You are on page 1of 18
Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis (Review) Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Borisenkco OV, Kovanen N, Varonen H, Rautakorpi UM, Williams Jr JW, Mikeld M THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION® “Tinie epi of Cochrane revi prepared and mntind by The Cochrane Callborstion and publhed in The Calne Lirary 2009, lsu 3 apse hacrheaelvary.cm WILEY Publishers Since 1807 aioe or seats opprgn 0 2009 Ts 7 st aon) ne Caaboron Paid abe Wey & Son, TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER eee 1 ABSTRACT. | 7 i 1 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY ‘ 7 : : 2 BACKGROUND : 2 ‘omectives ‘| : ‘ ace 7 3 METHODS : : oo i 3 RESULTS : ace 6 DISCUSSION : : : ey B AUTHORS CONCLUSIONS |< + sue 6 ‘ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. « ieee : Sea : 6 REFERENCES. : a ta 6 CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES ee 5 DATA AND ANALYSES . - n “Azlysc1. Comparison 1 Ania vas pact, Oucome | Cll ile defined aa ko ee or mprovement 117 0015 daysof allow up. ” ‘Asn. Compaion 1 Aiba ves placebo, Otcome 2 Clinic fle dined asa lack of aor inproement 161060 dasa ellow up. ss seeeetaabate ‘Analysis 13. Compaion | Asibiois versus placebo, Otcome 3 Cini failure defined a lack of crea 71015 diye ‘offllon ps ns Anahi 14. Comparison 1 Antibiot ves plo, Outcome Clin fre defined as Tack fea a 16. ie Gods offal up. % Analysis 5. Compatiton 1 Anbiois vers placebo, Outeme 5 Rel ater 60 days.» + tae ts) ‘Analjsis 16. Compan 1 Anibiais vers paceb, Outcome 6 Deop-ous due to adverse effets. n ‘Anes 2.1, Compurion 2 Macroldelepalespoin ves nmoxilnelwlaace, Outcome 1 Coph ees amex cy ” ‘nil fla defined a alc of ete o improvement at 7 to 15 days of follow up. ‘Anas 2.2. Compnraon 2 Mactlle cephalosporin resi anoscln-cllnae, Ostcoe 2 Ceph ves amex ly ‘nil flue dein Ick of ee o inprovernene a 16 1060 days of fallow up. ” ‘Analysis 23, Comparison 2 Microidlcephalosporin verre aoxillis-davuanate, Outcome 3 Drop-ous dus to advene ‘fect (ephslaspotn). %0 ‘Analysis 2.4, Comparon 2 Macoldefcephaesptin versus amostlin-darlanate, Outcome 4 Macrols vers amo: ‘lnc flue defined ae ak Fee or prone at 7 cw 15 days ofall, = 7 a “Analysis 2.5, Comparison Macoidfcepulesposin vers amoiilin-clavalanate, Outcome 5 Miacoldes versu ox. ‘hin dein «ak of eae or hpronemen at 16 co GD day ffl i a ‘Aaah 26. Comparison 2 Maolidelephaleprin us anoxia dale, Outcome 6 Dropous dace ales ‘let acrid vss 2 ‘Anal. Compaton 3 Non pesca seis vs benlacaae tee psig, Outcome 1 Cina Talus defined ae a ck of te oe improvenent at 710 15 days of allow up. % ‘Ash 32. Compatton 3 Non pencln abs vers berlacaman serve pili, Outcome 2 Chin Fale defined ae ack of ee or improvement at 161 60 days of allow up. 8 ‘Angas 33. Conpaon 3 Noreiin ambi ves balun ee ening, Outcome 3 Drop-ous “ "he to advee fle “Auli 1, Comprnon 4 Tesaeyine ves mst aves of ance, come | Cll ale defined aa of eo improvement a 7 to 15 dysof fallow up. vals. Comparon 4 Teeyines esa mised caso abies, Outcome? Drops dave eft FEEDBACK et aa acerca eee WHATS NEW | Sauna nasToRy Bee Be CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTHORS DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST. SOURCES OF SUPPORT NOTES . Tota far aut mastlory nts (eon) 7 Capris 2009 The CasraneCallsberaton Pablihed by Jha Way & Sons Led LUntervention Review] Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis ‘Anna Ahonao-Stloants!, Oleg V Dorenks?, Nina Kovanen®, Helena Vironent, Ull-Maja Rewakori John W Wiliams J, Maru Make? ‘Ransh Office for Hesih Technology Asean / RAOHTTA, National nse fr Health and Welle! THL, Tampere, Finland Department of Hematology and Geis, City Hospi 7, Therapie Building, Mosca, Russian Federation, “Fini Office for Health Technology Aseament / RnOHTA, National lie for Heat and Welle THL, Hei, Finland, ‘Deparment of General Practice, Univesity of Helin Helink, Flan. "Deparcnens of Medicine and Paychisey, Dudkam VAMC and Duke Uniescy Medial Center, Durham, NC, USA Contact sss: Anis Akoruo Silornt, Finish Offs for Heskh Tichnalogy Asessment / KnOHTA, National Insite for Health ond Welive 1 THL, Finn-Medi 3, Diokats 10, Tunpee, 33520, Baland. synliahowe-ssloranae4h.0. (Edt group: Cochrane Aste Repirnory Infections Group) Cobian Dace of Sper Reve, ue 3, 2009 (Scas in this ise: Fite) ‘Copytigt © 2009 The Cocitane Callabortion.Publhe by John Wile & Sons a DOI 10.1002/14651858.C000248 pub? “This version frat published online: 23 Api 2008 i tae 2, 2008. Republish online wich eit 8 July 2009 in sue 3, 2009. as assessed at up-to-date: 28 May 2007. (Help document ~ Dates and Sasesexpained “This record should be cited eet Aono Silocant A, Bocsnko OV, Kovanen N. Viroaen H, Rauekorpi UM, Williams Je IW Makeld M Antibiot For ate maxillary sss, Cochrane Drab of Sinai Review 2008, tse 2. At. No: CDOGO2A3. DOL 10, 1002/1 4651858.C000248 pub, ABSTRACT ackground Exper opinions vay onthe appropriate rl of xb Fr sims, one ofthe most ammo ages condins among als in arbor ct Objectives ‘We samined wheter anicks ate efetve inating acute ints, and if, which biotic elses ate the most ftv, Seacchstetepy ‘Wesearched the Coehane Cena Register of Conte Tins (CENTRAL, (The Cochrane Lv, 2007, sue 3}; MEDLINE (1950 0 May 2007) nd EMBASE (1974 co une 2007, Selection extern Rencomied conta as (RCTS) comparing anor wth placso or arsiot fom diferent ses for seu malay sss inaduls, We nlc ks wih linaly diagnosed scare snus, whether orn confined by radiography or bacteria ere Data collection and nya {les ae ceview authors independeiy serene search rts, extracted dcr and quali sasered cs, Rsk esos (RAD were calalted for iference in dhe ierventon and consol groupe wo sce whether o nos the eestmen wa fie. mtamling the plaecho controlled studi, the da acons antibiotic cer wore combine. Primary ouores were he clinic ile atest 7 co 15 daprand 16 060 dye low up. Main rnule [nate foracte mally anal (Revew) 7 pyre 9 109 The Cocare Calbeaton.Plohed by hn Wey 8S Fify-seren studies wee inhade n the eviews sx plceho-ontole air al 51 sds comparing ferent clases fan, ve stds involving 631 parla povided data or compaton of mets wo placebo, whe clini lure wasdefved a aack of er o improvement 27 ea 15 dap alow up, These is found alg satin dillenc in favor of eb, compared to placa, with a pole RR of 0.66 959 confidence interval (CD 0.44 co O58). Hower the cline sgnanee ofthe rel i uve lo coosidering chat creo improvement ate was high in both che plccbo group (80%) and the anibieic group (20%), Based ons stcen, when cin fe wat defied es ako cot care, there was sguieant difference in fivor afar compared to placebo with «pooled RR oF 0.74 959 C] 065 1 0.84) a7 015 days flow up, None af the ania preparitions twa aupevor each oe Author? conclusions Anvibioties have sal eacment fet im patients with complied ace snuss in primary eae setting with sympecms for moc than even days, Howes, 8096 of partipans reared without sulle inpeve within ew weeks. Clinicas ned o weigh thesinl eves af atibocs eaement apsne the penal for ave feta oth the individual and general population beh. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Antibiotic or acute itary sinus -Aavibioice provide a minor nyprovemen in simple (uncomplicated) sins fecdons, However, 8 ou of 10 patents impeove without nbices within two wees. The tal bouai grind may be overridden by he gene effecs of ani, both on dhe patent tnd on he population in gener, Ta sinus dhe meaner paces nen the nose Become infected which enuses pain and discharge fom dhe are Thee ae Four ps of snus Finke to the bony stevcares around the ncn: ction includ antbocis,decongeaos steroid dope or sprays mca clering drugs (cli) 2 aly, frontal, etsmoidlandspanoidal sinazs, Tenet famines, o¢sinos pe aha lvage. Thi vie foun ha anibntis help ome people bit bur do nt maken major diflerence ro most people BACKGROUND Sins a prevalent and impotence of heath nade Inthe US. sone an extinstt 2 snilion ease of acute sists cae ech yea, Sinus che eid 0 th most common sgneis for which an antibiotic i preszibed win primary cate ‘tings in Nordic cates (Aste 2002; Raatshopi 1998) and the US. (AMD 2000), Sis aecouns for 154% 02194 af al bio pressions for adn oupaten ce. ‘Asse bacterial mila sini preceded by a este rapper expiry sctifection (UR!) Upros0% oF patients sth sate URTIE have spnproms af shinosinsits (Gakic 194) ad upto 3996 af als (Paka 1998) have reversible snore te sls cavity whi show up asmagust eso tance imaging or Xe, flowing. commow eld sting fo one wack, I has Been etimated tha 0.5% 9 2%6 of paints with 2 ‘nanan cld have completions in dhe form of ace bctra infection ofthe snues (erg IAG Gwaliney 1996), However inguin thove pens with bacteria infection Fam those ‘with sympeots of insousts wi vial origin is cllenging, bacterin infection an cad by one or moe bacerit species, Commonly lose butts ache Sree pcame- rie prcwmenie, Haemophilia (Hiflacsze and ‘Menace (ctr) (Svan 19925 Ln 19. In appronintly hid of aepecred bacter sinusis case, bac teil culture rot the snge avy come Back negative Aen 072; Galeny 1925 use Some 19). SInsis cased acute or hone, depending on the pathologic ndings snd Ahration of ymproms (Lvs 1997), Acie acters ts For les chan Ba works dation (Kern 1984), At lease some of many cist of honic snus represent repre ent with ein problems, fe example, mechani obsrston of ins Ainge sora in ausoliaty dears 0 immonelogy (Gysenee 2005). “pia signs and symptoms inca purulent naa dichare, postnatal dp, snos pin at pslpaion, sal absucion with oor respons wo decongestants nate ici pit anda Tae toothache (Axelson 1972; Wiis 1993), but none ofthe signsoxaymptornisdagnentc when presesingalone Acute be ‘cle more Hike che symproms hae sted fer mote than one wack (Caney 2005). ‘Rbiode or aeute mason sn epyrgh’ 82069 The Cocwana Coaberatlon, Pine by Jn Wiley & Sone Ltd “icant recommendations For scute inuts ae divided and range fiom only ecing patents wit vec or peszent moder- ne symptons and specie ctl sss Gndnge we spect amiss Snow 2601) to cea al ptints wih ee bacterin wth broad spectrum anibiots (Winther 19). The purpose of anbiots is co dectesesynproms and restore the nonal faction of ehe sinuses, in dere prevent complication ad the developmen of ehoaic sina Unnecesry antibiotic presiprios should be