
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Item .
1 5.05 141 22
16 5.68 1.38 21
2 5.23 1.41 17
py 4.14 1.58 16
Scale 5.03, 1.09 25
9
Td‘Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Extrinsic goal orientation complements intrinsic goal orientation, and
concerns the degree to which the student perceives herself to be participating
in a task for reasons such as grades, rewards, performance, evaluation by
others, and competition. When one is high in extrinsic goal orientation,
engaging in a learning task is the means to an end. The main concern the
student has is related fo issues that are not directly related to participating in
the task itself (such as grades, rewards, comparing one’s performance to that
of others). Again, this refers to the general orientation to the course as 2
whole.
Item
7. Getting a good grade in this class is the most satisfying thing for
me right now.
11. The most important thing for me right now is improving my
overall grade point average, so my main concern in this class is
getting a good grade.
13. If can, I want to get better grades in this class than most of the
other students.
30. [want to do well in this class because it is important to show my
ability to my family, friends, employer, or others. |
Alpha: .62
Descriptive Statistics
!
Standard Correlation :
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Item
7 5.07 162 10
n 532 171 +09
13 531 173 10
30 4.43 2.07 +04
Scale 5.03 123 02 7 &
10 1aMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Yalue Component: Task Value
Task value differs from goal orientation in that task value refers to the
student's evaluation of the how interesting, how important, and how useful
the fask is ("What do I think of this task2"). Goal orientation refers to the
reasons why the student is participating in the task ("Why am I doing this?").
High task value should lead to more involvement in one's learning. On the
MSLQ, task value refers to students' perceptions of the course material in
terms of interest, importance, and utility.
Item
4. I think I will be able to use what I learn in this course in other
courses.
10. _ It is important for me to learn the course material in this class.
17. Tam very interested in the content area of this course.
23. I think the course material in this class is useful for me to learn.
26. I like the subject matter of this course.
27. Understanding the subject matter of this course is very
important to me.
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Item :
4 “5.33 172 15
10 5.87 1.24 15
7 5.32 1.64 21
2B 5.72 1.38 18
26 5.46 1.66 19
7 5.54 1.40 22
Scale 5.54 1.25 DRMotivated Strategies for Leaming Questionnaire Manual
Expectancy Component: Control of Learning Beliefs
Mage ar
i
Control of learning refers to students’ beliefs that their efforts to learn will
result in positive outcomes. It concerns the belief that outcomes are
contingent on one's own effort, in contrast to external factors such as the
teacher. If students believe that their efforts to study make a difference in
their learning, they should be more likely to study more strategically and
effectively. That is, if the student feels that she can control her academic
performance, she is more likely to put forth what is needed strategically to
effect the desired changes.
Ttem
2. If Istudy in appropriate ways, then I will be able to learn the
material in this course.
9. It is my own fault if I don’t learn the material in this course.
18. If I try hard enough, then I will understand the course material.
25. If Idon't understand the course material, it is because I didn’t try
hard enough.
Alpha: .68
Descriptive Statistics
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Item :
2 612 14 21
9 5.60 1.62 06
8 614 1.02 15
5 5.09 1.62 o1
Scale 5.74 98 13‘Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
‘The items comprising this scale assess two aspects of expectancy: expectancy
for success and self-efficacy. Expectancy for success refers to pérformance
expectations, and relates specifically to task performance. Self-efficacy is a self-
appraisal of one's ability to master a task. Self-efficacy includes judgments
about one's ability to accomplish a task as well as one’s confidence in one's
skills to perform that task.
Item
> 5. [believe I will receive an excellent grade in this class.
6. . Tmcertain I can understand the most difficult material
presented in the readings for this course.
12. I'm confident I can understand the basic concepts taught in this
course.
15, I'm confident I can understand the most complex material
presented by the instructor in this course.
20. I'm confident I can do an excellent job on the assignments and
tests in this course.
> 21. Lexpect to do well in this class.
29, Ym certain I can master the skills being taught in this class.
31. Considering the difficulty of this course, the teacher, and my
skills, I think I will do well in this class.
Alpha: .93
Resarenk race een fener Shanti nel Shoe HTTMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Expectancy Component: Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance
Descriptive Statisti
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Item
5 4.95 159 49
6 5.18 1.62 BC
12 6.36 96 2B
15 5.36 1.48 2
20 5.24 1.47 39
21 5.55 1.39 46
29 5.57 1.30 28
31 5.55 1.34 AS
14 41J
Motivated Strategies for Leaming Questionnaire Manual 1
Basic rehearsal strategies involve reciting or naming items from a list to be
learned. These strategies are best used for simple tasks and activation of
information in working memory rather than acquisition of new information
in long-term memory, These strategies are assumed to influence the
attention and encoding processes, but they do not appear to help students
construct internal connections among the information or integrate the
information with prior knowledge.
Item
39. When I study for this class, I practice saying the material to
myself over and over.
46. When studying for this class, I read my class notes and the
Course readings over and over again.
59. I memorize key words to remind me of important concepts in
this class.
72. I make lists of important terms for this course and memorize the
lists.
