The argument claims that..

Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors on the basi
s of which it could be evaluated.The conclusion relies on the assumption for whi
ch there is no clear evidence.Therefore,the argument is weak,unconvincing and ha
s several flaws.
First,the argument claims that..
This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way.ther..
The argument could have been clearer if it explicitly stated that..
Second,the argument claims that..
This is again very weak and unconvincing claim as the argument does not demonstr
ate any correlation between..
If the argument provided evidence that..the argument could have been a lot more
convincing.
Finally,the argument claims that.From this statement again it is not clear how.W
ithout suppoerted evidence and examples one is left with the impression that the
claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than a substantive evidence.The conc
lusion has noi legs to stand on.
In summary,the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing.It could be conside
rably stregthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts.In orde
r to assess the merits of certain situation it is important to have full knowled
ge of all the contributing factors.Withough clear information,argument remains u
nsustantiated and open to debate.