avoid. In ade Aion eo paien-telued adverse elects, side fees are asoci- ‘ned with rotance to anbiice among, comity segue pathogens. The corlation benween resistance and commaity bic we hat bee ase in ahy counties (Ach 20045 ‘Ars 1996; Broa 20025 Goossens 20055 Sepp 1995 Steinke 2001). No only the volume of aneibiecic use bur al the selec of broud-pectum deug, low dose and log duration of bide weamen increases ani cesizance (Giller 1958; Hay 2005; Odeo 2003), The European Ansiniteia Resistance Sunallance Sytem EARSS hat eee igen g opiaphical dieronce in esinance rater within Burope (Geesens 205) high ates of antibiotic rete wee ssn mere ae in igh consuming counties southern and ester Europe, Fret mpl see anererarkale differences beeen Earopea coun: tres the prevalence of extzace to pilin and marae tibet Spouse (EARSS 20"). a een eas, anincresing number of publhed sais haves supped that Srnibiaie mighe have ether har effece om health erough the dtubance of han mierobioc(Kikknen 2002 Masel 20; Velie 200, and pete predspsing cone nfciont (Aeson 2005; Hoss 1976; Jli-Eils 2000; Marpolis 2005; Sani 1997), ‘The purpose af this syutemacc review wa 0 quanify thee vcnes of anit therapy for acute sinusitis in ambulatory are ‘tings The ued ‘anbioi ie ese as «general ecm refering toallaneibscterl, OBJECTIVES “Ta compare the elect of anbires vers placebo on cnc fre ee fr sete manny sins. “To compe diferear dase of antibiocs for weaement of ete roar sisi “To campar the eet of shore versus long courses of antbioiss fase nails “To compre the side flees of diffrent ements. METHODS Criteria for considering studies for this review “Types of studios Randomized concolled ais (RCTS evaluating and compating aneiocs 2 placebo, oc we eileen cass of ani for eat insis “Tins having a spl sie ofa lene 30 parlpans wit seute salary ssi (becausein very ral samples many estimators areheowe be sensitive ‘Types of participants Tins wih aul or wi cha separstely repre dean sab ups fale were includ (aalescents atleast 12 years od ‘ere sceped, provided there wer ls than 20% of ptipants aged wer 18) ‘eve nny sinus as define) ahsoey of URT Hating 7 v0 30 days, with a lest evo clinical sg 0 syengroms: sins fsin x plpsion, porn rip, purulent nas dichage, nal ‘haration, oltre facil pain, mila eoothache, pled sens of smel or 2) adiogtapy,ulkasound, or ther imaghng ot cule fom sina seteton busine by puncture or endoscopy nd igaion or aprtion. In sues where nial diagnosis ‘was or clay deserted the ingnoiof acute malay snus shoul be ccafmed nat eat of B85 of paetcpanes by imaging inl inlotng a mise population of cue (ymproms ethan 30 dae ant non acute sisi or auc exrebstons of hone ‘inosiie wer incleda they separately reported dst on che sb group with acute sist, i ac least 890 of pacicipans had “Types of interventions Dray therapcs viewed weve: 1) amiiois versus control and 2) compatizons betwee ileren neste cases. “Tins the tocusd on nba eatmentsor complicated sins sinsach ae pancinuito foal sou (r solely edmsidal or spheroidal sina or infections of dena origin were exuded. Cointerventone sch s decongesan,aniizarines, exalt ies nowstetial anbinfnmatory deus, a conics wre tematic recorded “Types of outcome measures Primary outcomes (Cis falter a 7 4015 days afer the sat of teat. Failures define a lick of cue o improvement of pariipants vacate malay isi allow up. (Gliic faitare ie 9¢ 16 to 0 days arte sar of tweaxment alee defined a alc of creo provement of participants vith acate muley sisi fllow up. Taslotes or size acon cere by oe Whey & Son es Secondary outcomes Cini file race a7 to 15 days afer the sue of eaten Pile i defined ar nk oF ere of priipats with rece nae Alay sinus a fllow up. Clini flue sate a 16 to 6D days after the eat of wezement Ball define 3 ack of cure of prtipanes with sete ma ay snus fallow up. Brceiloga ite Radiographic aire, Relapse rates new acute episodes of snus afer 60 days fom the tit of the inl ese Diop due to adere ect Quay of ie Alig to work, Search methods for iden ication of studies Jn theprsions version of his even; CENTRAL. ses ssarched 2001; MEDLINE warseached fom 1966102001 and EMBASE fon 1974 vo 2001 Ta this updated evews we wil anew, more speci eva st «yo seatch for tl inthe Cochrane Central Reiter of Con tolled ‘als (CENTRAL (The Caran Library, 2007, se 3; MEDLINE (1950 wo May 2007); EMBASE (1974 to June 2007). J therovied etoy “taibiois wae wed san addins. word and “ntsc agent” a¢ am exploded MeSH te in dont "sis. The MEDLINE serch ters were am aver (CENTRAL and alepred for EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID) {exp SINUSITIS) 2einwieonp. Bout-2 ‘exp Ant-Bactrisl Agets RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL pr 9 CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL pr, 1 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALSsb, 11 RANDOM ALLOCATIONsh 12. DOUBLE BLIND METHODsh, 13 SINGLE BLIND METHOD, No one-13 15 Animal Ghuman sh, 17 15 at 16 18 4 wor 17 19 CLINICAL TRIAL pt 20 xp Cis Tle 24 (en a5 ia) sa. 22 (Ging)$ oF doublS or eebI6 or eiphS)alj25 (indS oe ‘ask sia 23 PLACEDOSat, 24 pleeboS sins 25 aniomS sab 26 ol 19-25 27 26900 17 26 Wor 27 297 and 28 “The