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Item
39 4.30 2.01 04
46 4.80 1.84 06
59 5.31 1.50 07
72 3.68 210 06
Scale 4.53 1.35 05Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual de
Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies: Elaboration vy») 2»
Elaboration strategies help students store information into long-tern
memory by building internal connections between items to be learned
Elaboration strategies include paraphrasing, summarizing, creating analogies
and generative note-taking, These help the learner integrate and connec
new information with prior knowledge.
Item
53. When I study for this class, I pull together information from
different sources, such as lectures, readings, and discussions.
62, I try to relate ideas in this subject to those in other courses
whenever possible.
64. When reading for this class, I try to relate the material to what I
already know.
67, When I study for this course, I write brief summaries of the
main ideas from the readings and the concepts from the lectures
69. I try to understand the material in this class by making
connections between the readings and the concepts from the
lectures.
81. I try to apply ideas from course readings in other class activities
such as lecture and discussion.
Alpha: .76
Descriptive Statistics
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation with Final Grade
Ttem
53 5.29 1.65 09
62 5.07 159 21
64 5.56 1.28 AZ
67 3.23 2.02 AS
69 5.35 150 19
81 491 156 AZ
Scale 491 1.08 224
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Organization strategies help the learner select appropriate information anc
also construct connections among the information to be learned, Examples o
an organizing strategies are clustering, outlining, and selecting the main ide:
in reading passages, Organizing is an active, effortful endeavor, and results ir
the learner being closely involved in the task. This should result in bette:
performance,
Item
32. When I study the readings for this course, I outline the material
to help me organize my thoughts.
42, When I study for this course, I go through the readings and my
class notes and try to find the most important ideas.
49. make simple charts, diagrams, or tables to help me organize
course material.
63, When I study for this course, I 80 over my class notes and make
an outline of important concepts.
Alpha: .64
ati
Standard Correlation
M aay fs
Item
32 3.70 217 06
42 5.93 131 21
49 3.04 1.94 AZ
63 3.90 2u AZ
Scale 414 1.33 7ae
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Critical thinking refers to the degree to which students report applying
previous knowledge to new situations in order‘to solve problems, reach
decisions, or make critical evaluations with sespect to standards of excellence.
Item
47.
51.
71.
Item
47
51
71
Scale
Toften find myself questioning things I hear or read in this
course to decide if I find them convincing.
When a theory, interpretation, or conclusion is presented in
class or in the readings, I try to decide if there is good supporting
evidence.
I treat the course material as a starting point and try to develop
my own ideas about it.
I try to play around with ideas of my own related to what Iam
learning in this course.
Whenever I read or hear an assertion or conclusion in this class,
I think about possible alternatives.
: Standard Correlation
Mean
3.83 77 04
4.36 1.68 3
3.81 1.85 08
4.66 1.74 A7
4.15 1.49 3
4.16 1.28 1S23
Motivated Strategies for Leaming Questionnaire Manual
Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies: Metacogniltive Self-Regulation
Metacognition refers to the awareness, knowledge, and control of cognition.
We have focused on the control and self-regulation aspects of metacognition
on the MSLQ, not the knowledge aspect. There are three general Processes
that make up melacognitive self-regulatory activities: planning, monitoring,
and regulating, Planning activities such as goal setting and task analysis help
to activate, or prime, relevant aspects of prior knowledge that make
organizing and comprehending the material easier. Monitoring activities
include tracking of one's attention as one reads, and self-testing and
questioning: these assist the learner in understanding the material and
integrating it with prior knowledge, Regulating refers to the fine-tuning and
continuous adjustment of one's cognitive activities. Regulating activities are
assumed to improve performance by assisting learners in checking and
correcting their behavior as they proceed on a task.
Ttem
33. During class time I often miss important points because I'm
thinking of other things. (REVERSED)
36. When reading for this course, I make up questions to help focus
my reading.
41. When I become confused about something I'm reading for this
class, I go back and try to figure it out.
44, If course materials are difficult to understand, I change the way I
tead the material.
S4. Before I study new course material thoroughly, I often skim it to
see how it is organized. :
55. Task myself questions to make sure I understand the material I
have been studying in this class.
56. I try to change the way I study in order to fit the course
requirements and instructor's teaching style.
57, T often find that I have been Teading for class but don't know
what it was all about. (REVERSED) :
61. T try to think through a topic and decide what I am supposed to
learn from it rather than just reading it over when studying.
76. When studying for this course I try to determine which concepts
T don't understand well.
78. When I study for this class, I set goals for myself in order to
direct my activities in each study period.
79. If get confused taking notes in class, I make sure I sort it out
afterwards,Ttem
Scale
VIRAGggvesege
‘Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manwal
Metacognitive Self-Regulation (continued)
Alpha: .79
Mean
492
298
579
4.07
451
412
461
481
4.50
5.12
453
455
454
Standard
Deviation
Correlation
with Final Gradas
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Besides self-regulation of cognition, students must be able to manage anc
regulate their time and their study environments. Time management
involves scheduling, planning, and managing one's study time. Thi:
includes not only setting aside blocks of time to study, but the effective use o!
that study time, and setting realistic goals. Time management varies in level,
from an evening of studying to weekly and monthly scheduling. Study
environment management refers to the setting where the student does he:
class work. Ideally, the learner's study environment should be organized,
quiet, and relatively free of visual and auditory distractions.
