You are on page 1of 1

JUAN ANTONIO, ANNA ROSARIO and JOSE ALFONSO, all surnamed OPOSA,

minors, and represented by their parents petitioners,


vs.
THE HONORABLE FULGENCIO S. FACTORAN, JR., in his capacity as the Secretary of
the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and THE HONORABLE
ERIBERTO U. ROSARIO, Presiding Judge of the RTC, Makati, Branch 66, respondents.
Facts
This case is unique in that it is a class suit brought by 44 children, through their parents, claiming
that they bring the case in the name of their generation as well as those generations yet unborn.
Aiming to stop deforestation, it was filed against the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources HYPERLINK "http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?
title=Department_of_Environment_and_Natural_Resources" \t "_blank" , seeking to have him
cancel all the timber license agreements (TLAs) in the country and to cease and desist from
accepting and approving more timber license agreements. The children invoked their right to a
balanced and healthful ecology and to protection by the State in its capacity as parens patriae.
The petitioners claimed that the DENR Secretary's refusal to cancel the TLAs and to stop issuing
them was "contrary to the highest law of humankind-- the natural law and violative of
plaintiffs' right to self-preservation and perpetuation." The case was dismissed in the lower court,
invoking the law on non-impairment of contracts, so it was brought to the Supreme Court on
certiorari.

Issue
Whether children have the legal standing to file the case?

Ruling
Yes. The Supreme Court in granting the petition ruled that the children had the legal standing to
file the case based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility. Their right to a healthy
environment carried with it an obligation to preserve that environment for the succeeding
generations. In this, the Court recognized legal standing to sue on behalf of future generations.
Also, the Court said, the law on non-impairment of contracts must give way to the exercise of the
police power of the state in the interest of public welfare.

You might also like