faction or Sng seated articles i PubMed wr wed or i aeady Weed placbo-comulled cls so at co ere ov inal, ora ales, Reference is fiom the leady devi wale and nine yeti ceviows considering placebo: onto sudy signe (eninge 20005 de Back 1997; de FRrvam 19; nie 2001; Kanne 2005 fp 2005; Linder 2005 Ln 1997 Salar 1876) wee reviewed for aon ppwprinte studs. Inlud and excluded alsin the previous serson wer rechecked by using the evised inchsion cites of Chis even A seat ofthe database Stem Fr Infomstion on Grey Lites in Bare SIGLEY wasiended, but the dbase vas nail vin the Imereti Noversber 2005. or the previous veton of hi reiew pharmaeeutesl eompaies ‘hac manufacture alo sa in the resent oF sete is tisha been cootaced and da and ferences fom all published sd wipublchel ion seat inass were equested. aches, ‘tec exper inthe fl hi been contacted and asked to review bibliography of de inal seview (1999) For compeseness. “There wer no lnguage o publication estcions. Data collection and analysis. ‘Study selection Four review ators (MAS, OB, NK, UMA) exe out he base- line searches Tee review author independently cad ‘out the sleston of prpere onthe bass ofthe le, keywonds nd shure, and he deceons about igi The fll ex of every tle considered fr inelsion ws obeaned che Inonmation ‘slevan co the incon citer ws no valet re absct ‘rif dhe tie was cclevanebut the abstract wot valle the fal teat of de epor was obiained. Atleast evo review shore independently ced ou information and den econdbog, ond ny diagrnmente were ese by consensus among thes four review authors ‘The nls csi fread eection were: andom location, sib verat eomtal oe abies versus acces. sunt roar sins defied by lil signs and symptoms or by ratiogrophy,wltasound, other imaging oF cle: spl se fat lea 30 ads wit acute isc Quality assossment ‘arton for ate monary srw (Rorow) Copyrgne 7009 The Cachare Colateaton Pubishe by John We Sons Lt ‘Alent ow seviw authors independently caied ou he gley tssenment of theinduded sades (AAS,OW or NK). Any dng. ments Benen then wee seared by conweaus. ‘The aethod- ‘logis quality ffl ete wasted wing allocation ‘oncralmen, blinding, completenes follow ap and bine com antiliy ofthe ervesion and col groups Tnsead of a= Signing a quali acre, ee allowing quality chesceiics were described inthe ables. ‘The candomination prsedare and allocation concesiment wete secured as (A) adequne concealment, (B) andor allen = owed but the atl method ued to conceal iis not known, {© inadequate concealment, and (D) lloction cnceiment not ted, a deseribed in che Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Rer ‘ie of Ipervetions 4.2.5 (Higgins 2005) Assesment codes Tacalloction concealment ae dered inthe ‘Chatteris of Include coe? rable, IF there was qust-andom or no random llcatin, dhe study was excel, ‘Other qual chastise inced infemation on whether participants and oureomse asesar were lide he asigned therapy ad information on reasons for withdewas, deoprous snd protocol deviations inthe imereation are contol groups In hisrevew the word Uoprout is used sa general tem refer ring heproprson ofthe parcpant without knawa orepocted lini outcome repulse of the reason for nisin dav. 1 she topo ate ws eeporeto be over 35% oe there ws significant Jinbolancein drop-out tes between che inerendon sad oneal roup, the seu at excladad Fiom the sales. Fach the ‘rude with high drop-in theanalyseswasseenasaquliy ase esecly when cere it ak of usivesal suacegs in ha ling the ising data (neta 2001), Ca ehis review, kiting smet-aalyac coc witha drop-out rales shan 35% as 2 pragmatic approach oaks comparisons withow compromising ‘he eal of ee overall ele Forher, information om che bein comparably of eh ioter- ‘etion sn contra groups ad che icy in wing cove ‘tone Benwesn grape were abo wed spar oF the quality a> sessment. The ese we considered as canpatae if he sty reported donation on dhe belne comparbiey ofthe inter ‘vention snd contol groups and thre was no difference between the goups nd not comparable i dese were important baseline sliferace in demographic caresses or sinusitis seveiy rt ing beeween the sly groups oF unclear oF no information on comparably. “The vin of bist wer acre for each study: The ove ating cof bine was bated on the wale reported in the Cochrane Mand ‘ook fr Systematic Reviews of Inerventions 4.25 (tion 7) ( gg 205) for defor chaste ound in the previous -patigziphs Gllocaton concent, blinding, completeness the Tollow up andthe comparably ofthe incervetion end eontol up (A) Lr is obi (plausible bie ikl ocevouly fot che rele) fal ere were met (1) Moderate ik of bi (lausile ba which ass ome dubs sivut the valid of che resus) fone or moe of he criteria were pany met (Cig kof bias (plausible bine which scious weakens con- fideo in the reel) Hone of mor itera ere nt met “Tobe clase as having low if bis, the sey had to ave dequate rndom slstion concesiment, double lind desig, fomparable intervention and conte groups ud dere ko had co be complete nfrrston on drop-ons by sux groups, Data extraction Daa foi lind sie wore xteactd by two review ate thors (AAS, or NK)- Dat presented onlin graphs and ges wee extraced whenever posible xtste