Item
35. L usually study in a place where I can concentrate on my course
work.
43. I make good use of my study time for this course.
52. I find it hard to stick to a study schedule. (REVERSED)
65. I have a regular place set aside for studying.
70, I make sure I keep up with the weekly readings and assignments
for this course.
73. attend class regularly.
77. — Voften find that I don't spend very much time ot this course
because of other activities. (REVERSED)
80. I rarely find time to review my notes or readings before an exam.
(REVERSED)
Alpha: .76nb
Item
Scale
SVISaSsS
Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Descriptive Statistics
Standard
153
1.65
201
2.03
191
98
1.80
1.48
1.05
wi
Correlation
23
26
2B
AS
12
17
07
20
2B
aMotivated Strategies for Leaning Questionnaire Manual
Resource Management Strategies: Effort Regulation
Self-regulation also includes students! ability to control their effort anc
attention in the face of distractions and uninteresting tasks. Effor
management is self-management, and reflects a commitment to completin;
one's study goals, even when there are difficulties or distractions. Effor
management is important to academic success because it not only signifie:
goal commitment, but also regulates the continued use of learning strategies.
Item
37. Toften feel so lazy or bored when I study for this class that I quit
before I finish what I planned to do. (REVERSED)
48. I work hard to do well in this class even if I don't like what we
are doing.
60. When course work is difficult, I give up or only study the easy
parts. (REVERSED)
74. Even when course materials are dull and uninteresting, I
manage to keep working until I finish.
Alpha: .69
Descriptive Statistics
Standard Correlation
Mean i ith Fi
Item
37 4.87 1.73 AS
48 5.26 145 28
60 5.52 1.42 29
74 5.36 1.47 23
Seale 5.25 1.10 32“y Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manuai
Another aspect of the environment that the student must learn to manage is
the support of others. This includes both peers and instructors. Good
students know when they don’t know something and are able to identify
someone to provide them with some assistance. There is a large body of
research that indicates that peer help, peer tutoring, and individual teacher
assistance facilitate student achievement.
Item
40. Even if I have trouble learning the material in this class, I try to
do the work on my own, without help from anyune.
(REVERSED)
58. I ask the instructor to clarify concepts I don't understand well.
68. When I can't understand the material in this course, I ask
another student in this class for help.
75. I try to identify students in this class whom I can ask for help if
necessary. i -
Alpha: 52
De: ive Statis
Standard Correlation
Mean Deviation wiih Final Grade
Item
40 3.26 1.80 +05
58 4.21 1.89 24
68 3.73 1.99 +06
75 4.15 2.00 =.08
Scale 3.84 1233 0218 Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Collaborating with one’s peers has been found to have positive effects on
achievement. Dialogue with peers can help a learner clarify course material
and reach insights one may not have attained on orie's own.
Item
34. When studying for this course, I often try to explain the material
to a classmate or a friend.
45. — [try to work with other students from this class to complete the
course assignments,
50. When studying for this course, I often set aside time to discuss
the course material with a group of students from the class.
Alpha: .76
Standard Correlation
Mean
Item
“ 3.48 1.92 07
45 294 197 +15
50 2.24 164 +07
Scale 2.89 1.53 +06Motivated Strategles for Learning Questionnaire Manual
Hayduk, L.A. (1987). uation modeling wi
and advances. Salar Johns Hopkins University Pans
Joreskog, K.G, & Sorbom, D. (1986). LISREL:_Analysis of linear structural
method of maximum likelihood: User's guid
Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software Inc.
McKeachie, WJ, Pintrich, P.R,, & Lin, Y.G. (1985). Teaching learning
strategies. Educational Psychologist, 20, 153-160.
McKeachie, W\J., Pintrich, P.R,, Lin, Y.G., & Smith, D. (1986). Teaching and
ing in the college classroom: A review of the research literature.
‘Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve
Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan.
Pintrich, P.R. (1988a). A process-oriented view of student motivation and
cognition. In J. Stark & L. Mets (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning
through research: New directions for institutional research (Vol. 57,
pp. 65-79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pintrich, PAR. (19880), Student learning and college teaching. In RE. Young &
KE. Eble (Eds.), College teaching and | aring for new
commitments. New directions for teaching and learning (Vol 33, pp.
71-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pintrich, P.R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and
cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (Eds.),
ances in motivation and achievement: Motivatio::-enhancin;
environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P.R., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
‘components of classroom academic performance. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P.R., & Garcia, T. (1991, in press). Student goal orientation and self-
regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich
(Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and sélf-
regulatory processes, (Vol. 7). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P.R., McKeachie, WJ., & Lin, Y.G. (1987). Teaching a course in
learning to learn. Teaching of Psychology, 14, 81-86.
aAppendices
eee Ee re PE GP EEE ere HEE Ee ere HEE EEE EEE
A Demographic Information
8. Scale Correlations
C. Confirmatory Factor Analyses Results