information relating co the sudy methodology or quale nye: andoniationconceaimenadeseibdin he ay ining time llow up, pecentgeot drop oursdurngfeowup and busine compra of the groupe Charscritis ling tomethods tha were entered inlided: teria oraceping pa ‘iipants ico thes (iagposson cine eadingraphyfnlute tus), dfnon af ewelFlure, and creatment compan, Charen ling to parcpsnts char wee exited ine ddd: numberof parame in extment sad concol groups cat, mean ag of patcipants pls age ranges he namber of ren and women, dhe yea the study yes published, she locaton where the dy war conducted (couney and sting where pl ticipants were reed), Characters ofthe inerventon that were excted included: interes compacisons, couse of n= ‘bine, ad information about co-intervntons Information on clini, bactrlageal and endographic ou comes ad advert vent ner ere extracted, Outcome infor tion wat manly extacced a numbers of pactsipants with lineal flue (noire by study group, Relapse with 6 days From hea ofthe tenant wes casi asa cine flare Tn some suis ce eles wee seed at more than ont ped follow ap, All ata were extracted for preselected mes, which syee 7015 dys 16060 diye and over 6 days follow up. Metar nalyes wer ated ou a thee pre-szcelnes basel onthe able ds. Pinal eesuldcions were wached by consensus among, eview Daca analysis “The dca consisted of comparisons for sbi vrs placebo sd anibotic versio. In rhe means of pcebo- one sis the daa ofall studless ofthe ani ‘ie wae were combined: The antibiotic vers ania en Drone were mscolielcepalesperins versus amoxiin-dav- lena, von-peiciinantiboves yess bere lactamase sentve penis and etctyeins versus mined else of anit. Ill nies che ozome rules wet preserved a dichotomous Foca. ‘Retest acre rin a or) Cepig 02900 Toe Cosson Colerain, Pushed by hn Wiley 8 Son LA Quon anaes of outcomes were performed ingame thle cre tn asp ae represen inthe Cochrane Handbook. for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 (Desks 2095). "This approach for xelaing the espnse te utes a «denominator the coul number of porcpens who completed the ei. Rik ‘tio (RR) were caleulted or diferences inthe inecreation sad contol groups whether nestment had ile or no, slang, ith tong Review Manager (RevMan version 4.27. basing he fee of cheng data on the over ea ofthe pletn- cone ois (rina tein meso, de aps of impting ae were us suing de outs of pur efor who no cuca war care) flrs ba 0m Fires oe) acnding eth vet te obs in he eon sour. ‘Thetis comparing antic ver acini wer poe ford sing sale ce data wih mpi. the dp- tae oe 38%, it at ower san 35% ba the Was conde diene nthe drt te beeen the nee tention gos the sy es ene fromthe ams he Seay wed intention ote mayo the mising day viduly considered wher che da cold be wed ia thems, In coe where more dha one ania ween ts of he sn my eeu in the ste atl, the eet in he conte prop wa vided cording the aries of he a Incaleaning es of aden fee, Feo OR wee we the ‘The metals wee conduc RevMan sng Bd fit sad endef ode Thesigianc any dscrcpancis in he xia of he wow sone fs om the diferent ae wae sed by mes of Cochran et fr hetrogeny and by neste of age). ‘he meme decries the ercenageof the varity init cate hai dr eeogeniy eer than sping A vale gee than 50% maybe consid to pen subeantl scons. Tote freobutae of elses alse planed to oan tht of agosto act sisi (cial cr raga an dhe easietion of he ei of bison the cel enim fer inportnt outcome. Howe hee ‘orinctcent aber ofan any ec tert op tounderake hi 1c wal planned Svea puicacon bis sng rh the egal Mun rarkeoraon etn he per rpeion sayy ty bn hewn ane nuns ft 0 snderae hi RESULTS Description of studies ‘Sees hares finde ds Ch seu, scterioofexcuded Search results and selection of studios “The electronic rach based on the ae, reved search sategy prodiced 2030 records, many of which were dupes OF ches, 171 records wore jece defiey oe meeting he nelson ster sply on che basis of tle or abstract, Dopicates were ome. Checking the sts fhe included and excluded sees in the provous version ofthis view, reviewing reference ss from the aeady denied els and stearic reviews and ung the Function for finding rclted articles in PubMed yielded sx more approprit ial. Altogether 269 fll oe repors were bane. All aon Engh language reporer were ranated eo see he les. The reslew authors cond re reports in German, Russian sn Scandinavian bnguages: Ouse narslaors were consulted to enify and scar the eprtin Portuguese, Spi, French, Chinese end Japanese: Prom these 269 reports, 117 were lly inclerant fortis evew. The mein cesone fr ercason were: tele withou contol group cuties with other eatment than sm tio sues comparing sane lane oF antibnie,and ie ‘sping children In tor chere were 152 repos tobe conser in desi, Pom these, 6 epetsepresating 57 individ tds were consid ‘rc ligible for inclusion in che review (the reasons for exhsion ofthe 83 suds with 90 report ae reported in dhe "Charen tis of excluded studied cable), Aina informatio is needed Fons one paccb-coneroled ay eo ses whether inchson crea fei revive Thi sry sl a Frome al suhoss (Sala 19973), Avoshes pore ieawiing» tandation in onlereobe ase (Miyano 2005) Six ofthe 37 inclded sues conpared ambi pcebo The vensising 51 sues compared diferent cases of Antibiotics The sdierofLindback 1996: Linde 1998 ete ondcted in che ame til but wed dren candor dy populations with difereniaclsion ert, ane are handled as separate studs ln the sadly dseripsons and analyes arches, ‘hte dies each hed ro soarntecompaons, peniclin verses pce ad smoxcln versus pleco, which ect separately The comprionspeniclln ves plac ae cut 5 Vinhaek 196 ant Lindback 19, ad dhe cormparnons ox ss plcebo a Lisback 1996b and Lidhack 19960, respi Sas 'Charactritisof included sade cable and Tate {fori cued study informacion meets the [abiotic or ent manor ans aon ‘Copyrgne0 1009 The Cechrane Calabration, Pushed by John Wey & Sone Suuly Comper. Drop: Cated Cured ate Cal come Cal an rons ous contol th, al afc Aacle ——Pesicilin Diagnose 10 9) BINT NH Peli fon 1970 V (400. bya eaio- 8%, Con (Green) — thee simes graphs tl Ailyfor 1 only pee ay) Gens with ‘ena des secretion congatont inde (oxymets Tig versus sxyict sal Lindbaele Peniilin Cline 10 29% (com. 1196 31880897 ei 1956 Teal symp- bined Combined (combined 55%, (ormny) (1320 mg toms bs indbaele Lindback indbacle Placebo: thee dines aga ese 195619964 9360 4 368% daly for 8 diye ‘indback Lindback lind: days) yee computer 9960) 19968) bck19960) a tomogre pieecbor phy show aed ing. opac- econger yore tae eel snd an eis were a lowed but ot pte verted in both gronpe Amor Clin 10 4385 98% Ame cil (500. ical eymp- cin 1 rome hat 588, throetimes. ing a Fest Placebo dbilyfort days 30% day) vere computer 8 romogst placcbo: phy show naling ope deconges sane Reon) Crag 09 Tha Cacsne Colsberston Pblshed by Jn Way & Son, Lia ‘Tbe 1, Collected information fom placbo-controlled studies (Conned) aed aml ein wee a Towed bor ot pre seced in bot groups hayoo aid level nbiek —Penclin 1998 Cormay) (1320 ong hice dies dhlyfoet0 dy) vee placebo: aad Aexonges and anal: ‘is wore och groupe lin ical mp rom nt ing a lense 5 days com pero tnagiaphy sowing smicos thickening of 5 mm cor more in sinus with ut apse: hnyoo tl level 0 10% (combined Gombined Lindbek 19988 ‘ Linbork 9836) a3 Tindbsc. 199880 indbck 19986) 30% 80 91% (combined Lindbaske 1998 Lind bck 9964) Infor. ‘alae Lindbick Amo 99a lla G00 om) me aly fort0 yp) vee placebos aa desonges sek mal ice Were ao lowe but not pre i es tone bs ing ae : days: com smog ‘having mond tisknng 5am i Sins with oat ope 4196 3636 lok svolable Tato fr santa malar ai (Review) Coppice ©2009 Tae Cochrane Calibration, Pushed by Jn Wie Ser, “Table 1, Collected information from placcho-contolled studies (Conrad) served in ityor fd Dodagroupe level yan Aone The mean 4 4% 50ST MHA Buchem eli (730 darwin of cil 1997 (Fhe mg. thee che symp- 28%, Nether nes daly tomatic Pecos bands) for 7 days) petad be- 9% vecut fore eat plecbo, mene Onymets 2.2 weeks, me radiograph Tine steam» showing > ination 5 mm me and passe- coal camel as thicken ceded ining, apse: both iy or ai. groups id Kev Hye 1958 Clin. 10:12; 25. 04606 33H TH 58H 7BBH B96; BON 935 8096 {(Neewy) Asthromyei ial symp- 27 Aaithromyein: Go mg. toms lst 23%, ‘once daily ing Placebo: for 3 day) 11-29 days 10% vermis oymp- placebo toms: pur lent sete lon, mew ‘ry sus tenderses sadior pin: ‘aiogaph sake to exclude ron lary sina tirbardon more than men me cen hide ning ‘aso fr seta sary ssa (Rove) Coprghe 8 068 The Cocrana Clboraon Published by os Wey Sons, Lid “Table Collected information from placebo-conralled studies (Continued) lin teal gmp om > 7 Meren- 4 14% cle 2005 (usa) Amore Falla (500 ng ove lyf 10-day, par diye) vere lent asl susplacebo discharge, facil pin 4% 57 Infor nore Amo raion not nation aoe li sri sable 23%) Praceor 12% Antibiotics versus plaeabo Six tle involving 747 pactiepante evaluated ancodc te rent compared with nonantisorc conwol for acute mae ily sss (sean 19705 Haye 998; Llc 186 inflk 1986bsLindack [Bae ioe 1998 Neen 2005; van Buchew 1997), To suds compared amoxcln ver ss pleco (Mcrenscin 2005 van Buchews 1997] evo sad ies compared pein Vat amauclin co placcbo(Linhack 196ue Linck 1926s Fidhoc 1998asLiebssk 1998), and ‘one snd cotnpared sichomycin ro paebo (Haye 198). The sey by Aslan 19°0 did natkavea placebo group bt thecor pation of pniilin V pve oxpmetsaine versus exymnetzaline Alone wat inched in chi tevin, The sty by indbaeke 1998 fe the sre etudy se Lindbacke 1996 but i sed 2 parte domized population. Thus ere ues hd more han evo cet ment ame (Asskeon 197%; Lindback 1996 nlbsek 190; indock 140 uc 19980) Nos decongesan and aa eet were allowed but mot prs inthe tae sais and fe wy ied 4 decongstanr a sipplementary eherapy and conta group eatnent (Assen 19°). ‘Ofte sc edie, dice wore conte in Novsy (Haye 1% Linh 199%HeLndbade 1994 Linde 18usL aback 19985), ane fo Sweden (Aschson 1970), one in the USA ( Mere 2605) and one in The Netherlands (oi Race 1997. In wo rics dignoss wat bated o line sigsand symptoms ating east sven day (Haye 1998; Mersin 2005). In four other dis, ages was conned by 2 adiogzaph (eri ‘ecreton inthe ery of Ascon 1970 and mucosal thicken tore han 5 man, presence of sr i eel oc total opciation inthe an Ukr 1997 ay o by «computer tomography (rene presence of alt level or toa opcifeation in che ay by Lindbac 1996 (Lindbac 198626Ladbsck 1996); and ‘ucts thickening ofS mm oF more without fe level oe toad ‘opacfaion inthe say by Lindback 1998 tLindbaek 1998: Tindbiek 19981). In one study (aye 1998) aography was ued co exlude the presence af empress Paaiipats were rented fom corr based panel prce- iss in Bive a the si esis the stay by Asn 197 did noe describe the itemment sting. Pavpan? average age 838 AP prorimately 37 yeas, and sppresinarely 669 were women, F ose and doar (ENT) commotiliy wax assed only in one seuly (on Becbeny 1997) which reported 12 of patipams wth an allo diene linia wate ice wer nt defined in oe stasis 1970 Bacon L997). bo adon to linia outcomes, a cogil utcnies wes reporedin wo sie (ino (99% Linlbac 19960; ys Shc 197), Notas repre bate roto osteores “Thuce aie wore fanllysopported by goernnenacaemic funding (atbek 19% nlbaek 19960; Lindback 1998ae Lindbick 19980: Mca 2005). Thee suds did no iden- tify a source of sport (el 1970; Haye 19K; ran Buchen 19), Comparison of aneiblotic versus antibiotic Fiy-one sis comparing deze clases of asbioccs were incladd in the wevew Treen comparisons wee: non-peni- Cli ance vero beta cama sestve pine (4 8), ‘on texsycine ern eeneyeine (8 = 3, of which one study was tho incline inthe camparon of non-peniclin abiotic ver sasbenlactarnee sense penis), macrolides versusamoxie tilig-clavalate (= 8), ephalesperins sus amoxelin-daw Lane (i = 10), and miscllncouscompargos (a = 21). ory ‘vo studies had ov teen arms ne sedis bad ve ent ‘meat ars, Studie were Bianca supported mos by a phat nace company (n= 36) adn our Farther sedis atleast fone of te auton: hd an aflion wth» pharmsceusel con pny leven ie did na deny a source of support. “Topi! decongestans andlor amibamines were preeibed in Five sles They wee allowed ba wot pressed in 19 sta, they were prohibited in 1 sya nor dsesibed in 25 studies, ‘One vl prs nal corcaerids as pat of dhe ineeven- tin (eu 1990), Paicpane wer rected fom otolaryngology speci settings in 16 suis, primary cv sein ia 11 studies, and ied sings in hee studs. Twenty-one sts cli no desc dhe reeriment or ane setting ori wat nels. Pastcipan sverage age wae approxima 38 yen co stakes dd wor > poe the mean age of che arian. In 36 sais, dhe mle 10 Female rato wa abot If or Te 5. Tee studies seed ENT cormarbiin ‘aie raat zany st eron) pre 089 The Gachrane Caboraton Phe yf Wey ® Diagnosis was based only on cnc sigs and srmpeoms inane sud fo 39 sues dlagrois was confirmed bya ratograph and in 1 siesbyeaiogaph aor culture. [nation to clini usc, bacterologkal outcomes were pore in 24 suis ‘an! algal outcomes in 11 sade, Only ne sadly sepoced the flee on Function or quality of The’ Charteris of exched srudies able presets the etons forexcason fcozolld dinial ds. Only those concale nia stu which con»predanioicweacment wth placebo “orantibionicvermsanbinicof dens clase fr acutely ‘Snuiswerelocladedin he ble, Sadia without cotel group vere ecuded inthe bk Ta the Charitericrofencladod sali tbl eight sedis were lhcebo conti and 75 acu compared difeene cases of tnabiogee The resone for exon were varie end in many studies, here were several reson forexson. En 19 sce one ofthe restons for exon wns ao mealon of andom alloca tion or the saul design vas cecly not randomized. OF ches ‘oo studies were placco-contelled Ie the ix hee andomizd hechocoolled ud he dagnortictteris of cue snass Aid not ill the inchsion ceri for ee view Risk of bias in included studies ‘Quality assossment for placebo-controlled studies Random allocation concealment was cise a adequate (A) in two sts (Merensten 2005; ws Bacher £997) and in Four sees random allostion was reported but the ate neo ‘sd o conceal tr noe kaowa (B) (Ansan 1970 ay 198; indbuc 19960eLindbek 1990; Lindlac 19984sLindhack 1998 Five ofthe sc dies documented a doube-ad design. The xy by Aselson 190 didnot report blinding of the patient oF invenignor o scaly Allplicebocomelied studies reported deop-out res adequately by stdy group. The pated deop-oar cates were between 0.6% 0 1494 a¢7 to 15 day lla wp. a ve af he sk studies, she lnervenion and ena groups were assed as comparable at Irina duving the dy. one atdy, the information on comparably ae noice co ss whether the groups were ‘comparable at belie or not (Azcbson 1970), “Tio der we seed shavings low tk of bine (Merona 200540 Biches 1997). Onestady (esson 1970) wasasessl shaving igh rkof bia onl heater tne cde as having Ss moderste sk of bias, Quality assessment for studies comparing antibiotic to antibiotic arco allocation concealment was cbse a adequate cone cealment (A) in nine seaies (Adegas 199835 Citlond 1999; Gehanna 1996 Gehanno 198% Gelman 2008; Henry 2004; Pee 201; Sher 2002; UpCharch 2006). In 42 sees random, Alloction war clasied ae (8) (tant allocation reporel but ‘he actu eto weed fo conceal it wot koown) “ony wo tus documented a double ind design. Ten stds iesrepored single, invetgnorindd desigs ad eter stod- {es wore blinded. One tay id ot report on binding 2 all ‘Most ofthe dies reported drop-out rues adequnely by say up. The reported drop-out rates ranged fom 0% ro 62% st Aieres allow vps 38 sade bad x drop-out exe of ls han DW in 39 of he 51 sis the nerveaton and con groups ‘wee asesed ro be canal asline and during he scaly. ve suds were ste ashing len se of bi (Chiod 99, Ghana 2004 Henme 200% Rese 2001: UipChuvch 2) 25 ties were seed 3 ving 3 moderate sk of bis an the oer 21 sic having high dk of bis Effects of interventions Cina outeomes wane eported in all rls and eased quan- ‘atv, Radialgia! and bacsoogia ouveomes were ea ste only for pheebo-contolled studies. However, none ofthe acco-conlled sis reported batriolgia outcomes Re thognphicoutconce were describ qualatiey der the sal umber of il poring chase Antibiotics versus placebo linia ature defined as ack of ere oF Improvement at 7 to 15 day fol op Fine ss nvving GB parcipnes prove dt forcompar- ino of bias plaesbo hen cia uur was defined 3 lock of ear iniprenerent9¢ 7 t0 15 dape flow up. There sre fad still signee dilfrence in Favor of a iiss companed a placebo witha RR of 0.66 (95% Cl 0.14 «0 '098) bse om a randon-efecs mode wing aalble ase da (Comparison 01, Outcome 01). (The esl was aon he same ts asingaib ‘oncolledroup was on average BIN; range 72% co BD%e (Table 1)-One ofthe studies ws assed a having Tow cco big one + high lc bie and che other shee having moderate kof Wise nk falture defined asa lnk of eure or mmprovement at ito 60 day flow up nly one of these five suds provided daca for antbioi vet ss plc compass a 16 x0 60 days followup (isye 1998) (Compson 1, Ourons 02). The difeene fled co eachsi nifeance wih a RR of 085 (9596 C1 0.36 01.98) Al andoa ‘ad prints wae erable Follow up inthis ey tink fatredotned as fal of cure a 7 015 days fellow Six ude wor include in chi meta-analysis comparing ai tie placsbo 27 t0 15 days follow up. Thee sis Foend f eignfean benef for snibois with + RR oF 0.74 (59% 165 100.84). There wut no iil signa heey berween stds The eulsare presented graphically in Compa ‘bo 01, Outcome 3."vo of thesis were sessed as having 1 hw sk of bis, one high sik of bias andthe acer dee 38 havinga moder isk of bis, tint far deine ae 2 tek of eure at 16 0 60 days fellow up (One ofthe siesta provided dats fr ante ver placsbo ‘ompatson at 16 ro 60 days allow up (Haye 1998) (Comparison ‘01, Oucome 04). The diflneace fed vo each tail signi ieance with « RR of 063 959% CL 0,38 1 1.5). Relapse rate afer 60 days Only one sudy reported long-term slaps ates 1997. Daring one-yenfllow par the primary ebd-pone st day 1c and recurtece rater were wt igicay dierent becween antibiotic (2196) and placebo (17) groups RR oF 1.25, (95% C1.72 02.19) (Comparion 03, Owcoine 05), Radiograph fllre Radiographic oucomes were reported in sv std (Linde 1996 Linde 1996 Buen 197) ad che sls wete onsite with the clinical outcomes in she india sai. Ta the sudy by Lindbek 1996, computer ronogeapy scores im proved sigan nore fr indvalual cated wth In thestedy by van Baio 1997, move pati tated with antbiocs showed radiographic solution (74% vers 60). Bactorologlet tore None ofthe aes reported his owcone Dropouts due to side facts Thc sie id ex report aay drop-outs dat side fics in the ansibotc or cont groups, Ia all, deap-s due 19 adverse fee were rae in both groups: 6 ot f 425 (4%) in aneatic soup aL ot oF 49 (0.3%) in conte rope (Comparison 01, Outcome 06. Quality off and sbi to work None the sds epated oucemseron quality of fan bity to work ‘Antibiotics versus antibioties In comparsons of nbc vers sia he dae were ana Tye only forthe primary outcomes measures chal lure te 2317 «015 cays fallow up ad 16 to 60 days low up (linia Fille defined as lack fee or nprovernen) ae fe the fallow ing secondary outcave mens: lap aes and drop-out ue to adverse cee. Non-penicilins versus beta-lactamase sensitive penielins igh studies compared a non-penillin antbosc (cephalosporins, = ‘3ermacroides, n= 3; minoeycine n= I alate inhibitor m= 1) 0. penile anionic (aol, n= 7 penn Wn where isthe number ofseadies Sevenof thes egh studies Gavolvig 1089 patipas) provided dc or lnc cutcome st 71015 days olow up and the date ofthese sues were combined egudles ofthe abiotic wed “Thesis led to lind a sgulicane difzence baween anti ofc, witha RR of 0.70 (95% C1 0.47 eo 1.06) (Carmpvison 03, Outcome 01), The drop-o aero heb seven mudi suged From0% 032%, and cherop-out es wee approximately a serous rexmen rope in he sie One at Hay 1995) provid data ¢ 16 96D days followup, though the sly dl the al sen derencebeowen thea groups wh ark ato value of 0.67 (95% C1037 01.20) (Compaion 03, utceme 02), None ofthe tes repo ong em slaps tes afer 60 dae Drop-outs de to adverts feces were infequan, scaring in 13 "Wad 2.3 6 of he non-peniclin andl pein ested grows, sexpectvely (Comparison 03, Outcome 0) CCophalosporins and macrolides versus amoxiilin with elavulanate ‘tia forsake maar sits (er) Caprgn 0 2900 Tae Cacrane Cotaooaton Ped by Jn Wiley & Sons Le Eghicen studies compas a cephslepotin or a macrolide (cephalnpocn,n = 10; mserolide, a = 8) co amoxelin-daru- Tonite, Fourteen sade provided daa for mets anaes cig sie compszedcaplaspxin (ther than fst generation) to amosicllinclavlasae and se studs compte macrolides lestromycn,avthromycin or toxchomycn) ro amorciin-

You might also like